dheld
>>
>> On Mar 13, 2012, at 8:57 AM, "Nick Hilliard" wrote:
>>
>> > On 13/03/2012 11:56, jack daniels wrote:
>> >> In this scenario Switching LOOP is getting formed. Only way I'm able
>> >> to get rid is shutdown Port eth1/1
gt;
> Att,
> Alessandro Braga
> CCIE #30393
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2012, at 8:56, jack daniels wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I have a scenario for which I'm scratching my head since lon
Hi Guys,
I have a scenario for which I'm scratching my head since long - please help
Nexus 5K-1-Nexus5K-2
| |
| |
Nexus2K-1 Nexus2K-2
| | Port eth 1/1
|
HI guys,
can you guide me if 1588V2 (boundry and transparent clock ) suppport
on cisco 7600 + cisco 12K
can you guide me if 1588V2 (boundry and transparent clock ) suppport
on Juniper M120 and M320.
Regards
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.
Hi guys,
If I have
Vlan100 , Vlan 2 , Vlan 3 -Trunk Dot1QCisco
3550 Switch1 SwitchA
Vlan 100 is native vlan .While frame goes out to SwitchA from
Switch1, I want to tag the frames of native vlan also . So that on
Switch A I get tagged traffic for Vlan 100 , 2, 3
Hi Champs,
Please help me with this :)
Regards
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:38 PM, jack daniels wrote:
> Dear Experts,
>
> If we want to configure gateway for 1000 Vlans on Cisco 7600 (HSRP
> will be a issue as it supports only 256 HSRP groups) . Any soltion for
> the same -
>
Dear Experts,
If we want to configure gateway for 1000 Vlans on Cisco 7600 (HSRP
will be a issue as it supports only 256 HSRP groups) . Any soltion for
the same -
I have though of two solutions but don't know whether they will scale
or workout , please help me in suggesting -
Solution 1 - ( I h
Hi Guys,
I have a vey basic doubt about two scenarios -
1) SCENARIO 1
VLAN X , VLAN Y , VLAN Z -HUB---switch
will vlan headers be kept intact and communication between
a) VLAN X (SUBNET 1) and its gateway on switch will happen
b) VLAN Y (SUBNET 2) and its gateway on switch will happen
c)
Hi guys,
what is the diffrence between CET-CEN-Metro Ethernet.
Regards
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi guys,
Please guide me link on internet to download any good book for NGN
Carrier ethernet Design
which talks about VPLS,HVPLS, HQOS,OAM,Performance Monitoring,ERPS, etc
Regrads
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.ne
Hi Guys,
Regrets for posting this querry but I'm thinking Day-in -day out to
position some of Routers/Switches in Service Providers.Can you please
guide me any link which talks about diffrent solutions where
Routers/Switches have been Positioned in past in diffrent Service
Providers.
Regards
_
is there any RJ45 port on SUP. I thnk its not , only thig u can do is
use SFP electrical or optical.
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 13/01/2011 19:42, jack daniels wrote:
>>
>> Does the port on SUP - Cisco 7606S Chassis,6-slot,Redundant
>>
Does the port on SUP - Cisco 7606S Chassis,6-slot,Redundant
System,2RSP720-3C,2PS
Support 100Mbps configurable port
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> On Jan 13, 2011, at 6:22 AM, jack daniels wrote:
>
>> I'm stuck in a problem :(
>> Please HE
Hi Guys,
I'm stuck in a problem :(
Please HELP to suggest Electrical (RJ45) SFP on -
7600 platform , Line card WS-6724-SFP which can be used as 100 Mbps.
Regards
Jack
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 6:53 PM, jack daniels wrote:
> S764AIK9-12233SRE
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 6:53
S764AIK9-12233SRE
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 6:53 PM, jack daniels wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> CUurent IOS I'm using is Cisco 7600-RSP720 IOS ADVANCED IP SERVICES SSH
>
> Regards
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 6:51 PM, jack daniels wrote:
>> Hi Group,
>>
>> Pl
Hi guys,
CUurent IOS I'm using is Cisco 7600-RSP720 IOS ADVANCED IP SERVICES SSH
Regards
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 6:51 PM, jack daniels wrote:
> Hi Group,
>
> Please suggest can I configure SFP-GE-T as 100 Mbps on 7600 . Line
> CARD is WS-X6724-SFP
&
ny...
