> So does that mean you no longer use Exiscan's "demime" facility, because,
> if I understand this correctly, it is sufficient to pass the mime parts
> to clamd for scanning. Using it and ScanMail would appear to bring some
> "competition" between Exiscan's demime and ClamAV's ScanMail.
>
> Could s
Кирилл Усатов said the following on 8/12/2004 5:44 AM GMT+2:
I scan mail with clamav 0.75 on my gentoo.
My bases is up to date.
Clamdscan /virus_file
Not catch a virus.
You are probably scanning a broken sample.
In any case, update to clamav 0.75.1.
Regards,
Niek Baakman
Todd Lyons wrote:
Brian Morrison wanted us to know:
>Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] by backup.ccina.ro with
>SpamAssassin (2.60 1.212-2003-09-23-exp); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:53:00
>+0300
This is the last line of Received headers, so it never says exactly
what host it came from.
It was
>Кирилл Усатов said the following on 8/12/2004 5:44 AM GMT+2:
>> I scan mail with clamav 0.75 on my gentoo.
>>
>> My bases is up to date.
>>
>> Clamdscan /virus_file
>>
>> Not catch a virus.
>
>You are probably scanning a broken sample.
>In any case, update to clamav 0.75.1.
I update clamav
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 09:02, Кирилл Усатов wrote:
> >Кирилл Усатов said the following on 8/12/2004 5:44 AM GMT+2:
> >> I scan mail with clamav 0.75 on my gentoo.
> >>
> >> My bases is up to date.
> >>
> >> Clamdscan /virus_file
> >>
> >> Not catch a virus.
> >
> >You are probably scanning a br
Hi,
I'm configuring my EXIM 4.41 with Clamav 0.72 ..
the anti-virus installed and working fine but when i
un-comment the following lines in exim4.conf
acl_smtp_mime = acl_check_mime
acl_smtp_data = acl_check_content
av_scanner = clamd:/var/run/clamav/clamd
and send mail ... to LOCAL/WAN user
Eric Becker wrote:
Although, he does bring up a good point about the ScanMail option
still not being officially supported. While I haven't had any
problems with the feature on my work's server, it certainly does raise
problems with some network admins.
ScanMail is not the only way to scan mai
Silly Billy wrote:
Hi,
I'm configuring my EXIM 4.41 with Clamav 0.72 ..
You should try 0.75.1.
2004-08-12 12:50:28 1Bv9Pw-r3-I6 malware acl
condition: clamd: unable to connect to UNIX socket
/var/run/clamav/clamd (Permission denied)
/var/run/clamav/clamd must be writable by exim user.
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
So does that mean you no longer use Exiscan's "demime" facility, because,
if I understand this correctly, it is sufficient to pass the mime parts
to clamd for scanning. Using it and ScanMail would appear to bring some
"competition" between Exiscan's d
I'm update clamav to 0.75.1
Clamscan catch virus
But clamdscan don't
& clamav-milter don't stop infected mail
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trog
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] W
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 10:31, Кирилл Усатов wrote:
> I'm update clamav to 0.75.1
> Clamscan catch virus
> But clamdscan don't
> & clamav-milter don't stop infected mail
Make sure you have ScanMail enabled in clamav.conf, that you've
restarted clamd and that you don't have any old libclamav librar
>On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 10:31, Кирилл Усатов wrote:
>> I'm update clamav to 0.75.1
>> Clamscan catch virus
>> But clamdscan don't
>> & clamav-milter don't stop infected mail
>
>Make sure you have ScanMail enabled in clamav.conf, that you've
>restarted clamd and that you don't have any old libclama
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 9:13 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering prior to version .05 (feb 10, 2004) what the real virus
> installed with mail clam av was.
Please can you rephrase your question?
Version 0.05 of what?
ClamAV does not install any viruses.
Regards,
Antony.
