Michael Davey wrote:
I will have a UMLinux test machine available in a couple of days.
Please give me
a shout if you want to test the image on another machine, or if you
need any other
help.
I do have a uml now running with the following configuration:
1) UML Kernel:
Hello everybody!
I don't know if it is usual to address the developers in this manner, but I
saw no other chance on getting in touch.
I have read about this bug in the bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24204
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24204 !
That
Thank you Eric ! I noticed you reintroduced a subset() method in the
CompositeConfiguration class, why was this necessary ? I tried to remove
it and all test cases still pass successfully.
Emmanuel Bourg
Eric Pugh wrote:
Applied! Can you review..
Eric
One of the classes that Oliver Heger is responsible was failing.. Maybe
this bug: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27427...
If you want to try removing it again, send me a patch, and I'll try it as
well and if it passes with out subset on both, then let's apply.. I saw
the bug
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25830.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27193.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Err this looks like the bug list for FOP and not Jakarta Commons ;)
Emmanuel Bourg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
|
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27775.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Yes the constructors with a default configuration have been removed to
promote the use of the CompositeConfiguration class instead. I still
think we could have left them though ;)
I don't know why the configure(Configuration conf) method to initialize
a configuration is missing but i'd support
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27730.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27686.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Is there any way to tweak the performance of the jakarta commons file
upload? I'm using it right now but the performance is really slow. Has
anyone else seen issues similar to this?
Thank,
David G. Tabion
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Hi,
It would help your cause if you posted a profile of the CPU time used,
showing that FileUpload was the bottleneck and where specifically it is.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: David G. Tabion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 22,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27775.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
+1 (although, I think you all know my opinion that we should be just
using the SNAPSHOT version for development).
On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 22:41, Al Chou wrote:
--- Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any objections to changing project.xml to point to Collections 3.0?
Sounds OK to me, as
On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 22:40, Al Chou wrote:
--- Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to propose the following repackaging of classes in the stat
and distributions packages.
1. Move the univariate statistical aggregates (DescriptiveStatistics,
SummaryStatistics et al)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27775.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
True,
I think, if developers are actually producing Applets, they have a
tendency to optimize them as much as possible, even un-jaring and
re-wrapping all the classes they are dependent on and eliminating the
classes they never use from the dependency jars. In the case of such
re-wrapping
And yes, maven has this option and its defaulted to true, we should
add it to our build.properties so that jars are not compressed.
maven.jar.compress
-Mark
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 12:06, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
True,
I think, if developers are actually producing Applets, they have a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27853.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27853.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27853.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Err this looks like the bug list for FOP and not Jakarta Commons ;)
Next week's should be right. It seems that every once in a while, one
project gets the wrong report.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
I cannot say that I am in favor of this change for several reasons.
(1) No performance benchmarks. This sounds like a thought
optimization.
(2) If the classes do take some amount of time T longer load, so what?
Context is what matters, for instance, for the example I know best, my
company's app
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27813.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I think this patch will fix the issue for [configuration].
Emmanuel Bourg
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
A bug was reported against [collections] ExtendedProperties
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27737
I found that the input stream created in the constructor was not closed. I
just
Here are the diff files for validator_1_0.dtd,
org.apache.commons.validator.FormSet and
org.apache.commons.validator.Form. I have also done the tests. Should I
include them as plain text or attach them? The test would be a
validation.xml file and the TestCase.
I didn't follow exactly the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27856.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Greetings All
I have been corresponding with Stephen regarding some design decisions
being made in [convert]. I'd like to make a couple of pugnacious
declarations and hope that ensuing discussion generates good ideas and
consensus.
I'll first state my beliefs, then I'll try to justify them
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27857.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I like all those suggestions a lot. Your use cases are very convincing
(probably b/c they're from a real live app!)
What do you think of the ConversionFactory.getMatchPercent method? This
seems inappropriate for an interface to me. This seems like it belongs in
an implementation of
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27858.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello all,
I've integrated a number of codec patches this weekend, including a
partial integration of the patch mentioned below an in progress ticket.
Code reviews and comments welcomed.
See the Bugzilla tickets:
In progress:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27781
Base64
--- Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 22:40, Al Chou wrote:
--- Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[deletia]
4. Similarly, I would like to create an inference or test subpackage
and put TestStatistic there.
+1 I wonder if there's a better name than
RB Don't know if the images made it to the list, so you'd better get
RB http://www.rblasch.org/convert/convert-docs.zip
A snapshot of my prototype is also available at
http://www.rblasch.org/convert/convert-proto2.zip
SC The complex conversions involving Type I didn't manage to grok, but
LA 1) The actual conversion logic should be implemented in small chunks,
LA inside the most primitive, bare code-container, interface :
LA public interface Conversion {
LA public Object convert(Object value) throws Exception;
LA }
I agree that the interface should be small, but I am not
Dear [convert] Members and Contributors
As discussed, Goldman Sachs has allowed me to release the core of my
conversion
framework under Apache License 2.0. Goldman Sachs has already signed Apache
Foundation's Contributor License Agreement as part of an earlier
contribution
to HttpClient.
I've
You may need to attach code to a Bugzilla request (select Commons then
Sandbox, prefix by [convert]). Or make available by a link.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: Legostaev, Andrei [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear [convert] Members and Contributors
As discussed, Goldman Sachs has allowed me
LA public interface Conversion {
LA public Object convert(Object value) throws Exception;
LA }
RB I am not too sure about the Exception. Throw-everything forces
RB the caller to Catch-everything. Maybe a more specific Exception,
RB like ConversionFailedException, is sufficient.
Stephen
My apologies for the previous message that got stripped of its
attachment and chopped to pieces by the ill-tempered mailing
list robot.
Please find the source compressed in Windows and UNIX flavours
here (with thanks to Mr Reeve):
www.adamreeve.com/jakarta/convert3.zip
skitching2004/03/22 23:07:54
Modified:digester/src/java/org/apache/commons/digester Digester.java
Log:
Make createSAXException methods public, so Rule classes
(like PluginCreateRule) can call them.
Revision ChangesPath
1.97 +4 -4
skitching2004/03/22 23:11:00
Modified:digester/src/java/org/apache/commons/digester/plugins
PluginCreateRule.java PluginRules.java
Log:
Significant changes to simplify design. There is now effectively a
stack of Rules objects; entering the scope of a plugin
Hi,
I am attempting to use the httpClient component to authenticate on a
proxy which uses NTLM authentication.
I have managed to use it successfully, but only when I explicitly
provide the data for the NTCredentials for the
HttpClient.getState().setProxyCredentials().
In JDK 1.4.2, if I use
Hello Brian,
JDK for Windows uses Windows specific code to get the
user's login credentials. HttpClient does not use Windows
specific code, hence you're out of luck.
You could analyse what the JDK does and replicate that
in your application. But I guess you'd have to write native
code to access
Hi Eric,
Reusing the MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager is definitely the way to
go. As Roland mentions reusing HttpClient instances might help
performance, but it is not necessary.
Mike
On Mar 22, 2004, at 2:01 AM, Eric Bloch wrote:
I'm happy to change my code but have a version of my
45 matches
Mail list logo