> Arie
>
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:37 PM, jack daniels
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I'm stuck in a problem where-
>>
>> I'm Service provider ( MEN) network ...imposing S-Vlan
>> S1-vlan 100 - Cvlans 1,2,3
>> S2-vl
Hi Guys,
I'm stuck in a problem where-
I'm Service provider ( MEN) network ...imposing S-Vlan
S1-vlan 100 - Cvlans 1,2,3
S2-vlan 200 - Cvlan 11,22,33
Can I give out Vlans 1,2,3,11,22,33 on a single port
Regards
Jack
___
cisco-nsp mailing lis
Hi guys,
My client is a Service Provider and has asked me cisco solution of Out
of band management solution presentation of all devices
(routers/switch/mux)..If any one has such details , request your
help!!!
Thanks and Regards
___
cisco-nsp mailing lis
Hi Guys,
CAN i use both SFP (optical ) ports on SUP-720-3CXL each as 1 GB
uplink and get total uplink throughput of 2 GB (etherchannle of both
SFP ports) from 1 qty. SUP-720-3CXL.
Regards
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://
can I make GRE with KEEPALIVE
and configure dampening on GRE
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
wrote:
>
>> but my local mux to router ethernet will nveer go down...so how will
>> dampening help in this case..
>
> it won't help then, but I sort of inferred as you mentioned
but my local mux to router ethernet will nveer go down...so how will
dampening help in this case..
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
wrote:
>
>>
>> Router R1 --Ethernet
>> Cable-MUXMUX---Ethernet Cable---Router
>> R2
>>
>> I ha
mux's? Why can't you just fix the link? Is protection an option? Can
> you run a second link for redundancy?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 27, 2010, at 1:03 PM, jack daniels wrote:
>
>> any comments Dear friends would be most appreciated and very helpfull
any comments Dear friends would be most appreciated and very helpfull for me.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:30 AM, jack daniels wrote:
> Hmm... laying intercity cables Technically good but not
> commercialy (which is most important).. :)
>
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 1:43 AM, K
Hmm... laying intercity cables Technically good but not
commercialy (which is most important).. :)
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Keegan Holley
wrote:
> You can always get a really long cable so you don't need the MUX's.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 2:49 PM,
Hi guys,
I have a scenario
Router R1 --Ethernet
Cable-MUXMUX---Ethernet Cable---Router
R2
my MUX to MUX link flaps a lot and my traffic impacts I have
backup links also. Can I do something that when link MUX to MUX flaps
I dont
use this for some
Hi guys,
Any one can help me with understanding - if SPA-1CHOC3-CE-ATM can be
channelised to DS3 or not ?
I have to choose chanelised STM1 card on SIP 400 (cisco 7600) , which
card to choose ( which can channelise to E1 , DS3 )
Regards
___
cisco-nsp ma
Dear All,
Are there any potential Technical issues with ignoring Cisco and
using GLC-LH-SM
rather than SFP-GE-L. What I can figure out is -
with GLC-LH-SM - no monitoring (no DOM)
SFP-GE-L higher cost.
Regards
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puc
policies would help with this. I'm personally not aware of a way to monitor
> capacity from within the circuit without testing and trying to use all the
> available bandwidth, which would defeat the purpose.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 1:56 AM, jack daniels
> wrote:
&g
Hi guys,
I have a EOSDH as a primary link in which GE is mapped to 4 STM-1
and backup path is another GE Link.
In case 2 STM-1 out of 4 STM-1 in EOSDH fail my routing will not be
aware of that and will not reroute the traffic to backup GE.
This will lead to congestion on Primary link , while bac
Hi ,
vrf-table-label is not supported on channelised STM-1 on juniper. This
is the reaqson why cisco is best.
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos90/swconfig-vpns/other-limitations.html#id-10993840
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:29 AM, wrote:
>> I'm facing a issue where I have conf
Hi,
To put my Q in other words -
How does BPDU go in RPVSTP -does BPDU of RPVST goes as a payload in vlan ?
