Re: Fedora Cloud Meeting Minutes 2021-11-11

2021-11-12 Thread Matthew Miller
in favor of this as well! Let me know how I can help! -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.

Future of Fedora Cloud as an Edition?

2021-10-28 Thread Matthew Miller
-future/34064 -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code

Re: Fedora 34 GCP image

2021-05-06 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 02:21:39PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: > FYI - I published the Fedora 34 GCP image to the `fedora-cloud` project in > GCP. > See https://pagure.io/cloud-sig/issue/328 for more details. Nice! -- Matthew Miller Fedora Proje

Re: Fedora 33 in GCP

2020-11-19 Thread Matthew Miller
ebsite at some point. What's needed for that? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://doc

Re: Can't use F33 EC2 image: SSH key doesn't work

2020-11-10 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 04:40:46AM -, Kevin White wrote: > OK, the problem isn't with the key, it is with Putty. Ah, good to know! -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscr

Re: EC2 access for testing?

2019-09-19 Thread Matthew Miller
not is the right question. It's something we're able to make available. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Co

Cloud/Server merge

2019-01-29 Thread Matthew Miller
n. What do you think? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct

Re: cloud images and EFI

2019-01-15 Thread Matthew Miller
sounds pretty solid. :) -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html Li

Re: cloud images and EFI

2019-01-14 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 01:39:51AM +0100, Alessio Ciregia wrote: > Does Fedora cloud images support EFI boot? > Or better, there are images built to boot on EFI platforms? What's your use case here? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader __

Re: More frequent Fedora Cloud updates

2018-06-20 Thread Matthew Miller
nitely want to be apart of that discussion if they > plan is to move Fedora Cloud under Fedora Server's umbrella. Awesome. Are you, by any chance, going to be at Flock this summer? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cl

Re: More frequent Fedora Cloud updates

2018-06-18 Thread Matthew Miller
to see Fedora Cloud merged with Fedora Server for F29 (or at the latest, F30). That shouldn't block this plan in any way, though! -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an e

[cloud-sig] Issue #282: Make sure official Fedora AMIs are in new regions as they come online

2017-09-16 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm reported a new issue against the project: `cloud-sig` that you are following: `` See https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/139 I'm looking into what we can do about the non-official and possibly malicious AMIs, but a first-line defense should be making sure we expand to these ne

[atomic-wg] Issue #295: Start using new mailing list/IRC channel around f26 release time

2017-07-13 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` So, thinking back to "These folks generally prefer not to use "antiquated" media like email and IRC at all", maybe the answer is _not a mailing list at all_? I've been thinking of spinning up Discourse instance in OpenShift (either th

[atomic-wg] Issue #295: Start using new mailing list/IRC channel around f26 release time

2017-07-12 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I don't think we want to direct all Fedora-related Atomic development discussion to projectatomic.io -- I don't think that's very discoverable for people in the Fedora community and will lead to confusion about 1) Fedora Atomic Host a

[atomic-wg] Issue #297: Disable deltarpms in the Fedora base docker image

2017-07-12 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` Because we do the nodocs and not all langs thing, the base docker image is missing files that prevent deltarpms from working on `dnf update`. This slows things down and wastes time when doing docker build. W

[atomic-wg] Issue #281: Figure out comprehensive strategy for atomic host container storage

2017-07-11 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I mean, not that I don't also have faith in you guys. :) `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/281 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lis

[atomic-wg] Issue #281: Figure out comprehensive strategy for atomic host container storage

2017-07-11 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` For what it's worth, I was talking with a Red Hat filesystems engineer and he strongly recommended moving to XFS across all of Fedora. Pretty much the only downside is lack of filesystem shrinking, and I don't think that's a big issue

[atomic-wg] Issue #290: Make fedora-minimal base image generally available

2017-06-29 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I still think we need a much, much more modular systemd package to address this, rather than a fake one. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/290 __

