Re: [c-nsp] ME-3600 Can't see ip pim vrf neighbor

T routes are quite expensive since you loose 8000 ipv4 routes. Any plans to change this in the future? Regards, Fredrik Vöcks Senior IP Network Engineer [http://www.bredband2.com/epost/logo_epost.jpg] On 24 May 2013 01:21, Waris Sagheer (waris) mailto:wa...@cisco.com>> wrote: Folks, I

Re: [c-nsp] ME-3600 Can't see ip pim vrf neighbor

Folks, Is it not documented properly regarding SDM template? Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 4

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x L3VPN MPLS problems with 15.3.2S

Hi Jason, Leigh, Adam & Aivars. These are serious issues. From the thread it seems 15.3(2)S has multiple issues, VRF ping, IPv6 enable causes L3VPN issue & management issues. Any other issues seen with 15.3(2)S? Jason, you mentioned that you have seen similar issues with other releases, can you p

Re: [c-nsp] Two Questions - ME3600 ERPS and MSTP

Hi Eric, Which image you are using? Are you using ME3600X or ME3600X-24CX? I am copying Wade who will help you with the following issue and EVC question. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Prov

Re: [c-nsp] Ang: ME3600X Output Drops

Pshem, The buffers on ME3600X are 18 MB per ASIC. Basically 18 MB for 24 gig ports and 18 MB for 2x10Gig ports. The buffers are dynamically allocated using intelligent resource scheduler. There is no reserved buffer and the pool is global. Drops are seen due to microburst since defaults are not

Re: [c-nsp] IP LFA in ring topology

Adam, I suppose you mean MLDP based MVPN support on ME3800X/ME3600X/ASR903, the feature is in roadmap for second half of next year. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa.

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 Configuration advice

Leigh, You need to add pop 2 symmetric. Example: interface GigabitEthernet0/1 switchport trunk allowed vlan none switchport mode trunk service instance 20 ethernet encapsulation dot1q 10 second-dot1q 20 rewrite ingress tag pop 2 symmetric bridge-domain 20 ! interface Vlan20 Ip

Re: [c-nsp] New Cisco ME3400 IOS?

Excerpt of the doc update in the config guide is as follows: WTD is configured by using the queue-limit policy-map class command. The command adjusts the queue size

Re: [c-nsp] Multicasting with MDT between ASR9K and ME3600

he mdt address family is active all over. Am I missing something obvious or is there something more sinister afoot? Leigh Sent from my iPhone - apologies for any spelling or grammar mistakes On 26 Apr 2013, at 19:46, "Waris Sagheer (waris)" mailto:wa...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Lei

Re: [c-nsp] ipsla - latency - related to cellular backhaul

Aaron, I have customers who are migrating from IP SLA to Y1731 PM just because of accuracy reasons. ASR9K, ASR903 & ME3600X-24CX & ASR901 offers hardware time stamping and PTP synchronization so you get much better accuracy and scale. Y1731PM will allow you to calculate 2 way delay & jitter, 1 wa

Re: [c-nsp] me3600X-CX 15.2(4)S2 GigE port-channel to ASR9k - isis blind

Hi Adam, Did the knob fixed the issue? Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389 CCIE - 19

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X upgrade and multicast questions

Hi Mike, I would recommend upgrading to 15.2(4)S3 which has been recently posted on CCO. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.com Phone:

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Signalled VPLS

Aaron, L2VPN context is the new L2VPN protocol based CLI. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/switches/metro/me3600x_3800x/software/release/15.3_2_S/configuration/guide/swl2vpn_prot_based.html L2VPN VFI is the legacy CLI. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/

Re: [c-nsp] Multicasting with MDT between ASR9K and ME3600

Hi Leigh, Can you elaborate the issues? I am copying Vinod who will be able to help you. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.com Phone:

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k to Me3600x VPLS

gE interfaces -or that one is only supported in 15.3 please? Thank you very much adam -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Waris Sagheer (waris) Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 2:47 AM To: Waris Sagheer (waris); Pshem Kowalczyk Cc: cisco-

