Re: fragmentation question [7:60643]

2003-01-13 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
gt; > from this group > > > > > is to take a chance on confirming what I THINK I know, > and > > > > > asking questions > > > > > about what I DON'T know. :) A lesson in humility, to be > > > sure. > > > > > > &

Re: fragmentation question [7:60643]

2003-01-13 Thread Steven A. Ridder
I know, and > > > > asking questions > > > > about what I DON'T know. :) A lesson in humility, to be > > sure. > > > > > > I know what you mean. I like to pretend to be an uber goddess > > of all > > things > > > tech, but to le

Re: fragmentation question [7:60643]

2003-01-12 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
what you mean. I like to pretend to be an uber goddess > of all > things > > tech, but to learn, I have to admit to lots of cluelessness > in some areas. > > It can be a bit painful, but definitely worth it! :-) > > > > Priscilla > > > > > GM >

Re: fragmentation question [7:60643]

2003-01-12 Thread Steven A. Ridder
; > -Original Message- > > From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 5:35 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: fragmentation question [7:60643] > > > > > > Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporat

RE: fragmentation question [7:60643]

2003-01-08 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
rth it! :-) Priscilla > GM > > -Original Message- > From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 5:35 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: fragmentation question [7:60643] > > > Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corp

RE: fragmentation question [7:60643]

2003-01-08 Thread Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate)
lity, to be sure. GM -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 5:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: fragmentation question [7:60643] Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate) wrote: > > Someone correct me if I'm wrong: OK,

Re: fragmentation question [7:60643]

2003-01-08 Thread Marc Thach Xuan Ky
MTU 1500 means that the network layer datagram size is 1500 max. For IP this is the IP datagram including IP header and transport (TCP/UDP) header and data. Fragmentation occurs at the IP level and only the IP header is duplicated (except offset, checksum etc) into each fragment. The TCP/UDP he

RE: fragmentation question [7:60643]

2003-01-08 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
ze of each packet, including the header. The term isn't always used that way, though. > GM > > -Original Message- > From: Paul Dong So [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 4:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: fragmentation question [7:6

RE: fragmentation question [7:60643]

2003-01-08 Thread Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate)
MTU is the total size of each packet, including the header. GM -Original Message- From: Paul Dong So [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 4:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fragmentation question [7:60643] Hi All, Please shed a light on this as I am confus

RE: fragmentation question [7:60643]

2003-01-08 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Paul Dong So wrote: > > Hi All, > > Please shed a light on this as I am confused. > > Fragmentation for UDP/TCP: > * Only the first fragment contains the UDP or TCP header, not > the > sequencial fragments? Yes that's right. Only the first fragment contains the UDP or TCP header. The rest of t

fragmentation question [7:60643]

2003-01-08 Thread Paul Dong So
Hi All, Please shed a light on this as I am confused. Fragmentation for UDP/TCP: * Only the first fragment contains the UDP or TCP header, not the sequencial fragments? Fragementation for IP packets * every fragmented packet will contains ip header? MTU 1500 bytes, doesn't it mean the data pa