How does BPDU go in MSTP- how the BPDU for all vlans in a instance go ?
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 7:41 PM, jack daniels wrote:
> Hi Group,
>
> Please suggest -
>
> doe
Hi Group,
Please suggest -
does BPDU of RPVST goes as a payload in vlan ?
how the BPDU for all vlans in a instance go ?
Regars
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://p
Dear All,
I'm facing a issue where I have configured 3E1's on channelised STM-1
card of juniper between M320 (P router ) and M120 (PE router )
Is there any limitations that we can't use Channelised Stm-1 and
configure E1 on MPLS core links ( P-P or PE-P)
Regards
can I do something with object tracking
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:51 PM, jack daniels wrote:
> But 1 more issue my IOS device is 4500 which doesnt support BFD
>
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:35 PM, jack daniels wrote:
>> Thanks for the help guys.
>>
>> It stated
But 1 more issue my IOS device is 4500 which doesnt support BFD
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:35 PM, jack daniels wrote:
> Thanks for the help guys.
>
> It stated in IOS realease 12.2(33)SRC
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
Thanks for the help guys.
It stated in IOS realease 12.2(33)SRC
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:22:20PM +0530, jack daniels wrote:
>> As IOS doesn't support BFD on static route.
>
> It does.
>
> (Not a
3.3/interfaces/configuration/guide/hc33bfd.html#wp1112516
>
>
> Brad Hedlund
> --
> Sent from my mobile phone
> (please excuse brevity, typos)
>
> On Oct 10, 2010, at 10:10 AM, "jack daniels" wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> can I configure static route wi
Hi guys,
can I configure static route with track option in IOS XR , so as to
take out my static route from routing table if next hop (not directly
connected) not reachable.
Regards
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nethe
Thanks Mikael
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, jack daniels wrote:
>
>> do u have any doc for the calculation will be of great help.
>> or please explain with example the calculation
>
> Facts:
> There are 8 bits per
do u have any doc for the calculation will be of great help.
or please explain with example the calculation
10X
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, jack daniels wrote:
>
>> But if customer asks me he has 10G traffic in and 10G
Hi guys,
I'm always confused with the use of MPPS .
I understand Mpps is million packets per second.
But if customer asks me he has 10G traffic in and 10G traffic out .
Now whie planning for card and device whats practical use of MPPS.
Regards
___
c
why would we have overlapping TE tunnels ?
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 09:30 +0530, jack daniels wrote:
>> If you don't have overlapping TE tunnels ? what is meaning of this
>
> If none of your MPLS TE LSPs use the same under
If you don't have overlapping TE tunnels ? what is meaning of this
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:21 +0530, jack daniels wrote:
>> I'm stuck in the understanding - does oit make sense to implement MPLS
>> AutoBandwidth
Hi,
R1R2
||
Y.Y.Y.0||--X.X.X.0
||
||
R4
Hi guys,
If I use SFP LX connector and coonect two routers ports back to back.
Will this have any impact on router port .
Is that I can use only SX SFP for Back to back connectivity with routers.
Also if my router port is coonecting to MUX which is colocated , I
need to mandatorly use SX SFP.
Hi guys,
If I use SFP LX connector and coonect two routers ports back to back.
Will this have any impact on router port .
Is that I can use only SX SFP for Back to back connectivity with routers.
Also if my router port is coonecting to MUX which is colocated , I
need to mandatorly use SX SFP.
t;
>
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:51 PM, jack daniels
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I'm stuck in the understanding - does oit make sense to implement MPLS
>> AutoBandwidth in scenario where I have only 20 subnets max to be sent
>> on this Backbone
26 AM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 00:21 +0530, jack daniels wrote:
>> hope MPLS TE - Auto-bandwidth enhancement and MPLS TE -
>> Auto-bandwidth allocator are same feature
>
> That seems strange. So you're saying you don't need something technical
> s
Thanks Aaron , if you have any supporting doc for same it will be very
helpful for me.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Aaron wrote:
> I think you have to stay with the SDH standand so,
> E3 not DS3 but you should be able to mix and match E3 and E1.