[c-nsp] Web based L3VPN configuration on ME3600X/ME3800X/ME3600X-24CX

Hi Everyone, I have posted a document at the following link which covers Web based L3VPN configuration using EEM scripts. The scripts are embedded in the document and just need to be copy/pasted into the switch or router. Document name is l3vpn_eem_script.docx and can be downloaded using the dow

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Signalled VPLS

All PEs within a given VPLS are assigned a unique VPLS Edge device ID (VE ID). Nick is right about BGP NLRI, VPLS BGP NLRI (RFC 4761) AFI = 25 (L2VPN) SAFI = 65 (VPLS) VE ID VE Block Offset (VBO) VE Block Size (VBS) Label Base (LB) Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/sig

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k to Me3600x VPLS

tried removing the vfi and re-adding it, but no avail. Is there any workaround available? kind regards Pshem On 11 March 2013 13:05, Waris Sagheer (waris) mailto:wa...@cisco.com><mailto:wa...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Pashem, You are right there is an issue with the control word between the

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Signalled VPLS

Nick and Aaron, Let me get back to you on this. Nick, is the configuration guide missing the sample configuration? Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.com

[c-nsp] ME3800X/ME3600X/ME3600X-24CX/ASR903/ASR901 Deployment Simplification Feedback

Hi Everyone, I have seen lot of good inputs on this mailer. I am collecting feedback for the existing deployment challenges on the following platforms so that we can address them. -ME3800X -ME3600X -ME3600X-24CX -ASR903 -ASR901 -ME3400E * What can Cisco do to simplify the deployment of the

Re: [c-nsp] access switch that supports per-vlan shaping

Chris, Have you looked at ASR901 with port based license? Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k to Me3600x VPLS

k.nether.net>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k to Me3600x VPLS Waris, Is this an IOS issue or an XR issue? I feel I may be running up against the same issue when I begin to deploy this in the near future. -- Sent from my mobile device On 2013-03-10, at 8:05 PM, "Waris Sagheer (waris)"

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k to Me3600x VPLS

nsp] ASR9k to Me3600x VPLS Hi, Thank you Waris for confirming my suspicions. We can't flap the interface as we have 50+ customers on it (all others are p2p vc). We've tried removing the vfi and re-adding it, but no avail. Is there any workaround available? kind regards Pshem On 11 M

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k to Me3600x VPLS

Hi Pashem, You are right there is an issue with the control word between the two platforms and this issue is in the process of getting fixed. I'll get back to you with the date of fixed image. BTW can you try to flap the interface? Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/si

Re: [c-nsp] mpls label stack limit ???

ASR903, ME3800X, ME3600X & ME3600X-24CX can support 5 labels PUSH and 3 labels POP. Unified MPLS can use up to 4 labels. L3VPN, LDP with TE/FRR in the core can also use up to 4 labels. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technic

Re: [c-nsp] u-pe placement

Ray, This is changing now. MPLS at access is becoming popular since there are ways to provide adequate security. Unified MPLS is one example. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access

Re: [c-nsp] MDT limit on ME3600x?

Hi Adam, Yes that's correct. ME3600X is an Access platform. For higher scale ME3800X should be used which can support up to 2K MDT tunnels. I have also unicast you a detailed deck for MVPN scale calculation. Below is the formula to calculate the tunnel, Formula for computing the MDT-Tunnel usage:

Re: [c-nsp] ASR901 to ME3600X xconnect

Hi George, TE/FRR with L3VPN is supported in Release 2.0-15.2(2)SNG Aug 22, 2012 TE/FRR with L2VPN will be supported in Release 15.3(2)S, March 30th, 2013 Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Pro

Re: [c-nsp] ASR901 to ME3600X xconnect

Pshem, "pop 2" in this documentation is not referring to MPLS but Ethernet EVC configuration where "pop 2" means removing of two vlan tags. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access G

Re: [c-nsp] High CPU ME3600-X

On ME3800X/ME3600X/3600X-24CX, I would recommend moving to 15.2(4)S2 or upcoming 15.2(4)S3 release. Best Regards, Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389 CCIE - 19901 Think

Re: [c-nsp] stp on me3600 on efp's with locally connected older switch

Team, MST AG is in roadmap to solve this problem. Best Regards, Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389 CCIE - 19901 Think before you print. This email may contain confident

