Author: leosutic
Date: Sun Dec 4 01:05:52 2005
New Revision: 353837
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=353837view=rev
Log:
Fixes bug 37691: CATaglet don't work with Javadoc tool of JDK1.5
Javadoc can not be generated with JDK1.5 because in 1.5
there is a new taglet interface
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37691.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
I've posted a version of the Commons website in my ~ which contains a
Dormant section to match the Commons repository (some of the links
are absolute, so if you're clicking through, do make sure you're not
going out to jakarta.apache.org, if that matters):
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Also have a look at http://people.apache.org/~mvdb/contributors.html which was
automatically generated by maven, based on the all the developers sections in
commons-proper.
Mvgr,
Martin
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
I've posted a version of the Commons website in my ~ which contains a
Dormant section
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
Author: mvdb
Date: Sun Dec 4 04:56:24 2005
New Revision: 353847
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=353847view=rev
Log:
Moved none committers to contributors section
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/feedparser/trunk/project.xml
Modified:
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Also have a look at http://people.apache.org/~mvdb/contributors.html
which was automatically generated by maven, based on the all the
developers sections in commons-proper.
Should this be a list of contributers and/or committers?
I ask as the headline talks about
Sorry, thought you were...
Phil
On 12/4/05, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/4/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My attempt to help the next person in line avoid the same confusion
(by updating step 12) is available as 37779 [1].
-Rahul
[1]
Author: oheger
Date: Sun Dec 4 08:41:48 2005
New Revision: 353870
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=353870view=rev
Log:
Fixed javadoc warning
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/configuration/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration/ConfigurationMap.java
Modified:
Rahul is an apache committer who already has commons-sandbox karma and
is interested in contributing to commons proper as well. Let's give
him karma to commons proper. I am not sure if a [vote] is really
needed in this case, but in any case, here is my +1.
Phil
+1
Phil Steitz wrote:
Rahul is an apache committer who already has commons-sandbox karma and
is interested in contributing to commons proper as well. Let's give
him karma to commons proper. I am not sure if a [vote] is really
needed in this case, but in any case, here is my +1.
Phil
--
[X] +1, let him commit!
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1, no, because
-
Stephen
[X] +1, let him commit!
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1, no, because
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/4/05, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have further changes that they'd want to suggest before I
attach the patch? Are we removing the Korean/Japanese translation
links since they're broken/stale? The wiki link will go under General
Information (missed that).
+1 :)
Btw, I'll go ahead and give him the karma this evening, assuming no
-1's. Seems that we should give more than 22 minutes for the vote :)
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hi
--
[X] +1, let him commit!
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1, no, because
Happy committing !!
---
Mario
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Links to maven tickets. Patches welcome!
- crlf fix (sorry for all the noise, will be configurable to just fix
the crlf part)
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPDIST-28 (patched)
- user.name not recognized by the jar plugin
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJAR-50
- incorrect jdk reported
On 12/4/05, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Also have a look at http://people.apache.org/~mvdb/contributors.html
which was automatically generated by maven, based on the all the
developers sections in commons-proper.
Should this be a list of
Author: oheger
Date: Sun Dec 4 09:33:34 2005
New Revision: 353877
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=353877view=rev
Log:
Added missing package.html files, updated existing
Added:
jakarta/commons/proper/configuration/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration/beanutils/package.html
On 12/4/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul is an apache committer who already has commons-sandbox karma and
is interested in contributing to commons proper as well. Let's give
him karma to commons proper. I am not sure if a [vote] is really
needed in this case, but in any case,
--
[X] +1, let him commit!
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1, no, because
-
On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can get multiple jars by creating a multiproject. When it comes
to non-standard contents, again the answer is that if you want it,
probably some others do too, so opening tickets and submitting patches
is the right thing to do. That's how
I'd like to add the work in www.osjava.org's gj-mail to [email] if I may.
It's a small package with two classes that do the following things:
1) Mailer class for easy emailing.
2) Template style emailing; ${foo} etc.
