[IO] [PROPOSAL] reader writer

2004-12-27 Thread Nishant Kumar
Hi, I have a small proposal. Usage scenario is as follows. One generates a char array of data using some process and then immediately this is consumed by another process. There are two ways of doing the same now. 1. Use a CharArrayWriter to accumulate the data generated in the first

Re: commons-logging auto-detection WAS: [logging] Enterprise

2004-12-27 Thread Henning P. Schmiedehausen
Ceki =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FClc=FC?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Log4j is slowly migrating to a model where there will be only a single log4j.jar installed per Application Server. This single copy will be installed under the ./common/lib or ./lib/ directories. See [1, 2, 3] for further details. This

Re: commons-logging auto-detection WAS: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-27 Thread Henning P. Schmiedehausen
Charles Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: -Original Message- From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2004 11:24 AM To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: commons-logging auto-detection WAS: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

Re: commons-logging auto-detection WAS: [logging] Enterprise

2004-12-27 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 09:55 AM 12/27/2004, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: Ceki =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FClc=FC?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Log4j is slowly migrating to a model where there will be only a single log4j.jar installed per Application Server. This single copy will be installed under the ./common/lib or ./lib/

RE: commons-logging auto-detection WAS: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-27 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 03:05 AM 12/27/2004, Charles Daniels wrote: If I understand the JCL discovery mechanism correctly, it actually should work just fine in the scenario you describe above. For it to work, you would not set the org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory system property, because, as you pointed out,

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/cli/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli2 CLITestCase.java

2004-12-27 Thread roxspring
roxspring2004/12/27 03:55:12 Modified:cli/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli2 CLITestCase.java Log: CLITestCase is now abstract to stop eclipse 3.1 complaining about it having no tests Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +1 -1

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/cli/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli LongOptionWithShort.java ArgumentIsOptionTest.java

2004-12-27 Thread roxspring
roxspring2004/12/27 04:42:38 Modified:cli/src/java/org/apache/commons/cli PosixParser.java Added: cli/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli LongOptionWithShort.java ArgumentIsOptionTest.java Log: Stops the PosixParser from bursting options unecessarily,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32525] - [cli] Parser breaks up command line parms into single characters

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32525. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/cli/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli ArgumentIsOptionTest.java

2004-12-27 Thread roxspring
roxspring2004/12/27 05:11:39 Modified:cli/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli2/jdepend JDependTest.java cli/src/java/org/apache/commons/cli Parser.java cli/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli2 CommandLineTestCase.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25044] - [cli] Error parsing option arguments

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25044. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/cli/src/java/org/apache/commons/cli Parser.java

2004-12-27 Thread roxspring
roxspring2004/12/27 05:21:17 Modified:cli/src/java/org/apache/commons/cli Parser.java Log: Recommitted with the fix applied not commented out (whoops) PR: 25044 Revision ChangesPath 1.17 +2 -3 jakarta-commons/cli/src/java/org/apache/commons/cli/Parser.java

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/cli/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli BugsTest.java

2004-12-27 Thread roxspring
roxspring2004/12/27 05:33:48 Modified:cli/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli BugsTest.java Log: Added test to demonstrate the 27635 has been fixed PR: 27635 Revision ChangesPath 1.20 +69 -0 jakarta-commons/cli/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli/BugsTest.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27635] - [cli] Only long options without short option seems to be noticed

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27635. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23515] - [cli] Really strange parsing behaviour

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23515. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32533] - [cli] CLI2 Group Parser skips arguments

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32533. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/cli/src/java/org/apache/commons/cli Parser.java

2004-12-27 Thread roxspring
roxspring2004/12/27 06:35:36 Modified:cli/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli BugsTest.java cli/src/java/org/apache/commons/cli Parser.java Log: When extracting option values from properties, options with a single argument can now be processed successfully. BR:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31148] - [cli] Passing properties in Parser does not work for options with a single argument

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31148. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/cli/src/java/org/apache/commons/cli HelpFormatter.java

2004-12-27 Thread roxspring
roxspring2004/12/27 06:51:38 Modified:cli/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli BugsTest.java cli/src/java/org/apache/commons/cli HelpFormatter.java Log: Line separator as first char for helpformatter footer and header no longer throws exception BR: 21215

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21215] - [cli] Line separator as first char for helpformatter (footer) throws exception

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21215. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25044] - [cli] Error parsing option arguments

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25044. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/cli/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli BugsTest.java

2004-12-27 Thread roxspring
roxspring2004/12/27 07:25:53 Modified:cli/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli BugsTest.java Log: Added test to demonstrate fix of 19383 BR: 19383 Revision ChangesPath 1.23 +18 -0 jakarta-commons/cli/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli/BugsTest.java Index:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19383] - [cli] Missing arguments in HelpFormatter.renderOptions(..)