Re: [c-nsp] l2vpn vpls w/bgp autodiscovery - me3600x to asr9k

We are also planning to support L2VPN BGP Signaling on ME3800X/ME3600X/ME3600-24CX in 15.3(2)S, March 30th 2013. As Pete mentioned, Cisco L2VPN implementation has been using LDP for signaling. LDP can be link or targeted. For signaling it always uses targeted LDP sessions. ASR9K was the first pla

Re: [c-nsp] spanning tree on me3600x

That's correct. EVC only supports MST. Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Reuben Farrelly Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2012 1:08 PM To: Aaron Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x sub-interfaces

sub interface is not supported but you can use SVI to achieve the same. -Waris On Oct 26, 2012, at 10:41 AM, "Eric A Louie" wrote: > Are sub-interfaces supported on the ME3600x? Or is there some special > formula > that I need to enable them? > > Cisco IOS Software, ME360x Software (ME360x-

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 QOS internal mapping

ME3600X only supports MQC just like any other Cisco router. There is no mls qos support. You can refer to the CCO documentation for more details. Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Muthukumar

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X Output Drops

Hi Ivan, The policy should work on EFP regardless of bridge or xconnect. Which image are you using? Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: Ivan [mailto:cisco-...@itpro.co.nz] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 7:30 PM To: Waris Sagheer (waris) Cc: Ivan; cisco-nsp Subject: RE: [c-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X arp inspection issue

Hi Claes, Did you open a TAC case to track this issue? Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Claes Jansson Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 8:10 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] M

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X sends Multicast-Copies out of same Interface

) How is the customer sending igmp join from Loopback" Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: Christian Meutes [mailto:christ...@errxtx.net] Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 2:51 AM To: Waris Sagheer (waris) Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X sends Multicast-

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X sends Multicast-Copies out of same Interface

Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: Christian Meutes [mailto:christ...@errxtx.net] Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 2:51 AM To: Waris Sagheer (waris) Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X sends Multicast-Copies out of same Interface Hi Waris, it's 15.2(2)S

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X Output Drops

ere a requirement to match on the VLAN level? What kind of traffic is there in case of "default"? Is it tagged or untagged? If tagged, is there a range? Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: Ivan [mailto:cisco-...@itpro.co.nz] Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 4:28 AM To: Waris Sag

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X Output Drops

Problem Statement: When there is a speed mismatch that is 10 Gig ingress interface/1Gig egress interface or 1 Gig ingress interface/100M egress interface, microbursts can happen. For example, 10 Gig Ingress interface->1 Gig Egress Interface Traffic rate 500 M, traffic direction 10 Gig to 1 Gi

Re: [c-nsp] asr901 - vlan-based eompls (l2vpn) supported ?

Yes. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/asr_901/Configuration/Guide/eompls.html Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of adam vitkovsky Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 12:21 AM To: 'George Gia

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X Embedded Packet Capture

: Pshem Kowalczyk Cc: Ivan; Waris Sagheer (waris); cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X Embedded Packet Capture Hi, Yes, as far as I understand there is no mac learning which is great for resource utilisation and scalability. No requirement other than "it is helpful

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X sends Multicast-Copies out of same Interface

Let me get back to you on this. Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: Christian Meutes [mailto:christ...@errxtx.net] Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 2:51 AM To: Waris Sagheer (waris) Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X sends Multicast-Copies out of same Interface

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X Embedded Packet Capture

: Waris Sagheer (waris) Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X Embedded Packet Capture Hi Waris, I had come across that bug referring to EPC in "Release Notes for the Cisco ME 3800X and ME 3600X Switch" - http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/metro/me3600x_3800

Re: [c-nsp] me3600 svi's not showing in and out bit counts that i see on corresponding phy int

SVI counters are currently not supported on ME3800X/ME3600X. You can use " show vlan counters", EVC MIB supported in 15.2(4)S or the following commands in pre 15.2(4)S release ->snmpwalk -v 2c 7.23.35.39 public .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.2 | grep 23575 interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifDescr.23575 = TenGigabi

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X Embedded Packet Capture

Ivan, Which packet capture you are referring to on ME3600X? There is no support of embedded packet capture on ME3600X. Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ivan Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 1

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X sends Multicast-Copies out of same Interface

