in there, it should not (4 +1's on not including
> it).
>
> Gary
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 05:15
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [lang]
t; > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [lang] Lang 2.0 release?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >
> > > >>How does that look? Should we call a vote?
> > >
> > > I would fix Steph
> 3) I missed one commit of Gary's, fixing his name in various places.
I've just committed another batch of Javadoc fixes to the root .lang
package. Will it ever end? :-) ahhh...
Gary
The util package is still in there, it should not (4 +1's on not including
it).
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 05:15
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] Lang 2.0 releas
nri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 05:15
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] Lang 2.0 release?
>
>
>
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
> > >>How does that look? Should we call a vote?
> >
--- Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have not looked at the "perf" test but the concept is not new and it is
> valid. A perf unit test, for example, would make sure that a certain bit
> of
> code performs within some time parameter, for example, faster than some
> JRE
> implementation o
1 inline comment.
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 16:55
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] Lang 2.0 release?
>
> Objections with RC4 ;-)
>
> 1) Binary ZIP ha
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 11:52
> > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > > Subject: RE: [lang] Lang 2.0 release?
> > >
> > >
> > > I've just rebuilt and remavend etc all the bits for Lang 2.0 unde
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>
> > Objections with RC4 ;-)
> >
> > 1) Binary ZIP has wrong CRLF when viewed on windows (License.txt and
> > Release-notes.txt). Source ZIP is fine.
>
> Binary uses Ant, source uses the linux command
pi/ I do
> not see the "@since 2.0" tags I finished adding this am.
>
> Gary
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 11:52
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> >
ommons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [lang] Lang 2.0 release?
>
>
> I've just rebuilt and remavend etc all the bits for Lang 2.0 under JDK
> 1.4.2 under Linux.
>
> I've not bothered with the thing in the project.xml, we don't care
> about getting that right
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> Objections with RC4 ;-)
>
> 1) Binary ZIP has wrong CRLF when viewed on windows (License.txt and
> Release-notes.txt). Source ZIP is fine.
Binary uses Ant, source uses the linux command 'encode'.
> 2) Source ZIP does not contain pre-built JAR fi
I've just rebuilt and remavend etc all the bits for Lang 2.0 under JDK
1.4.2 under Linux.
I've not bothered with the thing in the project.xml, we don't care
about getting that right for 2.0's release.
How does that look? Should we call a vote?
[Maven site will be up there in a bit]
Hen
Did you generate the JDiff report from Maven?
If so, does Maven download the 1.0.1 sources automatically and compares to
your local copy?
I am trying to get a fix on how easy it would be for me to generate the same
JDiff reports locally as I've fixes the @since 2.0 tags.
Thanks,
Gary
> -Or
> > > >>(2) It's seems trivial to add the missing @since tags JDiff
> complains
> > > about.
> > > >>Or that just too anal?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > S'not too hard to remove the tag and redo the build. Feel free to
> commit
> > > > them :)
> > > >
> > > > Hen
Committed to CVS.
Gary
ys.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 22:03
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] Lang 2.0 release?
>
>
>
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
> >
Heh. There's a lot to do before the maven site can go live. I was only
generating it for the easy to look at javadoc/src-reference/metrics etc.
Definitely not planned for a release anytime soon.
Hen
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We could do with sorting out the list of contrib
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
> >
> > What is perf? That long test that takes ages?
>
> I meant the EntitiesPerformanceTest or some such. When I first tried
> maven, this test was taking ages. What I was intending to do was to use
>
>
>
> **/*
We could do with sorting out the list of contributers before this maven site goes live.
Stephen
> from:Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> One other build:
>
> Maven site for Lang is generated and up in
> http://www.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.0/maven/
>
> All the RC builds have been
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Phil Steitz wrote:
the old .properties file format) I was just writing a note asking if
anyone had any objections to the following changes, which will fix this
among other things:
1. Mods to project.xml:
* Restrict tests to Suites run by Ant build (so m
Filed as MAVEN-701.
See http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-701
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/08/2003 03:25:41 PM:
>
> Yeah. This bug has me baffled. I've never had this
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Phil Steitz wrote:
> the old .properties file format) I was just writing a note asking if
> anyone had any objections to the following changes, which will fix this
> among other things:
>
> 1. Mods to project.xml:
>
> * Restrict tests to Suites run by Ant build (so maven bu
Henri Yandell wrote:
Yeah. This bug has me baffled. I've never had this problem with other
mavenised projects, and this has been happening in multiple versions of
maven [at least since b7].
Hen
Seems to go away (for me at least) when I cut out the empty
elements for the contributors (which I thin
Another good argument for using 1.4.2 to build. Thanks for the details.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 22:19
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] Lang 2.0 release?
>
&g
e for
the real release. So I am back to where I started from I think: release.
Gary (dizzy)
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 21:55
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [lang] Lang 2.0 re
Yeah, they don't distinguish between the two yet as far as I know. It was
a 'we need to do this' comment in the first project.xml I saw back in
maven b1(?), and it's quietly vanished.
Hen
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Here's another nit:
>
> On http://www.apache.org/~bayard/commons
Yeah. This bug has me baffled. I've never had this problem with other
mavenised projects, and this has been happening in multiple versions of
maven [at least since b7].
Hen
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I think there could be something's wrong with project.xml processing. The
> pag
Gary Gregory wrote:
I would regenerate with 1.4.2 to get the best Javadoc possible.
But here is the skinny: With Mozilla 1.5 Alpha, I get messed up rendering
and with IE 6.0, I get a pretty rendering. So, either IE is really clever or
this is a Mozilla bug. I just updated today from M 1.4 to 1.5 A
Here's another nit:
On http://www.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.0/maven/dependencies.html,
the text reads "These dependencies are required to compile and run the
application" but the only item is JUnit, clearly not a runtime dependency.
[lang] is not an "application" either. I do not know if w
I think there could be something's wrong with project.xml processing. The
page http://www.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.0/maven/team-list.html
lists 2 contributors project.xml but the 1st person (Ringo De Smet) is
listed twice and the 2nd (Steve Downey) is not listed at all.
Gary
> -Origi
* recall seing the same problem with 1.4.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 21:44
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [lang] Lang 2.0 release?
>
>
> I'm using Java(TM) 2
Fine w/ me but I am not a Maven user at the moment. Still using Ant...
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 21:58
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] Lang 2.0 release?
>
&g
32 matches
Mail list logo