>
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at
Hi guys,
Please help me with understanding if I have channelised STM1 card -
1) I can configure 3xDS3
2) I can configure 63xE1
CAN I configure on same channelised STM1 2xDS3 and rest E1.
Regards
Jack
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nethe
Hi guys,
Can you please suggest me with good boook or link for diifrent Packet
solutions going on in todays GSM world.
Regards
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puc
hope MPLS TE - Auto-bandwidth enhancement and MPLS TE -
Auto-bandwidth allocator are same feature
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:20 AM, jack daniels wrote:
> thanks peter
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 23:35 +0530, jack daniel
thanks peter
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 23:35 +0530, jack daniels wrote:
>> is cisco MPLS* *AutoBandwidth Allocator* supported on cisco 7600 platform.*
>> **
>
> It's trivial to find out with a browser and an Interne
Hi guys,
is cisco MPLS* *AutoBandwidth Allocator* supported on cisco 7600 platform.*
**
*Regards*
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-
Hi Guys,
I'm facing a issue and stuck on a thought process , would appreciate if some
way you guys can show with your experience in industry -
ISSUE
user X spoofs IP ADDRESS OF ISP-A and sends traffic out to internet...
now when traffic is comming back via ISP-A... I want to block such traf
Hi guys,
I'm shortning the whole story to the point where I'm getting stuck..
I'm scratching my head on this solution for a week. Can't find a solution ,
please help with this. Thanks in advance.
I have a network 12.0.0.0/8 , which is being learnt on a router from EBGP
peer and two redistribution
when OFFICE1 is down ...???
Regards
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 11:20 PM, jack daniels wrote:
> Dear experts,
>
> Please advise and help... If any more info required , for clarity please
> suggest.
>
> Thanx in advance.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 7:03 PM, jack daniels wr
Dear experts,
Please advise and help... If any more info required , for clarity please
suggest.
Thanx in advance.
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 7:03 PM, jack daniels wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> My office 2 is DR site of DR1..All my traffic goes out to MPLS
> remote sites via of
Hi guys,
My office 2 is DR site of DR1..All my traffic goes out to MPLS
remote sites via office 1 , and it goes out via office 2 only when office is
down ...
Below is my office 2 network Network of office 1 and office 2 are
replica of each other.
OFFICE 2
MPLS router 1
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:27 PM, jack daniels wrote:
> CAN Link state tracking help in this case ?
>
> can LINK STATE tracking detect remorte upstream failure ?
>
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3750/software/release/12.2_40_se/configuratio
will remove the port from the LACP
> bundle.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tim
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of jack daniels
> Sent: woensdag, 31 maart, 2010 14:10
> To: cisco-nsp@p
Hi guys,
I'm facing a solution challage , appriaciate if you guys can help
PC1---(VLAN 2)SW1-METRO ETHERNET Link
1 --SW2 (VLAN2)---PC2
|-Metro ETHERNET LINK 2
---|
I have L2 ex
LINK for same -
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/mpls/configuration/guide/mp_vpn_pece_lnk_prot.html#wp1054704
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:06 AM, jack daniels wrote:
> I found on internet
>
> MPLS VPN LOCAL LABEL - with BGP
>
> basically this is via advertising same label on
ds then you
> can
> monitor end to end via each cloud, and choose which one is better to use
> for
> a particular prefix or traffic type.
>
> --
> http://dcp.dcptech.com
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: jack daniels [mailto:jckdaniel...@gmail.com]
>
PE3
will converge so fast.
On 3/26/10, David Prall wrote:
>
> This is where PfR is involved to route around the primary carrier to the
> secondary.
>
> --
> http://dcp.dcptech.com
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: jack daniels [mailto:jckdaniel...@gmail.
a path between the two networks via one of their sites.
>
> David
>
> --
> http://dcp.dcptech.com
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: jack daniels [mailto:jckdaniel...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:41 PM
> > To: David Prall
> >
n import of which route is installed first.
>
> The local CE (CE3) is probing for the subnet at CE1. When it is no longer
> reachable by CE3 it will move the route to CE4. As long as CE4 is using CE2
> as the path via the cloud then no issue.
