Henri Yandell wrote:
I long since stopped using either the src or the binary download. I
get all my commons jars from either ibiblio or my local maven
repository, and I use the online javadoc. :)
Do you not use an IDE?
One of the main IDE advantages that I make use of is the ability to jump
Brett Porter wrote:
Doesn't the source zip required by an IDE usually need to be baed at the
same level as a JAR?
Not for Eclipse. Not sure about other IDEs.
The approach we're taking with Maven is to publish a source JAR (and
Javadoc JAR) that accompanies the binary JAR.
I assume thats
Currently we make available two versions, src and bin.
The src contains all the source code and xdocs. Occaisionaly the jar
file is included (this is a related issue to this email thread).
The bin contains the jar file, and the javadoc.
Yet, whenever I download a commons package I always
+1 I can't remember how many times I forget, and need to go back to
get the source, or the bin.
Alternatively make sure that the SRC distro always contains a
prebuilt jar inside it. That way you either need just the bin
release (lightweight, just the JAR ma'am), or the src with the jar
zip
file and runtime).
Which now that I've written it out matches what you've proposed I see
;-)
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 4:46 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [ALL] Distributing an ide
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 4:46 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [ALL] Distributing an ide version
Currently we make available two versions, src and bin.
The src contains all the source code and xdocs. Occaisionaly the jar
file is included (this is a related issue
it out matches what you've proposed I see
;-)
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 4:46 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [ALL] Distributing an ide version
Currently we make available two
