t.org" group.
google groups... yup... says it all.
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate
this messa
> > Complied with by a simple notice on ftp servers, and, funnily
> enough, inside the package you need to open and read before building,
> when was the last time you saw such a notice before downloading httpd,
> or postfix etc
>
> I can't say for sure how the law is interpreted in Australia,
On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 22:22 -0400, Michael Poole wrote:
> Just so people are not left wondering, I have better ways to spend my
> time than to debunk emails that are driven by emotion and ignorance of
> the subject matter(s) at hand.
> ___
> Coder-com ma
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 14:06 +1000, Empus wrote:
> I think you're missing my point.
>
>
No I didn't, thats why I said stand alone servers or networks with
"mandates" ie: it is server policy. or network policy to only ever
accept SSL connections, but, like I also said, it would not work on
large
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 12:36 +1000, Empus wrote:
> I've a huge fan of all things electronic security (working in this
> space for a living) but personally, I see little benefit in SSL
> for IRC, because of the very architecture model.
>
>
>
> Unless you're speaking with another client on the
Howdy,
Is there a way, like a statement in a class or whatever, to ignore the
connection rate rules of 3 every 20?
I've seen instances where it blocks legitimates (NAT's) and if not, can
this be a feature request to enable it in either a class, or maybe like
in a K:
Thoughts?
signature.a
Ignore me :) ... after recompile i needed to remove the ipv4 entries in
port blocks, now all is happy
Thanks for your help Entrope
Cheers
Noel
>
> I rebuilt with " --without-ipv6" that error now disappeared, now I
> get :4400 Address already in use,
> I'm thinking this is a good error b
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 08:10 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 07:20 -0400, Entrope wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > then you can avoid the error by writing the third line as "port =
> > ipv4 4400;".
> >
I rebuilt with " --w
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 16:40 +1000, Holland Rhodes wrote:
> I doubt this has anything to do with the issue, but .int is a valid TLD while
> services.int is not a valid (ie; unresolvable) hostname.
> Might try giving the server a routable host instead of loopback as well.
> But i'm not very smart.
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 07:20 -0400, Entrope wrote:
>
> *** Notice -- error creating socket for irc.server:4400:
> Address family not supported by protocol
>
> Usually this means that you have an OS like FreeBSD that is not
> configured to support IPv6. The block f
Hi,
I have used ircu for a decade, just upgraded our internal server from
its to current.
When I rehash I get
*** Notice -- Noel is rehashing Server config file
*** Notice -- error creating socket for irc.server:4400: Address family
not supported by protocol
If I rehash a few seconds later, I d
11 matches
Mail list logo
