Gert,
This sounds like a 'silent reload'. Capture
*K-traces*http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps359/products_tech_note09186a0080106fd7.shtml#ktraceand
send to TAC for analysis.
-Eninja
PS. You should probably only work with TAC escalation on this.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:39
Wilson,
*Feedback:*
- Make the Bug toolkit and Bug fixes freely available to all customers
that have purchased Cisco software and not just SMARTnet customers.
-Eninja
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Rodney Dunn rod...@cisco.com wrote:
I got involved through a few channels and
I want to buy a PA card to use in a 7200VXR and found the single-mode
fiber
one PA-POS-OC3SMI
As per Gert's response, no support for channelisation on this card, the
PA-MC-STM1 does not do SoNET (SDH only) despite having the framing
sonet command which is most annoying :(
Bug toolkit is not only available to Smartnet customers. Shared Support
customers also have access.
-Mensagem original-
De: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] Em nome de e ninja
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 17 de agosto de 2009 03:22
Para:
Hi all,
I have an issue with a 7206VXR which boots into boot mode without any
errors. The registry is 0x2102 and therefore not the issue, any ideas
what might be wrong.
Richard
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
The config-register is not really 0x2102?
Hi all,
I have an issue with a 7206VXR which boots into boot mode without any
errors. The registry is 0x2102 and therefore not the issue, any ideas
what might be wrong.
Richard
___
cisco-nsp mailing
Shared Support is a variant of SMARTnet where Cisco and its partners
'share support' delivery.
Wilson,
To simplify.
- Make the Bug toolkit and Bug fixes freely available to all customers
that have purchased Cisco software.
-Eninja
On Aug 17, 2009, at 2:07 PM, Leonardo Gama Souza
If I had to guess, you probably upgraded the IOS code, and didn't upgrade the
bootloader?
On a 7200-series chassis, you need to upgrade both the IOS and the Bootloader
when you change versions.
Grab the same bootloader version as the IOS and put that on, then change the
bootloader statement
LinkedIn
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- shahar
PS: Here is the link:
https://www.linkedin.com/e/isd/688615787/b7Jw9lfG/
It is free to join and takes less than 60 seconds to sign up.
--
shahar grin has
Yes it is ..
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Alex Balashovabalas...@evaristesys.com wrote:
The config-register is not really 0x2102?
Hi all,
I have an issue with a 7206VXR which boots into boot mode without any
errors. The registry is 0x2102 and therefore not the issue, any ideas
what
There was no upgrade at all. Box was working fine, then a schedules
downtime to sort the power and when it next boots up, it boots into
boot mode.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Matlock, Kenneth Lmatlo...@exempla.org wrote:
If I had to guess, you probably upgraded the IOS code, and didn't
Fail.
--
Sent from mobile device
On Aug 17, 2009, at 8:33 AM, shahar grin shahar.g...@gmail.com wrote:
LinkedIn
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- shahar
PS: Here is the link:
https://www.linkedin.com/e/isd/688615787/b7Jw9lfG/
It is free to join
Hi,
I am still experiencing unknown unicast flooding with the Catalyst 6509 VSS
1440 configuration.
I have tried two more tests, to check if the flood will stop:
1. I turned off the routed-mac feature
#sh mac-addr aging-type routed
Routed MAC aging : disabled
2. I configured the arp
Probably would help to know what IO controller and NPE you have, what
image is the bootloader, where and what image you are trying to boot.
Not always can a 7200 boot directly of ide flash.
Do you have any configuration, such as boot statements?
Mikisa Richard wrote:
Hi all,
I have an issue
On 01/06/2009, at 9:32 PM, Adam Armstrong wrote:
If anyone has a Nexus in testing they'd like to give SNMP read
access to for a while I'd be interested in adding support for it to
Observer.
I don't think it would help in your scenario Ash, but I'm sure it'd
be useful to some people :)
It's probably easier to use the NAT Virtual Interface (ip nat enable
instead of ip nat inside|outside) in a VRF environment. You also don't
need NAT-on-a-stick with NVI.
Ivan
http://www.ioshints.info/about
http://blog.ioshints.info/
-Original Message-
From: Andy Saykao
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Matlock, Kenneth L wrote:
If I had to guess, you probably upgraded the IOS code, and didn't
upgrade the bootloader?
On a 7200-series chassis, you need to upgrade both the IOS and the
Bootloader when you change versions.
Where'd you get that idea? Other than making
Hi
Im a bit confused regarding 3560 egress QoS.
This is the default setting on a 3560, only mls qos is enabled globally.
FastEthernet0/4
Egress Priority Queue : disabled
Shaped queue weights (absolute) : 25 0 0 0
Shared queue weights : 25 25 25 25
The port bandwidth limit : 100 (Operational
Correction!
It should be 1/25th of 100meg = 4 meg. Thats really strange to have such a
small limit.
Found this also:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/113754
Regards
Roger
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Roger Wiklund co...@xy.org wrote:
Hi
Im a bit confused regarding 3560
Thanks for the advise. This is a good one. Will definitely do.
