Before there's any mis-speaking going on, what does ODBC (Open Database
Connectivity) have to do with Microsoft's claims to an object oriented OS?
Perhaps the technology that was intended for direct comparison to CORBA is
COM (Microsoft's Component Object Model). I think the statement these
Micro
Not a cooker issue, but it is a concern to all Linux users.
You guys at Mnadrake should be posting info about UCITA to all of your users
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Act on UCITA NOW
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 16:20:39 -0500
From: Skip Lockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An update on
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, you wrote:> > The latest 'Linux is crap because' are :
> >
> > 1) 'Linux is only capable of blocking'. I thought Unix became non blocking about
> > 1980, but I'm not sure. If it did I assume Linux is as well.
I know nothing about this.
>
> > 2) NT / 2000 are completely obj
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, you wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, you wrote:
> > The latest 'Linux is crap because' are :
> >
> > 1) 'Linux is only capable of blocking'. I thought Unix became non blocking about
> > 1980, but I'm not sure. If it did I assume Linux is as well.
>
> Linux wasn't non-blocking i
-Original Message-
From: Eugenio Diaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 5:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Cooker] libgtop problem (this is very old)
Is there a reason we are being ignored? I just want to
help Mandrake become the best distro.
Anyone fro
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, you wrote:
| OS wrote:
| >
| > Hello,
| >
| > I have to work with a crowd who's basic attitude seems to be 'take me now
| > Bill'. They cannot understand why I like to try / use Mozilla despite its
| > problems, they cannot understand why I have a colourful screen background
Try re-installing the X font servers
(XFree86-fs- something).
There's a bug whereby permanent files are installed into /tmp
and they cause this symptom.
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, you wrote:
| Hello All
|
| I seem to get that again while i have had that before i just reinstalled,
| this time i hop
FWIW, I've had the same experience.
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, you wrote:
| Hello,
| did anyone have success with the method described at
| http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/cookerdevel.php3 ?
|
| I wrote an e-mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" but did not
| get an answer for over a week now. So I'm still i
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, CPT KIDD wrote:
> 2 bugs (or hinderences) when setting up remote lp!!
>
> 1) Printtool SHOULD recommend to setup a hosts.lpd or hosts.equiv file on the
> linux machine with the printer
>
> 2) When setting up/specifying the printer on the remote computer, you only
> ne
2 bugs (or hinderences) when setting up remote lp!!
1) Printtool SHOULD recommend to setup a hosts.lpd or hosts.equiv file on the
linux machine with the printer
2) When setting up/specifying the printer on the remote computer, you only
need to enter the "printer name" and not the whole str
does help if you have a valid email address
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, you wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 02:20:52PM -0800, CPT KIDD wrote:
> > they are small enough to email. think i can further compress them to around
> > 200k or less. w/o compression is going to be large. i'm using the radius
>
hi,
> >
>
> *nods* I have been through this fix , with the configure.. it is two lines
> actualy, i just put a * at the end of each checks so it checks
> all the files
> libqt.*
ok. this fix is acceptable since only qt2 has QCString. i will change the
patch on my own system.
> that worked wel
geoffrey lee wrote:
> yo!
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 11:52 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [Cooker] cooker and licq
> >
> >
> > geoffrey lee wrote:
> >
> > > hi,
> > >
> > > >
> > > > the p
yo!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 11:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] cooker and licq
>
>
> geoffrey lee wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > >
> > > the problem is that the checks for qt look for libqt.s
geoffrey lee wrote:
> hi,
>
> >
> > the problem is that the checks for qt look for libqt.so and not
> > libqt.2.so so it will fail if there in the same dir, you have to have
> > the qt in a seperate dir with a ln to the qt2 libs etc. for the
> > configure and automake scripts in licq to work.
>
>
hi,
>
> the problem is that the checks for qt look for libqt.so and not
> libqt.2.so so it will fail if there in the same dir, you have to have
> the qt in a seperate dir with a ln to the qt2 libs etc. for the
> configure and automake scripts in licq to work.
i have got licq 0.80 to build on
Hey guy,
just a couple of observations from another newbie. (at least as far as linux
goes) there has been a great effort to document the basics and in no small
measure even the more esoterical aspects of the project in motion known as
linux. i word it that way because there isn't always a set in
geoffrey lee wrote:
> Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> >
> > "Lord And Master;)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > what problems maybe I can help?
> >
> > the /usr/lib/libqt.so stuff, configure of licq search (via nm) the
> > symbols of qt2 but /usr/lib/libqt.so come from qt1.4 by default on
> > man
"Sergio P. Korlowsky" wrote:
> "Lord And Master;)" wrote:
>
> > I have noticed that cooker is still using licq version 75.3a version
> > 80.0 is out and has many many new features, and they have aslo fixed the
> > spec file so it compiles correctly now (with out munkieing with the
> > configure s
I may be wrong but I think you may have spelled it wrong.
I think the base word is
"apaciguar"
which means
"To appease"
"apasiguate" looks to be the verb form of the noun,
literally meaning "to appease you".
Hope this helps
Dalton
Halfline wrote:
> Does anyone know what apasiguate means?
> (
Hello,
did anyone have success with the method described at
http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/cookerdevel.php3 ?
I wrote an e-mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" but did not
get an answer for over a week now. So I'm still in "step one"...
So long,
Juergen
Hello,
how do I make an installable ISO-Image of cooker?
Are the instructions from
http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/cookerdevel.php3
still correct?
I remember some time, were I had to generate a
dependency list (gendepslist) and a hdlist.
Is this still correct, of does cooker not need those
files
Hi all,
linux-2.3.99-pre3 is out now... so maybe i will have better luck
compiling ..
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.3/linux-2.3.99-pre3.tar.gz
--
Nitin Raja Bhatia: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
/\
|ICQ: 3417925 | "Where I want to
OS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I have to work with a crowd who's basic attitude seems to be 'take me now
> Bill'. They cannot understand why I like to try / use Mozilla despite its
> problems, they cannot understand why I have a colourful screen background and
> the worst sin of all
OS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> By non blocking I meant the blocking of synchronous calls to the OS., thereby
> effectively freezing other OS calls while the OS believes it is blocked.
>
As I stated in my previous mail, yes, there are locks, but they're
here in order to prevent races. You won'
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>
> "Lord And Master;)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > what problems maybe I can help?
>
> the /usr/lib/libqt.so stuff, configure of licq search (via nm) the
> symbols of qt2 but /usr/lib/libqt.so come from qt1.4 by default on
> mandrake (this should be a AUTOMAKE fix
"Lord And Master;)" wrote:
>
> I have noticed that cooker is still using licq version 75.3a version
> 80.0 is out and has many many new features, and they have aslo fixed the
yes it is out. i am waiting for the neew gtk + licq (currently the old
one doe not compile with 0.80 but i have hacked th
> * Sun Feb 06 2000 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2.3.42-1.0mdk
>
> - 2.3.42
> - New release numbering scheme
Your forget your changelog boy.
--
Warly
By non blocking I meant the blocking of synchronous calls to the OS., thereby
effectively freezing other OS calls while the OS believes it is blocked.
Surely OO is more than fad of the day. However it sounds like Linux is more or
less OO by the mere fact that it is comprised of so many packages (
Hello,
I have tried XFree86 4.0-4mdk and I have had a few problems.
I use a laptop with an ATI Rage Mobility Pro.
1) The emulation of 3 mouse buttons no longer works. This is awkward with
only two mouse buttons since there is no universal keyboard method in Linux for
cut and paste between apps
30 matches
Mail list logo
