Hi ,
I uncomment the line TCPSocket 3310 on /usr/local/etc/clamav.conf but
when I run the command:
/usr/local/sbin/clamav-milter -blo /var/run/clmilter.sock
it says:
connect: Connection refused
Can't talk to clamd server at 127.0.0.1 on port 3310
Check your entry for TCPSocket in /usr/local/etc/cl
On Monday 12 Jan 2004 5:36 am, STEPHEN_DAVID SCANLAN wrote:
> I can't get clamav-milter to create a socket correctly.
> I am particularly puzzled with the clamd errors. How can I tell if the
> Daemon is running?
> I don't see it with ps -aux
Of the two problems you mention I suspect the second i
On Monday 12 Jan 2004 7:19 am, Alikhani wrote:
> Hi ,
> I uncomment the line TCPSocket 3310 on /usr/local/etc/clamav.conf but
> when I run the command:
> /usr/local/sbin/clamav-milter -blo /var/run/clmilter.sock
> it says:
> connect: Connection refused
> Can't talk to clamd server at 127.0.0.1 on p
Hi All,
Below is the output of freshclam while updating virus db. I am running
clamav on sparc solaris 8 machine. freshclam was doing fine for
previous version of clamav (0.60) the problem comes after updating to
version 0.65
---
Clam
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 05:50:38PM -0800, OpenMacNews wrote:
> still no joy at 17:50 PST ...
> -- On Sunday, January 11, 2004 8:05 PM -0500 "Christopher X. Candreva"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, OpenMacNews wrote:
> >>my db updates have *suddenly* stopped working afte
Hi Nigel
Thank you very much for your help. I run clamd at first and the when I
run clamav-milter it was OK.
-- by regards
-- Sophia
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Monday 12 Jan 2004 7:19 am, Alikhani wrote:
Hi ,
I uncomment the line TCPSocket 3310 on /usr/local/etc/clamav.conf but
when I run the comm
Just worked here after failing earlier in the day.
Regards
Mick Pollard ( lunix )
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:44:29 -0500 (EST)
"Christopher X. Candreva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Payal Rathod wrote:
>
> > I updated my definitions just 1 mins back. They seem ok.
> > -Pay
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 at 16:45:30 -0500, jef moskot wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what sort of viruses are typically being added to the
> database? Are they mostly new viruses?
Added are viruses which users submitted to us :-) . Or found by us.
Of course we add new viruses as quickly as possible (th
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Mick Pollard wrote:
> Just worked here after failing earlier in the day.
Checking the logs, updates started working at 4:50 AM this moring (Monday)
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 967-7816
WestNet Inte
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 04:53:45PM -0800, OpenMacNews wrote :
> hi,
>
> my db updates have *suddenly* stopped working after no prior problems
> for ages.
>
> now, a:
>
>% /usr/local/clamav/bin/freshclam --log=/var/log/freshclam.log
>--datadir=/var/clamav_db
>
> reports:
>
I have a problem with clamscan. When I scan the test files it reports the correct
number of infected files but when I scan a copy of the EICAR Standard Antivirus Test
File, clamscan ignores it. Whats up?
Bob Simpson
---
This SF.net email is
All-
I was wondering, if after the mele last evening with the distribution of
new defintions, if it would be possible to configure more control over the
update process... Specifically, I'd like to think that if I had a mirror
site geographically close (relatively) to me, that I would be more likel
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 at 6:51:36 -0600, Robert L. Simpson wrote:
> I have a problem with clamscan. When I scan the test files it reports
the correct number of infected files but when I scan a copy of the EICAR
Standard Antivirus Test File, clamscan ignores it. Whats up?
Please, shorten lines len
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 at 7:54:54 -0500, Carl Holtje ;021;vcsg6; wrote:
>
> I was wondering, if after the mele last evening with the distribution of
> new defintions, if it would be possible to configure more control over the
> update process... Specifically, I'd like to think that if I had a mirror
Carl Holtje ;021;vcsg6; wrote:
All-
I was wondering, if after the mele last evening with the distribution of
new defintions, if it would be possible to configure more control over the
update process... Specifically, I'd like to think that if I had a mirror
site geographically close (relatively) t
Hello, list!
I can't compile clamav-milter on my FREE-BSD 4.4-RELEASE system :(
Everything looks fine, except a few warnings about crypt, but no errors...
clamav-milter itself isn't appears after make.
Any ideas?
p.s. sendmail compiled with milter - actually I run a drweb mail filter
via it...
On Monday 12 Jan 2004 3:31 pm, EyedMax wrote:
> Hello, list!
> p.s. sendmail compiled with milter - actually I run a drweb mail filter
> via it...
Running a milter from within sendmail (i.e. having a sendmail which supports
mailters at runtime) is not the same as being able to build new milters.
Hi all,
I have got some false positives but the files are too big for the form
at http://www.nervous.it/~nervous/cgi-bin/sendvirus.cgi
The false positives are occuring with boot disk images and iso files.
The implicated signatures are :
- HLLC.GodSquad
- Constructor.Dos.DBCK
- HLLO.C-Virus.4096
An
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Monday 12 Jan 2004 3:31 pm, EyedMax wrote:
Hello, list!
p.s. sendmail compiled with milter - actually I run a drweb mail filter
via it...
