Hi!
I would like to know how to deal with versions of dependend libraries.
Naturally VFS do have a bunch of dependencies, some of them are actively
developed.
As far as I know a non-backward compatible change in the public api
requires a n.0 release where
x.0 = current release
x+1.0 =
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34020.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: skitching
Date: Tue Jun 7 23:31:58 2005
New Revision: 189535
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189535view=rev
Log:
Replace use of static Log objects with instance or local variables.
It isn't safe to use static Log objects in code that might be deployed
via a shared classloader as
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34886.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: skitching
Date: Tue Jun 7 23:59:50 2005
New Revision: 189540
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189540view=rev
Log:
Add comments re:
* use of static variable safe in shared classloader
* memory leak possible on webapp undeploy
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34824.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34568.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: skitching
Date: Wed Jun 8 00:36:21 2005
New Revision: 189542
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189542view=rev
Log:
Disable the MemoryTest unit test, as it fails and there is no known solution.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/project.xml
Modified:
Author: skitching
Date: Wed Jun 8 00:38:39 2005
New Revision: 189544
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189544view=rev
Log:
Make private model variables final, as they are never modified within this
class and cannot be accessed outside it. This also makes it clear that these
static variables
Author: skitching
Date: Wed Jun 8 00:37:10 2005
New Revision: 189543
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189543view=rev
Log:
Make a private variable final.
Add some comments.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils/BeanUtils.java
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35262.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: brett
Date: Wed Jun 8 01:01:27 2005
New Revision: 189548
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189548view=rev
Log:
getting ready for core release
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/tag-project.xml
jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/project.properties
Author: brett
Date: Wed Jun 8 01:02:25 2005
New Revision: 189549
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189549view=rev
Log:
[maven-scm-plugin] prepare release 1.0-RC2
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/project.xml
jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/xdocs/changes.xml
Modified:
Author: brett
Date: Wed Jun 8 01:02:52 2005
New Revision: 189550
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189550view=rev
Log:
[maven-scm] copy for tag commons-jelly-1.0-RC2
Added:
jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/tags/commons-jelly-1.0-RC2/
- copied from r170904,
Author: brett
Date: Wed Jun 8 01:11:12 2005
New Revision: 189552
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189552view=rev
Log:
[maven-scm] copy for tag commons-jelly-tags-xml-1.1
Added:
jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/tags/commons-jelly-tags-xml-1.1/
- copied from r189544,
Author: brett
Date: Wed Jun 8 01:19:47 2005
New Revision: 189553
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189553view=rev
Log:
update to ant 1.6.5
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/ant/project.xml
jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/ant/xdocs/changes.xml
Author: brett
Date: Wed Jun 8 01:20:13 2005
New Revision: 189554
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189554view=rev
Log:
[maven-scm-plugin] prepare release 1.1
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/ant/project.xml
Author: brett
Date: Wed Jun 8 01:20:22 2005
New Revision: 189555
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189555view=rev
Log:
[maven-scm] copy for tag commons-jelly-tags-ant-1.1
Added:
jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/tags/commons-jelly-tags-ant-1.1/
- copied from r189552,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35253.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35260.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: brett
Date: Wed Jun 8 01:11:03 2005
New Revision: 189551
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189551view=rev
Log:
[maven-scm-plugin] prepare release 1.1
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/xml/project.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35262.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Done, and sites published. Will wait a few hours for it all to propagate
- so will send a single announcement out tomorrow morning. If anyone
else would like to in the mean time, feel free.
- - Brett
Brett Porter wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Is any
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35263.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: skitching
Date: Wed Jun 8 02:16:14 2005
New Revision: 189563
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189563view=rev
Log:
Added comment re potential memory leak, and safety when using shared
classloader.
Modified:
Author: skitching
Date: Wed Jun 8 02:17:09 2005
New Revision: 189564
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189564view=rev
Log:
Added comment only.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils/PropertyUtils.java
Modified:
Umm.. Brent, did you follow the official procedure for creating this
release?
