zhongzhijie1 commented on PR #16650:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16650#issuecomment-3038317515
@jerpelea hello
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16675:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16675#discussion_r2186496535
##
libs/libc/machine/arm/armv6-m/arch_mcount.S:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+/
+ * libs/libc
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16677:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16677#discussion_r2186492045
##
drivers/input/touchscreen_upper.c:
##
@@ -149,6 +150,11 @@ static int touch_open(FAR struct file *filep)
filep->f_priv = openpriv;
nxmutex_unlock(&up
xiaoxiang781216 merged PR #16674:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16674
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nu
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 5991a8c4cc xtensa/espressif: Change LEDC imple
hujun260 commented on code in PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#discussion_r2186287186
##
sched/sched/sched_setpriority.c:
##
@@ -259,7 +250,7 @@ static inline void nxsched_running_setpriority(FAR struct
tcb_s *tcb,
#endif
if (nxsched_reprio
hujun260 commented on code in PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#discussion_r2186284177
##
sched/sched/sched_setpriority.c:
##
@@ -259,7 +250,7 @@ static inline void nxsched_running_setpriority(FAR struct
tcb_s *tcb,
#endif
if (nxsched_reprio
hujun260 commented on code in PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#discussion_r2186285968
##
sched/sched/sched_setpriority.c:
##
@@ -231,8 +223,7 @@ static inline void nxsched_running_setpriority(FAR struct
tcb_s *tcb,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
int c
hujun260 commented on code in PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#discussion_r2186284177
##
sched/sched/sched_setpriority.c:
##
@@ -259,7 +250,7 @@ static inline void nxsched_running_setpriority(FAR struct
tcb_s *tcb,
#endif
if (nxsched_reprio
hujun260 commented on code in PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#discussion_r2186284177
##
sched/sched/sched_setpriority.c:
##
@@ -259,7 +250,7 @@ static inline void nxsched_running_setpriority(FAR struct
tcb_s *tcb,
#endif
if (nxsched_reprio
hujun260 commented on code in PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#discussion_r2186284177
##
sched/sched/sched_setpriority.c:
##
@@ -259,7 +250,7 @@ static inline void nxsched_running_setpriority(FAR struct
tcb_s *tcb,
#endif
if (nxsched_reprio
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch asf-site
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx-website.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/asf-site by this push:
new 70fdee160 Publishing web: 0c4cf72
JianyuWang0623 opened a new pull request, #16677:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16677
## Summary
Add mirror/swap support for touchscreen, update drivers/input/ft5x06 and
enable touchscreen for "lckfb-szpi-esp32s3:lvgl".
1. driver/touchscreen: Add support for mirror/swap coo
acassis commented on PR #16662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16662#issuecomment-3037032619
> I'm trying to get my hands on a S3-Box, should have one soon so I can test
this. Please hold this PR for now.
I think this error will happen in any ESP32-S3 board using the USB
S
fdcavalcanti opened a new pull request, #16676:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16676
## Summary
- arch/risc-v: set SCL timeout for esp_i2c.c
- boards/risc-v: fix config for SPI and I2C drivers
This PR fixes a condition where the I2C clock would timeout due to low
fdcavalcanti commented on PR #16662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16662#issuecomment-3036992421
I'm trying to get my hands on a S3-Box, should have one soon so I can test
this. Please hold this PR for now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respon
Gary-Hobson commented on issue #16655:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16655#issuecomment-3036821465
@sumpfralle This is due to some incompatible instructions in armv6m. You can
try adding this PR to your code.
https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16675
Since I don't ha
Gary-Hobson opened a new pull request, #16675:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16675
## Summary
libc/mcount: add armv6m mcount implementation
armv6m does not support the complete Thumb-2 instruction set, resulting in
compilation errors
CC: dirent/lib_alphasort.c m
eren-terzioglu opened a new pull request, #16674:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16674
## Summary
PWM (LEDC) was not working properly due to miscalculation of clock
internals. This PR fixes this issue and enables another features of PWM(LEDC)
like clock selection, clock divisi
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#discussion_r2185684622
##
sched/sched/sched_setpriority.c:
##
@@ -223,29 +230,30 @@ static inline void nxsched_running_setpriority(FAR struct
tcb_s *tcb,
/* A context switch will
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#discussion_r2185684622
##
sched/sched/sched_setpriority.c:
##
@@ -223,29 +230,30 @@ static inline void nxsched_running_setpriority(FAR struct
tcb_s *tcb,
/* A context switch will
JorgeGzm commented on PR #3120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3120#issuecomment-3036635060
I followed the qemu-armv8a board tutorial to set up the build environment:
https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/platforms/arm64/qemu/boards/qemu-armv8a/index.html
# Compi
jasonbu commented on issue #16655:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16655#issuecomment-3036622244
@Gary-Hobson please review this issue
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
acassis commented on PR #16662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16662#issuecomment-3036560159
@jiayadong8995 maybe the crash is happening because you are calling
usbserial write before the USB serial is enabled. I think it could happen when
CONFIG_DEBUG is enabled
--
This is an
acassis commented on code in PR #16662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16662#discussion_r2185546254
##
arch/xtensa/src/esp32s3/esp32s3_serial.c:
##
@@ -1223,6 +1226,7 @@ void up_putc(int ch)
#ifdef CONSOLE_UART
esp32s3_lowputc_restore_all_uart_int(CONSOLE_DEV.priv
tmedicci commented on PR #16662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16662#issuecomment-3036552032
We are testing internally...