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19383. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17662] - [cli] Unknown options are ignored instead of throwing UnrecognizedOptionException

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17662. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25018] - [cli] CommandLine getArgList() serves no options but args, only

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25018. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24045] - [cli] CommandLine state can be written to Properties

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24045. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24040] - [cli] Per option Triggers

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24040. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24039] - [cli] Factored out help for common groups

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24039. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21304] - [cli] Broken link report (13 404s)

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21304. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: commons-logging auto-detection WAS: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-27 Thread Martin Cooper
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 12:49:45 +0100, Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 03:05 AM 12/27/2004, Charles Daniels wrote: If I understand the JCL discovery mechanism correctly, it actually should work just fine in the scenario you describe above. For it to work, you would not set the

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/cli/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli2 DocumentationTest.java

2004-12-27 Thread roxspring
roxspring2004/12/27 09:41:28 Modified:cli/xdocs/examples ant.xml cli/src/test/org/apache/commons/cli2 DocumentationTest.java Log: Documented ant example Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +266 -1jakarta-commons/cli/xdocs/examples/ant.xml Index:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31464] - [cli] CLI cant parse ANT option set as claimed in official usage guide

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31464. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31284] - [cli] CLI does not support long parameter names on command-line.

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31284. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/cli/xdocs/examples index.xml

2004-12-27 Thread roxspring
roxspring2004/12/27 10:17:06 Modified:cli/xdocs/examples index.xml Log: Added examples overview documentation Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +14 -1 jakarta-commons/cli/xdocs/examples/index.xml Index: index.xml

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32851] New: - copyProperties and null/empty values.

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32851. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: commons-logging auto-detection WAS: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-27 Thread Richard Sitze
Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/27/2004 05:49:45 AM: At 03:05 AM 12/27/2004, Charles Daniels wrote: If I understand the JCL discovery mechanism correctly, it actually should work just fine in the scenario you describe above. For it to work, you would not set the

Re: commons-logging auto-detection WAS: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-27 Thread Richard Sitze
Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/27/2004 02:57:45 AM: Charles Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: -Original Message- From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2004 11:24 AM To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24039] - [cli] Factored out help for common groups

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24039. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24040] - [cli] Per option Triggers

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24040. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24045] - [cli] CommandLine state can be written to Properties

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24045. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: commons-logging auto-detection WAS: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-27 Thread Martin Cooper
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 12:41:56 -0600, Richard Sitze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/27/2004 05:49:45 AM: At 03:05 AM 12/27/2004, Charles Daniels wrote: If I understand the JCL discovery mechanism correctly, it actually should work just fine in the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31151] - [cli] Setting description of a Option

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31151. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32533] - [cli] CLI2 Group Parser skips arguments

2004-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32533. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: commons-logging auto-detection WAS: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-27 Thread Matt Sgarlata
Ceki Gülcü wrote: At 03:05 AM 12/27/2004, Charles Daniels wrote: If I understand the JCL discovery mechanism correctly, it actually should work just fine in the scenario you describe above. For it to work, you would not set the org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory system property, because, as

Re: commons-logging auto-detection WAS: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-27 Thread Richard Sitze
Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/27/2004 01:07:28 PM: On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 12:41:56 -0600, Richard Sitze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/27/2004 05:49:45 AM: At 03:05 AM 12/27/2004, Charles Daniels wrote: If I understand the JCL

Distributions to include dependencies?

2004-12-27 Thread Henri Yandell
Not a huge issue for things like Lang which have no dependencies, but for other things like Digester I think it would be a lot better if the binary tar.gz contained the jars it depends on? So when I download digester-1.6, the tar.gz contains jars for logging-1.0.3 and beanutils-1.7. We're not

Re: Distributions to include dependencies?

2004-12-27 Thread Phil Steitz
Henri Yandell wrote: Not a huge issue for things like Lang which have no dependencies, but for other things like Digester I think it would be a lot better if the binary tar.gz contained the jars it depends on? Just my HO, but to me that defeats the purpose of ibiblio/java-repository. It also

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/cli project.properties

2004-12-27 Thread roxspring
roxspring2004/12/27 14:22:02 Modified:cli project.properties Log: Force 1.3 compatibility even when compiling under 5.0 Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +5 -0 jakarta-commons/cli/project.properties Index: project.properties

Re: Distributions to include dependencies?

2004-12-27 Thread Henri Yandell
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 15:14:36 -0500, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: Not a huge issue for things like Lang which have no dependencies, but for other things like Digester I think it would be a lot better if the binary tar.gz contained the jars it depends on? Just

Re: Distributions to include dependencies?

2004-12-27 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
I am with Henri here... Oliver On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:36:02 -0500, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 15:14:36 -0500, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: Not a huge issue for things like Lang which have no dependencies, but for other things

Re: Distributions to include dependencies?