I don't remember seeing any VOTE thread on this, and it is definitely
*not* permitted to perform a release without an official VOTE thread
having been passed. There's a whole lot of other stuff that is certainly
I don't see any problem with keeping the change. I agree that a new RC isn't
necessary (we've done this a couple of times already on doc changes).
On 6/7/05, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just committed a change to fix the javadoc of StopWatch. This is
a javadoc only
I generally like small classes with few methods, but a significant exception
to that is utility classes. In this case I prefer the kind of thing we've
done with StringUtils. That way, when there is string manipulation to be
done, I know exactly where to go to look, without having to drag out
Author: skitching
Date: Wed Jun 8 03:52:15 2005
New Revision: 189571
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189571view=rev
Log:
Fix PUBLIC NON-FINAL member of this class The member really should be
final, and there is no reason for it to be anything other than private.
Note that this
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35260.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I like the idea of these methods being in a class which specializes in
cloning. I think it will make it more obvious where to look. If a person
wants to find a method which will help them clone their objects, where would
they naturally look? If there is no CloneUtils, they might look in
Author: skitching
Date: Wed Jun 8 04:26:36 2005
New Revision: 189573
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189573view=rev
Log:
Added comments only.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils/MethodUtils.java
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34568.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35267.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34568.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: skitching
Date: Wed Jun 8 05:21:03 2005
New Revision: 189576
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189576view=rev
Log:
Removed invalid comment.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils/ConvertUtilsBean.java
Modified:
On 6/6/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first public release candidate (RC3) for Betwixt 0.6.1 is now
available for download:
http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-betwixt/. Please check and
report any problems ASAP.
I was wondering why you only increase the lowest
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34568.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Am I wrong or do I have to implement
protected String[] doListChildren()
throws Exception
{
throw new Exception(Not implemented.);
}
in HttpFileObject in order make this work?
final FileSystemManager fsManager = VFS.getManager();
final FileObject base =
Torsten Curdt wrote:
Am I wrong or do I have to implement
protected String[] doListChildren()
No you are not wrong if you really would like to spider a http server.
Even if the webserver presents you a directory listing its a html page
which needs to be parsed.
There were people
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35260.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34457.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35260.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Has anyone gotten FTPS (FTP over SSL) working using commons-net? If so,
can you share your experience?
Sample code would be most helpful.
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Scott Dudley
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 21:20 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
Umm.. Brent, did you follow the official procedure for creating this
release?
I don't remember seeing any VOTE thread on this, and it is definitely
*not* permitted to perform a release without an official VOTE thread
having been
Author: rdonkin
Date: Wed Jun 8 13:24:39 2005
New Revision: 189633
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189633view=rev
Log:
Fixes for documentation. Thanks to Simon Kitching.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/branches/RELEASE_0_6_1_BRANCH/xdocs/faq.xml
Author: rdonkin
Date: Wed Jun 8 13:36:17 2005
New Revision: 189635
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189635view=rev
Log:
Added information about upgraded dependencies. Thanks to Simon Kitching.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/branches/RELEASE_0_6_1_BRANCH/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Author: rdonkin
Date: Wed Jun 8 14:09:43 2005
New Revision: 189639
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189639view=rev
Log:
Fixed problem with break iterator (and improved sense at the same time). Thanks
to Simon Kitching.
Modified:
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 18:46 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 22:35 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
The first public release candidate (RC3) for Betwixt 0.6.1 is now
available for download:
http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-betwixt/. Please check and
report
Author: rdonkin
Date: Wed Jun 8 14:41:24 2005
New Revision: 189645
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189645view=rev
Log:
Replaced deprecated target
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/branches/RELEASE_0_6_1_BRANCH/maven.xml
Modified:
Author: rdonkin
Date: Wed Jun 8 14:42:02 2005
New Revision: 189646
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189646view=rev
Log:
Added source target. Thanks to Simon Kitching.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/branches/RELEASE_0_6_1_BRANCH/project.properties
Modified:
Author: rdonkin
Date: Wed Jun 8 15:01:09 2005
New Revision: 189652
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189652view=rev
Log:
Added -src suffix to source distribution. Thanks to Simon Kitching.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/branches/RELEASE_0_6_1_BRANCH/maven.xml
Modified:
Ok, there was no formal [VOTE] thread. Apologies.
But There was four +1's about it (Dion, Hans, Brett, and I).
Actually the commit that Brett just did are for RC2 for Jelly-core and
1.1 for xml and ant tag-libs.
Should we then make a vote again ?
I'd rather accept this for this one (as it's
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 22:37 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
snip
=== SRC tarball
The -src download unpacks into a directory which does *not* have -src in
the name. This is the default behaviour of Maven, but not the way that
many other distributions work. I happen to like -src
Author: polx
Date: Wed Jun 8 15:33:57 2005
New Revision: 189663
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189663view=rev
Log:
If Ant taglib is at 1.1, fmt should depend on 1.1
then, not on snapshot anymore.
paul
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/fmt/project.xml
Modified:
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 22:21 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
===
Maven reports:
I would suggest disabling this report. Firstly, a log of the last 30
days isn't of much use. And secondly, due to the import into SVN of
back-dated CVS changes, date-based selection on the apache
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 23:22 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
=== other
The src distro builds fine with Java1.5 on Linux (debian 3.1).
Unfortunately, there are ?? unit test failures when using java 1.3.1:
TEST
Sorry.
I saw square brackets, release and +1's from the jelly developers and
saw that as a green light. My mistake.
I was going to come back and follow the doc to do the distributions and
so on, as I had run out of time last night, but I'll hold off here for now.
Options:
- pull these
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34457.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 6/9/05, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry.
I saw square brackets, release and +1's from the jelly developers and
saw that as a green light. My mistake.
Even though the thread had [proposal], I still took it as a vote for an RC2.
So apologies there from me too.
I was going
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 09:09 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
Sorry.
I saw square brackets, release and +1's from the jelly developers and
saw that as a green light. My mistake.
First, I should point out that all stuff below is *just my personal
opinion*.
The only emails I can find about
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35278.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon,
There is definitely confusion abounds :)
Simon Kitching wrote:
|The only emails I can find about this are here, from oct/nov 2004.
That was for RC1, already distributed as a full release bundle. It was
done at that time, and there have
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35260.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Thought I'd summarise the CSV threads on the user list. Due to the
high level of user activity in those threads, I've mailed this to both
user and dev lists. Interested users should probably hop over to the
dev list at some point as I imagine future threads will consolidate
there.
Basic idea is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In preparation for putting together a formal release candidate, it seems
the current src/bin distribution build only bundles the docs and core
JAR - no additional tag libraries, or the contents of the bin directory.
Any thoughts on what should be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Niklas,
I'm in favour and think commons is the right place to do it. This has
been on the table for a number of years (eg
http://ant.apache.org/ant2/actionlist.html#exec), it's just a matter of
getting some momentum, I think. Personally, I still
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35260.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Sounds good to me. I like the idea that the bin distribution will work
out of the box.
If that means defaulting JELLY_HOME, if unset, to the directory above
bin, that would be great.
On 6/9/05, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In
On 6/8/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Another question is where the code should go. [lang] and [io] have
been suggested, as has a [csv] component. I'll go as far as to say
that [csv] is the direction we should go and see if anybody disagrees
:)
Some sort of CVS utility
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34568.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: tobrien
Date: Wed Jun 8 22:13:15 2005
New Revision: 189708
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189708view=rev
Log:
Minor documentation update to index.xml
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/jexl/trunk/xdocs/index.xml
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jexl/trunk/xdocs/index.xml
URL:
Author: skitching
Date: Wed Jun 8 22:34:54 2005
New Revision: 189712
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189712view=rev
Log:
Add javadoc describing default values for converters and related behaviour.
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32207.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33931.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
76 matches
Mail list logo
