http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3452
Product: ifplugd
Component: ifplugd
Summary: Drakconnect fails Internet connection - Internal Network
Access Available
Version: 0.13-3mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I know this won't be that much help, since I can't remember exactly what I
did...but I was having this same problem, and finally found that there was,
(i think) a mimeinfo error... like it was trying to open it with the default
of konqueror -captio
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 14:24, Clive Dove wrote:
> I am still seeing this message whenever I open a desktop folder.
>
> Is there any way to get rid of it?
>
> Before anyone asks, I did update the packages today.
Had something like this happen to me before. What was recommended to me
and I might
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 08:39, Jan Ciger wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > Are you suggesting that there not be floppy images at all? Should we
> > have to waste CDs just to run a network install? Must we have a
> > CD-writer to do a network install (of course, you can u
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 09:59, John Allen wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2003 17:52, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote:
> > I am a silver member of the club, but at the moment not message in one or
> > other way :-(
> >
>
> I'm a silver member also, and got an offer of 20% for pre-order 9.1
>
> But rea
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 07:40, Leon Brooks wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2003 05:39 pm, Chad wrote:
> > Then simply type some thing along the lines of urpms (urpmi for SRPMS)
> > urpms –flags=”--mach=k6-2 -o3” kde-full
> > urpms would then sort out the dependencies required for a full install of
>
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 19:05, Charles Shirley wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2003 17:24, Clive Dove wrote:
> >I am still seeing this message whenever I open a desktop folder.
> >
> >Is there any way to get rid of it?
> >
> >Before anyone asks, I did update the packages today.
>
> Hi Clive,
>
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2932
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-20 06:11 ---
This bug is similar to bug 2088. With two different computers, I can ping and access
other computers on the network, but cannot connect to the Internet. The appropria
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 03:07, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Ainsi parlait Leon Brooks :
> > On Wednesday 19 March 2003 12:26 am, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > > Ainsi parlait Austin :
> > >> Telling someone on dialup: just install glibc-devel, XFree86-devel, and
> > >> kernel-source... is a big deal.
> >
Le mer 19/03/2003 à 07:06, Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
> sorry if i give you such an attitude but as i receive and answer lots
> of emails each day, i used to write short, sharp mails.
I know, it's the same for me, I have about 11,000 unread mails (mostly
mailing lists though). My friends and family
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2659
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-20 05:04 ---
Two computers using Mandrake 9.1rc2 available from the download mirrors will not
connect to the Internet, and the error is:
ifup: RTNETLINK answers no device found
De
Does anyone know which servers are completely up to date? I've resynced
and resynced and resynced cooker and it still gives me errors whenever I
do MakeCD --check
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 12:30, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> On Wednesday March 19 2003 10:24 am, John Rowley wrote:
> > Francisco Alcaraz Ariz
You should have better luck if/when you can install 9.1;-)
-
which deps on
metalab.edu getting the ISOs
my connected buddy seeing that
and doing the D/l
burning the set
bringing the set to work
Whats the DVD copy going for?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 20 March 2003 01:02, andre wrote:
> On Thursday 20 March 2003 01:39, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > anyone knows where dosemu went? why is it no longer in contrib nor
> > main?:(
>
>
Okay, since nobody's too excited about automated local rebuilding of SRPMS (it
WOULD be a lot more work than it sound like, I admit), how about this for a
happy medium...
New policy: it's okay to enable MMX instructions for multimedia applications
that are not in main, but a notice must be adde
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3440
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-20 02:16 ---
Since I've made all the updates of cooker I get the same message when the system
is checking the dependencies at boot up and also later while it is running.
this is what
On Thursday 20 March 2003 01:39, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> anyone knows where dosemu went? why is it no longer in contrib nor main?:(
I think the reason is that it can't be build with a free compiler. But maybe
http://dosbox.zophar.net is an o
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3070
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-20 01:54 ---
Its on CD 3 (The international CD which doesn't work during install). Just
insert it and run:
rpm kde-118n-nb-3.1-1mdk.noarch.rpm
Not sure if it requires dependencie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
anyone knows where dosemu went? why is it no longer in contrib nor main?:(
- --
Regards,
Per Øyvind Karlsen
Sintrax Solutions
http://www.sintrax.net - +47 41681061
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+eQ3bv8F7V9JOSu
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3451
Product: Installation
Component: Installation
Summary: 9.1rc2 NFS Installation abort due to missing file
pciusbtable
Version: 1.809
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3450
Product: Installation
Component: X
Summary: Diamond SpeedStar A90 & ViewSonic 6E configured
incorrectly
Version: 1.809
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UN
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 17:24, Clive Dove wrote:
>I am still seeing this message whenever I open a desktop folder.
