[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] xfce-utils-4.0.1-1mdk

2003-11-16 Thread andre
On Sunday 16 November 2003 14:55, Marcel Pol wrote: > - 4.0.1 > - sysconfdir = /etc/X11 > - use 06 as session numbering > - postinstall: run fndSession > - don't install gdm sessionfile > Xtart has a problem when two wm have the same sessionnumber

Re: [Cooker] Re: TUX?

2003-11-03 Thread andre
On Monday 03 November 2003 08:44, Leon Brooks wrote: > I've also seen "alot" in reputable Yankee publications. Wrong is wrong, > no matter how many times you repeat it. (-: But if everybody repeats it than it is right, atleast with languages

Re: [Cooker] frozen-bubble competition?

2003-10-27 Thread andre
On Sunday 26 October 2003 18:41, Michael Scherer wrote: > On Sunday 26 October 2003 18:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Wondering if gc has seen this: > > > > http://monkey-bubble.tuxfamily.org/screenshots.html > > yes, a news already passed on a french linux website 2 month ago. I see that this

Re: [Cooker] Downloading 9.2 - "Five stars"

2003-10-15 Thread andre
On Wednesday 15 October 2003 17:26, Buchan Milne wrote: > > Where is the md5sum for this distro ? > > Apparently not needed with Bittorrent, though Danny has posted his in > the Club (in the comments on the current story). There are two reasons for md5sum 1. To check if the downloaded file is dow

[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] howto-sgml-nl-9.2-1mdk

2003-10-12 Thread andre
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 18:45, Lenny Cartier wrote: > [Contrib-RPM] > > -=-=-=- > Name: howto-sgml-nlRelocations: (not relocateable) > Version : 9.2 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 1mdk Build Date: Wed Oct

Re: [Cooker] need clarification on dynamic usb storage device and supermount

2003-10-03 Thread Andre Lourenco
e done as an user... the output says that "cannot touch `/dev/sda1': Permission denied" but my usb disk gets mounted anyway. the problem with supermount is that one must su to root to safely umount the drive and remove it. or... with supermount, is it safe to remove the usb disk wi

Re: [Cooker] need clarification on dynamic usb storage device and supermount

2003-10-03 Thread Andre Lourenco
eject it. Note that an user should not be required to call the admin and ask him to remove safely that usb-storage device... Andre Lourenco Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FRE

Re: [Cooker] need clarification on dynamic usb storage device and supermount

2003-10-02 Thread Andre Lourenco
home tomorrow. Andre Lourenco > It would help if you: > - -posted the relevant line from /etc/fstab > - -told us how you got here (did you boot with the > USB device, use > harddrake, or did this get added by hotplug?) > &

Re: [Cooker] need clarification on dynamic usb storage device and supermount

2003-10-01 Thread Andre Lourenco
> AFAIK, hotplug can't detect the removal of USB > storage devices, so my > fstab entry for it stays until the next boot > (AFAICT). > for this i use "eject removable" as root... it stops the usb drive and removes the entry on my fstab. BTW i also cannot umount as user... when i plug the device

Re: [Cooker] 9.2 ISOs has been sent

2003-09-24 Thread andre
On Thursday 25 September 2003 01:06, Michael Lothian wrote: > Last time I checked (I work for a big supermarket chain in the UK) Shops > buy things from the people that make them. It's then the shops > responsibility to sell them. With this kind of stuff there is often a buy back guaranty or somet

Re: [Cooker] rxvt menu entry?

2003-09-18 Thread andre
On Thursday 18 September 2003 17:37, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > Ainsi parlait andre : > > Since when can mcc be run by non-root? > > Since there is a wrapper. How do you do that. When i try it i get asked for root password

Re: [Cooker] rxvt menu entry?

2003-09-18 Thread andre
On Thursday 18 September 2003 07:25, Mike Eheler wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > How about a compromise? Put it in the Configuration menu (where it > > belongs). User terminals (gnome-terminal, konsole etc etc, can go in > > Terminals, but rxvt should only be needed for configuration work so

Re: [Cooker] rxvt menu entry?

2003-09-17 Thread andre
On Thursday 18 September 2003 00:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > How about a compromise? Put it in the Configuration menu (where it > belongs). User terminals (gnome-terminal, konsole etc etc, can go in > Terminals, but rxvt should only be needed for configuration work so that's > where it belongs).

Re: [Cooker] Re: WindowMaker-Terminal now konsole??

