rstand the scenario completely. Can you elaborate on the use
case that this is going to provide?
> >Thanks,
> >Sailaja.M
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com]
> >Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 5:32 PM
> >
See inline
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:30 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Local versus Shared Storage Type for Compute Offering
>
> Hi,
>
> I was a little surprised to see th
It's a bug. Error message shouldn't show the internal db id. Instead it should
show the UUID and/or name.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 9:04 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: Error Deploying VM in 4.0
>
> On Mar 12,
map it for VPC case
where there can be N private nics and 1 public nic.
Chiradeep, can you share your thoughts on this?
Thanks,
Koushik
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 5:56 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Koushik Da
Resending as I didn't see the mail on dev list.
> -Original Message-
> From: Koushik Das
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 6:37 PM
> To: Chiradeep Vittal; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Manan Shah
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco AS
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 5:56 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Koushik Das
> Cc: Manan Shah
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStack
>
> - It might be better to support
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 10:12 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to invite the CloudStack community t
the deployment model section and added HV limitation (Vmware only
feature)
- Also updated the API section with parameter details.
Comments/feedback?
Thanks,
Koushik
> -Original Message-----
> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Sears [mailto:chris.x.se...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 2:57 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: VXLAN Support
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> Others can probably give a more detailed answer, but I can tell you that folks
> a
+1 to the idea of staging area.
Each commit should be put in the staging area and on successful build and BVT
run, it would get pushed to master. The staging area should maintain a queue of
all the commits and process them in a sequential manner.
If it is possible to set up all these with the exi
Ideally the upgrade path from any point release like 4.0.x should always run
4.0 to 4.1 upgrade script. This upgrade script should make the changes only if
it is not already present. I came across [1] which shows how to do such checks
but its only applicable for mysql 5 and above. For lower vers
Congrats Radhika!
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 3:28 AM
> To: CloudStack DeveloperList
> Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath
> Subject: New committer: Radhika Puthiyetath
>
> Hi folks:
>
> The Podling Project M
Congrats Sateesh!
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:45 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: New committer: Sateesh Chodapuneedi
>
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache Clo
> On Feb. 25, 2013, 1:30 p.m., Koushik Das wrote:
> > Ship It!
Added to master
commit 6675d2c1a36d0182ff1218375bc896228dd64434
- Koushik
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.o
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9202/#review17039
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On Feb. 23, 2013, 2:05 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9158/#review16836
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On Feb. 18, 2013, 6:44 p.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9157/#review16835
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On Feb. 18, 2013, 5:57 p.m
db/schema-40to410.sql
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Koushik Das
> wrote:
> > Rohit,
> >
> > Currently I see that there are 2 sql files related to upgrade from version A
> to B, for e.g. schema-40to410.sql and schema-40to410-cleanup.sql.
> > 1. What all sho
in 410to420.sql.
-Koushik
> -Original Message-
> From: Sanjay Tripathi
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 5:57 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Koushik Das
> Subject: RE: unable to upgrade database to 4.2.0
>
>
> As a workaround, in Databas
Rohit,
Currently I see that there are 2 sql files related to upgrade from version A to
B, for e.g. schema-40to410.sql and schema-40to410-cleanup.sql.
1. What all should go in the normal one and what all in the -cleanup one? For
e.g. should deleting table metadata go in cleanup script, should del
Cc: Sateesh Chodapuneedi; cloudstack; Koushik Das
Subject: Re: Review Request: PATCH-4 for feature VMware vNetwork Distributed
Virtual Switch support in CloudStack
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9201/
On February 17th, 2013, 2:01 p.m
t;
Put some comment as to why 2 and 3
- Koushik Das
On Feb. 5, 2013, 5:23 a.m., Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. T
prepareNetwork
as you have mentioned in the description?
- Koushik Das
On Feb. 13, 2013, 4:04 a.m., Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apach
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9202/#comment35391>
You are passing the displayName to findVMByInstanceName, should this be the
computed instanceName?
setup/db/db/schema-40to410.sql
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9202/#comment35392>
This feature is no longer part of
For schema changes for features that are not part of 4.1 what is the place to
put the changes.
