I sense a misunderstanding of transients in this message.
Am Sonntag, 9. Juni 2013 18:51:00 UTC+2 schrieb Steven Degutis:
Thanks for the feedback. I'l look into #1. Regarding #2, we just wanted a
side-effecty (mutable) way of adding assertion-results within a test. I
suppose I could use
Jay,
2013/6/8 Jay Fields j...@jayfields.com
My favorite recent addition - I can run my app from within emacs, allowing
me to change my app with a simple C-x C-e and see my changes immediately in
the running app (no restart, refresh or reload necessary).
Would you mind to extend on that ?
Thank you for the fix, now it works without the problem.
It's fun to write grammars with Instaparse :-)
On Friday, June 7, 2013 1:29:32 AM UTC+2, puzzler wrote:
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Mark Engelberg
mark.en...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Short answer: This is fixed in
Hello Mark,
I have few suggestions:
1. I was going through the tutorial and comparing EBNF and ABNF grammars.
ABNF adds Bounded Repetition 3*5 A. Is there any chance of adding it also
to EBNF? I don't know, how the syntax would be, but it can be useful at
times.
Repetition of characters can be
EBNF syntax for bounded repetition could be just simply A 3*5 and these are
equal:
A? is A*1
A+ is A1*
A* is A0*
Frantisek
On Monday, June 10, 2013 11:04:52 AM UTC+2, Frantisek Sodomka wrote:
Hello Mark,
I have few suggestions:
1. I was going through the tutorial and comparing EBNF and
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Frantisek Sodomka fsodo...@gmail.comwrote:
EBNF syntax for bounded repetition could be just simply A 3*5 and these
are equal:
A? is A*1
A+ is A1*
A* is A0*
Right now, in the EBNF syntax, numbers are valid non-terminal identifiers.
So for example, rather
Large bounded repetition is a theoretical question. My use case requires to
ensure repetition of only small number of digits - one digit, two digits
and similar. I would use bounded repetition to ensure the needed number of
digits. Yes, different workarounds will work for me, so it is not a
any job opportunity in China ?
2013/5/27 Functional Jobs s...@functionaljobs.com
Here are some functional programming job opportunities that were posted
recently:
Clojure Programmer at Triggit
http://functionaljobs.com/jobs/148-clojure-programmer-at-triggit
Cheers,
Sean Murphy
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:57 AM, Frantisek Sodomka fsodo...@gmail.comwrote:
Googling the exception operator:
http://avisynth.org/mediawiki/User:Gzarkadas/EBNF
Exception The effect is the logical negation of the rule
following. For example -a becomes ? all characters not equal to a
Hey, its been a while since this discussion ended..
I read through it and now i am fully confused, where did -? and -? end
up being in?
Thanks,
Shlomi
On Thursday, April 21, 2011 5:51:59 PM UTC+3, Ivan Koblik wrote:
Hi Paul,
Thanks, good to know. Sorry for the misleading email.
Cheers,
They're in the core.incubator contrib repository
https://github.com/clojure/core.incubator
shlomivak...@gmail.com writes:
Hey, its been a while since this discussion ended..
I read through it and now i am fully confused, where did -? and -? end
up being in?
Thanks,
Shlomi
On Thursday,
On 10 June 2013 13:59, Nicola Mometto brobro...@gmail.com wrote:
They're in the core.incubator contrib repository
https://github.com/clojure/core.incubator
They're also in the clojure.core namespace for Clojure 1.5 onward, but
renamed to some- and some-.
- James
--
--
You received this
On Jun 10, 2013, at 12:22 AM, julianrz julia...@yahoo.com wrote:
This may be a little off topic, but does this, or any other framework, solve
some testing inconveniences that exist in Clojure and probably other
functional languages:
1) testing recursive functions. I want to test what a
oh thats a much better option! thanks!
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:30 PM, James Reeves ja...@booleanknot.com wrote:
On 10 June 2013 13:59, Nicola Mometto brobro...@gmail.com wrote:
They're in the core.incubator contrib repository
https://github.com/clojure/core.incubator
They're also in
1) testing recursive functions. I want to test what a recursion STEP
does, not the whole function. Can I mock 'recur'?
You shouldn't need to, pull the body of the loop out as as separate
function, then test that function.
