DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33347] New: - Allow logging additional fields to database

2005-02-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33347. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33347] - [logging] Allow logging additional fields to database

2005-02-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33347. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[jelly] x:set null pointer exception

2005-02-02 Thread Brett Porter
Hi Paul, The issue I was having was a null pointer exception resulting from running the following: x:parse var=navXML xml= / x:set var=nav value=$navXML/body / I think in the past, this used to set nav to null (presumably because navXML was an empty document, where now it is a null document?)

[GUMP@brutus]: Project commons-id (in module jakarta-commons-sandbox) failed

2005-02-02 Thread Adam Jack
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects

[GUMP@brutus]: Project commons-jelly-tags-util (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-02-02 Thread commons-jelly-tags-util development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-util has an issue affecting its community integration. This

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33352] New: - add collection modifiers feature to PropertyUtilsBean.

2005-02-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33352. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33353] New: - add collection modifiers feature to PropertyUtilsBean.

2005-02-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33353. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33352] - [beanutils] add collection modifiers feature to PropertyUtilsBean

2005-02-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33352. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33353] - add collection modifiers feature to PropertyUtilsBean.

2005-02-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33353. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33353] - [beanutils] add collection modifiers feature to PropertyUtilsBean

2005-02-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33353. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33353] - [beanutils] add collection modifiers feature to PropertyUtilsBean

2005-02-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33353. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33352] - [beanutils] add collection modifiers feature to PropertyUtilsBean

2005-02-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33352. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33347] - [logging] Allow logging additional fields to database

2005-02-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33347. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [resources] complete class diagram

2005-02-02 Thread James Mitchell
This fails for me. If you would like us to include this in the docs, you could open an enhancement ticket and attach the file. That would also give your diagrams more visibility. Thanks. -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx -

Re: [jelly] x:set null pointer exception

2005-02-02 Thread Paul Libbrecht
I fear this used to be treated as exception eater. More precisely: it throwed if it could not parse the xpath. But it just gave null if there were some other exceptions... So the easy thing would probably be to return null if there was an exception at evaluating XPath... (I think this is what

Re: [resources] complete class diagram

2005-02-02 Thread Anaximandro (Woody)
enhancement ticket? I dono if I really understand this ... Well, lets go If anyone needs the model (rose) send me a note. Woody - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [digester] initial code for Digester2.0

2005-02-02 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:28:04 +1300, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 15:04 +1300, Sharples, Colin wrote: - Why is Action an abstract class? So that we can later add new functionality to Action without breaking custom Action subclasses that users have

Re: [digester] initial code for Digester2.0

2005-02-02 Thread Reid Pinchback
One section of the release notes says: The Digester now *always* uses a namespace-aware xml parser. I was wondering why this is. There are a lot of XML parsers out there, and some of them have done things like trade namespace awareness for performance. If somebody has a application where

Re: [digester] initial code for Digester2.0

2005-02-02 Thread Reid Pinchback
--- Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:28:04 +1300, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My major concern is that if we are going to warn people not to implement the Action interface, then what really is the point of providing it in the first place? As I

Re: [digester] initial code for Digester2.0

2005-02-02 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 14:48:42 +1300, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Wouldn't it be possible (and even desirable) to have a more general Pattern class instead of a String in Digester#addRule? Can you explain more? Well, RuleManager is an abstract class (discussion abstract class vs.

Re: [vfs] proposal: FileUtils

2005-02-02 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hello! Sorry for being late, but I have had an appointment day with one of our customers. public abstract class Backup implements IOOperation { protected Backup(final FuPolicy policy) { And two implementations: public class NoBackup extends Backup { public class SimpleBackup extends Backup

svn commit: r149515 - in jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/trunk: RELEASE-NOTES.txt build.xml project.xml

2005-02-02 Thread ozeigermann
Author: ozeigermann Date: Wed Feb 2 06:45:55 2005 New Revision: 149515 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=149515 Log: Prepared 1.1b2 Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.txt jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/trunk/build.xml

Re: [vfs] proposal: FileUtils

2005-02-02 Thread Mario Ivankovits
What do you think, if the commands do not chain the next command, but if they create a Undo-Command which will be put on a stack and - in case of an exception can be processed to rollback all commands. I havent though about it in every detail, but if it is possible it is easier to handle - and

Re: [vfs] proposal: FileUtils

2005-02-02 Thread B. K. Oxley (binkley)
Mario Ivankovits wrote: In pseudo code: UndoStack tx = new UndoStack(); try { Backup(tx, ...) Copy(tx, ...) Move(tx, ...) } catch (Exception) { tx.rollback(); - process undo-stack } This looks ok. I still prefer each command to handle it's own cleanup (try/catch/finally in part existing for