Hi Christian, Can you tell me the software release? Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Christian Meutes Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 1:37 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] ME3

Re: [c-nsp] me3600x 6vpe

That's correct. 6PE/6VPE will be supported in 15.2(4)S, Q3Cy12. Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 2:56 PM To: 'Pshem Kowalczyk' Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.n

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X IOS Version

[mailto:faruk.sej...@bhtelecom.ba] Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 2:11 PM To: Waris Sagheer (waris) Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X IOS Version Hi Waris, It is SR 620762785 Tnx in advance Regards, Faruk On 2.7.2012 10:56, Waris Sagheer (waris

Re: [c-nsp] Me3600 microburst / drops / queue-limit

Hi Rick, This is a valid request. We'll be introducing this command in the future release. I don't have the exact release number but it is in the roadmap. Can you unicast me the customer name? Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-b

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X IOS Version

Faruk, Can you send me the SR number for the following issue? It should be fixed in 15.2(2)S too. Let me confirm the release and will get back to you. Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Faruk

Re: [c-nsp] cisco me3600x and me3600x-cx 6VPE support

It is in roadmap for 15.2(4)S, Q3Cy12. Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of adam vitkovsky Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 6:51 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] cisco me3600x and me3

Re: [c-nsp] Apply C-VID and S-VID to untagged packet

You can also do it using two ports on the same switch, ingress EFP port matching untagged traffic while pop2 symmetric on the egress or NNI port in the same bridge-domain. At egress it'll push 2 tags. Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco

Re: [c-nsp] p2mp te tunnels on me3600x

Hi Mark, BGP c-mroute signaling with MLDP will be supported. Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mark.ti...@seacom.mu] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 2:48 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Waris Sagheer (waris); adam vitkovsky Subject: Re: [c-nsp] p2mp te tunnels

Re: [c-nsp] p2mp te tunnels on me3600x

MLDP is on the roadmap for 2HCY13. P2MP TE is supported in hardware but software support is in radar. If you have a requirement, please ask your account team to reach out to me. Thanks, Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether

Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)

- From: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim [mailto:ihsan.juna...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 7:12 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Waris Sagheer (waris) Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x) Well took me by surprise and managed to bring the VC l2transport up. Turned

Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)

Please open a SR and I'll have someone to work with the TAC engineer. Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim [mailto:ihsan.juna...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 8:07 AM To: Waris Sagheer (waris) Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VF

Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)

Did you get a chance to look at the configuration which I have sent in my earlier email? Are there any gaps? Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim [mailto:ihsan.juna...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 7:42 AM To: Waris Sagheer (waris) Cc: Arie Vayner

Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)

You need to have attachment circuit up for flat VPLS with autodiscovery to work. Attached is the working configuration. Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Arie Vayner (avayner) Sent: Wednesday,

Re: [c-nsp] GRE tunnels between Cisco ME3600X

That's correct. ME3600X does not currently support GRE. -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 5:58 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] GRE tunnel

Re: [c-nsp] Multicast WAS: Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

Hi Charles, Are you facing any challenges with multicast deployment? -Waris From: Charles Mills [mailto:w3y...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 11:31 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Waris Sagheer (waris) Subject: Multicast WAS: Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth

Re: [c-nsp] Port mirror on a Service Instance

That's correct. ME3800X/ME3600X will support SPAN/RSPAN in 15.3(1)S, Q4CY12. -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Andrew K. Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 11:56 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re:

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X architecture

Bacon, I'll unicast you the slides. Regarding MVPN, it is supported in hardware. EFT image is available for testing. -Waris -Original Message- From: Jeff Bacon [mailto:ba...@walleyesoftware.com] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 5:08 AM To: Waris Sagheer (waris) Cc: cisc

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X architecture

Hi, The architecture details are currently not available on CCO. ME3800X/ME3600X has Cisco Carrier Ethernet ASIC. It is a Cisco ASIC and it has all the features (QOS, MPLS, EVC) hardwired. The forwarding is TCAM based hence NO performance impact upon enabling multiple features at the same time.

Re: [c-nsp] Why does the ME3600X not support VLAN mapping?