[atomic-wg] Issue #290: Make fedora-minimal base image generally available

2017-06-28 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` That's less than I expected, really. :) (And some of it really random. From coreutils, we loose `pinky` but not `base32` (which isn't in EL7 and I'd never heard of... but that's another story.) I'd really love to see a bug associated

[atomic-wg] Issue #290: Make fedora-minimal base image generally available

2017-06-28 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Is it possible to make the minimal image the base of the regular image? That seems ideal from a testing perspective (not to mention explosion of streams). I've had in the back of my mind for a while the idea of fedora-minimal and fedo

Re: Fedora Release Tools Monthly Status

2017-06-15 Thread Matthew Miller
reporting on soon... :) Thanks Kate! -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[atomic-wg] Issue #282: Atomic Host images omit many common locales that all other flavors include

2017-06-06 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` What is the size impact? Is it possible or will it be possible in the near future to add locales (perhaps as system containers)? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/282 __

[cloud-sig] Issue #138: Produce updated cloud base images monthly

2017-05-25 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I like the idea of building only when something changes, although as Dusty pointed out to me, that's practically a moot point for monthly updated images, as there's _always_ going to be something that's changed in that time. For "wher

Re: Proposal: Release blocking for F27

2017-05-11 Thread Matthew Miller
g non-beta releases are. I definitely don't want to treat these as extra and special. A two-week candidate should start being produced as a matter of course at branch. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposal: Release blocking for F27

2017-05-05 Thread Matthew Miller
using the normal (two-week) release process". -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[atomic-wg] Issue #270: Update getfedora.org with Digital Ocean

2017-04-28 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I'd also like to add Dply (https://dply.co/). This is an experimental service run by a Digital Ocean employee, and basically lets you get started with the smallest droplets quickly. The cool thing — in addition to the very low bar for

[atomic-wg] Issue #270: Update getfedora.org with Digital Ocean

2017-04-26 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Sounds good to me. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/270 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe se

Re: Many new dependencies in f25 updates-testing

2017-04-26 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:04:59PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: > What's bringing in all of this stuff? Not sure, but offhand it looks like stuff that might be leaking in from build dependencies somehow. (All that srpm macro stuff?) -- Matthew Miller Fedora Projec

Re: Proposal: Release blocking for F27

2017-04-12 Thread Matthew Miller
ular issue at beta release time, it's okay to present an earlier build and later update once that's fixed. If necessary, we can call this "pre-release" rather than "beta". -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader __

[atomic-wg] Issue #262: F26 Talking Points

2017-04-05 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Can we combine 3 & 5 into one point? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/262 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Meeting about rolling releases

2017-03-17 Thread Matthew Miller
> and when we'll be ready to deploy them (if ever). I can't make this. But, do you have someone from Modularity and/or Base Runtime in this? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

[atomic-wg] Issue #232 `ssh issue on libvirt based images`

2017-03-03 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I'd like to look at the logs still. :) `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/232 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.o

[atomic-wg] Issue #232 `ssh issue on libvirt based images`

2017-03-02 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Kushal, were you able to get the system logs from a failed image? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/232 ___ cloud mailing list --

[atomic-wg] Issue #170 `Finish new Fedora Atomic PRD`

2017-02-14 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` It *also* just came up in the latest Marketing meeting. https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-02-14/marketing.2017-02-14-13.58.log.html#l-173 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.

Re: 2wk atomic release candidate: 20170213

2017-02-13 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 06:11:50PM +0100, Thomas Mueller wrote: > Tested the Cloud-Base vagrant virtualbox image with the puppet selinux > modules acceptance tests (https://github.com/voxpupuli/puppet-selinux). > Looks good. Awesome -- thanks! -- Matthew Miller Fedora Proje

Re: Ownership of the Cloud Base Image

2017-02-09 Thread Matthew Miller
> If yes we need people to volunteer for that. I don't think we should put a huge amount of work into the wiki, at least for public consumption. (It's okay for SIG/WG workspace.) I *hope* that we will have our revitalized docs infrastructure online RSN. -- Matthew

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20170208.n.0 compose check report