> -Original Message-
> From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 11:43 PM
> To: Rohit Yadav; Edison Su; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Sheng Yang;
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koushik Das resolved CLOUDSTACK-672.
Resolution: Fixed
> Set VMware cluster max. limit based on HV vers
- Koushik Das
On Jan. 21, 2013, 11:44 a.m., Koushik Das wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koushik Das updated CLOUDSTACK-672:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
> Set VMware cluster
tps://reviews.apache.org/r/9158/#comment35312>
In case of restoreVM can newTemplateId be null even if the user passes UUID
for new template? If possible do you want to continue with restoreVm with
original template or fail the operation
- Koushik Das
On Feb. 7, 2013, 11:32 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala
VM and restoreVM methods
setup/db/db/schema-40to410.sql
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9157/#comment35306>
Fix is not going to 4.1 so this file shouldn't be changed. This should be
moved to something like 41to42.sql
- Koushik Das
On Feb. 6, 2013, 2
tps://reviews.apache.org/r/9158/#comment35305>
What if template is null? The null check that's happening in the 'else'
case should be made for both existing as well as new template
- Koushik Das
On Feb. 7, 2013, 11:32 a.m., Hari
Congrats Likitha!
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 8:07 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: New committer: Likitha Shetty
>
> Hi folks:
>
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache
CloudStack).
> createASA1000vPool(ovf template id, zone, vnmc ip, N, increment,
> threshold) Then as the capacity reaches threshold%, the pool capacity is
> incremented by increment% asynchronously.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 1/21/13 12:46 AM, "Koushik Das" wrote:
>
&
: Alex Huang
> Cc: Abhinandan Prateek; Koushik Das; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Raise cluster size limit to 16 on VMware
>
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:49:39AM -0800, Alex Huang wrote:
> > I've cced Chip in case he knows this was decided alr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koushik Das resolved CLOUDSTACK-446.
Resolution: Fixed
> Host going to alert state, if you are adding already ad
- Koushik Das
On Feb. 5, 2013, 10:46 a.m., Koushik Das wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/7891/
> --
The changes are in review board. I will wait for some more time and if there is
no feedback will rebase and merge to master/4.1.
> -Original Message-
> From: Abhinandan Prateek
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 9:32 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
ost page in MS UI to verify that host status chages to 'Alert'
from 'Up'
After applying the fix follow the same repro steps and verify that the host
status doesn't change to 'Alert'.
Thanks,
Koushik Das
These are all nonoss jars and so need to be copied manually. Refer to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/How+to+build+on+master+branch
for the download location and also if you don't want to build nonoss
components.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailt
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9196/#comment34427>
Not used
vmware-base/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/mo/VirtualSwitchType.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9196/#comment34430>
Make vmwaredvs, nexusdvs, vmwaresvs as constants
- Koushik Das
On Feb. 5, 2013, 5:41 a
t parameter governs that?
- Koushik Das
On Feb. 5, 2013, 5:28 a.m., Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
&g
> On Feb. 1, 2013, 7:10 p.m., Koushik Das wrote:
> > plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/network/VmwareTrafficLabel.java,
> > line 64
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/9189/diff/1/?file=254158#file254158line64>
> >
> > What is the nee
vSwitch/dvSwitch","VLAN ID"
[4] "Name of vSwitch/dvSwitch","VLAN ID","vSwitch Type" - Example:
dvSwitch0,100,vmwaredvs
[5] "Name of vSwitch/dvSwitch",,"vSwitch Type" - Example:
dvSwitch0,,vmwaredvs
The way you are handling n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koushik Das resolved CLOUDSTACK-435.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.2)
4.1.0
ommit ca56e7667c4bd6998c13ee36d6cd43c639be4dd4
- Koushik Das
On Nov. 1, 2012, 6:22 p.m., Koushik Das wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13570173#comment-13570173
]
Koushik Das commented on CLOUDSTACK-435:
Added to master
co
Even after running the MS for 20-30 mins. the memory usage doesn't come down. I
had thought that maybe due to all the dependency injections the initial usage
may be high but looks like that's not the case.
From: Koushik Das
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 6:21 PM
To: clou
ualSwitchMO.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9189/#comment34326>
TODO?