>
> David
>
> --
> ht
hability information in this
> case, and based on that changing the local routing table.
>
> David
>
> --
> http://dcp.dcptech.com
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: jack daniels [mailto:jckdaniel...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2
com
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of jack daniels
> > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 12:35 PM
> > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PFR Questi
dear guys,
is my mail being delivered to group as no one replied.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:42 PM, jack daniels wrote:
> Hi Network champs,
>
> I'm stuck in understanding of PFR . Docs say it converges in 3 sec ( for
> realtime traffic VOICE )...
>
> I understand y
Hi Network champs,
I'm stuck in understanding of PFR . Docs say it converges in 3 sec ( for
realtime traffic VOICE )...
I understand you can send traffic out secondry link but what about traffic
which has to come back from remote end ( for which SP has not converged).
But if you have --
|CE1-
Hi guys,
I have been working on 7613 and 6500 devices implementations.But I always
have a confusion on -
CEF720 and DCEF720 cards.
1) how to identitify if the card is CEF720 or DCEF720
2) in CEF720 if traffic(L2 or L3) is withing same port group of the ASIC
will it go still go to PFC
3) in DCEF7
Thanks a lot for all replies they were very helpful to me .
Regards
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Cyrill Malevanov wrote:
> iperf is the perfect solution for both transmit and receive speed checks
>
> On Jan 18, 2010, at 7:57 PM, jack daniels wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
>
Hi guys,
I want to check the throughout in scenario
CE1-MPLS cloud CE2
CE1 link is 2 Mbps
CE2 link is 2Mbps
If CE1 pumps 2Mbps then want to check if CE2 recieves it.
Is there any s/w to genrate traffic at CE1 ? OR any other method ?
Regards
__
Hi,
please help me with any link or book which can help enhace knowledge in SP
(MPLS/ISP) products/cards/design BASICALLY for a Solution architect guy.
Thanks
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo
Hi guys,
I'm new into STM technologies. Request your help in guiding me how to enable
STM card (divide timeslots for catering 155 E1's) on Cisco 7206 router.What
is KLM ?
for configuring E1 for a customer from STM-1 , details I mentioned below are
they enough -
1) clock will be obtained locally
Hi,
I have a topolgy
MPLS INTERNET
| |
| |
CE1
CE2-
(172.16.1.1/30
) (
172.16.2.1
Hi Guys,
This is a paticular design issue I'm facing with customer where I have a lot
of constrainits .
Topology
MPLS CLOUD (ISP1)
MPLS CLOUD (ISP2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
CE1
CE2
|
|
|PIX525
(CLUSTER)-
Hi ,
I can run any protocol , cant run tunnel as other side is client who cant
make changes
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Vincent C Jones <
v.jo...@networkingunlimited.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 21:06 +0530, jack daniels wrote:
> > I have a scenario -
> &g
Hi Guys,
I have a scenario -
CE ---ISP1
|
|
|
ISP2
users behind CE connect to remote application ,
Now issue is if ISP1 LINK or ISP1 goes down I have times less than 4 sec
for application to go via other link so that users are not imacted.
So can there be any solution for traffic to conver
Hi all,
I wanted help in like what parameters to check in output of show tech of
router or switch - U all can help with your experience
Like bootvar , config register , bpdugaurd etc for switch
Regards
J.Daniels
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 1:17 AM, jack daniels wrote:
> Hi
Hi Garry,
my aim is to do review of the configs of ROUTERS and Switches in my network.
As a review , need to track down the best practices that should be
configured and are not there in my network.
Regards
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Garry wrote:
> jack daniels wrote:
>
Hi ,
I'm looking for doc which suggests best practices for network ( ROUTERS and
SWITCHES )
Please help me with doc link if any there.
Regards
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archi
Hi All,
Please advise any doc which can help in studying " show Tech-support" for
switch and router output while doing audit.
