Yup, that was the ticket. Thanks Tim!
-graham
On 7/31/09 11:06 AM, "Tim Stevenson" wrote:
> Hi Graham,
>
> You need to do this from *both* rommons. The config reg is sync'd between RP &
> SP when you do a write mem, but if you are manually changing it from in the
> rommon, then each rommon is
Jay Nakamura wrote:
Not sure many people are still using 7500 but was wondering what IOS
people are using that's stable these days. I googled the archive but
couldn't find anything past 2005.
RSP4/VIP2-50/ 1~2 MC-DS3 PA and 2 FE ports
Not much fancy feature needed. Rate limiting and some clas
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 04:50:05PM -0400, Jay Nakamura wrote:
> Speaking of scrapping it, what router or L3 switch would you recommend to
>
> - Connect legacy T1 users (1 or 2 DS3s)
7200VXR, NPE225 or NPE400 (NPEs below 225 won't work, 300 is unsupported).
> - Connect direct Ethernet users
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 04:50:05PM -0400, Jay Nakamura wrote:
> Speaking of scrapping it, what router or L3 switch would you recommend to
>
> - Connect legacy T1 users (1 or 2 DS3s)
> - Connect direct Ethernet users (Colo or Eth WAN 40~50mbps aggragate)
>
> that's cheap and reliable, new or used?
Speaking of scrapping it, what router or L3 switch would you recommend to
- Connect legacy T1 users (1 or 2 DS3s)
- Connect direct Ethernet users (Colo or Eth WAN 40~50mbps aggragate)
that's cheap and reliable, new or used? Again, QoS and rate limiting
is most we would use over simple L3 forward
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 04:12:10PM -0400, Jay Nakamura wrote:
> Not sure many people are still using 7500 but was wondering what IOS
> people are using that's stable these days. I googled the archive but
> couldn't find anything past 2005.
>
> RSP4/VIP2-50/ 1~2 MC-DS3 PA and 2 FE ports
>
> Not m
Latest 12.0(32)S rebuild that is on Cisco.com
or either 12.4(25).
Rodney
Jay Nakamura wrote:
Not sure many people are still using 7500 but was wondering what IOS
people are using that's stable these days. I googled the archive but
couldn't find anything past 2005.
RSP4/VIP2-50/ 1~2 MC-DS3 P
I can't speak to the IOS but they do make good end tables.
:)
- Original Message -
From: "Jay Nakamura"
To:
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 1:12 PM
Subject: [c-nsp] Recommended IOS for 7500
Not sure many people are still using 7500 but was wondering what IOS
people are using that's st
Not sure many people are still using 7500 but was wondering what IOS
people are using that's stable these days. I googled the archive but
couldn't find anything past 2005.
RSP4/VIP2-50/ 1~2 MC-DS3 PA and 2 FE ports
Not much fancy feature needed. Rate limiting and some class based QoS
capability
Jack,
http://howtos.mysolvr.com/How_to_Power_Off_and_On_a_Cisco_GSR_12000_Linecard
Eninja
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:23 PM, jack daniels wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'm facing a issue in Cisco 12416 request your help -
> >
> > show GSR -
> > "Slot 19 type = Switch Fabric Card 16XOC192
> > st
I vaguely recalled the 7200VXR/G2's requiring the "fancy" DOM SFPs,
not the regular GLC- SFP's.
A little Googling turned up this:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps341/prod_qas0900aecd80471791.html
"Q. Which SFP modules are supported on the Cisco NPE-G2?
A. The following SFP mo
Hi,
That works fine. You just need to enable routing to that remote subnet to the
local SVI on the switch.
-ryan
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Granados
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 2:48 PM
To: ci
Hi, I have a question RE port forwarding.
BACKGROUND
We have a pix with two interfaces. One public interface has a static
outside of 206.x.x.77 and we have an internal interface with an interface IP
of 10.18.7.254. On the inside interface we attach a core switch with lots
of VLANs with diff
On Jul 30, 2009, at 6:42 PM, Andy William wrote:
Thx all and i will think about Gulfstream Daryl :)
but i start to think about P2P connections like AT&T IPL
(International Private Line) or ATM PVC between both sites , what do
you think ? what is the estimated cost for 2M connection ?
T
That yes. I took his question as nat'ing post encapsulated inner packets
due to his "inside" reference:
>>> Can you NAT traffic inside GRE?