The goal is to completely move to EVC model and it should be able to handle all cases. -Waris -Original Message- From: Richard Hartmann [mailto:richih.mailingl...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 4:42 AM To: Waris Sagheer (waris) Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c

Re: [c-nsp] real world experience - ASR901 / ASR903

Rolf, RSP1A RSP1B* IPv4/IPv6 Routes 12,000/6,000 32,000/16,000 RSP1B numbers may change in future. -Waris -Original Message- From: Rolf Mendelsohn [mailto:rolf-...@internet.ao] Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 2:01 AM To: Waris Sagheer (waris) Cc: Pshem

Re: [c-nsp] Why does the ME3600X not support VLAN mapping?

Hi Richard, Following vlan mapping syntax is not supported. -Waris -Original Message- From: Richard Hartmann [mailto:richih.mailingl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 8:51 AM To: Waris Sagheer (waris) Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Why does the ME3600X not

Re: [c-nsp] real world experience - ASR901 / ASR903

ASR 903 runs IOS XE and ASR901 runs classical IOS. ASR 901 Scale: IPv4 Routes - 12K BGP peers - 100 Number of VRF - 128 IPv6 support is in roadmap for August timeframe. ASR 903 is capable of line rate performance. It does not support full internet routing table. -Waris -Original Message

Re: [c-nsp] Why does the ME3600X not support VLAN mapping?

Hi Richard, ME3600X does support VLAN mapping through EVC. Can you elaborate the requirement? Regards, -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Richard Hartmann Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 7:54 AM To: cis

Re: [c-nsp] New Cisco ME3400 IOS?

Hi, ME3400 new release "12.2(58)EX" will be available by the end of March. Following new features are expected to be delivered in the new release, -Y.1731 PM Delay Measurement (DM) -IPSLA DMM/DMR MIB -Enhanced QoS buffer management Regards, -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun.

Re: [c-nsp] Interoperability issue between ME-3800X and Huawei OSN 6800(1000BaseLX)

Have you tried forced speed mode on the Huawei side since autoneg is not supported on SFP+? -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Luis Anzola Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 6:15 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.net

Re: [c-nsp] FW: Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

2 rate 3 color and 1 rate 2 color policer are supported at ingress. 1 rate 2 color policer is only supported at Low latency queue (priority queue) at egress. Egress policer on non priority queue is on the roadmap. In case of SVI, you need to apply the qos policy on the EFP or trunk port. -Waris

Re: [c-nsp] ME-3600X - CoPP

Christian, There are set of CPU queues handling different traffic types. Policing itself is done in hardware. -Waris -Original Message- From: Christian Meutes [mailto:christ...@errxtx.net] Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 10:40 PM To: Waris Sagheer (waris); Nick Hilliard Cc: cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] ME-3600X - CoPP

CPU -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Hilliard Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 12:07 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME-3600X - CoPP On 09/02/2012 19:15, Waris Sagheer

Re: [c-nsp] ME-3600X - CoPP

CoPP will be supported in 15.2(2)S, Q2CY12. -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of ?? ??? Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 1:55 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] ME-3600X - CoPP

Re: [c-nsp] Outbound drops on ME-3600X-24FS-M microbursts

Microburst is the culprit as it has been suggested in the first email. Default queue-limit is 100 us which is not sufficient to accommodate 10Gig burst. However you can increase the queue-limit up to maximum queue-limit of 492 KB or 3932 us. The reason it does not allow queue-limit policy on the ma

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

es Mills [mailto:w3y...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 10:30 AM To: mti...@globaltransit.net Cc: Waris Sagheer (waris); cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing? Given where this thread has gone I thought I'd weigh in

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

Please do and send me the number. Thanks, -Waris -Original Message- From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mti...@globaltransit.net] Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 10:17 AM To: Waris Sagheer (waris) Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Nick Hilliard Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

Hi Christian, The issue has been fixed and the fix will be available in the next release coming out early March. -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Christian Meutes Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 9

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

Waris Sagheer (waris); Nick Hilliard Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing? On Friday, January 27, 2012 02:33:11 AM Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote: > You mentioned broken IPv6, it should be working in the latest image > 15.1(2)EY1a. Waris, this is the one

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

Hi David, We did a session "Designing Access Network With the ME3600X and ME3800X" in Cisco Live last year. Session slides can be a good starting point to understand the platform. You can ask the SE to reach out to me. Regards, -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.net