Running a milter from within sendmail (i.e. having a sendmail which supports
mailters at runtime) is not the same as being ab
>> At any rate, is there way to make clamav-milter produce a log or at least
>> produce some output on the terminal screen? The man page for
>>clamav-milter
>> mentions a -x or --debug-level but these options are not recognized.
>They are recognised if you recompile with CL_DEBUG.
>It is already
I made the change to the
sys/types.h
and everything now works fine without any errors.
Thanks...
Marc S. Brooks
Programmer/Systems Admin
Tech Deck/Modifiers Cars/Skumm/X Concepts
975 Andreasen
Escondido, CA 92029
760-740-2625 ph
760-740-2643 fx
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Monday 29 Dec 2003 7:52
I'm just wondering if you have GMP on your machine? It's needed to
verify the signatures of the new database files introduced with 0.65.
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
SpamAssassin 2.61 + DCC 1.2.21, ClamAV 0.65 +
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> Added are viruses which users submitted to us :-) . Or found by us.
Well, yes, obviously, but could you maybe take a recent representative
update and give us an idea of what the added viruses are like? Just so
that we get an approximate feeling of wha
Are you subscribed to clamav-virusdb? If not, try that first.
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
SpamAssassin 2.61 + DCC 1.2.21, ClamAV 0.65 + GMP
jef moskot wrote:
Well, yes, obviously, but could you maybe take a recen
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 12:20, jef moskot wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> > Added are viruses which users submitted to us :-) . Or found by us.
>
> Well, yes, obviously, but could you maybe take a recent representative
> update and give us an idea of what the added viruses are
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
> are you on the clamav-virusdb mailing list?
Yes, but it doesn't say whether the viruses are old or new, and looking
them up given the various names used and the quantity of updates is not
very convenient.
> Tomasz Kojm sent out an update on Saturday
On Monday 12 Jan 2004 6:06 pm, Internet Helpdesk wrote:
> What do the different debug levels log? Specifically, what log level only
> logs error?
The higher the level the more that is debugged (-x9 debugs more than -x4).
There is no logic to it, only what I needed to debug when developing the so
> Would it be fair to say that when a new update comes out that it has
> likely been triggered by a recent discovery?
In most cases yes, since it's a fairly young project and specialized for
scanning e-mail it's not that interesting to pump up the number of
recognized viruses like the commercial
ERROR: Error while reading md5 sum of database from clamav.elektrapro.com
ERROR: Can't get viruses2.md5 sum from clamav.elektrapro.com
Someone knows what's happened?
tks
Mário
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perf
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 01:56:47PM -0500, jef moskot wrote :
[...]
>
> Thanks, that puts things into a little perspective.
>
> I'm really just looking for a GENERAL idea. For example, if you had to
> explain to the average user what sort of viruses were being added to the
> database...is it MO
At 08:07 AM 13/01/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>ERROR: Error while reading md5 sum of database from clamav.elektrapro.com
>ERROR: Can't get viruses2.md5 sum from clamav.elektrapro.com
>
>Someone knows what's happened?
I got the same log entry around midnight local time (GMT+11 with Daylight
Saving
At 11:02 AM 12/01/04, Flinn Mueller wrote:
>Maybe a browsable virus database would be in order. Something ala
>http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/. The description data
>from sendvirus.cgi would need to go right in there. Anyone working on
>something like this already? Even making ac
c2o Technical Support wrote:
At 11:02 AM 12/01/04, Flinn Mueller wrote:
>Maybe a browsable virus database would be in order. Something ala
>http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/. The description data
>from sendvirus.cgi would need to go right in there. Anyone working on
>something
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Denis De Messemacker wrote:
> In conclusion, and to answer your question, we receive actually a
> majority of current worms,trojans and viruses that are still in activity.
> Those are analysed on a fifo base.
> At any time, if fast spreading new virus is received, it preempts t
I don't see any reason to re-invent the wheel. If there are no legal or
technical problems with linking to another commercial site, I think it
makes more sense to just add an URL to our list, as opposed to generating
fresh content for thousands of entries.
Jeffrey Moskot
System Administrator
[EMA
On Jan 12, 2004, at 7:48 PM, jef moskot wrote:
I don't see any reason to re-invent the wheel. If there are no legal
or
technical problems with linking to another commercial site, I think it
makes more sense to just add an URL to our list, as opposed to
generating
fresh content for thousands of
As this is not a clamav-issue, this message should not be here.
However,
Fritz Mesedilla wrote:
How come I got this message from spamcop that I am sending spam?
Based on the Mail relay test on abuse.net, I am clean.
Besides, I am protected by amavisd-new,clamav, and spamassassin.
As a general
Heya,
At 01:27 PM 13/01/04, you wrote:
>> I don't see any reason to re-invent the wheel. If there are no legal
>> or
>> technical problems with linking to another commercial site, I think it
>> makes more sense to just add an URL to our list, as opposed to
>> generating
>> fresh content for thous
Sorry but it was through this mailing list that I got this message.
I sent a message to this list [clamav-users] concerning freshclam update problems
yesterday then after that I got this message from spamcop.
Anyway, thanks for that clarification.
Cheers,
fritz
---
+ Basta Ikaw Lord
-
How come I got this message from spamcop that I am sending spam?
Based on the Mail relay test on abuse.net, I am clean.
Besides, I am protected by amavisd-new,clamav, and spamassassin.
Cheers,
fritz
---
+ Basta Ikaw Lord
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
40 matches
Mail list logo