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
acassis commented on PR #16671:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16671#issuecomment-3036522155
Added #needs_more_testing because it could have side effects that we don't
know it.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
acassis merged PR #16672:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16672
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apac
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
acassis pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 886718ade1 xtensa: support more than 32 cpu inte
jlaitine commented on PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#issuecomment-3036474072
> In principle, we should not determine whether other cores are in the
sched_lock state, because this state is not fixed and can change at any time.
Instead, we should modify some global
tmedicci commented on PR #16672:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16672#issuecomment-3036459234
> Please don't merge it yet. We are running internal testing.
Internal testing passed successfully!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
cederom commented on code in PR #16665:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16665#discussion_r2185471114
##
Documentation/applications/examples/xedge/index.rst:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+``Xedge`` a lightweight Lua-based web framework for building secure, real-time
IoT applic
cederom commented on code in PR #16665:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16665#discussion_r2185474525
##
Documentation/platforms/arm64/qemu/boards/qemu-armv8a/index.rst:
##
@@ -299,6 +299,70 @@ Running with QEMU + hvf on M1/MacBook Pro (macOS 12.6.1)
-mon chardev=
cederom commented on code in PR #16665:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16665#discussion_r2185471114
##
Documentation/applications/examples/xedge/index.rst:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+``Xedge`` a lightweight Lua-based web framework for building secure, real-time
IoT applic
cederom commented on PR #3120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3120#issuecomment-3036400714
Yup :-) GCC 14.2 AARCH64 needs to be used :-)
```
% ./tools/configure.sh -B qemu-armv8a:xedge
% gmake -j24 CROSSDEV=aarch64-none-elf-
(..)
Register: ping
Register:
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#discussion_r2185451688
##
sched/sched/sched_addreadytorun.c:
##
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ bool nxsched_add_readytorun(FAR struct tcb_s *btcb)
* situation.
*/
- if (nxsched_islocked_tcb(
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#discussion_r2185450555
##
sched/sched/sched_setpriority.c:
##
@@ -231,8 +223,7 @@ static inline void nxsched_running_setpriority(FAR struct
tcb_s *tcb,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
int c
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#discussion_r2185449179
##
sched/sched/sched_setpriority.c:
##
@@ -259,7 +250,7 @@ static inline void nxsched_running_setpriority(FAR struct
tcb_s *tcb,
#endif
if (nxsched_reprio
cederom commented on PR #3120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3120#issuecomment-3036348494
Hmm I have this build error on FreeBSD, any hints welcome :-)
```
% ./tools/configure.sh -B qemu-armv8a:xedge
% gmake -j24 CROSSDEV=aarch64-none-elf-
(..)
done
Regi
cederom commented on code in PR #16665:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16665#discussion_r2185428343
##
Documentation/applications/examples/xedge/index.rst:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+``Xedge`` a lightweight Lua-based web framework for building secure, real-time
IoT applic
acassis commented on issue #16655:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16655#issuecomment-3036249422
@anchao @jasonbu any idea?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specifi
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#discussion_r2185295638
##
sched/sched/sched_mergepending.c:
##
@@ -190,96 +190,90 @@ bool nxsched_merge_pending(void)
{
FAR struct tcb_s *rtcb;
FAR struct tcb_s *ptcb;
- FAR struct t
acassis commented on code in PR #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/1#discussion_r2185322071
##
arch/sim/src/sim/posix/sim_errno.c:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,336 @@
+/
+ * arch/sim/src/sim/posix/si
acassis commented on PR #16665:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16665#issuecomment-3036186139
@JorgeGzm please also include this printscreen in the Documentation, this
way user will see what to expect from this example
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
acassis commented on PR #16665:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16665#issuecomment-3036179991
@JorgeGzm please split this commit in documentation: and boards/qemu:
commits to make it easy to be tracked in the Release Notes during the Release
phase
--
This is an automated messag
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#discussion_r2185295638
##
sched/sched/sched_mergepending.c:
##
@@ -190,96 +190,90 @@ bool nxsched_merge_pending(void)
{
FAR struct tcb_s *rtcb;
FAR struct tcb_s *ptcb;
- FAR struct t
JorgeGzm commented on PR #3120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3120#issuecomment-3036139279
@xiaoxiang781216 Could you check if there's anything else that needs to be
fixed.