>
>Is there any way to get rid of it?
>
>Before anyone asks, I did update the packages today.
Hi Clive,
There is a workaround posted in the bugzilla entry
[Bug 1471]. It
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-20 01:09 ---
When I try your suggestion it does not work either[ModPerl::Registry: Can't
locate object method "register_cleanup" via package "Apache::RequestRec" at
/usr/lib/perl5/ve
hello
mandrake use ifplugd, which can be disabled via MII_NOT_SUPPORTED in
configuration file of interface. this is ok during startup, but if
i want handy run ifup of ifdown script there is error message that
MII_NOT_SUPPORTED is unknown command... hm..
this is bug for me, but i think that this c
Le mer 19/03/2003 à 15:52, Pascal a écrit :
> Any other cooker fellow who cannot read this page under mozilla ?
>
> http://static.ir.dgi.minefi.gouv.fr/public/faq/site/quiEstConcerne.html
> (french iso8859-1 coding)
I can read it without problems. I am running 9.1 pre-final.
Jean-Michel
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3356
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-19 23:54 ---
Thanks. Apologies for being a bonehead and not even checking if msec was the problem.
Am I correct in assuming that if I run urpmi -v --auto-select it will automatic
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-19 23:50 ---
Le Mercredi 19 Mars 2003 17:06, burj-al-arab a écrit :
Why do you use CGI module if you produce all HTML code and HTTP header
manually ?
you have a name conflict here.
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2786
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-19 23:48 ---
I had the same problem on my laptop. I solved it by doing the following:
- rpm -Va | grep '[oO]pen'
reported the following:
Unsatisfied dependencies for OpenOffice.o
latest kernel-secure package have preconfigured options about grsecurity
patch. previous kernels hasn't this variable set, admin can set these
variables and tune grsec module by hand via sysctl interface.
unfortunatelly, one of preset variables is kernel.grsecurity.grsec_lock
which is set to 1. th
As I understand the gcc docs, using both -march and -mcpu is odd. You should
probably be running these tests with just -march or just -mcpu. There may be
some other issues as well, but this is as good a place to start as any.
Bob Finch
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 03:12 pm, Austin wrote:
> Here'
Hoyt Duff wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2003 12:51 pm, Texstar wrote:
>
>> Deno responded:"Nope. He wants to have as many people as possible using
>>the distro as fast as possible, in order to get more users, and make more
>>money that way."
>
>
> By making it only available to Club members at fir
I am still seeing this message whenever I open a desktop folder.
Is there any way to get rid of it?
Before anyone asks, I did update the packages today.
What I did for 9.0 (and will do for 9.1) that worked well was get a copy
of 9.0 CD1/2/3+the PLF ISO which got most of the main packages for me. I
then burned a copy of all the RPM's in the Cooker Contrib's directory at
the time of release which ensured I had a complete system should I need
it.
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Texstar wrote:
> Is there a list of packages in cooker that will not appear on the mdk 9.1 CDs?
> I know the OO help files and kdeartwork won't but are there any other ones?
>
Warly posted a list last week. But it isn't much more than that.
|Registered Linu
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 04:42 pm, Hoyt Duff wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2003 12:51 pm, Texstar wrote:
> > Deno responded:"Nope. He wants to have as many people as possible using
> > the distro as fast as possible, in order to get more users, and make more
> > money that way."
>
> By making i
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 12:51 pm, Texstar wrote:
> Deno responded:"Nope. He wants to have as many people as possible using
> the distro as fast as possible, in order to get more users, and make more
> money that way."
By making it only available to Club members at first (2-3 weeks) woudl
incr
Is there a list of packages in cooker that will not appear on the mdk 9.1 CDs?
I know the OO help files and kdeartwork won't but are there any other ones?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Works for me.
Jan
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 21:52, Pascal wrote:
> Any other cooker fellow who cannot read this page under mozilla ?
