On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 03:39 +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote:
I am also a struts committer.
Excellent! So would you be willing to do your struts development with
the latest beanutils in your path rather than the 1.7 release?
If you could do that, then just your regular runs of the unit tests
should
No problem doing both of these. Once its at the point of doing a
development build, we can also ask on the struts user list for prople to
test it out.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 7:11 AM
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 03:39
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23815.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35091.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23815.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 5/25/05, Rory Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
Actually, I'm not a Discovery developer at all, I added my name to the
project.xml file (as Robert and Davinum did) so we could push out a release.
I have created a distribution release, however, I cannot push this to the
site
On 5/21/05, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They look a bit like something I do on Joda-Time, and vaguely similar to
[collections].
The basic idea is to link the latest version javadoc to a known fixed
URL. To achieve this, each releases javadoc must be uploaded in a
directory
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34819.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not having SSH access seems a bit of a problem as a release manager.
Updating the site, uploading the distributions all seem quite
important components :)
Indeed. Nothing I can do about it right now, unfortunately.
Take a look at the Lang release. I
Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not having SSH access seems a bit of a problem as a release manager.
Updating the site, uploading the distributions all seem quite
important components :)
Indeed. Nothing I can do about it right now, unfortunately.
Take a look at the Lang release. I
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki
for change notification.
The following page has been changed by rodrigolopes:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/MathWishList
Author: olegk
Date: Thu May 26 11:21:14 2005
New Revision: 178662
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178662view=rev
Log:
PR #34961 (HttpClient does not correctly handle escaped characters in HTTP
header elements)
Contributed by Oleg Kalnichevski
Reviewed by Ortwin Glck
Added:
Author: olegk
Date: Thu May 26 11:30:31 2005
New Revision: 178663
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178663view=rev
Log:
PR #34961
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/release_notes.txt
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/release_notes.txt
URL:
Author: olegk
Date: Thu May 26 11:31:15 2005
New Revision: 178664
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178664view=rev
Log:
Fixed a typo
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/release_notes.txt
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/release_notes.txt
URL:
Author: skitching
Date: Thu May 26 13:40:34 2005
New Revision: 178678
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178678view=rev
Log:
Fix accidental use of java1.5 method.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/digester/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/digester/SetNestedPropertiesRuleTestCase.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34819.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32420.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi John,
First off, thanks for the time and effort you guys have put into the port.
Having joined Chris recently on the Collections15 port, I understand the
work that
is required to get this done.
Some comments and thoughts below.
Our approach was to shoot for supporting generics in the
I take the silence, aside from Max that is, to mean there is no interest
from the Commons dev community for this proposal?
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
On Wed, May 25, 2005 1:53 pm, Frank W. Zammetti said:
That sounds
You might want to read this email thread:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-commons-devm=111231929725398w=2
Regards,
Simon
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 18:47 -0400, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
I take the
That's cool Simon, thank you for the reference. I did not see that
thread when it was live.
Can you, or anyone else, tell us where the Web Commons project is, if
anywhere? I don't see it in the sandbox, so I assume that means it
never got off the ground? It's only been a bit over a month
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35095.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 5/26/05, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You might want to read this email thread:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-commons-devm=111231929725398w=2
That is in fact why I have not responded until now. As can be seen
from that thread, I volunteered to sound out the Taglibs
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34819.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32590.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Well, you are in a position to drive such a thing where I am not, so I
will keep an interested eye on how it goes... I will have some code to
contribute when it gets going.
I would also propose that what is currently in the Servlet package in
the sandbox probably makes sense in a Web Commons
That is so very odd. I'm at a loss to explain it. I don't have access to a
system with JDK 1.3 so I'm not able to try it. Maybe someone else can try?
One thing I did find I needed to do was to change th junit version in
default.properties from 3.7 to 3.8.1. Gary, could you try making this
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 17:35 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
Hi All,
I'd like to propose that we do a release 1.7 of Digester.
I'm willing to act as release manager for this.
Well, there hasn't been much response on this! So far:
dion +1
PLEASE take a little time for this, otherwise a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32859.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi:
I found possible solution. With 1.3.1, if I set fork to false, the test
is found and run. Weird.
Gary
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 5:06 PM
To: Gary Gregory
Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Author: ggregory
Date: Thu May 26 17:42:00 2005
New Revision: 178721
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178721view=rev
Log:
Refactor unit test fork attribute in a default.properties property named
test.fork, default is true, as in the build.xml file.
Modified:
As a minor clean up facilitating debugging, I've refactored the unit
test fork attribute in a default.properties property named test.fork,
the default is true, as in the build.xml file.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005
Hi,
with lang/trunk:
maven clean test works for me with java1.5 on linux
ant clean dist-build-2.1 test works for me with java1.5 on linux
with the contents of file commons-lang-2.1-RC6a-src.tar.gz:
maven clean test works for me with java1.5 on linux
ant clean dist-build-2.1 test works for
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32859.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Glad you found it.
On 5/26/05, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi:
I found possible solution. With 1.3.1, if I set *fork* to *false*, the
test is found and run. Weird.
Gary
--
*From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:*
Simon,
Thanks for the tests. Glad to hear 1.5 is clean.
I found the same errors with the DateUtilsTest and I've got a fix ready to
check in. I was waiting until we resolved these other issues.
There is a tag for RC6 but not for the RC6a because I built it from the head
and from a couple of
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32859.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: dfs
Date: Thu May 26 19:00:13 2005
New Revision: 178726
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178726view=rev
Log:
Backed out change made in r161466 in response to issue #32859,
effectively reverting to r155429. The patch from the issue
reporter has no effect other than to break
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32859.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Well, it is not a real solution, just a data point in finding out what
is wrong. I'll keep looking tomorrow.
Gary
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 6:02 PM
To: Gary Gregory
Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35096.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35096.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 20:05 -0400, Steven Caswell wrote:
That is so very odd. I'm at a loss to explain it. I don't have access to a
system with JDK 1.3 so I'm not able to try it. Maybe someone else can try?
I've also tried building with JDK1.2.2 on linux.
I got this as part of the output
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35097.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35097.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35097.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35096.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34819.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello Steven and All:
Here is a fix for build problems on Sun Java 1.3.1 and 1.2.2.
Instead of using this odd way of invoking unit tests:
target name=test.lang depends=compile.tests
echo message=Running lang package tests .../
java classname=${test.runner} fork=${test.fork}
49 matches
Mail list logo