Re: [vfs] proposal: FileUtils

2005-02-02 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hello! I'm curious what you find out about Commons Transactions. When I looked it over, it seemd to me designed with primitives for us to use to make our own transactions. I missed any ready-to-use code for this purpose. I wonder how much overlap there is with java.util.concurrent in the

svn commit: r149517 - in jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/trunk: build.xml project.xml

2005-02-02 Thread ozeigermann
Author: ozeigermann Date: Wed Feb 2 07:12:35 2005 New Revision: 149517 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=149517 Log: Added new test Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/trunk/build.xml jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/trunk/project.xml Modified:

Re: [vfs] proposal: FileUtils

2005-02-02 Thread B. K. Oxley (binkley)
Mario Ivankovits wrote: JDK5: Dont forget, our target is jdk1.3 (even if I use 1.5 since it is out) You cant imagine how fast the first user shouted after I used (by mistake) a jdk 1.4 method. JDK 1.3!? I had no earthly idea. -

[vfs] temporary files

2005-02-02 Thread B. K. Oxley (binkley)
What's the right way to make a temporary file with VFS? I need some for unit tests. For the nonce I did this: FileObject createTemporary() { // Using JDK UUID generator -- is this JDK1.3-compiant? final FileObject tmp = VFS.getManager().resolveFile( tmp:/ +

svn commit: r149519 - jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/tags/TRANSACTION_1_1_B2_RELEASE

2005-02-02 Thread ozeigermann
Author: ozeigermann Date: Wed Feb 2 07:23:20 2005 New Revision: 149519 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=149519 Log: Tagging as 1.1b2 Added: jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/tags/TRANSACTION_1_1_B2_RELEASE/ - copied from r149518,

svn commit: r149521 - jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/trunk/project.xml

2005-02-02 Thread ozeigermann
Author: ozeigermann Date: Wed Feb 2 07:31:50 2005 New Revision: 149521 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=149521 Log: Added missing end tag Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/trunk/project.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/trunk/project.xml URL:

svn commit: r149522 - jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/trunk/project.xml

2005-02-02 Thread ozeigermann
Author: ozeigermann Date: Wed Feb 2 07:35:16 2005 New Revision: 149522 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=149522 Log: *really* added missing end tag Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/trunk/project.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/trunk/project.xml

svn commit: r149523 - jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/tags/TRANSACTION_1_1_B2_RELEASE/trunk

2005-02-02 Thread ozeigermann
Author: ozeigermann Date: Wed Feb 2 07:35:55 2005 New Revision: 149523 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=149523 Log: Tagging as 1.1b2 Added: jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/tags/TRANSACTION_1_1_B2_RELEASE/trunk/ - copied from r149522,

[transaction][VOTE] Release 1.1b2

2005-02-02 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
Dear community, after the first commons transaction 1.1 beta release - some bugs partially found by OJB committer Armin Waibel have been fixed, - some tests partially taken over from OJB have been added, and - tests on a multi processor machine have been successfully performed This seems to be

[svn][ot] How to move a tag?

2005-02-02 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
Folks, sorry, this is a bit OT, but I am struggeling how to move a tag in SVN. Any hints? Thanks in advance, Oliver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33364] New: - FastDateFormat analog for DecimalFormat

2005-02-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33364. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [transaction][VOTE] Release 1.1b2

2005-02-02 Thread Stefan Lützkendorf
+1, Stefan Oliver Zeigermann wrote: Dear community, after the first commons transaction 1.1 beta release - some bugs partially found by OJB committer Armin Waibel have been fixed, - some tests partially taken over from OJB have been added, and - tests on a multi processor machine have been

Re: [vfs] temporary files

2005-02-02 Thread Mario Ivankovits
B. K. Oxley (binkley) wrote: What's the right way to make a temporary file with VFS? I need some for unit tests. For the nonce I did this: FileObject createTemporary() { // Using JDK UUID generator -- is this JDK1.3-compiant? final FileObject tmp = VFS.getManager().resolveFile(

[resources] todo

2005-02-02 Thread agodinhost
There is anyone working on Unit Tests for Property Resources or Unit Tests for Abstract Classess tasks? Woody - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [vfs] temporary files

2005-02-02 Thread B. K. Oxley (binkley)
Mario Ivankovits wrote: But this has several drawbacks, among them: * No automatic cleanup on exit as with File.deleteOnExit() Yes - and in my opinion thats ok so. If you run VFS in an WebApp environment the next exit might be very long in the future. And even then, if the jvm crashes or is

Re: [vfs] temporary files

2005-02-02 Thread Mario Ivankovits
B. K. Oxley (binkley) wrote: Hmmm, but why dont you use the new RamFS ;-) Yah, yah. Not there yet. :-) But this is a good point. :-) I just wanted to underline the great possibilities. Have you run across any good tree implementations? (I don't, of course, mean TreeMap.) Dont know what you

svn commit: r149546 - in jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk: project.xml src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient/ssl/SimpleSSLSocketFactory.java src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient/ssl/SimpleSSLTestProtocolSocketFactory.java