2017-02-08 Thread Matthew Miller
. When I do a dnf system-upgrade to rawhide of a vanilla f25 cloud image, there is some additional stuff -- including having both python2 and python3 -- but I don't think enough to cause that. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing

Re: Atomic Host: important updates in testing

2017-02-07 Thread Matthew Miller
pt fedora-easy-karma to work with ostree. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[atomic-wg] Issue #196 `moving to docker 1.13 in Fedora 25`

2017-02-06 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Once the team has consensus on the preferred approach, it would be good to bring it to FESCo to make an official exception to the updates policy. (See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Exceptions) `` To reply, visit the li

[atomic-wg] Issue #196 `moving to docker 1.13 in Fedora 25`

2017-02-06 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` The Fedora approach would be to create a [Copr](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/). `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/196 ___ cl

Re: Periodic Cloud Image Updates

2017-02-03 Thread Matthew Miller
ut there should be some way to "scroll back" all the way to the GA releases.) 8. Decide if we want to switch Cloud Base entirely to this automatic process and eschew release milestones I'm sure I'm missing something -- what else should be added? -- Matthew Miller Fed

[atomic-wg] Issue #199 `Plan for Atomic prerelease images`

2017-02-03 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` _I_ think it makes sense to have that on a prerelease page, but I'll let others weigh in too. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/199

[atomic-wg] Issue #199 `Plan for Atomic prerelease images`

2017-02-03 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I think that we should start producing prelease images immediately at the branch (later this month — 2017-02-21) as part of the two-week process. I don't think there should be specific Alpha/Beta builds. `` To reply, visit the link be

Re: fedora/25-cloud-base on atlas

2017-02-03 Thread Matthew Miller
Fedora Atomic I meant here: https://atlas.hashicorp.com/boxes/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&sort=&provider=&q=fedora -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: fedora/25-cloud-base on atlas

2017-02-03 Thread Matthew Miller
ge when you search for "Fedora". Is there any way to get download numbers over time? That would be very interesting. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: tunir tests: what's this useradd-not-found failure?

2017-02-02 Thread Matthew Miller
n-gating test about auditd, which got automatically fixed. We > did not make any changes on the tests. Yeah, but... how could that go wrong in this way? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To

tunir tests: what's this useradd-not-found failure?

2017-02-01 Thread Matthew Miller
x27;, f) AssertionError: 'useradd' not found in '' -- Ran 1 test in 0.140s FAILED (failures=1) How is it that useradd is not found in this image but everything else works and other images are fine?

Re: Does it make sense for me to convert my server to an Atomic Host ?

2017-01-23 Thread Matthew Miller
r else don't mind a few minutes of downtime here and there. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[atomic-wg] Issue #197 `Change size of Root, Docker partitions in F26 Atomic Host storage setup`

2017-01-18 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I think we can simplify the rules to 1. RootFS: 25% of disk space, with a minimum of 3GB and a maximum of 16GB 2. Docker Partition: maximum of 50% of total disk space 3. Leave anything else unallocated No need to specify a rule for un

[atomic-wg] Issue #197 `Change size of Root, Docker partitions in F26 Atomic Host storage setup`

2017-01-18 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` This should be easy to do with anaconda-based installs, but how would this work with images? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/197 __

Re: About the recent failures of Atomic images on Autocloud

2017-01-18 Thread Matthew Miller
on Autocloud > > with 2 CPU(s) or get this issue fixed somehow? > I think we need to find out what the issue is and fix it. +1. I wonder if this is actually a widespread problem that we've just noticed in this way. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader __

[atomic-wg] Issue #193 `Please add Atomic Host and Fedora Cloud Base to AWS Asia Pacific (Seoul) Region and other new regions`

2017-01-12 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Hi David. I _do_, but we've been blocked on legal for... years. Email me or hit me up on IRC and I can give you details, but the short of it is that Fedora can't sign anything promising support beyond the community support we offer —

[atomic-wg] Issue #194 `Develop process to make sure we add new AWS regions when they become available`