I remove old version of clamav
& install clamav .75.1 from tar.gz
Clamav.conf
_
LogFile /var/log/clamd.log
LogFileMaxSize 16M
LogTime
LogSyslog
User clamav
LocalSocket /var/run/clamav/clamav.sock
StreamSaveToDisk
ScanMail
ScanArchive
___
ls -l /usr/lib/clamav/
-rw-r--r-
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 12:25, Кирилл Усатов wrote:
>
> I have old libmilter.a: is it ?
>
I wouldn't have thought so.
I guess you are scanning the file by hand rather than pushing it back
through the mail system.
You are running clamd as the user clamav - does that user have access
rights to th
Hello, Кирилл.
You wrote, 12 августа 2004 г., 15:25:03:
КУ> I remove old version of clamav
КУ> & install clamav .75.1 from tar.gz
КУ> Clamav.conf
КУ> _
КУ> LogFile /var/log/clamd.log
КУ> LogFileMaxSize 16M
КУ> LogTime
КУ> LogSyslog
КУ> User clamav
КУ> LocalSocket /var/run/clamav/clam
On Aug 11, 2004, at 1:22 PM, Martin Konold wrote:
Am Wednesday 11 August 2004 16:19 schrieb Bart Silverstrim:
Hi Bart,
DNS was developed exactly for this kind of purpose.
Storing non-DNS related information for retrieval? As I understand
the
proposition (and the original lecture that this idea wa
On Aug 11, 2004, at 10:40 AM, Damian Menscher wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Lionel Bouton wrote:
Since some time I am thinking of a bittorrent approach too. Bittorrent
is quite efficient at distributing files and there are implementations
allowing multiple trackers to distribute the remaining server-
> >Although, he does bring up a good point about the ScanMail option
> >still not being officially supported. While I haven't had any
> >problems with the feature on my work's server, it certainly does raise
> >problems with some network admins.
>
> ScanMail is not the only way to scan mail vi
Am Thursday 12 August 2004 15:16 schrieb Bart Silverstrim:
> > Abusing the DNS to directly transfer files etc is not appropriate as
> > the DNS
> > infrastructure is not ready for such kind of "abuse".
>
> Give it time...someone's going to do it.
Well, people have tried to abuse it before fortuna
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:41:50 +0200
Damjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone know what does CGPav use? Clamav ScanMail
option or some internal
mail demime-fier?
cgpav is capable to rip attachments by itself. You can
safely turn off ScanMail with cgpav.
Regards,
Fajar
--
Hi,
Sorry for he confusion. The virus I'm referring to is found in a CPAN
module archive Mail-ClamAV-0.01.tgz < Mail-ClamAV-0.05.tgz
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-authors/id/S/SA/SABECK/
The change log in 0.05 mentions that the "real" virus was replaced by the
ecair virus signature. A virus sca
I'm still having trouble trying to find info on using milter, clamav with
OSX.
I assume I need to compile clamav-milter, but in the INSTALL notes all is
says about OSX is this:
Sendmail on MacOS/X (10.1) is provided without a development package so this
can't be run "out of the box"
Any help is
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 15:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> If this is the wrong list to post this or these CPAN modules have nothing
> to do with the clamav project I apologize for the interruption.
The second of those two options.
-trog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed m
> Although, he does bring up a good point about the ScanMail option
> still not being officially supported. While I haven't had any
> problems with the feature on my work's server, it certainly does raise
> problems with some network admins.
ScanMail should be safe in the CVS/daily snapshot ve
I need to increase the ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio in clamscan as I have had
a few zips being incorrectly identified as oversized zips.
I first increased the ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio in clamav.conf but the zip
file was still incorrectly identified. From reading the changelog it looks
like that th
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 15:58, Plant, Dean wrote:
> I need to increase the ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio in clamscan as I have had
> a few zips being incorrectly identified as oversized zips.
>
> I first increased the ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio in clamav.conf but the zip
> file was still incorrectly id
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:58:30 +0100
"Plant, Dean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to increase the ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio in clamscan as I
> have had a few zips being incorrectly identified as oversized zips.
>
> I first increased the ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio in clamav.conf but
> the zip
* On 2004.08.12, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Randall Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still having trouble trying to find info on using milter, clamav with
> OSX.