Regards
J.Daniels
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Thorsten Dahm wrote:
> jack daniels wrote:
>
>> I have been assigned to do AUDIT ( LAN
Dear Group,
I have been assigned to do AUDIT ( LAN / WAN ) for a NETWORK comprising of
devices 2950 , 3750 , 4500 , 2800 , 2600 , 7206 VXR . Please advice which
commands showuld I need to conectrate more and check outputs for making
audit report
Thanks and Regards
___
Hi ,
Please help me with any doc which states about multilink regarding "
MULTILINK SHOULD NOT have its L2 links from diffrent service providers or
with diffrent delay" < but bandwidth of links is same in my case.
We are having some issues of slowness while accessing citrix application
across
Hi ,
I'm a bit confused on -
"Also, don't assume that because you can add 8 100Mbit interfaces, that
you can use them at full speed.."
Regards
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Howard Jones wrote:
> On 29/09/2009 13:03, Antonio Soares wrote:
> > Here's the document you need:
> >
> > Cisco 720
Dear group,
Please help me to identify 8 port Fast Ethernet Card for Cisco 7206 VXR
Router and how much Bandwidth points it will be occupy,
Cisco 7206 VXR (NPE-G1) 6 Slots VXR
Regards
J.Daniels
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
http
Hi all ,
I have got a project for an ISP ( also LDP configured ) runnning OSPF to
migrate to IS-IS.
I was planning to runnn dual IGP , as ospf with AD 110 and ISIS with AD 115
, OSPF will always be preffered.
I was planning the challenges for migration, below are the ones which I
could think of , p
Hi All,
I have a querry for issue I'm facing---
If I put boot sequence -
sh bootvar
BOOT variable = cat4000-i5s-mz.122-25.EWA11.bin,1;
CONFIG_FILE variable does not exist
BOOTLDR variable does not exist
Configuration register is 0x2102
sh bootflash
-#- ED type --crc--- -seek-- nlen -
I'm in middle of a issue , request your help in this
issue -
We have a GSR 12416 connected to JUNIPER router.
We are running OSPF between them.
OSPF neighbourship comes up :)
BUT now when I enable under ospf "mpls ldp sync" --- ospf neighbourship goes
down and doesn't comes up. Request your
- Each LC is connected in 10 Gbps mode via 4 link to switch fabric .
Now what I know is for full b/w mode 10 Gbps half duplex , you require
atleast 2 SFC online working. But if you see all SFC went to power down and
then power up state , so why few LC cards were still online.
Please ALSO guide - w
Hi all,
I'm getting below error in gsr chassis 12416 , please suggest
048724: .Aug 11 20:09:13.853 IST: %MBUS-6-SWITCHED_FABCLK: Slot 9 primary
clock switched to clock 0
048725: .Aug 11 20:09:17.191 IST: %FABRIC-3-ERR_HANDLE: Reconfigure all
fabric cards due to SUSHI REGISTER RESET ERROR error fr
the next-hop.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: jack daniels [mailto:jckdaniel...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 5:01 PM
> > To: Marko Milivojevic
> > Cc: Cisco-NSP
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] HIDE AS BGP
> >
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > can
Hi,
opened just tac case and as per them its a hardware isssue .
Thanks and Regards
J.Daniels
On 8/10/09, Aaron wrote:
>
> Open a tac case.
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 00:55, jack daniels wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>> I'm getting below error on GSR 12
Hi Mark,
can you please put more light on the example you proposed .
Thanks and Regards
J.Daniels
On 8/10/09, Marko Milivojevic wrote:
>
> You can use CSC in ISP1 and run BGP directly between Customer and ISP2.
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:59, jack daniels wrote:
> > Hi ,
Hi ,
Just to be more specific on the solution requirement -
Customer---ISP1---ISP2---Internet
Internet should not see ISP1 AS number . I 'm looking for L3 solution.
Thanks and Regards
J.daniels
On 8/10/09, jack daniels wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Customer---ISP1---ISP2---Internet
&g
27;t
remove the private AS numbers. This situation is considered a configuration
error.<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Please advise how to go for this.
Regards
J.Daniels
On
Hi All,
We had a requirement in which customer wants that the ISP- AS should not be
visible when route are advertised to internet via a upstream(L2 VPN
solution).
Can we use BGP command no-prepend with Replace AS attribute to hide ISP AS
in internet.
Can we peer with customer using l
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