2) testing sequence, esp. lazy
For this, I often create a generator
On Monday, June 10, 2013 9:20:31 AM UTC-5, tbc++ wrote:
1) testing recursive functions. I want to test what a recursion STEP
does, not the whole function. Can I mock 'recur'?
You shouldn't need to, pull the body of the loop out as as separate
function, then test that function.
2)
You can certainly use with-redefs with any testing library/framework, or
you can pass dependencies into your production-code functions. I think
perhaps I'm missing the detail you're seeing on how using a particular test
framework encourages using global vars - can you elaborate?
You're right, my
Hey Thomas - How'd you get the nice syntax highlighting in your post?
Alan
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Steven D. Arnold
thoth.amon.i...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks for the responses! As suggested, wrapping in 'doall' does work.
On Jun 8, 2013, at 3:28 AM, Thomas Heller th.hel...@gmail.com
Hey,
I pasted the code into gist ( https://gist.github.com/thheller/5734642 )
and copypasted that into the post.
Cheers,
/thomas
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Alan Thompson thompson2...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey Thomas - How'd you get the nice syntax highlighting in your post?
Alan
On Sat,
We have an admin option to start ( stop) a repl server inside our
application so we can nrepl from Emacs into any live running instance
and evaluate code in that live context - great for debugging only
happens on production issues as well as making interactive
development and debugging locally
Sometimes I've wanted a function that takes a value and a bunch of tests,
and returns it if it passes every test, otherwise nil.
So I wrote if-and:
(if-and foo
string?
#(.startsWith % f)
#(.contains % oo))
;; = foo
(if-and foo
string?
#(.startsWith % f)
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Steven Degutis sbdegu...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes I've wanted a function that takes a value and a bunch of tests,
and returns it if it passes every test, otherwise nil.
So I wrote if-and:
(if-and foo
string?
#(.startsWith % f)
Hi guys,
This might not be a good idea but if the goal is to have a minimal testing
utilities (or testing abstractions might I say ?) do you plan
to port them to ClojureScript ? The idea of a minimal testing utility that
would be extensible to suit everyone's taste and style of testing would
There's also the defmacro route:
(defmacro if-and [test-expr binding tests]
`(let [~binding ~test-expr]
(and ~@(concat tests [binding]
Evaluates test-expr, then evaluates to the result of that if the tests all
pass, and to a falsey value otherwise (in fact, the first falsey value
Hi there
I'm writing a talk about Clojure in the real world and I would like to
know, if possible, which companies are using Clojure for production or
to make internal tools.
Thank you
Plínio Balduino
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure
Hi Plínio,
We use Clojure heavily in beanstalkapp.com.
Best,
Dima
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Plínio Balduino pbaldu...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi there
I'm writing a talk about Clojure in the real world and I would like to
know, if possible, which companies are using Clojure for production
Look at this:
http://dev.clojure.org/display/community/Clojure+Success+Stories
Luc
Hi there
I'm writing a talk about Clojure in the real world and I would like to
know, if possible, which companies are using Clojure for production or
to make internal tools.
Thank you
Plínio Balduino
Thanks. I went there before ask here =)
Plínio
On Jun 10, 2013 6:58 PM, Softaddicts lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca wrote:
Look at this:
http://dev.clojure.org/display/community/Clojure+Success+Stories
Luc
Hi there
I'm writing a talk about Clojure in the real world and I would like to
I am just curious, not requesting this feature :-)
How to represent negation in BNF?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10922352/how-to-represent-negation-in-bnf
http://pythonhosted.org/modgrammar/libref.html
modgrammar.EXCEPT(grammar, exc_grammar, **kwargs)
Match grammar, but only if it
On Jun 10, 2013, at 9:20 AM, Timothy Baldridge tbaldri...@gmail.com wrote:
Midje on the other hand, is a massive pile of macros and DSLs that so
complicate your code that advanced tests are insanely hard to debug. ... And
I can't tell you how many dozens of hours I've lost trying to figure
ReadyForZero.com uses clojure exclusively (~50K lines) on the backend for
http and api requests.
Ignacio Thayer
Co-founder/CTO ReadyForZero.com
On Monday, June 10, 2013 2:47:25 PM UTC-7, Plinio Balduino wrote:
Hi there
I'm writing a talk about Clojure in the real world and I would like to
There are currently 4 roles defined: Definer, Asserter, Runner, and
Reporter.