>
> I assume I need to compile clamav-milter, but in the INSTALL notes all is
> says about OSX is this:
>
> Sendmail on Ma
At 16:09 12.08.2004, Randall Perry wrote:
I'm still having trouble trying to find info on using milter, clamav with
OSX.
AFAIK you should be able to recompile sendmail, Then you get the latest
version with all goodies.
cheers
Erich
THINK
Püntenstrasse 39
8143 Stallikon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PG
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:58:30 +0100
> "Plant, Dean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I need to increase the ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio in clamscan as I
>> have had a few zips being incorrectly identified as oversized zips.
>>
>> I first increased the ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I need to increase the ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio in clamscan as I
> > have had a few zips being incorrectly identified as oversized zips.
> >
> > I first increased the ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio in clamav.
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Charlie Watts wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I need to increase the ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio in clamscan as I
> > > have had a few zips being incorrectly identified as oversized zips.
> > >
> > > I fi
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:06:40 -0600 (MDT)
Charlie Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So a --max-ratio of 12 should be sufficient (right?), but isn't. Even
> a--max-ratio of 93 isn't sufficient. The file isn't scanned correctly
> until--max-ratio is 94 or above.
I see nothing strange in that, so wh
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> I see nothing strange in that, so what's the point ? The limit is
> calculated on a per file basis and some files in the archive have big
> compression ratios, e.g.
That explains everything - per-file, rather than per-archive. Thank you
muchly. I was assu
Arthur Kerpician wrote:
Todd Lyons wrote:
Brian Morrison wanted us to know:
>Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] by backup.ccina.ro with
>SpamAssassin (2.60 1.212-2003-09-23-exp); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:53:00
>+0300
This is the last line of Received headers, so it never says exactly
what host it
On Thursday, August 12, 2004, at 07:41 AM, Damjan wrote:
Although, he does bring up a good point about the ScanMail option
still not being officially supported. While I haven't had any
problems with the feature on my work's server, it certainly does
raise
problems with some network admins.
ScanMa
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:57:26 +0700 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Fajar
A. Nugraha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Silly Billy wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >I'm configuring my EXIM 4.41 with Clamav 0.72 ..
> >
> >
> You should try 0.75.1.
>
> >2004-08-12 12:50:28 1Bv9Pw-r3-I6 malware acl
> >condition: clamd
Hi,
I'm looking at possibly integrating ClamAV into a project of mine and
would appreciate any advice from people before embarking...
Basically the application is a J2EE web application where users can
upload files. I wish to virus check the files which will commonly be
Microsoft Word documents
What do folks think is an appropriate interval for a cron job to run
freshclam? Is once an hour reasonable?
Thanks,
Phil
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic D
Quoting Philip Ershler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
What do folks think is an appropriate interval for a cron job to run
freshclam? Is once an hour reasonable?
Once an hour is what i run. But please dont run it on the hour.
Jim
---
SF.Net email is spons
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Philip Ershler wrote:
> What do folks think is an appropriate interval for a cron job to run
> freshclam? Is once an hour reasonable?
Depends on your setup. If you're running a small-scale system, run it
every 2 hours. If you have 500-5000 users, run it once an hour. If
ov
* On 2004.08.05, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Robert Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #0 0x0804c0d7 in clamfi_connect ()
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x0804c0d7 in clamfi_connect ()
> #1 0x08051d2b in st_connectinfo ()
> #2 0x0856bce0 in ?? ()
> #3 0x015f7d94 in ?? ()
After working with Nigel to
>>
>> I have old libmilter.a: is it ?
>>
>
>I wouldn't have thought so.
>
>I guess you are scanning the file by hand rather than pushing it back
>through the mail system.
>
>You are running clamd as the user clamav - does that user have access
>rights to the file you are trying to scan?
>
>What d
Hello all.
I have a problem with make on MacOS X Panther 10.3.5. I searched the
archives and found the usual "run 'sudo ranlib /usr/lib/libbz2.a' " tip.
However this does _not_ work for me (and someone else on this list).
Scanning works though, but if I try to compile pyclamav it complains about
45 matches
Mail list logo