2005-02-02 Thread olegk
Author: olegk Date: Wed Feb 2 10:51:25 2005 New Revision: 149546 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=149546 Log: Fixed the problem with the test server keytstore. Special thanks to Brett Porter brett -at- apache.org Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/project.xml

Re: svn commit: r149154 - jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient/ssl/SimpleSSLSocketFactory.java jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient/ssl/SimpleSSLTestProtocolSocketFactory.java

2005-02-02 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Brett, Unfortunately this doesn't help. The trouble is that junit resource files do not seem to be copied to HOME/target/test-classes/ If you declare the resources inside your unit test element they should be: unitTest includes ... /includes resources resource

Re: [resources] todo

2005-02-02 Thread James Mitchell
What would like to know? -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 1:34 PM Subject: [resources] todo There is anyone

Re: [svn][ot] How to move a tag?

2005-02-02 Thread Brett Porter
You mean retag a file that has already been tagged? You can probably copy with history again. If that doesn't work, it's probably a matter of essentially merging the changes since the file was tagged. Remember, svn doesn't really tag anything and there is nothing magic about the trunk,

Re: [resources] todo

2005-02-02 Thread agodinhost
I can help in this tasks (and a little in documentation, with diagrams and so on). Can I? Woody What would like to know? James Mitchell There is anyone working on Unit Tests for Property Resources or Unit Tests for Abstract Classess tasks?

Re: [resources] todo

2005-02-02 Thread James Mitchell
You are welcome to take a look at it. The Resources project is pretty much complete and simply waiting for integration into Struts (and potentially other) projects. For Struts integration, it won't be much longer. -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc.

svn commit: r151054 - in jakarta/commons/sandbox/feedparser/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/feedparser: MetaFeedParserListener.java example/HelloFeedParser.java sax/RSSFeedParser.java

2005-02-02 Thread burton
Author: burton Date: Wed Feb 2 13:00:54 2005 New Revision: 151054 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=151054 Log: example of how to include date info in a parser Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/feedparser/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/feedparser/MetaFeedParserListener.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33167] - [dbcp] Individual connection close method

2005-02-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33167. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33167] - [dbcp] Individual connection close method

2005-02-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33167. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [resources] complete class diagram

2005-02-02 Thread Dirk Verbeeck
I think James wants an enhancement issue in bugzilla with the file attached. -- Dirk Anaximandro (Woody) wrote: enhancement ticket? I dono if I really understand this ... Well, lets go If anyone needs the model (rose) send me a note. Woody

Re: [vfs] proposal: FileUtils

2005-02-02 Thread Mario Ivankovits
B. K. Oxley (binkley) wrote: I'm curious what you find out about Commons Transactions. When I looked it over, it seemd to me designed with primitives for us to use to make our own transactions. I missed any ready-to-use code for this purpose. After 2 hours of copy/paste their

svn commit: r151071 - jakarta/commons/proper/chain/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/chain/generic/DispatchCommand.java

2005-02-02 Thread jmitchell
Author: jmitchell Date: Wed Feb 2 14:17:52 2005 New Revision: 151071 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=151071 Log: remove used import Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/chain/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/chain/generic/DispatchCommand.java Modified:

Re: [digester] initial code for Digester2.0

2005-02-02 Thread Simon Kitching
Hi Oliver, On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 15:22 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 14:48:42 +1300, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Wouldn't it be possible (and even desirable) to have a more general Pattern class instead of a String in Digester#addRule? Can you explain

RE: [digester] initial code for Digester2.0

2005-02-02 Thread Sharples, Colin
My major concern is that if we are going to warn people not to implement the Action interface, then what really is the point of providing it in the first place? As I said above, I just cannot think of any situation where a class would want to be an Action *and* extend some other class.

Re: [digester] initial code for Digester2.0

2005-02-02 Thread Simon Kitching
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 06:04 -0800, Reid Pinchback wrote: --- Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:28:04 +1300, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My major concern is that if we are going to warn people not to implement the Action interface, then

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33377] New: - A bug in BeanPointer::asPath()

2005-02-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33377. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [resources] complete class diagram

2005-02-02 Thread Anaximandro (Woody)
Ohh, Know I understand ... Sorry. I will post this today. I think James wants an enhancement issue in bugzilla with the file attached. -- Dirk Anaximandro (Woody) wrote: enhancement ticket? I dono if I really understand this ... Well, lets go If anyone needs the model

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33379] New: - Class diagram

2005-02-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33379. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33379] - Class diagram

2005-02-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33379. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [svn][ot] How to move a tag?