2003-09-10 Thread andre
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 03:48, David Walser wrote: > I agree, this is caused by a recent change to kdebase-konsole that makes > its xvt alternatives value take precedence over rxvt. I'm not sure I agree > with that. I think users should have to change the alternative if they > want konsole

Re: [Cooker] Request: Speedtouch kernel integration

2003-09-08 Thread Andre Lourenco
that link goes to speedtouch user space drivers that also require the firmware. --- Michael Lothian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes there is I enen gave the link for it down below > > Andre Lourenco wrote: > > >mcc could use modem_run from user space drivers >

Re: [Cooker] Request: Speedtouch kernel integration

2003-09-07 Thread Andre Lourenco
mcc could use modem_run from user space drivers with "-k" switch (kernel driver support) to load firmware. this way we wouldn't need speedmgmt from www.speedtouch.com BTW, about firmware... there is no opensource replacement of speedtouch' firmware, AFAIK. --- Michael Lothian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Cooker] Re: Re: Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-06 Thread andre
On Saturday 06 September 2003 23:05, Thierry Vignaud wrote: > David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > at first, i strongly disagree with dadou violation of the > > > packaging policy. > > > > > > but now i think that dadou thoughs is that we'll quite always > > > install rxvt since it's requ

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-06 Thread andre
On Saturday 06 September 2003 21:50, Thierry Vignaud wrote: > andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Which you can use from kicker / run or foot menu / run. > > > > Don't think that kicker/run has the standard 500 command memory that > > rxvt has. run is

Re: [Cooker] Re: Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-06 Thread andre
On Saturday 06 September 2003 17:39, Abel Cheung wrote: > On 2003-09-06(Sat) 16:40:38 +0200, andre wrote: > > You can't add it because the png for rxvt is also removed. That may be an > > ugly icon but it is needed to not have a bad icon > > Then probably some better icon

[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-06 Thread andre
Could rxvt also be build with --enable-slipwheeling

Re: [Cooker] Re: Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-06 Thread andre
On Saturday 06 September 2003 15:51, Vincent Meyer, MD wrote: > On Thursday 04 September 2003 07:52 pm, David Walser wrote: > > David Baudens wrote: > > > xterm is installed if KDE or GNOME are not installed. > > > > So? xterm != rxvt. Anyway, xterm sucks. > > > > Like someone else said, why don'

Re: [Cooker] Re: Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-06 Thread andre
On Saturday 06 September 2003 16:04, Thierry Vignaud wrote: > "Vincent Meyer, MD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > xterm is installed if KDE or GNOME are not installed. > > > > > > So? xterm != rxvt. Anyway, xterm sucks. > > > > > > Like someone else said, why don't we remove Koffice and Mozil

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-04 Thread andre
On Thursday 04 September 2003 14:11, Frederic Crozat wrote: > Then we should move Terminal menu entry from main menu to a subsection > (Applications is probably the best choice). main menu is the right place. A terminal is the most important system program on a Nix system. > > Moreover, for peo

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-04 Thread andre
On Thursday 04 September 2003 17:47, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 13:43, andre wrote: > > Linux is not windows. Even if your a n00b you need a terminal. For > > instance if you want to play frozen-bubble and start at level 70 than the > > easiest way to do

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-04 Thread andre
On Thursday 04 September 2003 17:21, David Baudens wrote: > xterm is installed if KDE or GNOME are not installed. Why, isn't rxvt good enough

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-04 Thread andre
On Thursday 04 September 2003 14:09, David Baudens wrote: > I don't understand why people want always install a terminal. Most of users > don't need it. If you need one, simply choose Consoles tools category when > you can choose which packages should be installed. And if you need one > after insta

Re: [Cooker] konsole without kdebase-konsole

2003-09-04 Thread andre
On Thursday 04 September 2003 14:04, Laurent Montel wrote: > Le Thursday 04 September 2003 13:34, andre a écrit : > > How can i still have konsole when i de-install kdebase-konsole? > > Strange your question :) misunderstand question kdebase-konsole isn't installed on my sys

[Cooker] konsole without kdebase-konsole

2003-09-04 Thread andre
How can i still have konsole when i de-install kdebase-konsole?

[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-04 Thread andre
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 22:31, David Baudens wrote: > -=-=-=- > David Baudens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2.7.10-3mdk > > - Remove menu entry for rxvt package (but keep it for CJK package) I mind it a little bit that you remove rxvt from menu, but removing the icon is something i really mind. plea

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-04 Thread andre
On Thursday 04 September 2003 12:39, David Baudens wrote: > Problem is that a terminal emulator is not needed for an > office/multimedia/internet/ect. workstation. So, if people who install > computer don't explictly say he want to use a terminal, there is no reason > to install it. It is why Konso

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-04 Thread andre
On Thursday 04 September 2003 02:21, David Baudens wrote: > > Why? > > To not have several terminal emulators in applications menu. Rxvt is > always installed (used by MCC) and will be duplicated with other > terminals. I still don't understand why rxvt shouldn't have a menu entry. How else would

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-04 Thread andre
On Thursday 04 September 2003 00:58, Steffen Barszus wrote: > What i wanted say is that kde-konsole should be installed if > kde-workstation is choosen. How am i supposed to urpmi without it ? ;) > > Just my humble opinion > > Steffen Why, what is special about konsole

[Cooker] kopete 0.7.2 (soon to be released) will fix msn BUG

2003-08-30 Thread Andre Lourenco
he new MSN v9 protocol that is not affected by this." so... i think that cooker should upgrade to 0.7.2 when it's available - Before 9.2, i mean. Andre Lourenco Want to chat instantly with your online friends?