It looks like the Runner does finding, filtering, and execution. I think
you could further break the Runner down into Discoverer and Executor. I
might want to just ask What tests do I have? without actually running
you should also check out https://github.com/rplevy/swiss-arrows
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
It might surprise you to know that there are actual human beings with
feelings who write the software you slam.
You are right. And I apologize for my strong words. For the goals that
Midje strives for, it is an excellent library.
My reaction is more against the ideas behind Midje (from the
you can just use (every? true? '(arg1 arg2 )) or def a simple function
.
i think the Core is powerful enough.
2013/6/11 Cedric Greevey cgree...@gmail.com
There's also the defmacro route:
(defmacro if-and [test-expr binding tests]
`(let [~binding ~test-expr]
(and ~@(concat tests
I'm new to Clojure, but with some lisp experience, I've dabbled in Scheme
for a few years. Used Racket earlier this year for a couple of sectoins of
a MOOC. And occasionally write Emacs lisp.
The idea is to create cyptograms https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptogram.
These are word puzzles
Hmmm? Maybe
(defn if-and [x tests]
(if (every? true? (map #(% x) tests)) x))
for a version that's a function, would short-circuit but for seq chunking,
and returns nil or x.
Incidentally, I think you can dechunk any seq with (map first (take-while
seq (iterate next s))), but haven't tested
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Cedric Greevey cgree...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm? Maybe
(defn if-and [x tests]
(if (every? true? (map #(% x) tests)) x))
for a version that's a function, would short-circuit but for seq chunking,
and returns nil or x.
Yes, that's why you might as well use
On Monday, June 10, 2013 10:20:20 PM UTC+2, Steven Degutis wrote:
Sometimes I've wanted a function that takes a value and a bunch of tests,
and returns it if it passes every test, otherwise nil.
Does this seem useful enough to put into core?
A simpler variant already exists in core,
Here's my re-write. user (defn gen-crypto []
(let [atoz (range 65 91)
upper (map char atoz)
lower (map #(char (+ % 32)) atoz)
digit (range 10)
[sl su sd] (map shuffle [lower upper digit])
encrypt (reduce conj
Thank you for your example. I especially like doing sl, su, sd in one line.
However:
user= ((gen-crypto) 1 for me, 2 for you.)
1 zdu gy, 2 zdu fdx.
The numbers are coming through without translation. I believe defining
digit as:
user= (map #(char (+ 48 %)) (range 10))
(\0 \1 \2 \3 \4 \5 \6 \7
Try this version. user (defn gen-crypto []
(let [chars #(- (iterate inc %)
(map char)
(take 26))
upper (chars 65)
lower (chars 97)
digit (take 10 (chars 48))
[sl su sd] (map shuffle
It's pretty frustrating that I, a regular old Clojure user who likes
writing tests, can't mix and match tools from existing testing libraries.
Seriously, there's 4 major ones (clojure.test, speclj, midje, expectations)
and they each do mostly the same things but vary slightly in some areas. I
I work for Nanonation Inc (Nanonation.net) and we have a couple internal tools
as well as a new product, Viewpoint, where the backend and web portal are both
100% Clojure.
---
Joseph Smith
j...@uwcreations.com
@solussd
On Jun 10, 2013, at 6:48 PM, Ignacio Thayer itha...@gmail.com wrote:
An alternative implementation that shuffles all printable characters. This
version returns the encryption map and generalizes the encrypt/decrypt
functionality.
https://gist.github.com/SegFaultAX/5754209
On Tuesday, August 12, 2008 10:25:00 PM UTC-7, Joubert Nel wrote:
Hello,
I have a
Here is an alternative implementation that generalizes the encrypt/decrypt
functionality. It also uses all printable characters for the source
dictionary.
https://gist.github.com/SegFaultAX/5754209
P.S. I accidentally posted this as a reply to an older question I happened
to have open.
On
Originally we had Runner split into Discoverer and Runner, but I had to
combine them both in Runner again so that we can have an autorunner.
Imagine that you've started your autorunner at the command line, and you
create a new test in your existing file and save it. The discoverer has
already
47 matches
Mail list logo
