Re: [parent-pom] versions

2007-04-02 Thread Henri Yandell
On 4/1/07, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've noticed that the plugin versions are not specified in the commons parent pom. From my experience this is a *really* bad idea as maven then picks the most recent from local repository. Which again can easily lead to inconsistent site builds

Re: [parent-pom] versions

2007-04-02 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Henri Yandell wrote: Personally I think we should only have the plugins defined if the release jar itself needs them for stability. Otherwise we just deal with whatever pain Maven is throwing everyone's way and yell at them to fix. Er why? It is not our job to be gump and test commons builds

Re: [parent-pom] versions

2007-04-02 Thread Torsten Curdt
On 02.04.2007, at 09:49, Stephen Colebourne wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: Personally I think we should only have the plugins defined if the release jar itself needs them for stability. ...and then have the project define the reports they want? Otherwise we just deal with whatever pain Maven

Re: [parent-pom] versions

2007-04-02 Thread Henri Yandell
On 4/2/07, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 02.04.2007, at 09:49, Stephen Colebourne wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: Personally I think we should only have the plugins defined if the release jar itself needs them for stability. ...and then have the project define the reports they

RE: [parent-pom] versions

2007-04-02 Thread Jörg Schaible
Torsten Curdt wrote on Sunday, April 01, 2007 2:17 PM: I've noticed that the plugin versions are not specified in the commons parent pom. From my experience this is a *really* bad idea as maven then picks the most recent from local repository. Which again can easily lead to inconsistent site

Re: [parent-pom] versions

2007-04-02 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Henri Yandell wrote: On 4/2/07, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 02.04.2007, at 09:49, Stephen Colebourne wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: Personally I think we should only have the plugins defined if the release jar itself needs them for stability. ...and then have the project define

Re: [parent-pom] versions

2007-04-02 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Torsten Curdt wrote: I've noticed that the plugin versions are not specified in the commons parent pom. From my experience this is a *really* bad idea as maven then picks the most recent from local repository. Which again can easily lead to inconsistent site builds across the team. So if no

[parent-pom] versions

2007-04-01 Thread Torsten Curdt
I've noticed that the plugin versions are not specified in the commons parent pom. From my experience this is a *really* bad idea as maven then picks the most recent from local repository. Which again can easily lead to inconsistent site builds across the team. So if no one objects I will