>
> http://static.ir.dgi.minefi.gouv.fr/public/faq/site/quiEstConcerne.html
> (french iso8859-1 coding)
-BEGIN P
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3382
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2529
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|9.1-21mdk |9.1-26mdk
--- Additional Comments
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 21:52:50 +0100
Pascal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any other cooker fellow who cannot read this page under mozilla ?
My french is too rusty to really be able to read it but it did display
in mozilla properly for me.
Charles
--
Man's unique agony as a species consists
me !
et franchement c'est bien dommage . lol
Any other cooker fellow who cannot read this page under mozilla ?
http://static.ir.dgi.minefi.gouv.fr/public/faq/site/quiEstConcerne.html
(french iso8859-1 coding)
me !
et franchement c'est bien dommage . lol
Any other cooker fellow who cannot read this page under mozilla ?
http://static.ir.dgi.minefi.gouv.fr/public/faq/site/quiEstConcerne.html
(french iso8859-1 coding)
Any other cooker fellow who cannot read this page under mozilla ?
http://static.ir.dgi.minefi.gouv.fr/public/faq/site/quiEstConcerne.html
(french iso8859-1 coding)
--
Pascal
__
Running 42 min, 3 users, load average: 0.83, 0.49,
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 21:16, Austin wrote:
> On 2003.03.19 15:05 Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> > IMHO nope, as support is offered for packages we provide. i.e. one would
> > assume because that feature is offered packages *he* does rebuild that
> > way are supposed to be supported. Which I think
Le Mercredi 19 Mars 2003 18:51, Texstar a écrit :
> I posted "Oh man, I really hope Jaques will
> let the club members have first access, then wait until 9.1 is on the store
> shelves before he puts it on the mirrors for freebie downloads."
Not all poeple have enought money to be in club, but try
Le Mercredi 19 Mars 2003 21:08, Gwenole Beauchesne a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> > That works only for libraries linked at compile time however, while
> > symlinks
> > works also for binaries, and for dynamically loaded libraries.
>
> Why people would dlopen() a library themself if the primary goal was
> sup
On 2003.03.19 15:05 Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
IMHO nope, as support is offered for packages we provide. i.e. one would
assume because that feature is offered packages *he* does rebuild that way
are supposed to be supported. Which I think, is not intended.
So maybe the alternative is:
a) for non-m
Here's a simple benchmark from Narfi.
Athlon XP 2100.
Asus A7N8X motherboard (NForce2)
512 MB memory, PC2700 2-2-2
Mandrake 9.0
###
# Compiling for athlon-xp
export CFLAGS="-march=athlon-xp -mcpu=athlon-xp -O3 -finline-limit=1
-ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer"; export CXXFLAGS=$CFL
Hi,
Also, there are cases where the there's no explicit code in the
application to
take advantage of SSE/MMX, but the optimizer can find some use for it
anyway.
GCC does not do auto-vectorization at this time. However, you can use
some intrinsics instead of writing assembly code.
Bye,
Gwenole.
Hi,
That works only for libraries linked at compile time however, while
symlinks
works also for binaries, and for dynamically loaded libraries.
Why people would dlopen() a library themself if the primary goal was
supposed to get better performance? Again, the process I described is
the way to g
Hi,
So either a script, or an extension of urpmi that will fetch the
source, rebuild it to your machine's capabilities, and install the new
rpm.
IMHO nope, as support is offered for packages we provide. i.e. one would
assume because that feature is offered packages *he* does rebuild that
way a
Hi ,
it may be a newbie question, but is there a how-to, or other documentation
how to build a custom kernel rpm/ src.rpm ,
i tried to build a kernel based on kernel-2.4-linus,
but when the build proccess got to depmod after compressing the modules,
it failed with a lot of bla bla .gz is not elf
> Helge Hielscher wrote:
> Greg Meyer wrote:
>> Why don't you just mirror cooker and install from hard disk? It's a much
>> faster install anyway.
>>
> Is there a HOWTO somewhere? Does it work on a floppy-less PC?
I don't have a floppy drive. Thanks to Buchan for showing me this. I
simplified
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3231
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-19 20:44 ---
Still a no-go with DrakX 1.809.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--- Re
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3435
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-19 20:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=385)
--> (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=385&action=view)
same problem on 2 different machines and graphic cards
not a hardware
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 03:21, David Walser wrote:
> Could the application itself just have runtime detection of CPU
> features, so you can compile SSE/MMX support in the one package, but it
> won't try to use it on CPUs that don't support it? I think mplayer does
> this, and didn't use to.
Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 19:00, Austin wrote:
> On 2003.03.19 11:23 Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> > why are everyone so obsessed about "optimizing" their packages? in most
> > cases
> >
> > it only gives marginal perfomance increase and often introduce
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3435
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-19 20:03 ---
Just tryed again with your link
And the characters dessapear if I force this page to render as utf-8
It displays just fine as iso-8859-1 or -15
Latest cooker, Nvidia
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 04:06, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> Jean-Michel Dault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am in total admiration by your perl skills. As the Capernaum
> > Centurion would say if he had been a programmer, "I am not worthy
> > that thou shouldest come under my roof: but speak the r
Le Mercredi 19 Mars 2003 17:23, Per Øyvind Karlsen a écrit :
> why are everyone so obsessed about "optimizing" their packages? in most
> cases it only gives marginal perfomance increase and often introduces weird
> bugs and performance penalties..
Not for applications having dedicated mmx support b
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 12:17 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> On Wednesday March 19 2003 10:23 am, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> > why are everyone so obsessed about "optimizing" their packages? in
> > most cases it only gives marginal perfomance increase and often
> > introduces weird bugs and performa
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 11:26 am, you wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> w9ya wrote:
> > Perhaps Mandrake can/would compile the whole thing (distro) -mcpu i686
>
> - -02
>
> > instead of -march ???. That way you can ..."have your cake and eat it
>
> too."
>
> > Also, fo
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 01:24 pm, Helge Hielscher wrote:
> Greg Meyer wrote:
> >Why don't you just mirror cooker and install from hard disk? It's a much
> >faster install anyway.
>
> Is there a HOWTO somewhere? Does it work on a floppy-less PC?
>
Don't know about a HOWTO, but I know you can se
On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 19:24, Austin wrote:
> 1. Spiffy new sounddrake.
> If I knew perl, I'd do it myself, but alas...
> I'd like to see a more intuitive setup. What card is detected? What
> drivers do you want, alsa or oss? Do you want a sound daemon?
"I have no drivers, but I want to use remo
Greg Meyer wrote:
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 12:05 pm, Gary Greene wrote:
I know, and I don't mean to be rude. I am willing to report this
upstream, I just would like someone from MandrakeSoft to let me know if
this is desireable, or if it is better handled through "official"
channels since i
Greg Meyer wrote:
Why don't you just mirror cooker and install from hard disk? It's a much
faster install anyway.
Is there a HOWTO somewhere? Does it work on a floppy-less PC?
Regards,
Helge
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 17:17, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> On Wednesday March 19 2003 10:23 am, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> > why are everyone so obsessed about "optimizing" their packages? in
> > most cases it only gives marginal perfomance increase and often
> > introduces weird bugs and performance pena
Freenet support?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 12:05 pm, Gary Greene wrote:
> > I know, and I don't mean to be rude. I am willing to report this
> > upstream, I just would like someone from MandrakeSoft to let me know if
> > this is desireable, or if it is better handled through "official"
> > channels since it affe
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 12:17 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> On Wednesday March 19 2003 10:23 am, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> > why are everyone so obsessed about "optimizing" their packages? in
> > most cases it only gives marginal perfomance increase and often
> > introduces weird bugs and performa
On 2003.03.19 11:23 Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
why are everyone so obsessed about "optimizing" their packages? in most cases
it only gives marginal perfomance increase and often introduces weird bugs
and performance penalties..
Exactly why thing are great the way they are now. i586 -O3 is a perfec
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 17:52, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote:
> I am a silver member of the club, but at the moment not message in one or
> other way :-(
>
I'm a silver member also, and got an offer of 20% for pre-order 9.1
But really I don't give a crap, I paid my money for silver membership,
Le Mercredi 19 Mars 2003 18:31, Gwenole Beauchesne a écrit :
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > > No package will be built with MMX optimizations by default as there are
> > > Pentium out there without those extensions. However, if your
> > > application dynamically links against so
On 2003.03.19 11:23 Buchan Milne wrote:
And then we end up with some things being slower ... it should really
only optimise those packages which are known to have some benefit from
being optimised.
Absolutely.
In fact, the optimization level is quite trivial.
What's important is that video and math
I am a silver member of the club, but at the moment not message in one or
other way :-(
> > Seems to me I remember reading that iso's wouldn't be posted till
> > the box sets are ready (April?). But that maybe they'd be available
> > to Club members before that. I believe that info came from
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 11:30 am, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> On Wednesday March 19 2003 10:24 am, John Rowley wrote:
> > Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote:
> > >Cooker seems to be stoped from yesterday.