2004-12-27 Thread Phil Steitz
Henri Yandell wrote: On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 15:14:36 -0500, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: Not a huge issue for things like Lang which have no dependencies, but for other things like Digester I think it would be a lot better if the binary tar.gz contained the jars it

Re: commons-logging auto-detection WAS: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-27 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Matt, JCL exists mainly for the purpose of libraries wishing to *integrate* with the logging API chosen by the user by deferring the selection of the logging impl to runtime. The author of library net.sf.morph probably does *not* wish to impose any logging related property on the end-user.

Re: Distributions to include dependencies?

2004-12-27 Thread David Graham
It would certainly be helpful to our users to include the dependencies in the distro. Otherwise, it's like trying to drive a car without the wheels. David --- Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not a huge issue for things like Lang which have no dependencies, but for other things like

Re: Distributions to include dependencies?

2004-12-27 Thread Steven Caswell
I'm +1 to Henri's idea for this reason: When I'm using a package that requires other jars, I typically install the package on my development platform way ahead of the time when I'll be running maven. On some projects I never even run maven on the development box. Having the dependent jars as

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-27 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 2004-12-16 16:51:31, Richard Sitze wrote: I do not advocate a fail-on-no-config or fail-on-ambiguous-config. I advocate a *warn* or *error* on either, using the simple default logger. The warning will be visible on the console, which suffices for my immediate concerns. How that

Re: Distributions to include dependencies?

2004-12-27 Thread Martin Cooper
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:38:03 -0500, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not a huge issue for things like Lang which have no dependencies, but for other things like Digester I think it would be a lot better if the binary tar.gz contained the jars it depends on? So when I download

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-27 Thread Ceki Gülcü
On 2004-12-16 18:09:36, Richard Sitze wrote: ok, without going back to review exactly what I said in an earlier note, I had in mind something like: commons-logging-core.jar - core interface factory class, NO config commons-logging.jar- core + all helpers, NO config

Re: commons-logging auto-detection WAS: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-27 Thread Matt Sgarlata
I think often JCL will be used as you describe, but not always. For example, let's say I am developing a component that monitors database activity and monitors usage statistics (this is a hypothetical example). The main purpose of this component is to log messages to be processed later by a

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/jelly/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly/util TagUtils.java

2004-12-27 Thread polx
polx2004/12/27 17:39:23 Modified:jelly/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly/impl StaticTagScript.java TagScript.java jelly/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly JellyContext.java

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/jelly/src/test/org/apache/commons/jelly/core BaseMemoryLeakTest.java

2004-12-27 Thread polx
polx2004/12/27 17:46:36 Modified:jelly/src/test/org/apache/commons/jelly/core BaseMemoryLeakTest.java Log: The tagHolderMap size was reported way too often... paul Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +5 -5

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/jelly/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly/util TagUtils.java

2004-12-27 Thread Brett Porter
The test is failing for me. Is that to be expected? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: polx2004/12/27 17:39:23 Modified:jelly/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly/impl StaticTagScript.java TagScript.java jelly/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly JellyContext.java

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/jelly/jelly-tags/xml project.xml

2004-12-27 Thread brett
brett 2004/12/27 17:59:41 Modified:jellyproject.xml jelly/jelly-tags/xml project.xml Log: bump version Revision ChangesPath 1.158 +1 -1 jakarta-commons/jelly/project.xml Index: project.xml

[jelly] failure since RC1

2004-12-27 Thread Brett Porter
I just updated the Jelly dependency on Maven's CVS HEAD from beta-4 (which I verified as working) to the latest and got a failure. Going back, I found the same problem with Jelly RC1. The call to output.flush() currently on line 242 of TagScript.java is throwing a NullPointerException. Any

Re: [jelly] failure since RC1

2004-12-27 Thread Brett Porter
It appears the call to output.flush() was added and output was always null. I've added an if(output !=null) around the flush call - can someone let me know if this isn't a valid state and requires further investigation. THanks, Brett Brett Porter wrote: I just updated the Jelly dependency on

Re: Distributions to include dependencies?

2004-12-27 Thread Henri Yandell
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 15:48:00 -0800, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not me. Doing this will lead to people having multiple copies of various component jars lying around on their disks, and will unnecessarily increase the amount of stuff that people need to download. Definitely

Re: [CLI] Status

2004-12-27 Thread David Morris
Rob, Thanks for applying all of the patches and getting CLI into shape. I will supply a test case for 32533. I have been working on an XMLBuilder that uses an XML document to describe Options, Arguements, and Groups. Hopefully it will be useful to CLI. While working on this I found that not all

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/jelly/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly/impl TagScript.java

2004-12-27 Thread brett
brett 2004/12/27 20:07:34 Modified:jelly/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly/impl TagScript.java Log: allow output to be null Revision ChangesPath 1.48 +4 -2 jakarta-commons/jelly/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly/impl/TagScript.java Index: TagScript.java

Re: [jelly] failure since RC1

2004-12-27 Thread Dion Gillard
This seems fine. On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 13:48:22 +1100, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It appears the call to output.flush() was added and output was always null. I've added an if(output !=null) around the flush call - can someone let me know if this isn't a valid state and requires