Re: [Cooker] Re: [move] cooker contrib changes

2003-08-30 Thread andre
On Saturday 30 August 2003 04:05, Abel Cheung wrote: > On 2003-08-29(Fri) 22:58:02 +0200, andre wrote: > > On Friday 29 August 2003 14:02, mandrake wrote: > > > stardict need dictionnaries > > > > > > these packages has been moved from cooker contrib to cooker m

Re: [Cooker] XFree86 not reading Xmodmap file

2003-08-30 Thread andre
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 23:28, Luca Berra wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 06:10:20AM -0400, David Walser wrote: > >Running XFree86-4.3-10mdk > > > >The file /etc/X11/Xmodmap is not automatically loaded by xmodmap when X > > starts up. I have to do it manually. > > > >Also, the right Windows key

[Cooker] Re: [move] cooker contrib changes

2003-08-29 Thread andre
On Friday 29 August 2003 14:02, mandrake wrote: > stardict need dictionnaries > > these packages has been moved from cooker contrib to cooker main: > - stardict-freedict-nld-deu-2.1.0-1mdk.noarch.rpm (i586) > - stardict-freedict-nld-eng-2.1.0-1mdk.noarch.rpm (i586) > - stardict-freedict-nld-fra-2.

Re: [Cooker] Main mirror BROKEN AGAIN!!!!!

2003-08-28 Thread Andre Lourenco
Agree... I already lost more that one good cooking week with this problems... With so many people having problems, we should ask ourselves if we are testing 9.2 in a useful way. Andre Lourenco --- dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The main mirror sunsite.uio.no is not current again.

[Cooker] latest kopete and msn messenger

2003-08-28 Thread Andre Lourenco
/Upgrades.aspx to complete the update. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] has left the chat. are you ppl receiving this to? Andre Lourenco Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger http

Re: [Cooker] Re: things to improve now we finally have supermount-ng

2003-08-28 Thread Andre Lourenco
udf:iso9660 for CD too IMO --- Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Use ext2:vfat for floppies and Jaz/ZIP/ide-flopy; > > udf:iso9660 for DVD; iso9660 for CD. This covers > most common cases. > > done. > = "On the side of the software box, in the 'System

Re: [Cooker] XMMS - audio compress monitor

2003-08-28 Thread Andre Lourenco
thanks for the tip - it's working here --- Levi Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (...) click on the > Effect/ General Plugins tab, select "KOMPRESSOR > CRUSH XMMS" from the > Effect Plugins menu, then click the Configure button > right below that menu. > > Select the Monitor tab and di

[Cooker] XMMS - audio compress monitor

2003-08-27 Thread Andre Lourenco
why does xmms start with a window that says 'audio compress monitor'? that windows doesn't seem to work at all, but it stats up with xmms anyway Andre Lourenco Want to chat instantly with your online friends

[Cooker] cooker font rendering -- touching perfection

2003-08-27 Thread Andre Lourenco
congratulations to everyone working to get fonts working better, cause they are looking just great in recent cookers. i had a mirror problem since 20th (solved today) and i can tell you that fonts are 100x better than they were a week ago. __

[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] wmtv-0.6.5-4mdk

2003-08-25 Thread andre
On Monday 25 August 2003 18:10, Michael Scherer wrote: > [Contrib-RPM] > > -=-=-=- > Name: wmtv Relocations: (not relocateable) > Version : 0.6.5 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 4mdk Build Date: Mon Aug 25

Re: [Cooker] Bootsplash submissions -- round 3

2003-08-20 Thread Andre Lourenco
http://ni.fe.up.pt/andyrock/mdk2.png 1-vera sans bold 2-vera serif bold 3-vera sans 4-vera serif --- "J.A. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 08.20, Andre Lourenco wrote: > > http://ni.fe.up.pt/andyrock/mdk.png > > > > look at that ima

[Cooker] italic fonts look really bad?!!?!?!?!?!?!

