e why does this thing only
load resources from the system classloader?
From: Maarten Coene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 6/23/2004 5:30 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [configuration] DOM vs DOM4J
And what about donating the code to
AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [configuration] DOM vs DOM4J
Emmanuel Bourg wrote on Tuesday, June 22, 2004 5:06 PM:
Jörg Schaible wrote:
Taking Paul's comment into account, there seems not to be a real
sufficient solution. DOCConfiguration is quite nice for
It'll be in CVS if we come up with a reason to reimplement it...
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 9:19 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [configuration] DOM vs DOM4J
>
&
Emmanuel Bourg wrote on Tuesday, June 22, 2004 5:06 PM:
> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
>> Taking Paul's comment into account, there seems not to be a real
>> sufficient solution. DOCConfiguration is quite nice for JDK >= 1.4,
>> since no additional dependency is generated. Therefore I vote in
>> first
Jörg Schaible wrote:
Taking Paul's comment into account, there seems not to be a real sufficient solution.
DOCConfiguration is quite nice for JDK >= 1.4, since no additional dependency is generated.
Therefore I vote in first place for the DOMConfiguration, but it might be good to have
DOM4JConfi
ric
> -Original Message-
> From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 9:00 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [configuration] DOM vs DOM4J
>
>
> Emmanuel Bourg wrote on Monday, June 21, 2004 8:17 PM:
>
> &
Emmanuel Bourg wrote on Monday, June 21, 2004 8:17 PM:
> Is there a good reason to keep the configurations using DOM4J instead
> of their DOM based equivalent ? If there is no difference
> between the two
> I'm tempted to remove DOM4JConfiguration and
> HierarchicalDOM4JConfiguration (or to move t
On 21-Jun-04, at 20:17 Uhr, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Is there a good reason to keep the configurations using DOM4J instead
of their DOM based equivalent ? If there is no difference between the
two I'm tempted to remove DOM4JConfiguration and
HierarchicalDOM4JConfiguration (or to move them to a cont
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Is there a good reason to keep the configurations using DOM4J instead of
> their DOM based equivalent ? If there is no difference between the two
> I'm tempted to remove DOM4JConfiguration and
> HierarchicalDOM4JConfiguration (or to move them to a contrib directory),
> and
Is there a good reason to keep the configurations using DOM4J instead of
their DOM based equivalent ? If there is no difference between the two
I'm tempted to remove DOM4JConfiguration and
HierarchicalDOM4JConfiguration (or to move them to a contrib directory),
and then merge DOMConfiguration i
10 matches
Mail list logo