- Koushik Das
On Jan. 31, 2013, 5:21 p.m., Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koushik Das resolved CLOUDSTACK-606.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed to master
commit 77e3aade03b756762d73c0739653d71a85ad8c2d
objections I
am going to add this to master.
- Koushik Das
On Nov. 1, 2012, 6:22 p.m., Koushik Das wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apach
Test plan looks good.
-Koushik
> -Original Message-
> From: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 12:20 AM
> To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org; cloudstack-
> d...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [ACS41][QA] Test plan for S
Thanks everyone.
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 4:13 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: new committer: Koushik Das
>
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC)
instance name. Would it be
possible to provide a list of well defined attributes (for e.g. display name,
account etc.) + fixed suffix.
- Koushik Das
On Jan. 31, 2013, 7:21 p.m., Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati wrote:
>
> ---
>
nd ensure that after
applying the patch and retarting the MSs distribution happens properly.
- Did basic validation in a single MS setup, added multiple hosts in a cluster
and created VMs on them.
Thanks,
Koushik Das
/reviews.apache.org/r/9133/#review15951
---
On Jan. 31, 2013, 9:10 a.m., Koushik Das wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9133/
> ---
ion happens properly.
- Did basic validation in a single MS setup, added multiple hosts in a cluster
and created VMs on them.
Thanks,
Koushik Das
34141>
if newTemplateId id passed there is no need to check old template id.
server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9158/#comment34143>
template id in log message should be correctly chosen based on what is used
- Koushik Das
On J
tps://reviews.apache.org/r/9157/#comment34135>
Why is restoreVMInternal call needed in the RebootVM command?
- Koushik Das
On Jan. 30, 2013, 11:32 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e
tps://reviews.apache.org/r/9157/#comment34129>
There is no need for this file to change, revert the changes
core/src/com/cloud/vm/VMInstanceVO.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9157/#comment34132>
Why is_volatile a property of the vm instance?
- Koushik Das
On Jan. 30, 201
ion happens properly.
- Did basic validation in a single MS setup, added multiple hosts in a cluster
and created VMs on them.
Thanks,
Koushik Das
command and can be executed independent of other commands
- Koushik
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9133/#review15802
---
O
uplication in createHostAndAgent and
createHostAndAgentDeferred but I feel it is better to do the cleanup as part of
a separate commit.
server/src/com/cloud/resource/ResourceManagerImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9133/#comment34110>
fixed
- Koushik Das
On J
> -Original Message-
> From: Ram Ganesh [mailto:ram.gan...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 1:06 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] DeployVirtualMachine userdata enhancements
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: rohityada...@gmail.c
667. Can you send out
separate review request for each? Also as a general rule a commit should
correspond to a single issue only.
-Koushik
- Koushik Das
On Jan. 29, 2013, 5:08 p.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>
> ---
&g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13565362#comment-13565362
]
Koushik Das commented on CLOUDSTACK-606:
Fix shared at h
in a single MS setup, added multiple hosts in a cluster
and created VMs on them.
Thanks,
Koushik Das
; even cluster size > 8 host) is still available ?
No. Looking at the code doesn't look like the backdoor was available earlier as
well.
>
> Thanks
> Prashant Kumar Mishra
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
> Sen
g/r/9041/#review15550
-------
On Jan. 21, 2013, 11:44 a.m., Koushik Das wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/
, January 25, 2013 11:41 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Internal db. id in VM instance/disk names
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:17:10AM +0530, Koushik Das wrote:
> Recently there were changes made in CS to replace internal ids with
> uuid. The reason was to obfusca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koushik Das updated CLOUDSTACK-742:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
> Integrate Cisco ASA 10
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koushik Das updated CLOUDSTACK-743:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
> Integrate Cisco VSG
Recently there were changes made in CS to replace internal ids with uuid. The
reason was to obfuscate the increasing id sequences with something random. But
if you look at the vm instance name format i---VM,
it still has the internal ids in them. Should there be changes in the VM names
as well
The db. entry gets created at install time. These are max. supported values
specific to HV version and won't be editable through API/UI.