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

MVPN (Rosen Draft) will be available in the first half of 2012. mLDP is being planned for first half of 2013. -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 7:12 AM To:

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

Hi Nick, You mentioned broken IPv6, it should be working in the latest image 15.1(2)EY1a. Let me know which image you are having the problem. -SPAN/RSPAN support is being planned for Q4CY12. -4 Byte ASN support is being planned for Q3CY12. -uRPF early 2013 -Egress Policing on non LLQ early 2013 -Po

Re: [c-nsp] GRE Tunnelling on the ME3600/ME3800 Switches ?

GRE tunneling is currently not supported on ME3800X/ME3600X. The feature is in radar for 2013. Policy based routing is also in the roadmap. -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Reuben Farrelly Sent: Tuesd

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600/3800 query

Mark, BGP AD and PW IGMP Snooping are supported on both the platforms in the latest release 15.1(2)EY1a. -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 9:35 PM To: cisco-

Re: [c-nsp] OutDiscards (ME3600X)

Nick, You are right about the rebuild & SPAN support but 15.1(2)EY1a does contain new features e.g. Unicast IPv6 -Waris -Original Message- From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:n...@foobar.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 2:57 AM To: Christian Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Waris Sag

Re: [c-nsp] OutDiscards (ME3600X)

Christian, Are you experiencing any microburst? What is the egress or NNI link? -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Christian Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 12:38 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sub

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X IOS 15.1(2a)EY1a Code: [Was: Re: Cisco ME3600X and Bridge-Domain Routing config question}

Thanks Reuben for the feedback. I'll try to incorporate your suggestion in our release planning. -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Reuben Farrelly Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 12:58 AM To: c-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 - HSRP with an EoMPLS vc as the bridging mechanism

This configuration will not work. However you can achieve it through "Routed Pseudowire" where you can configure the xconnect under "int vlan". -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Lixfeld Sent: Th

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 IOS / SPAN

QinQ is only supported on EVC interfaces. It is not supported on switchport. -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ankur Mittal Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 9:05 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sub

Re: [c-nsp] Strange Packetloss on ME3600X

Christian, I suspect it may be built in default control plane policers kicking in to protect the CPU. Let me confirm this and will get back to you. -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Christian Meutes S

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 IOS / SPAN

Ankur, Replies inline [Waris] -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ankur Mittal Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 3:49 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] ME3600 IOS / SPAN Thanks for the

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 IOS / SPAN

Tassos, Can you send me the list if SRs? ME3800X should not be dropping packets with maximum queue-limit. We are working on an enhancement to increase the queue-limit range. Is there a SR for the counter issue? Can you also send me the details of the last issue "matching of non default classes"? I

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 IOS / SPAN

Ankur, I would recommend moving to 15.1(2)EY1 which will be posted on CCO in couple of weeks. SPAN/RSPAN is not currently supported and the feature is in roadmap. -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ank

Re: [c-nsp] ME 3600X questions

It is being planned for 15.2(4)S, Q3CY12. -Waris -Original Message- From: LavoJM [mailto:lav...@secureobscure.com] On Behalf Of cisco...@secureobscure.com Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 12:29 PM To: Waris Sagheer (waris); cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] ME 3600X

Re: [c-nsp] ME 3600X questions

Unicast IPv6 Routing will be supported in 15.1(2)EY1, October 30th. -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Alex Wågberg Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 8:12 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re:

Re: [c-nsp] ME 3600X questions

The platform is capable of your requirement (EoMPLS/VPLS) and back to back topology has been tested internally. -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Vincent Touchard Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 3:30

Re: [c-nsp] VPLS on software routers

Robert, You can try ME3600X since it supports VPLS as well as H-VPLS in 15.1(2)EY. However it is not a software router. -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Robert Hass Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2011 2:45

Re: [c-nsp] ME 3600X questions

Hi Mark, I have not seen any customer issues reported on EVC Xconnect feature supported in 15.1(2)EY. I'll let you know if I hear anything. -Waris -Original Message- From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mti...@globaltransit.net] Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 1:52 AM To: Waris Sagheer (wari

<    1   2   3   >