Michael
On Sunday 16 August 2009 03:15:44 pm Seth Mattinen wrote:
Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
Thanks everybody who replied.
I was promised our circuits to be examined by electrician on Monday.
Is there a way for me to check the
For sure... bootloaders are one of those things I don't like to touch until
I have to... it's been so long since I had to upgrade the bootloader on
anything we have that I'd have to read the docs again to remember how..;)
Paul
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
You need to put a sniffer on those ports to discover the destination for the
unicast flooding.
-- Eric Cables
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 6:01 AM, C and C Dominte
domintefam...@yahoo.co.ukwrote:
Hi,
I am still experiencing unknown unicast flooding with the Catalyst 6509 VSS
1440
On 8/16/09, Lincoln Dale l...@cisco.com wrote:
On 15/08/2009, at 7:37 AM, Lee wrote:
On 8/14/09, Lincoln Dale l...@cisco.com wrote:
.. snip lots of really cool examples ..
why one would ever touch SNMP willingly after using the above is
beyond me. :)
Is there an XML equivalent to the
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 16:27 +0200, Roger Wiklund wrote:
Does this then mean that per default, the egress queue 1, handling COS
5, EF etc, only has 25mbit on a fastethernet port. Everything above
that gets dropped.
Yup, as you say it's actually 1/25th of the port bandwidth. But yes,
everything
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 06:30:10AM -0600, Matlock, Kenneth L wrote:
On a 7200-series chassis, you need to upgrade both the IOS and the Bootloader
when you change versions.
No.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
Tasso,
What are you trying to achieve?
Arie
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tassos
Chatzithomaoglou
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 20:04
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between subinterface and
Just a quick question.
Taking into account that everyone's network is different and to find the
best limit you need to study a trace.does anyone use a rule of thumb
for configuring the rate limit for arp inspection. Does anyone find the
default 15 pps too low on ports other than
Hi,
Anyone running LACP on links with latency about 10 ms or higher? With
local links and latency ~1 ms we have no problems at all, it just works
perfect, however recently we ran into strange issues with CRS-1 (IOS-XR
3.6.2) and LACP on remote links with latency 10 ms or higher. When we
try
Wilson,
Thanks.
-Eninja
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Wilson Shiu (wshiu) ws...@cisco.comwrote:
Eninja,
Thank you so much for your feedback. I will definitely discuss your request
during my next meeting with the Bug Tool Kit team.
Regards,
Wilson
*From:* e ninja
Hi All
I have a problem with the below ISIS toplogy , All ADJ of R1 are L1 and
interface between R2 is in A2 from R2 side and in A3 side from R3 side
so R2 and R3 have L2-ADJ betwene them , as expected both R2 and R3 send LSP
with ATT bit set so R1 has 2 L1 default routes point to both R2 and R3
Security Team wrote:
I have a telco that wants to hand me an OC3 on which there will be 3 DS3's,
all doing different things. One will be a clear channel (pt-pt) DS3, one
will contain 28 T1's in the DS1 time slots of the DS3, and one will be
unused for the time being.
CJ,
I'm going to agree
Hi, I'm having an issue binding more than one map to the outside interface
so I need someone to set me straight.:)
Background
I have an ASA 5520 that's providing access to a private network via the
Cisco VPN client. I wish to establish a few LAN-to-LAN sessions to branch
offices using the
Rodney,
Do you think you might be able to gain the ear of someone responsible
for the CSCC? I've had ongoing issues with it ever since it was
introduced. I raised those concerns several times and they were never
resolved. Now that SCC has been completely deleted and replaced with
CSCC I
Hello,
Do a show isis database and you will see who is setting the ATT bit. R2 and
R3 are setting the ATT bits and these get flooded to R1 and then across to each
other in L1. Probably looks like this:
R1#sho isis database
IS-IS Level-1 Link State Database:
LSPID LSP Seq Num
Your configuration looks invalid. An ISIS router should only be part of a
single area. This is different from OSPF, where a router can be in multiple
areas.
It seems like R1 is advertising the default route it receives from R2 to R3,
and R3 to R2. This wouldn't happen if R2 and R3 were in the
Hi Scott,
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 15:30 -0700, Scott Granados wrote:
Hi, I'm having an issue binding more than one map to the outside
interface so I need someone to set me straight.:)
Background
I have an ASA 5520 that's providing access to a private network via
the Cisco VPN client. I
Scott,
Add the following to your ny-map:
crypto map ny-map 65535 ipsec-isakmp dynamic dynmap
That should get you what you want.
-ryan
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Granados
Sent: Monday, August
Never had to do this, even though we've upgraded 6 times in 4 years.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matlock, Kenneth L
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 10:12 AM
To: Paul Stewart; Jon Lewis; Matlock,
The only time I had to upgrade the bootloader on a 7200 platform was when I
migrated from NPE-400 to NPE-G2.
-- Eric Cables
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 06:30:10AM -0600, Matlock, Kenneth L wrote:
On a 7200-series
Does anyone know if the OSM-2+4GE-WAN+ supports copper GBICs in the WAN ports
- currently installed in a 7600 running 12.2SRC4.
Thanks
Cameron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
40 matches
Mail list logo