-Original Message-
From: Hari Kannan
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 1:24 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Koushik Das
Subject: RE: R
SCUSS] Scaling up CPU and RAM for running VMs
Oh, if it's not already obvious, we're onboard for collaborating on this
feature and can help implement the KVM hypervisor portions. :-)
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13558707#comment-13558707
]
Koushik Das commented on CLOUDSTACK-672:
Posted the review @ h
ao.java 8f4a475
server/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/dao/HypervisorCapabilitiesDaoImpl.java
1a6fb72
setup/db/create-schema.sql 174f53c
setup/db/db/schema-40to410.sql a9d168d
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9041/diff/
Testing
---
Manually verifed the scenarios mentioned above.
T
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koushik Das updated CLOUDSTACK-672:
---
Summary: Set VMware cluster max. limit based on HV version (was: Raise
cluster size
and has an easy northbound API. This would be my preferred solution.
However as of now (NSM v5.0.2), the ASA1000v is not supported.
It may also be the case that using VNMC may be a cheaper (albeit less
supported) option
[1] http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps11636/index.html
On 1/17/13 9:26 PM, "
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koushik Das resolved CLOUDSTACK-803.
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in master with commit
commit
: cloudstack; Koushik Das
Subject: Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-988: HV version must be updated in
hypervisor_version column of host table
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8993/
Is this just for the sake of consistency ? Was something
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koushik Das reopened CLOUDSTACK-988:
resolution reason was incorrect
> HV version must be updated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koushik Das resolved CLOUDSTACK-988.
Resolution: Fixed
> HV version must be updated in hypervisor_version column
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koushik Das resolved CLOUDSTACK-988.
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
committed to master
commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koushik Das resolved CLOUDSTACK-810.
Resolution: Fixed
Added to master with following commit
commit
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:43 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'providing support of optional Public
> IP assignment for EIP with Basic Z
Manan,
Can you answer the questions that Chiradeep has raised?
Chiradeep,
I saw that you have started working on asa/vnmc here
(https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-cloudstack/repo?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/cisco-vnmc-api-integration).
I would like to underst
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556130#comment-13556130
]
Koushik Das commented on CLOUDSTACK-988:
Review @ https://reviews.apache
Posted the review for this https://reviews.apache.org/r/8993/
> -Original Message-
> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:15 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Inconsistent way to store host H
ctly updated in host table for XS and Vmware
Thanks,
Koushik Das
I have updated the patch, can anyone do a review?
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 8:43 PM
> To: Koushik Das; Frank Zhang; CloudStack DeveloperList; 'Chiradeep Vittal';
> Abhinandan Prateek
> Subject: RE: Review R
See inline
> -Original Message-
> From: Sanjay Tripathi [mailto:sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 1:23 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Limit Resources to domain/account
>
> Koushik,
>
> >What is the upgrade story? For e.g
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:45 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of SRX&F5 inline mode support in
> CloudStack from Citrix
>
> +1
>
> On 1
What is the upgrade story? For e.g. say based on the existing VM's for an
account, the total CPU and RAM exceeds the global maximums. What happens in
this case?
Also for CPU number of cores are considered, should speed also be considered?
-Koushik
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Sear
Looks like storage vmotion is not possible for VMs with linked clone. Check
this KB
http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1014249.
This is for 4.x, not sure if the latest version supports it.
-Koushik
> -Original Message-
> From:
components to use and some components
> choose to store the version again that's fine. However, VmWare storing it in
> version is definitely incorrect. That's meant for the version of the resource
> file.
>
> --Alex
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From
Koushik Das created CLOUDSTACK-988:
--
Summary: HV version must be updated in hypervisor_version column
of host table
Key: CLOUDSTACK-988
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-988
ep the Vmware host version details?
>
> Regards,
> Devdeep
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 2:23 PM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Inconsistent w
The 'host' table has a column 'hypervisor_version' but that doesn't get filled
(tried with XS and Vmware). For Vmware the column 'version' is populated with
HV version whereas in case of XS it has CS version appended with some timestamp.
There is another table 'host_details'. For XS saw that ther
ally generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8855/#review15219
-----------
On Jan. 15, 2013, 7:09 a.m., Koushik Das wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an au
able.
Also verified in a debugger that it is read correctly while creating the
directagent thread pool.
Thanks,
Koushik Das
1 - 100 of 241 matches
Mail list logo