2017-01-12 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` The current process is "wait until someone complains". I think we can do better. :) They're announced at https://aws.amazon.com/new/#global-infra — maybe we come up with automation, or maybe it's just a mat

[atomic-wg] Issue #193 `Please add Atomic Host and Fedora Cloud Base to AWS Asia Pacific (Seoul) Region`

2017-01-12 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Actually, looks like we're missing several: * US East (Ohio) * Canada (Central) * EU (London) ← and note that Ireland and Frankfurt are no longer "EU West" and "EU Central" * Asia Pacific (Mumbai) `` To reply, visit the link below o

Re: [atomic-devel] Please test new docker version with CVE

2017-01-12 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 07:11:16AM -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote: > > With the power of roshi we might be able to make this happen! > > Also, I think he likes beer. > It's on my list of things that need a test plan :) Nice! Now, what else can I wish for -- Matthew Miller F

Re: Please add AMI image to AWS Seoul region

2017-01-12 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 10:22:26AM -, ms@sentience.rocks wrote: > Dear Matthew Miller, > > I see you commented about AWS Seoul region about a year ago. But we still > don't have fedora cloud AMI listed in Seoul region.. > > If this issue was forgotten because no one e

[atomic-wg] Issue #193 `Please add Atomic Host and Fedora Cloud Base to AWS Asia Pacific (Seoul) Region`

2017-01-12 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` This [opened in January](https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/now-open-aws-asia-pacific-seoul-region/) and we missed it. (If we were in the Amazon Marketplace, this would happen automatically. Oh well.) See re

Re: Fedora Cloud Images Home page - oVirt

2017-01-12 Thread Matthew Miller
place to ask, can you please point me > to the correct place? I would suggest either adding to this ticket https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/57 or filing a new one in that tracker. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cl

Re: [atomic-devel] Please test new docker version with CVE

2017-01-12 Thread Matthew Miller
tps://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WX4EVTG3S2EXWMQ3DJBCBP6FNMJHZFRA/ -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud

Re: Proposal: require DESCRIPTION, USAGE label for images

2017-01-11 Thread Matthew Miller
a brief statement > Even though that is the intended use, the usage description should be > uniform and state what capability or function is provided. > Actual usage pattern for code is always more interesting than intended use. ... and doesn't the "description" cove

Re: Proposal: require DESCRIPTION, USAGE label for images

2017-01-10 Thread Matthew Miller
we should probably follow a consistent convention. Also, looks like instead of "usage", that recommends: help Command to run the help command of the image runCommand to run the image -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader __

Re: Proposal: require DESCRIPTION, USAGE label for images

2017-01-10 Thread Matthew Miller
standard wording for that? Like USAGE: Invoked by $OTHERCONTAINER or USAGE: Invoked by Kubernetes when $WHATEVERTRIGGERS or are there too many possibilities? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposal: require DESCRIPTION, USAGE label for images

2017-01-10 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:33:05AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > > USAGE: single command line giving usage example > > for invoking the container; will be "N/A" for > > some containers. Why N/A? What circumstances would this be? -- Ma

Re: About the recent failures of Atomic images on Autocloud

2017-01-09 Thread Matthew Miller
then > > randomly allows to ssh again. > > I could not reproduce this using the same images over our OpenStack > > cloud. Any tips will be helpful to find the cause. > > > Can we get together and debug this? Is this a key-generation entropy proble

Re: Fedora 25 - need karma on new docker

2017-01-05 Thread Matthew Miller
> discuss this further on its own. So, good news — we're very, very close to having it so you can drop taskotron checks into dist-git and have them run automatically when the package is built. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mail

Re: Fedora 25 - need karma on new docker

2017-01-05 Thread Matthew Miller
a look at https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-eb3447f0f7 and at the bottom in the "Feedback Guidelines", see "Test Case calc interactive" and "Test Case calc regress". Howto docs: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_package_test_plan_creation

Re: Fedora server cloud images dead?