3) MBoxMimeMessage
Now, 1) should be unnecessary, I assume [email] already
On 12/4/05, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can get multiple jars by creating a multiproject. When it comes
to non-standard contents, again the answer is that if you want it,
probably some others do too, so opening tickets and
Author: oheger
Date: Sun Dec 4 10:53:43 2005
New Revision: 353891
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=353891view=rev
Log:
New documentation for building Configuration; updates on navigation
Added:
jakarta/commons/proper/configuration/trunk/xdocs/building.xml (with props)
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37709.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 12/4/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NOTICE.txt still needs to be added explicity as a jar resource, IIRC.
:::sigh::: Never mind. LICENSE.txt is working fine... it's NOTICE.txt
that isn't getting included in the .jar file automatically. Thanks
for the confirmation. :)
--
Wendy
Hi Wendy!
:::sigh::: Never mind. LICENSE.txt is working fine... it's NOTICE.txt
that isn't getting included in the .jar file automatically. Thanks
for the confirmation. :)
I've seen this on the myfaces mailing list a while ago and already
answered how we in commons-dev do this:
snip/
Hi Phil,
I think I am now at a point where I have a maven build, which should satisfy
almost all points noticed by you and other reviewers - except for the line
ending issue. After some documentation improvements I hope I can publish the
(hopefully final) RC3 in some days.
I had a
Henri Yandell wrote:
I turn the navigation off on Maven projects. Can't stand the
project-reports, project-info roll-ups that make it harder to find
javadocs etc.
Hear hear! Javadocs are not a project report for anyone who uses
these sites. This one we can't blame on Maven, though, can we?
Phil Steitz wrote:
Rahul is an apache committer who already has commons-sandbox karma and
is interested in contributing to commons proper as well. Let's give
him karma to commons proper. I am not sure if a [vote] is really
needed in this case, but in any case, here is my +1.
Phil
On 12/4/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
I turn the navigation off on Maven projects. Can't stand the
project-reports, project-info roll-ups that make it harder to find
javadocs etc.
Hear hear! Javadocs are not a project report for anyone who uses
these
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005, Paul Libbrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do i not understand Gump or the fact that we stick Jaxen head is
something that could be changed ?
It could, but one of the main points of Gump is that you don't.
In certain cases we know the HEAD of a project is going to develop
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37711.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
+1
On 12/5/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul is an apache committer who already has commons-sandbox karma and
is interested in contributing to commons proper as well. Let's give
him karma to commons proper. I am not sure if a [vote] is really
needed in this case, but in any
Seems like a reasonable addition.
+1.
On 12/5/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to add the work in www.osjava.org's gj-mail to [email] if I may.
It's a small package with two classes that do the following things:
1) Mailer class for easy emailing.
2) Template style
On 12/4/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, 1.6.
This is sort of what I meant when I said it's harder to do these
releases. How is one supposed to KNOW what versions of these 30 or 40
plugins you have to have in order to build
The Commons Net team announces the release of Commons Net 1.4.1. This
small fix release cleans up ONLY the inadvertently introduced dependency
on JDK 1.4 in commons-net 1.4.0.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Steve Cohen wrote:
The Commons Net team announces the release of Commons Net 1.4.1.
This small fix release cleans up ONLY the inadvertently introduced
dependency on JDK 1.4 in commons-net 1.4.0.
Congratulation!
Thanks!
---
Mario
On 12/4/05, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/4/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, 1.6.
This is sort of what I meant when I said it's harder to do these
releases. How is one supposed to KNOW what versions of
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Will Jelly work against Jaxen 1.1? What are you going to tell your
users who want to combine Jelly and Jaxen and want to use the latest
released version of Jaxen?
Oh, its far worse than that. IIRC, Jelly works with Jaxen 1.1 beta 4.
Jaxen 1.0 will not work, because it is
Dion Gillard wrote:
If we really do *have to have* a specific release of a plugin, it
should be a dependency of the project.
Noone should be forced to remember it.
Worst case, we should provide a link to suggested upgrades and details
about what to expect if you don't.
