On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 05:22:50PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really minor issue, it's only evident on macros which expand by default
(ie %install with debug support) and in the changelog list, so I don't see
the point of changing historic changelogs if they cause no harm (note the
%install on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 08 June 2003 07:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ahh, but there are better ways of achieving this, either by direct mail
> (probably the best) or one of the samba lists (some of which I subscribe
> to, some of which I do in digest, some I don't
after 3 seconds
no error messages ...
thanks
One of the following packages is needed:
1- libguile10-devel-1.4.1-4mdk.i586
2- libguile12-devel-1.6.0-4mdk.i586
What is your choice? (1-2) 2
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed (6
MB):
libguile10-1.4.1-4mdk.i586
libguile12-devel-1.6.0-4mdk.i586
libltdl3-dev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
>
> But then we would need a set of config tools for those using LDAP, and
> those not using LDAP (although it should really only be very small
> installations not using LDAP). If instead, libconf could handle LDAP also,
> a config tool would only need to support
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So there are currently configuration frontends that are sufficient for all
LDAP use?
Im not sure about 'all LDAP use' but I've been working with davedap
http://davedap.sourceforge.net). It uses php, and you really need to
understand LDAP (which I'm in the process of l
Michael Reinsch wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 10:51:29 +0200
"John Keller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael (Reinsch), if you look at my bug report, you'll see that
CLOCK_SYNC set to "yes" (as per the default install of the rpm)
doesn't help. And I keep my config pretty vanilla -- other than
can anyone tell me where to keep a tab on current
lists of hardware, that is likely to be included in the next
release.
Specifically I would like to know the status of
motherboards using nvidia nForce2 MCP2-T chipset, such as the MSI K7N2
Delta-ILSR.
regards,
Maxim Narbrough.
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>
> [...]
>
>> > libconf doesn't store the config information elsewhere than where
>> they are - in the config files. Libconf
>>
>> In the end, there must only be one copy of the configuration
>> information (any other system with meta-configuration eventually has
>> p
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
> > libconf doesn't store the config information elsewhere than where they
> > are - in the config files. Libconf
>
> In the end, there must only be one copy of the configuration information
> (any other system with meta-configuration eventually has problems with
dams wrote:
> Luis Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> Originally, when I checked the wiki page on libconf I
>> felt that it would be more interesting if the config
>> information was stored in XML. That way, with some
>> API, the configuration modules could be written in any
>> language, not ne
Luis Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > No ... but I do want to see more configuration
> > stored (possibly) in LDAP.
>
> That is the way to go, no doubt in my mind.
>
> Originally, when I checked the wiki page on libconf I
> felt that it would be more in
hackeroaster-2.2.0-0.3.1mdk needs a Require for
pygtk2.0-libglade as pkg is not launchable without it.
Charles
--
"I'm a mean green mother from outer space"
-- Audrey II, The Little Shop of Horrors
-
Mandrake Linux 9.2 on PurpleDragon
Kernel- 2.4.21-0.1mdk
---
> Yes, by extranet, I meant VPN. And as you can see, we already have
> distcc working on the sparcs. (Thanks Per Oyvind! :)
Mhh, do you think that distcc could work on a vpn ? isn't there some
issues about the bandwidth ?
> BTW, What are our options for building the VPN? IP-IP, IP-GRE (easy
> t
On Sunday 08 June 2003 21:45, you wrote:
> Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > Good. If your system is using local time for CMOS -
> > compile your kernel with CONFIG_APM_RTC_IS_GMT off. Please, do not
> > do any other changes against default Mandrake config. If it helps
> > I will do the patch.
> >
> > If
On 2003-06-08(Sun) 17:52:27 +0200, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > /home/maddog/rpmdevel/tmp/gtranslator-0.99-buildroot i586 error: line 137:
> > Dependency tokens must begin with alpha-numeric, '_' or '/': - Using spec
> > file from src package for gtranslator-0.39.2-1 for RedHat
> >
Am Sonntag, 8. Juni 2003, 20:53:36 Uhr MET, schrieb Shlomi Fish:
> http://t2.technion.ac.il/~shlomif/xmms-mplayer-0.2.1-2mdk.src.rpm
> I added gtk-devel to the BuildRequires.
This is not needed, as libxmms1-devel already requires gtk-devel.