2017-01-04 Thread Matthew Miller
e expect the Cloud Base Image to merge with Fedora Server. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[atomic-wg] Issue #170 `Finish new Fedora Cloud PRD`

2016-12-22 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @jberkus Whatever was wrong before seems fixed now. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/170 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fe

[atomic-wg] Issue #170 `Finish new Fedora Cloud PRD`

2016-12-20 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @jberkus I suspect it's related to the FAS change to use kerberos. Maybe someone from the infra team can help. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/170

Re: [atomic-wg] Issue #170 `Finish new Fedora Cloud PRD`

2016-12-19 Thread Matthew Miller
I'm seeing that problem too. It was working previously, so I'm not sure what happened. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

review my container?

2016-12-13 Thread Matthew Miller
7;m already the package maintainer of as a way of dipping into the process. And, hey, it's an easy example of a containerized command-line tool. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: next steps for migrating Cloud Base image to Fedora Server?

2016-12-06 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 05:01:56PM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote: > I have been identified as a stakeholder of this image and have an > action item to deliver some paragraph that indicates such to sgallagh. So I'll check this one off as Dusty's problem now? :) -- Matthew Miller Fedor

next steps for migrating Cloud Base image to Fedora Server?

2016-12-06 Thread Matthew Miller
I think we had general agreement around what we want to do here: have the Cloud Base Image become instead Fedora Server, but shipped as a cloud image and made available in cloud providers. What are the next steps to actually get there? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader

[atomic-wg] Issue #160 `Ship fedora-motd in F24 atomic image`

2016-12-01 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > We can enable motdgen.service at system boot. This will execute atomic and > dnf commands only during first boot and cache the results. I'm concerned that this'll make the first boot annoying slow. Can we just run it from a systemd

[atomic-wg] Issue #5 `tracker for GCE work`

2016-11-24 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` CentOS isn't officially there directly - it's provided by SoftLayer. I'm not sure of all of the details behind that. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/5

[atomic-wg] Issue #5 `tracker for GCE work`

2016-11-24 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` We are probably still blocked on legal issues for getting a listing, but that doesn't mean it shouldn't _work_. We could also better document the process by which users can get the image uploaded themselves. `` To reply, visit the lin

Article idea: Launch fedora on dply.co

2016-11-24 Thread Matthew Miller
some followup articles with things like "set up Wordpress in a container on Fedora Atomic" with pre-cooked configs for doing that with a button press. To try it (Fedora 24), click this: https://dply.co/b/fz95S8RH -- Matthew Miller Fedora

[atomic-wg] Issue #154 `make Fedora Atomic download page clearer`

2016-11-23 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I have two small ones. First, I think the freshness indicator is not visible enough in the top bar. Maybe that's just me. I guess, for one thing, it's easy to gloss over header-section text, but also, there's no indication that that's

[atomic-wg] Issue #154 `make Fedora Atomic download page clearer`

2016-11-23 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Should we update Josh's wiki page above or put proposals here? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/154 ___ cloud mailing list -- clo

Re: Fedora 25 Compose for Release Day

2016-11-21 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 10:40:58PM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote: > Looks like we have a candidate for release for F25 Atomic this week. \o/ -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscr

[atomic-wg] Issue #180 `Future of Fedora Dockerfiles`

2016-11-18 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > Where fedora/apache has > 1 million pulls, Once we've transitioned to the new system, let's make sure we don't lose this — we need a plan to get the images from the new build system to the docker hub somehow. `` To reply, visit th

Re: FYI: F25 image builds - none for the past few days

2016-11-01 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 10:31:42AM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: > We now have successful image builds! Please try them out! Awesome! -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: Docker Layered Image Naming and Tagging

2016-10-27 Thread Matthew Miller
just say drop the first > httpd and make it registry.fedoraproject.org/httpd:latest I'd hate to make it top-level simply because modularity forgot to handle this because we forgot to tell them... > Thoughts? Should we bring this to the modularity group for review?