Which brings me to
Author: scohen
Date: Sun Dec 4 12:34:32 2005
New Revision: 353903
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=353903view=rev
Log:
add the changes for 1.4.1 to the main trunk.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/net/trunk/xdocs/changes.xml
Modified:
Author: scohen
Date: Sun Dec 4 12:40:46 2005
New Revision: 353905
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=353905view=rev
Log:
correct version number
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/net/trunk/build.xml
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/net/trunk/build.xml
URL:
On 12/4/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dion Gillard wrote:
If we really do *have to have* a specific release of a plugin, it
should be a dependency of the project.
Noone should be forced to remember it.
Worst case, we should provide a link to suggested upgrades and
What is the point of marking defects LATER before the release and then
resetting them afterward? I don't see any report on the site that makes
use this information! Nor does it appear that there's any way to query
bugzilla for the particular version I'm interested in commons-net
1.4.1. Why
Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/4/05, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/4/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, 1.6.
This is sort of what I meant when I said it's harder to do these
releases. How is one supposed to KNOW what
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24456.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24539.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26296.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29613.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31108.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32579.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34763.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34778.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35185.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35260.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35338.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35592.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35863.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36249.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36473.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37401.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29415.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37782.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37782.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/4/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is another inaccuracy in the instructions. Step 14 says the
dependencies are listed in STATUS.html. Net, at least doesn't have a
STATUS.html. These seem to be generated from project.xml.
Good point. Patch /
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37783.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37783.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 12/4/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/4/05, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/4/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, 1.6.
This is sort of what I meant when I said it's harder to do these
On 12/4/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/4/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is another inaccuracy in the instructions. Step 14 says the
dependencies are listed in STATUS.html. Net, at least doesn't have a
STATUS.html. These seem to be
Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/4/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
I turn the navigation off on Maven projects. Can't stand the
project-reports, project-info roll-ups that make it harder to find
javadocs etc.
Hear hear! Javadocs are not a project report for anyone
On 12/4/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/4/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
I turn the navigation off on Maven projects. Can't stand the
project-reports, project-info roll-ups that make it harder to find
javadocs etc.
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37713.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37714.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Steve Cohen wrote:
We need to discuss this further.
Mario Ivankovits VFS is a client of Net and he has users still on 1.3
who are complaining that Net 1.4 breaks VFS.
And not only my users constantly complain about it. AFAIK this is also
true for other commons
Please see three responses consolidated in one email below -
On 12/4/05, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
I've posted a version of the Commons website in my ~
snip/
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/
snap/
The Jakarta Commons project is composed of
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 12/4/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/4/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is another inaccuracy in the instructions. Step 14 says the
dependencies are listed in STATUS.html. Net, at least doesn't have a
STATUS.html.
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 12/4/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/4/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
I turn the navigation off on Maven projects. Can't stand the
project-reports, project-info roll-ups that make it harder to
On 12/4/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 12/4/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/4/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
I turn the navigation off on Maven projects. Can't stand the
On 12/4/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/4/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 12/4/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/4/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
I
On 12/4/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 12/4/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/4/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is another inaccuracy in the instructions. Step 14 says the
dependencies are listed in
Steve Cohen wrote:
Not quite so trivial. The commons-io site evidently pushes two sets of
javadocs, one for SVN latest and another for the last official
release. Net only has one and the one it has, although it's location is
named analogously to io's SVN latest, actually points to net's last
On 12/4/05, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Cohen wrote:
Not quite so trivial. The commons-io site evidently pushes two sets of
javadocs, one for SVN latest and another for the last official
release. Net only has one and the one it has, although it's location is
named
Giorgio's propsal/code in zip form are uploaded to:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-concoct.zip
On 12/1/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/1/05, Giorgio Gallo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've read trough the charter and will post a formal proposal as soon as
I get the
Oliver Heger wrote:
snip/
Hi Phil,
I think I am now at a point where I have a maven build, which should satisfy
almost all points noticed by you and other reviewers - except for the line
ending issue. After some documentation improvements I hope I can publish the
(hopefully final) RC3 in
Steve Cohen wrote:
What is the point of marking defects LATER before the release and then
resetting them afterward? I don't see any report on the site that makes
use this information!
Never done it. Should be removed from the docs IMHO.
Nor does it appear that there's any way to query
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37711.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
