On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:51:38AM +0900, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
This is personal opinion: posting to all the -dev lists is very hard
(burden) for him (Rob?) to do.
I recommend him to post a note to committers@
and write please copy this mail to -dev lists to which you are
subscribing,
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:22:11 +0100
Mads Toftum wrote:
This is personal opinion: posting to all the -dev lists is very hard
(burden) for him (Rob?) to do.
I recommend him to post a note to committers@
and write please copy this mail to -dev lists to which you are
subscribing, instead. I
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Do people want the newsletter to continue? If so then I'm happy
to edit the Oct/Nov issue with no promises to tackle subsequent
issues - aiming to publish in a week or so.
+1 and much thanks.
As much as voting with +1s would be appreciated,
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 18:26, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Do people want the newsletter to continue? If so then I'm happy
to edit the Oct/Nov issue with no promises to tackle subsequent
issues - aiming to publish in a week or so.
+1 and much
It seems to me that a short message to announce@apache.org, with a *link*
to the web page with the report *rather* than the entire report in the
email itself, would be the best option. You'll hit the widest swath of
the community in an ASF-wide forum where such messages are generally
Do people want the newsletter to continue? If so then I'm happy
to edit the Oct/Nov issue with no promises to tackle subsequent
issues - aiming to publish in a week or so.
+1 and much thanks.
As much as voting with +1s would be appreciated, voting with content would
be better
Tetsuya
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Rob Oxspring wrote:
Right then, I don't really want to start another round of endless
discussions so I'll try to keep this short and to the point. Do people want
the newsletter to continue? If so then I'm happy to edit the Oct/Nov issue
with no promises to tackle
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 17:53:42 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Joshua Slive wrote:
As much as voting with +1s would be appreciated, voting with content would
be better as would someone setting up the dedicated newsletter@ mailing
list. To vote with content just use the wiki:
3. Apache Newsletter is one of the News from the ASF material,
which people who do not have much time to read all the websites in
the Apache.org have been eager to get in the past,
so it fit to the original usage of [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
and I will publish this newsletter to this
At 03:39 AM 8/26/2003, David Reid wrote:
3. Apache Newsletter is one of the News from the ASF material,
which people who do not have much time to read all the websites in
the Apache.org have been eager to get in the past,
so it fit to the original usage of [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
and I
Peoples,
After the conversation concering the matter of our The
Apache Newsletter, I have come to tentative conclusion:
1. I will not publish the second newsletter (Issue #2) in
the middle of September 2003. I will release in the middle
of October as The Apache Newsletter Issue #2
2. In The
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
(b) subscribe each [EMAIL PROTECTED] to announce@apache.org
Whoa whoa whoa. b) is backwards - from the other discussions on this, you
wanted to subscribe announce@apache.org to each [EMAIL PROTECTED],
not the other way around.
I think
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 16:26:18 -0700 (PDT)
Brian Behlendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. My concerns about one list trying to deliver to another remain.
I still am not sure it's wise to automate that. For example, just
today I found that the announce@ws.apache.org list was configured to
Someone said:
Ah! It sounds as if other people aren't aware of the background and
original intent. From what you are saying, announce@apache.org should
be
subscribed to announce@tlp.apache.org. That way announcements would
automatically funnel to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 to the general idea.
* Noel J. Bergman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
So then it sounds as if two action items are to:
(a) ensure that each TLP has an announce@
(b) subscribe each [EMAIL PROTECTED] to announce@apache.org
Works for me.
Sounds good, unless anyone has any reservations I'll look at doing this
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Thom May wrote:
* Noel J. Bergman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
So then it sounds as if two action items are to:
(a) ensure that each TLP has an announce@
(b) subscribe each [EMAIL PROTECTED] to announce@apache.org
Works for me.
Sounds good, unless anyone has
(b) subscribe each [EMAIL PROTECTED] to announce@apache.org
Whoa whoa whoa. b) is backwards - from the other discussions on this, you
wanted to subscribe announce@apache.org to each [EMAIL PROTECTED],
not the other way around.
I think you're saying what I meant. announce@apache.org is
On 16/08/2003, at 11:58, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
When I originally proposed the announce@apache.org list, the purpose
was
this: Each project would send their announcements to their own list
(eg.
announce@httpd.apache.org) AND send a copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That
way people
Ah! It sounds as if other people aren't aware of the background and
original intent. From what you are saying, announce@apache.org should
be
subscribed to announce@tlp.apache.org. That way announcements would
automatically funnel to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is that right?
I'm not suggesting we reopen
On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 17:58:05 -0400, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Ah! It sounds as if other people aren't aware of the background and
original intent. From what you are saying, announce@apache.org should be
subscribed to announce@tlp.apache.org. That way announcements would
Of course, I never really clarified this, which might have been part
of the problem. I just hoped people would figure out by example.
Uh huh ... LOL
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Thom May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I *still* don't think that announce@ is an appropriate list.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would seem to me to be the most appropriate address,
and if people agree I will set up
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 20:02:09 +0100
Thom May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Noel J. Bergman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Personally, I think that announce@apache.org is the correct place for a
monthly ASF newsletter.
I'm vaguely ambivalent, but I really think that we should keep
announce for
Soliciting amusing war stories from the larger community would be fun.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 10:48:43 +0900, Tetsuya Kitahata
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm vaguely ambivalent, but I really think that we should keep
announce for announcements, and have something else for sitewide of
interest stuff.
I am still not sure the difference between
hello!
Now, I published the first newsletter and I felt as if a load had
been taken off my shoulders. So, I can write what I wanted to say.
(If I jumped into the conversation occurred here in the early
this month, this first newsletter would *never* be published,
my character taken into
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Thom May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I *still* don't think that announce@ is an appropriate list.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would seem to me to be the most appropriate address,
and if people agree I will set up the list ASAP.
... This fact means that
Personally, I think that announce@apache.org is the correct place for a
monthly ASF newsletter. However, I do agree with your comments related to
the terra-intl.com references. The following ought to have been removed:
My main job is marketing, business development and IT consulting [4].
* Noel J. Bergman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Personally, I think that announce@apache.org is the correct place for a
monthly ASF newsletter.
I'm vaguely ambivalent, but I really think that we should keep announce for
announcements, and have something else for sitewide of interest stuff.
Joshua Slive wrote:
A couple suggestions:
- Perhaps a monthly newsletter is asking a little too much. Many projects
don't have much going on in a month. Quarterly might get more results.
Empathic +1 on quarterly. I'm scared to death already for next month's
nagging. ;-)
- I'd tone down the
30 matches
Mail list logo