Re: Docker Layered Image Naming and Tagging

2016-10-26 Thread Matthew Miller
detail (just the label, nothing in the path at all). Does that present any practical problems that I'm not seeing? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: should we release new fedora cloud image for f24

2016-10-24 Thread Matthew Miller
tests the build infrastruture, mostly), but it'd be a lot more valuable if they pulled in updates. (It'd actually be good to have one with updates-testing, too, as an early-warning system.) -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ c

Re: should we release new fedora cloud image for f24

2016-10-24 Thread Matthew Miller
n the security team tells us to, and they didn't as far as I know reach out to say so in this case. (I think usually that's been for issues classified as "critical".) We *did* have aspirations of releasing respun cloud images monthly in any case, though -- Mat

Re: Docker Layered Image Naming and Tagging

2016-10-21 Thread Matthew Miller
.org/httpd/24/http:2.4.23 with Fedora version indicated by labels? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

F25 atomic -- vagrant working, but not the qcow2?

2016-10-12 Thread Matthew Miller
What's the status of all of this? https://apps.fedoraproject.org/autocloud/jobs/326 Rawhide still completely failing, https://apps.fedoraproject.org/autocloud/jobs/324 and no F24 composes at all? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___

Re: [Base] adopting the Docker base image into Atomic WG

2016-10-10 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 02:41:50PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > Now that Cloud -> Atomic and will be focusing on Project Atomic, can we move > the > Docker base image into this group from the "Fedora Base" group? Somebody who cares about it should own it, is all I care

Re: No Two Week Atomic Release

2016-10-06 Thread Matthew Miller
take a lot of karma, too. I think we should have the ability to selectively pull things like this into Atomic from updates-testing. This seems like a poster-child case for when that might be a good idea. (But I don't see anything there, either.)

cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

2016-10-05 Thread Matthew Miller
s Cat vs. Heisenbug, the marketing push should be around Atomic, Workstation, and Server individually. The release does give us an excuse for PR, but it's my sense that two releases a year is a little overwhelming for that — we are still getting F24 reviews coming in. And, since column inches

cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

2016-10-04 Thread Matthew Miller
no reason that can't work with the new Atomic-focused design. For that matter, we could launch that _before_ the GA. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

2016-10-04 Thread Matthew Miller
ile — basically, since Release Blocker is the only big attention-forcing hammer we have, we tend to hit too many things with it. We need a different way. > Now, we could discuss alternatives, such as having > Atomic Host being able to carry its own overrides > temporarily. As you know, I&#

cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

2016-10-04 Thread Matthew Miller
efinition. As we get into the Grand World of Modularity, there's going to be more and more stuff like this. If the base runtime is updating on a one month cycle, and GNOME updating whenever the upstream x.y.1 is ready, and server roles all coming out as each is updated... a "release&quo

Re: Fedora 25 atomic images?

2016-10-04 Thread Matthew Miller
nsition from this to Fedora-Atomic-25? Manual changes? Is there a documented SOP for this? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Cloud/Atomic Test Day

2016-10-03 Thread Matthew Miller
ble image. It probably will, but I think it answers the question about whether making it a release-blocker for everything else is even possible. For F26, would it be possible to start building it at branch from rawhide? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader __

Fedora 25 atomic images?

2016-10-01 Thread Matthew Miller
missing it? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Docker Layered Image Naming and Tagging

2016-09-30 Thread Matthew Miller
ages will be composed out of existing RPMs, is there any reason to _not_ keep both branches? We basically get that "for free" in terms of human effort (although not build time and resources). -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud ma

Re: Docker Layered Image Naming and Tagging

2016-09-30 Thread Matthew Miller
sion from earlier, this'd be the "stream". Or whatever equivalent term to that is chosen. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

2016-09-30 Thread Matthew Miller
Atomic *needs* to be release blocking, because if it misses the grand unified release, we have the ability to update it at the next cycle, so it's less of a big deal. But if we collectively prefer to make sure everything is lined up on the release day... I can see arguments f

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >