RE: Priority Queuing [7:46108]

2002-06-09 Thread Jarred Nicholls
Sunil, Yes that would be great if you could do that in your lab. I'd appreciate it. The reason I used extended access list is because I want to queue traffic for the "destination" 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.1, not the source address. And extended uses destination addresses as part of the cal

RE: Priority Queuing [7:46108]

2002-06-08 Thread sunil sunilindia
Hi, I think this should work weel, But I dont think you need an extended access list for implementing this as you you want the 192.168.1.1 to be given High priority over 192.168.1.2, You are not specifying any Particular traffic from 192.168.1.1 to be given high priority. Well if you want I can

Priority Queuing [7:46108]

2002-06-08 Thread Jarred Nicholls
ge if the extended access list would work like that with priority queuing :-) Thanks for the help! Jarred Nicholls, CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46108&t=46108 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscripti

Re: "Priority-queuing-weighted-fair-queuing" [7:1853]

2001-04-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
u"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi,all, > > I just finished Caslow, 2nd ed. In the chapter on queuing, he very briefly > mentions a beast called "priority-queuing weighted fair queuing". The two > alone, I get; ho

Re: "Priority-queuing-weighted-fair-queuing" [7:1853]

2001-04-25 Thread Cthulu
= > > > -Original Message- > > From: Cthulu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 4:01 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: "Priority-queuing-weighted-fair-queuing" [7:1853] > > > >

RE: "Priority-queuing-weighted-fair-queuing" [7:1853]

2001-04-25 Thread PSIHOYIOS PANAYIOTIS
= > -Original Message- > From: Cthulu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 4:01 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: "Priority-queuing-weighted-fair-queuing" [7:1853] > > > Hi,all, > > I just finished Caslow, 2nd ed. In th

"Priority-queuing-weighted-fair-queuing" [7:1853]

2001-04-25 Thread Cthulu
Hi,all, I just finished Caslow, 2nd ed. In the chapter on queuing, he very briefly mentions a beast called "priority-queuing weighted fair queuing". The two alone, I get; however, I am unable to find any info on the Cisco site about the merger (if you can call it that) that resu

Re: priority queuing

2000-11-29 Thread Brian
yes On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Marshal Schoener wrote: > Can a 1601 router with IOS 11.3 can handle priority queueing > over a serial interface (frame-relay)? > > Thanks a million in advance! > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy

priority queuing

2000-11-29 Thread Marshal Schoener
Can a 1601 router with IOS 11.3 can handle priority queueing over a serial interface (frame-relay)? Thanks a million in advance! _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations

Re: How do I verify that priority queuing works ?

2000-10-29 Thread Frank B.
27;t see the results from your telnet session. Aloha, Frank Piatnitchi Cristian wrote: > > Hi all > > I set-up the priority queuing. > How do I verify that priority queuing works on a serial interface (or on any > other kind of interface ) ? > Is there any IOS command for

How do I verify that priority queuing works ?

2000-10-27 Thread Piatnitchi Cristian
Hi all I set-up the priority queuing. How do I verify that priority queuing works on a serial interface (or on any other kind of interface ) ? Is there any IOS command for that ? Does anybody want to explain me ? Thanks in advance Cristian Piatnitchi _ FAQ, list