In the PR https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16665 I added an example of
how to use xedge wi
acassis commented on code in PR #3120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3120#discussion_r2185285286
##
examples/xedge/Kconfig:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+#
+# Xedge IoT Toolkit - NuttX Kconfig integration
+#
+# Xedge is an embedded software toolkit designed to enable hig
hujun260 commented on PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#issuecomment-3036131751
In principle, we should not determine whether other cores are in the
sched_lock state, because this state is not fixed and can change at any time.
Instead, we should modify some global o
tmedicci commented on code in PR #16672:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16672#discussion_r2185237536
##
arch/xtensa/src/common/xtensa_int_handlers.S:
##
@@ -219,7 +321,7 @@ _xtensa_level1_handler:
* area in a2.
*/
- dispatch_c_isr 1 XCHAL_IN
hujun260 commented on code in PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#discussion_r2185251309
##
sched/sched/sched_addreadytorun.c:
##
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ bool nxsched_add_readytorun(FAR struct tcb_s *btcb)
* situation.
*/
- if (nxsched_islocked_tcb(
hujun260 commented on code in PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#discussion_r2185242444
##
sched/sched/sched_addreadytorun.c:
##
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ bool nxsched_add_readytorun(FAR struct tcb_s *btcb)
* situation.
*/
- if (nxsched_islocked_tcb(
tmedicci commented on code in PR #16672:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16672#discussion_r2185237536
##
arch/xtensa/src/common/xtensa_int_handlers.S:
##
@@ -219,7 +321,7 @@ _xtensa_level1_handler:
* area in a2.
*/
- dispatch_c_isr 1 XCHAL_IN
hujun260 commented on code in PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#discussion_r2185217336
##
sched/sched/sched_setpriority.c:
##
@@ -231,8 +223,7 @@ static inline void nxsched_running_setpriority(FAR struct
tcb_s *tcb,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
int c
hujun260 commented on code in PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#discussion_r2185205538
##
sched/sched/sched_setpriority.c:
##
@@ -259,7 +250,7 @@ static inline void nxsched_running_setpriority(FAR struct
tcb_s *tcb,
#endif
if (nxsched_reprio
jasonbu commented on code in PR #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/1#discussion_r2185203130
##
arch/sim/src/sim/win/sim_errno.c:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+/
+ * arch/sim/src/sim/win/sim_err
TimJTi commented on PR #3119:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3119#issuecomment-3035914031
> If the new PR doesn't have the build break, your change is fine
Sorry - I hadn't properly rebased by branch to latest upstream so it had a
mix of upstream/master and my own chan
jlaitine commented on PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#issuecomment-3035898054
I realized that sched_mergepending didn't re-check the minimum priority
after every loop. So added that...
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to th
Javinator9889 commented on PR #13413:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/13413#issuecomment-3035561745
> > > I have the feeling this is breaking the mqueues under certain
conditions - for example, heavy load. We were using NuttX 12.1.0 and we've
updated to 12.9.0. We've reached a sit
Javinator9889 commented on PR #13413:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/13413#issuecomment-3035420379
I don't have a detailed backtrace of the deadlock - sorry. I was checking
with `ps` on NSH and found that the producer thread was stuck on `MQNOTFULL`
and the consumer was on `MQNOT
GUIDINGLI commented on PR #13413:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/13413#issuecomment-3035423487
> > I have the feeling this is breaking the mqueues under certain conditions
- for example, heavy load. We were using NuttX 12.1.0 and we've updated to
12.9.0. We've reached a situation
GUIDINGLI commented on PR #13413:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/13413#issuecomment-3035410289
> I have the feeling this is breaking the mqueues under certain conditions -
for example, heavy load. We were using NuttX 12.1.0 and we've updated to
12.9.0. We've reached a situation w
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new b2158c8e3c arch/arm/stm32f0l0g0/adc: move ADC_
xiaoxiang781216 merged PR #16670:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16670
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nu
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/1#discussion_r2184938694
##
arch/sim/src/sim/win/sim_errno.c:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+/
+ * arch/sim/src/sim/win
xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #13413:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/13413#issuecomment-3035295859
@GUIDINGLI could you look at this problem.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above t
jlaitine opened a new pull request, #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673
## Summary
This fixes scheduling issues found in both code review and testing. The main
issues started with nxsched_addreadytorun putting tasks to the pending list on
wrong basis; basically ch
Javinator9889 commented on PR #13413:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/13413#issuecomment-3035103660
I have the feeling this is breaking the mqueues under certain conditions -
for example, heavy load. We were using NuttX 12.1.0 and we've updated to
12.9.0. We've reached a situation
chirping78 opened a new pull request, #16672:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16672
## Summary
The architecture defines maximum of 128 interrupts, whereas previous code
only supported 32 interrupts. For every 32 interrupts added, there are three
additional registers: `INTE
raiden00pl commented on code in PR #16670:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16670#discussion_r2184573694
##
arch/arm/src/stm32f0l0g0/Kconfig:
##
@@ -3596,6 +3596,18 @@ config STM32F0L0G0_ADC1_RESOLUTION
---help---
ADC1 resolution. 0 - 12 bit, 1 -
70 matches
Mail list logo
