MS Office has an Information Rights Management feature that helps prevent
sensitive documents and e-mail messages from being forwarded, edited or copied
by unauthorized people. It is found under File - Permissions. This requires
the installation of a Windows Rights Management client to invoke.
If the document doesn't have some special formatting that will be lost in a
copy/paste process, Select All and copy/paste it into a brand new document
file. Even if you lose formatting, that should allow spell check to be run and
at least identify the misspelled words for you.
Fred Holmes
At
Try thi procedure-
If the spell checker passes over areas of text and does not pick-up mis-spelt
words it is possible that the text has been marked not to be checked.
To solve this problem do the following:
1. highlight the area which won't spell check.
2. click 'Tools' menu then the 'Language'
Someone at work has a document which was created in Word and will not
allow spell check to be run on it regardless of what computer we use.
We are trying to figure out how to undo this feature. We are at a
loss how the document got that way. Any ideas?
The only problem would be getting it attached to the vandal in question ;-)
Richard P.
You got me thinking.
There are many modern day Animal cameras. These are used to capture
pictures of animals out in the wild. Proximity detector triggered,
good lenses and use SD type cards to capture
As I said there lies the conundrum.
To get a camera (any type) close enough to take a clear picture to
identify and give you a chance of catching the miscreant, you stand a
chance that your own trap becomes vandalized.
Although I recently have seen a number of video cameras capture
vandals
We've had this model for awhile, it's been very reliable. I was recommending
it to a patron, but can't find it anywhere. Is it not being produced, if
not, can someone recommend a similar 35mm scanner? I've never used the Nikon
Coolscans, but they seem to be the most prevalent. I'm looking
I believe that Minolta got out of that market.
I hear good things about the Nikon cool scans.
Stewart
At 10:16 AM 2/27/2008, you wrote:
We've had this model for awhile, it's been very reliable. I was
recommending it to a patron, but can't find it anywhere. Is it not
being produced, if
It's hard to compare the security of a cam in a school with that of a
cam out in the woods. The one has all sorts of law enforcement
protection, the other doesn't. Not to mention in a school setting even
a blurry image might be recognizable.
Of course, if you just want the cams to deter, then you
I am using a computer that has these specs:
2.4Ghz Acer
Win XP Pro
512MB RAM
149GB HD
3.5 1.44 FD
Now, When I click on 'System', in the 'Control Panel', it consistently tells
me, there is only 504MB RAM. That says to me, that something is wrong with the
RAM but, it isn't keeping the computer
Probably time to split the threads, because comparatively, home
security is a breeze with cheap multicam systems with motion sensing,
email alerting, and several days of .mp4 recording readily available.
Too bad, it could have been a very interesting discussion. Okay...
Mac folks to the left.
Modern RAM DIMMs are actually made up of lots of smaller RAM chips.
One of them possibly has a fault.
Shut your system down completely and reseat the DIMM(s), with the
usual anti-static warnings.
If that does not fix the problem, buy some new RAM - it is cheap, and
XP would be much,
No it does not.
What kind of video subsystem do you have?
Is it sharing any of your ram?
Many low end models of subsystems built on the motherboard that share
the RAM you have installed so you end up with less Ram.
Presently it shows you are giving it 8 MP ram. I bet it can be
increased
Without knowing details, it seems more likely to me that the missing
8M is being used as video memeory, and thus not available to the system.
This is almsot certainly the case if there is no separate video card and
the video is on board.
Sometimes you can configure this in the BIOS.
On Wed, Feb
I applied the Microsoft-supplied registry hack to enable Windows
Update to apply SP3 RC2. Yesterday morning, Update had downloaded the
SP3 fix. I installed it, and upon restarting, the machine went into
a restart loop.
Windows recognized that it hadn't successfully shut down previously
and
I was already thinking the same thing.
It isn't my computer but, for the essence of what you suggested, I agree 100%
Christopher
-- Original message --
From: Matthew Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Modern RAM DIMMs are actually made up of lots of smaller RAM chips.
One of
Hope you aren't beta testing on your main machine heh
Mike
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Roger D. Parish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I applied the Microsoft-supplied registry hack to enable Windows
Update to apply SP3 RC2. Yesterday morning, Update had downloaded the
SP3 fix. I installed
There is no separate video card in this machine, which is why, I detest using
this PC. Mine is having some upgrading done to it. Mine has a separate video
card.
This PC is a 2.4Ghz piece of junk.
Christopher
-- Original message --
From: Allen Firstenberg [EMAIL
It is utilizing on-board video.
I would love to boost the video, along with do a bunch of other things to it.
Christopher
-- Original message --
From: Rev. Stewart Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No it does not.
What kind of video subsystem do you have?
Is it
I have a couple of machines that have video chip on board. One cheap compaq
and one cheap ACER. I stuck a couple of cheap memory chips in both, and both
work quite nicely. the compaq I am using right now has an ATI radon express
200 and is happy doing 1600 x 1050 32bit at 60hertz. must go
do you have the latest video software in it. the big thing about later
versions of video software is conflict resolution.
At 02:35 PM 2/27/2008, you wrote:
It is utilizing on-board video.
I would love to boost the video, along with do a bunch of other things to it.
Christopher
--
I bought mine from a vendor who had factory refurbished ones (before
Minolta/Konica melted into Sony). I see several up on eBay in your range.
There is quite a difference between the model 5400 and the 5400II inasmuch
as the former is incandescently lit, has usbfirewire, and has 3 corrections
It doesn't have the latest software.
Christopher
-- Original message --
From: gerald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
do you have the latest video software in it. the big thing about later
versions
of video software is conflict resolution.
I will check the RAM, again.
Christopher
-- Original message --
From: gerald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a couple of machines that have video chip on board. One cheap compaq
and
one cheap ACER. I stuck a couple of cheap memory chips in both, and both work
quite
I can't do it because, it doesn't belong to me.
Christopher
-- Original message --
From: gerald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it's a free download, should do it unless you are not allowed to muck with
the
machine.
Here is one way to find those who got your mailbox.
http://my.earthlink.net/article/str?guid=20080227/47c4ee50_3ca6_15526200802271119159552
Stewart
At 12:38 PM 2/27/2008, you wrote:
Probably time to split the threads, because comparatively, home
security is a breeze with cheap multicam
26 matches
Mail list logo