--
What difference does it make to the dead, the orphan
Check:
http://t2.technion.ac.il/~shlomif/xmms-mplayer-0.2.1-2mdk.src.rpm
I added gtk-devel to the BuildRequires.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
--
Shlomi Fish[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://t2.technion.ac.i
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> Good. If your system is using local time for CMOS -
> compile your kernel with CONFIG_APM_RTC_IS_GMT off. Please, do not
> do any other changes against default Mandrake config. If it helps
> I will do the patch.
>
> If your system keeps CMOS as GMT or turning the above off
On Sat, 07 Jun 2003 15:13:11 +0200, Luca Berra wrote:
>
> I would personally like a single framework for configuration, but all
> frameworks i found in 13 years working on unix systems do suck far
> more than vi.
The reason they all suck worse than vi is because they all aim far too
low. They al
On nie 8. czerwca 2003 14:59, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > However with more machines to rebuild packages (and with centralised
> > and automated extranet) we may be able to make it for the next
> > release.
>
> what about using a cross compiler ? If done properly, people just have
> to install a rpm
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3278
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|
söndagen den 8 juni 2003 17.42 skrev R.I.P. Deaddog:
> Hi all,
>
> This is what I get when I'm trying to make gtranslator package (GNOME2
> port):
>
> =
> + cp -pr AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog DEPENDS INSTALL NEWS README THANKS TODO
> /home/maddog/rp
Hi all,
This is what I get when I'm trying to make gtranslator package (GNOME2
port):
=
+ cp -pr AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog DEPENDS INSTALL NEWS README THANKS TODO
/home/maddog/rpmdevel/tmp/gtranslator-0.99-buildroot/usr/share/doc/gtranslator-0.
> Neither do I. Probably because I don't know the intention of creating
> those debug info yet. Is this something new from stock rpm 4.2?
Apparently, but I am not sure ... I will ask on the maintainers list ...
> If so,
> I'd guess the name "debug" is chosen because Red Hat don't use this as
> p
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4036
Product: kdebase
Component: program
Summary: Konqueror Not taking cookies from local WebMin process
Product: kdebase
Version: 3.1.2-8mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
S
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 04:17:24PM +0200, Luca Berra wrote:
>>/me admits his ignorance of the existance of mandrake cvs, i will
>> search for it and see if i have anything else to patch.
>>
> got a spec from samba cvs and would like some comments:
>
BTW, note the way things work, the samba relea
On 2003-06-08(Sun) 16:47:37 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > You can use
> >
> > %define _enable_debug_packages 0
> >
> > to avoid it for now.
> >
>
> I don't like making uninformed decisions, which is why I asked the
> question above. But IMHO this is a bug in rpm, they should use a name
> whi
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 04:17:24PM +0200, Luca Berra wrote:
/me admits his ignorance of the existance of mandrake cvs, i will search
for it and see if i have anything else to patch.
got a spec from samba cvs and would like some comments:
why kill wrepld? the ldap scripts?
make --with system work:
>> BTW, is there actually any real use for these debug packages. I had a
>> samba3-debug package (containing benchmark/validation tools), which I
>> now had to rename, and add provides/obsoletes for also.
>>
>> They could at least have chosen a better name (-rpm_debug or
>> something) which is gua
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 03:37:03PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>with 2.3.2-4mdk also. So it must be something else, possibly the fact
>> that klama is running kernel-2.4.19-16mdkenterprise (my cooker box is
>> running
> it could be, but samba should not include kernel headers
Well, since k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 08 June 2003 15:59, Michael Scherer wrote:
> and, when you say a extranet, do you mean some kind of vpn, with access
> for the community ? if so, then using a crosscompiler and , maybe
> distcc will allow to have more ressources avaliaible, b
>
> Hey Buchan, thanks for this information. And with
> appologies to the list this was the purpose of my
> short message announcing the beta release. I know that
> you are working on it and was hoping that you would be
> awake and would answer.
>
Ahh, but there are better ways of achieving this,
On 2003-06-08(Sun) 12:41:07 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > while %_libdir/* is not much better than using
> >
> > %files
> > /*
>
> It's much better.
> /* would own many directories owned by other packages (mainly filesystem),
> whereas for any package that doesn't have lib subpackages, %_lib
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 03:37:03PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with 2.3.2-4mdk also. So it must be something else, possibly the fact that
klama is running kernel-2.4.19-16mdkenterprise (my cooker box is running
it could be, but samba should not include kernel headers, in fact in the
spec linux/
> 2) We (the community) have resources to keep the cooker tree up to
> date, with exception of Drak* tools.
