jasonbrooks reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
We removed kubernetes, etcd, flannel, gluster and ceph from the atomic host for
Fedora 25:
https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/c/219c9bb26426811a5f32188c59682ad70c3283e5?branch=f25
The idea is that these p
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
> There's a kube 1.4.5 in koji for fc26
> (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=816481), and I've asked
> Jan about making it available for fedora 25.
Can you keep us in the loop here on the progress of this one?
jasonbrooks added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
>
> There's a kube 1.4.5 in koji for fc26
> (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=816481), and I've asked
> Jan about making it available for fedora 25.
>
> Can you keep us in the loop here on the progress of thi
dwalsh added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
I have asked Giuseppe Scrivano to move forward on system
containers to implement kubernetes workflow on atomic host. He currently has
most of services available as system containers and is moving them into
github.com/projectatomic/a
gscrivano added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
There are already two system containers for etcd and flannel, already available
on Docker hub as gscrivano/etcd and gscrivano/flannel. I'll move them to
Fedora as soon as you tell me how to proceed for doing that. There is no
sy
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
as an alternative for now I have been working on getting the openshift-ansible
installer to work against F25 atomic host. I have opened up several issuses:
https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/issues/2808
https://github.co
jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Well, OpenShift is its own thing rather than an alternative to Kubernetes.
Some people want Kube, some want OpenShift.
So I've been doing a bunch with Kubeadm on AH. Jason's version does actually
work, with some caveats:
1) it req
jasonbrooks added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
> 1) it requires package layering, which really pushes up the idea of having a
> way for users to build their own OStree servers.
What do you mean by that? Package layering doesn't require someone to build
their own ostree serve
jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Well, the whole point of Atomic is to be immutable: "configure once, deploy
many times". Having a key piece of infrastructure depend on per-server package
layering kinda breaks that. It makes it hard to explain why people should use
jasonbrooks added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
kube 1.4.5 for f25 in bodhi:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-fffea4b1c3
I've been working on getting it running in rpm-installed node pkgs / master
pkgs in containers. Notes on that here:
https://gist.github.
jasonbrooks added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Some updates:
* the issue of fedora having an aged kube is resolved, v1.4.5 is in f25 stable
* the issue of not being able to just `rpm-ostree install kubernetes` and
proceed as if we never removed kube from the image is open. Thi
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
kubernetes rpms are in the install tree now:
https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/39
the images produced tonight should have the content in there. Let's close this
issue if testing is successful there.
``
To reply, visit
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
new release is out with k8s rpms in it:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/P7TI767PHSAR42QKER3JIU27WJ7KB2YW/
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagu
13 matches
Mail list logo