> > >
> > >I suppose lots of Mandrake users as me are waiting to see the isos
> > > into the mirrors.
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > No package will be built with MMX optimizations by default as there are
> > Pentium out there without those extensions. However, if your application
> > dynamically links against some optimized DSOs that would be fine to put
> > those libraries in *
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leon Brooks wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2003 04:16 pm, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
>
> OK, how about a half-step towards Gentoo?
Note of course, that optimisation is only one goal. Please consider
other features also.
>
> If URPMI knows what archit
On Wednesday March 19 2003 10:24 am, John Rowley wrote:
> Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote:
> >Cooker seems to be stoped from yesterday.
> >
> >I suppose lots of Mandrake users as me are waiting to see the isos
> > into the mirrors. But nothing at the moment and, worse, not idea
> > about the date of
On Wednesday March 19 2003 10:23 am, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> why are everyone so obsessed about "optimizing" their packages? in
> most cases it only gives marginal perfomance increase and often
> introduces weird bugs and performance penalties..
>
> here's a little example:
> http://www.mandrak
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3227
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3221
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Additional Comments Fro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 11:47 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2003 11:12 am, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 11:08:23 -0500, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 19 March 2003 10:44 am, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> > >> > It
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3221
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3223
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-19 18:00 ---
9.1 Bamboo, problem is still here.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] radek]$ rpm -qa | grep kde
kdelibs-common-3.1-58mdk
kdebase-servicemenu-1.0-6mdk
galaxy-kde-0.2-18mdk
kdelibs-3.1-
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 14:00, Götz Waschk wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 19. März 2003, 13:35:22 Uhr MET, schrieb Francesc Pinyol
Margalef:
> > Is it planned for final 9.1 to update the DVB drivers under
> > 3rdparty/mod_dvb?
>
> No. Don't you think it's a little bit too late to ask this after the
> fi
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3411
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comment
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 11:39 am, Jan Ciger wrote:
> > Are you suggesting that there not be floppy images at all? Should we
> > have to waste CDs just to run a network install? Must we have a
> > CD-writer to do a network install (of course, you can use lilo too, but
> > that's a bit too complex
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3413
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 07:33 am, Leon Brooks wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2003 04:16 pm, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Narfi Stefansson wrote:
> >> I believe that Steffen is right that mjpegtools was compiled without
> >> MMX
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 11:12 am, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 11:08:23 -0500, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 March 2003 10:44 am, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> >> > It wasn't a kde problem... a patch was applied to libqt3 between 12mdk
> >> > and 13mdk that forces the use of A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 07:40 am, Leon Brooks wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2003 05:39 pm, Chad wrote:
> > Then simply type some thing along the lines of urpms (urpmi for SRPMS)
> > urpms –flags=”--mach=k6-2 -o3” kde-full
> > urpms would then sort
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3446
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-19 17:42 ---
Yes, possible a "drive disk" image with some extra modules.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Are you suggesting that there not be floppy images at all? Should we
> have to waste CDs just to run a network install? Must we have a
> CD-writer to do a network install (of course, you can use lilo too, but
> that's a bit too complex for most).
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Meyer wrote:
> How about a unified boot iso like SuSE does, instead of maintaining
seperate
> hd, network, etc. floppy images.
Are you suggesting that there not be floppy images at all? Should we
have to waste CDs just to run a network install? M
Perhaps a special option to laptops could be also a good idea; I have seen
some messages in this way in Mandrake list.
El Miércoles, 19 de Marzo de 2003 17:15, Greg Meyer escribió:
> How about a unified boot iso like SuSE does, instead of maintaining
> seperate hd, network, etc. floppy images.
El Miércoles, 19 de Marzo de 2003 17:12, Greg Meyer escribió:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2003 11:07 am, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote:
> > Till said me that the cooker is now uptodate (yesterday I downloaded
> > cooker but some script were still old and the iso creation gave me lot of
> > errors), so
Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote:
Cooker seems to be stoped from yesterday.
I suppose lots of Mandrake users as me are waiting to see the isos into the
mirrors. But nothing at the moment and, worse, not idea about the date of the
release.
Could anyone of the Mandrake team give us a clue?
Thanks
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