Not all, only the ones who deals with the hardware.
> However with more machines to rebuild packages (and with centralised
> and automated extranet) we may be able to make it for the next
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 12:27:23PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Anyway, for some reason samba3beta1 builds fine on my cooker box (well,
>> my cvs snapshot from Thursday did), but fails on the build cluster,
>> with:
>>
>>In file included from smbd/quotas.c:65:
>>/usr/include/linux/quota.h:48
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In fact, the packager was informed that this release
> would be made on
> Thursday, and submitted his packaging changes
> upstream on Friday (after a
> successful build on 9.1 and cooker from CVS
> snapshots), and was
> downloading the source on 3 different machin
Hi,
Is there a urpmi mailing list - I would like to join
If no list where does discussions happen?
Please - Any help would be appreciated
Thanks
Regards
Johan
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 12:27:23PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, for some reason samba3beta1 builds fine on my cooker box (well, my
cvs snapshot from Thursday did), but fails on the build cluster, with:
In file included from smbd/quotas.c:65:
/usr/include/linux/quota.h:48: error: parse er
Testing send/receive
johan
Hello,
Thanks for the feedback on the idea. Now, I would like to summarise some
points that aroused in your replies.
1) MandrakeSoft might be reluctant to take the non-Intel ports under it's
wings. This of course makes sense (as Stefan noticed, support = money, and
we cannot ask the company fo
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 02:47:15PM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
Is there standard way to generate configuration file during installation so
that it still belongs to RPM?
%ghost
L.
--
Luca Berra -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> Is there standard way to generate configuration file during installation so
> that it still belongs to RPM?
You could have the package own a placeholder file that's overwritten in %post. Of
course, rpm -V packagename will turn up something about that file, but it's up
On Sun, 08 Jun 2003 09:36:05 +0200
Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>At the moment, to my knowledge we have the following machines _dedicated_
> >>>to non-intel cooker development (please, developers, fill in all blanks):
> >>>
> >>>Alpha
> >>>- 2 x XP1000 - CSC still 7.1b - nee
Is there standard way to generate configuration file during installation so
that it still belongs to RPM?
TIA
-andrey
> It's the glob. For better packaging, you would at least use something
> like
>
> %{_libdir}/%{name}
> %{_libdir}/whatever
Why??? Until now, we knew that there would only ever be files that needed
to be in the package there. What happens when rpm decides they now want
unstripped copies of binarie
On Friday 06 June 2003 3:05 pm, Charles A Edwards honored me with this
communique:
> Has anyone else noticed that nothing can now be installed using
> rpmdrake.
>
> Program launches without problem but regardless of the rpm selected, one
> is always greeted with:
> "Sorry, the following package(s)
> On Sun, 2003-06-08 at 04:10, Luis Ortega wrote:
>> I would if I knew what bothered you. I am very much
>> interested in this package being promptly packaged as
>> I am testing it.
>
> For this kind of central package you can take it as read that the
> packager will be aware of releases as soon as
While testing gkrellm with kernel 2.5 support I lost ability to clean
autostart gkrellm on KDE login. What I'd like is to start with the same
setings as in
kstart --alldesktops --ontop --skiptaskbar --skippager gkrellm
and with fixed screen position. Unfortunately, using kstart in Autostart wou
Releasing means supporting. supporting a product requires an
organisation and knowledge being available. It also needs to be
worthwhile --> bring some $$$ to the company. For the alpha, mips,
pa-risc and sparc the market is too small.
Since I'm more or less the maintainer of the alpha port, I
On 2003-06-08(Sun) 01:34:07 +0200, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> > > Is it possible to have an automatic macros in rpm which make:
> > > %exclude %_libdir/debug
> > >
> > > Somes specs have in %files:
> > > %_libdir/*
> > > and rpm stupidly include debug files !
> >
> > Of course, automatic exclusion wo
But, we might be getting to the point where we actually need a cooker
extranet. For example, I would like to be able to remove build output on
an automated build host to get a package rebuilt, but we wouldn't want
anyone to be able to remove build output ...
It seems installer need works
53 matches
Mail list logo