Luan Nguyen wrote:
So you are talking about NAT after GRE? You certainly could NAT and then
GRE-encapsulated the NATTED traffic?
Regards,
---
So you are talking about NAT after GRE? You certainly could NAT and then
GRE-encapsulated the NATTED traffic?
Regards,
Luan Nguyen
Chesapeake NetCraftsmen, LLC.
http://www.netcraftsmen.net
-Original Message-
From: Rodney
There is no code that does translation of the inner ip frame that I'm
aware of.
Rodney
Luan Nguyen wrote:
No?
I remember doing overlapping RFC1918 sites for GRE/IPSEC VPN.
Regards,
Luan Nguyen
Chesapeake NetCraftsmen, LLC.
http://www.netcraftsmen.net
-
Hi Graham,
You need to do this from *both* rommons. The
config reg is sync'd between RP & SP when you do
a write mem, but if you are manually changing it
from in the rommon, then each rommon is going to have an independent value.
Break to the SP, confreg 0x2142, reset, then wait
for the RP
No?
I remember doing overlapping RFC1918 sites for GRE/IPSEC VPN.
Regards,
Luan Nguyen
Chesapeake NetCraftsmen, LLC.
http://www.netcraftsmen.net
---
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:c
Add Time Warner to the IPv6 enabled list as well.
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jo Rhett
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 11:30 PM
> To: Eric Van Tol
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject:
No.
Jeff Kell wrote:
The GRE question reminded me of a nagging thought...
Can you NAT traffic inside GRE?
Jeff
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.
Jason wrote:
Greetings,
This is a quick and simple question. Can someone confirm my suspicion
that GRE is process switched on a 2651XM?
on 12.4 and later code (can't remember exactly where we did it) the SYN
is CEF switched and the rest of the flow. RST/FIN's are process switched
to tear
The GRE question reminded me of a nagging thought...
Can you NAT traffic inside GRE?
Jeff
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Greetings,
This is a quick and simple question. Can someone confirm my suspicion
that GRE is process switched on a 2651XM? Also, if there's a document
somewhere outlining what is process switched on which router/switch that
would be really handy to have.
Thanks,
Jason
_
Thanks Tim and Jesse for the replies.
Well, I only had a small window this morning to get this resolved and
both confregs from rommon didn't seem to bypass the config like I
wanted. Also tried just confreg with no args, and selecting it to
ignore the config with still no affect.
But as I
Dean Smith <> wrote on Thursday, July 23, 2009 22:54:
> Is there any tweak, trick or feature that enables a route-reflector
> to pass on multiple iBGP paths to clients ?
>
> This is for a straightforward iBGP ipv4 setup (no multiprotocol bgp
> or MPLS, so no unique VRF ids etc).
until add-path i
Thanks for the explanation Brad. Makes sense to me now.
Jose
Brad Henshaw wrote:
Lobo wrote:
I setup a traffic generator to send 95Mbps of traffic with DSCP EF
(46) across the different switches but when it hit the 3750, the
egress traffic was only ~4Mbps.
After reading up a b
> I use
> 1000BASE-LX/LH (GLC-LH-SM), on both Catalyst and 7206 NPE-G2, interface and
> protocol are up but I cannot do anything, what am I missing?
How are your speed negotiation settings on both ends?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.n
anyone know what is value of mtbf & mttr usually in cloud MPLS ? is there
any resource to calculate it ? for me it's very difficult to know my MPLS
reliability
_
Note: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only fo
Thanks Ben.
Unfortunately, that OID object doesn't exist on the Cisco 3640 with the IOS I'm
using.
nagios# snmpwalk -v 2c -c public 203.17.101.x 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.171.1.3.1.1
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.171.1.3.1.1 = No Such Object available on this
agent at this OID
nagios# snmpwalk -v 2c -c pu
You can get a count of the number of tunnels up under
1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.171.1.3.1.1
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/SNMP/do/BrowseOID.do?local=en&translate=Translate&objectInput=cipSecGlobalActiveTunnels
Check min/max values on that?
2009/7/31 Andy Saykao :
> Hi All,
>
> We've got an IPSEC tunnel c
Hi all,
Currently we setup Lan2Lan services via L2TPv3 tunnels and with QinQ if vlan
transparency is needed.
The problem is that sometimes we need to connect multiple sites to the same
L2L.
I have read a little bit about VPLS but it seems you need a MPLS network for
this, which I don't hav
32 matches
Mail list logo