2005-02-02 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
Yes, that's what I was trying. However, merging the new stuff in generated a new trunk inside the tag (which seems to be just like a branch). Isn't there anything similiar to CVS moving a tag? Thanks anyway :) Oliver On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 06:32:26 +1100, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [digester] initial code for Digester2.0

2005-02-02 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:39:01 +1300, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was also wondering, there may be occasions where it is desirable to have the full body *including tags* passed in a call back. This would mostly apply in mixed context tags where text is mixed with style

VOTE: FeedParser move to Commons Proper...

2005-02-02 Thread Kevin A. Burton
Subject: Hey gang. I'd like to propose that we move FeedParser into commons proper. The main personal requirement for this is that I want to do a 0.5 release for my CodeCon talk on the FeedParser on Feb 11. http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/feedparser/ We've been in the sandbox for 11

Re: [svn][ot] How to move a tag?

2005-02-02 Thread Simon Kitching
Hi Oliver, I don't quite understand what you are trying to do. I hope the following helps (though I'm not an SVN guru, so others might correct this). Normally CVS tags are simply used to mark a set of files so that you can retrieve that same set later. In this case, the equivalent in subversion

[Jakarta Commons Wiki] Updated: FeedParser/HelpingDevel

2005-02-02 Thread commons-dev
Date: 2005-02-02T18:16:00 Editor: KevinBurton Wiki: Jakarta Commons Wiki Page: FeedParser/HelpingDevel URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/FeedParser/HelpingDevel no comment Change Log: -- @@

Re: [transaction][VOTE] Release 1.1b2

2005-02-02 Thread James Mason
Looks good. +1 -James On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 17:03 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: Dear community, after the first commons transaction 1.1 beta release - some bugs partially found by OJB committer Armin Waibel have been fixed, - some tests partially taken over from OJB have been added,

svn commit: r151102 - in jakarta/commons/sandbox/feedparser/trunk: build.xml src/java/org/apache/commons/feedparser/example/HelloFeedParser.java xdocs/index.xml

2005-02-02 Thread burton
Author: burton Date: Wed Feb 2 18:23:27 2005 New Revision: 151102 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=151102 Log: dox for a more advanced feedparser. Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/feedparser/trunk/build.xml

Re: [digester] initial code for Digester2.0

2005-02-02 Thread Simon Kitching
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 02:11 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:39:01 +1300, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was also wondering, there may be occasions where it is desirable to have the full body *including tags* passed in a call back. This would mostly

svn commit: r151107 - in jakarta/commons/sandbox/feedparser/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/feedparser: DefaultFeedParserListener.java MetaFeedParser.java impl/DebugFeedParserListener.java

2005-02-02 Thread burton
Author: burton Date: Wed Feb 2 18:50:39 2005 New Revision: 151107 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=151107 Log: support for new onAuthor methods Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/feedparser/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/feedparser/DefaultFeedParserListener.java

svn commit: r151108 - jakarta/commons/sandbox/feedparser/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/feedparser/DefaultFeedParserListener.java

2005-02-02 Thread burton
Author: burton Date: Wed Feb 2 18:51:34 2005 New Revision: 151108 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=151108 Log: more javadoc... Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/feedparser/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/feedparser/DefaultFeedParserListener.java Modified:

Re: VOTE: FeedParser move to Commons Proper...

2005-02-02 Thread Dion Gillard
I'm +1 on the promotion. On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:54:11 -0800, Kevin A. Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Subject: Hey gang. I'd like to propose that we move FeedParser into commons proper. The main personal requirement for this is that I want to do a 0.5 release for my CodeCon talk on

Re: [digester] initial code for Digester2.0

2005-02-02 Thread Simon Kitching
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 05:48 -0800, Reid Pinchback wrote: One section of the release notes says: The Digester now *always* uses a namespace-aware xml parser. I was wondering why this is. There are a lot of XML parsers out there, and some of them have done things like trade namespace

Re: [lang] new method on ClassUtils

2005-02-02 Thread Henri Yandell
Potential problem with the forName is bad issue, we already have a method using forName: convertClassNamesToClasses which turns a List of String into a List of Class using forName. So, a) this seems to be a problem? b) I'd like to point it at the new forName method (or however that gets

Re: [digester] initial code for Digester2.0

2005-02-02 Thread Reid Pinchback
--- Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Supporting namespaces in an xml parser seems very simple to me. I think it much more likely that only antique and unmaintained parsers fail to support namespaces. And people who are determined to use antique and unmaintained parsers can just stick

Re: [digester] initial code for Digester2.0

2005-02-02 Thread Simon Kitching
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 20:45 -0800, Reid Pinchback wrote: --- Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Supporting namespaces in an xml parser seems very simple to me. I think it much more likely that only antique and unmaintained parsers fail to support namespaces. And people who are