2003-08-20 Thread Andre Lourenco
italic fonts look really bad in cooker. almost all TTF msfonts, vera, etc look bad when they are italic. strange... 9.1 have nice fonts here Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger http

Re: [Cooker] Bootsplash submissions -- round 3

2003-08-20 Thread Andre Lourenco
http://ni.fe.up.pt/andyrock/mdk.png look at that image. IMO the 1st "Mandrake linux" looks better (and more professional) than the 2nd. 1st vera sans 2nd vera serif -- cause i don't know what serif font is used in round 3 Andre Lourenco --- Brant Fitzsimmons <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [Cooker] Bootsplash submissions -- round 3

2003-08-20 Thread Andre Lourenco
is't nice overall, but fonts, IMO look a bit unprofessional, maybe sans fonts would look better. Andre Lourenco --- Brant Fitzsimmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey there, > > Below is a web page containing further revisions to > the Mandrake > Bootsplash. A prog

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] starfighter-1.00-4mdk

2003-08-14 Thread andre
On Monday 04 August 2003 04:36, Leon Brooks wrote: > Means it runs on X, FrameBuffer and SVGAlib, plus any other targets > addressed by GGV etc. Including aalib. (-: > > Cheers; Leon I read that. It runs on X and on some other screen types you will never ever use. In short useless info.

Re: [Cooker] Evolution 1.4.4-2mdk

2003-08-14 Thread andre
On Wednesday 13 August 2003 21:40, Frederic Crozat wrote: > Le Wed, 13 Aug 2003 21:02:26 +0200, Dave Cotton a écrit : >> > Now just get Mozilla to open when I click on a link and we're away. > > Until it is fixed at package level, just create a http service in > gnome-file-types-properties and assi

[Cooker] RE: [Contrib-Rpm] distcc-2.10.1-1mdk

2003-08-14 Thread Duclos Andre
Hi, 1- Use --enable-gnome for build graphical monitor. (http://distcc.samba.org/distccmon-gnome-20030616.png) 2- Split this package : distcc, distcc-server (or distccd) and monitor ? Bye -Message d'origine- De : Lenny Cartier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mercredi 13 août 2003 12

Re: [Cooker] Mozilla (was: Portage for Mandrake?)

2003-08-14 Thread andre
On Wednesday 13 August 2003 00:23, Jay DeKing wrote: > Likewise, I haven't had any serious problems with Mozilla, other than the > occasional lack of a flashing cursor within whatever input box happens to > be focused. When that happens, clicking the mouse a few times on the input > box restores th

Re: [Cooker] Package proposal: wallpaper-dir

2003-08-14 Thread andre
On Wednesday 13 August 2003 07:52, Abel Cheung wrote: > On 2003-08-12(Tue) 23:55:33 -0400, Levi Ramsey wrote: > > I'm not sure that this belongs in the filesystem package. To my > > thinking, only directories that one absolutely needs for a working > > ^^^

Re: [Cooker] RPM for MS-Windows (was: starfighter)

2003-08-14 Thread andre
On Tuesday 05 August 2003 05:34, Leon Brooks wrote: > Shouldn't be hard to port rpm -qp functionality to MS-Windows, either. > Or you could add CygWin and have pretty close to the whole nine yards. > > Cheers; Leon Cygwin has rpm (4.2 even IIRC)

Re: [Cooker] Mozilla (was: Portage for Mandrake?)

2003-08-14 Thread andre
On Thursday 14 August 2003 05:11, Curtis Hildebrand wrote: >> No. Mozilla and Galeon don't work for me either. I'll attach the last > lines from a mozilla strace. This is on a fresh cooker install from > yesterday. > > /curtis For me galeon works. Do you have the no XBL binding for browser bug

Re: [Cooker] Portage for Mandrake?

2003-08-10 Thread andre
On Saturday 09 August 2003 17:20, Buchan Milne wrote: > I wanted to reply to this one earlier, but gave up after mozilla crashed > on the half-finished mail .. You got mozilla working. That is more than most

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] scorched3d-35-1mdk

2003-08-06 Thread andre
On Tuesday 05 August 2003 18:52, Bret Baptist wrote: > Actually there is a forum, just follow the big forums link at the top. > > To fix this make sure that you are running your X in 24bit mode. > > > Bret. Or have the program(or shellscript) check for it and give a meaningful error

[Cooker] drakxservices doesn't work if...

2003-08-04 Thread Andre Lourenco
if there is a dead link in /etc/rc.d/init.d/ drakxservices does not work at all. it says that cannot enter that directory. 9.1 and cooker -AndyRock- Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messe

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] starfighter-1.00-4mdk

2003-08-03 Thread andre
On Sunday 03 August 2003 20:16, Charles A Edwards wrote: > Project: Starfighter is a is a Space/Arcade game which uses the SDL > libraries. > Why would i want to know what libraries it uses

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpmdrake-2.1-29mdk

2003-07-29 Thread andre
On Friday 25 July 2003 23:09, FACORAT Fabrice wrote: > Le ven 25/07/2003 à 13:45, Thierry Vignaud a écrit : > > --=-=-= > > Name: rpmdrake Relocations: (not > > relocateable) Version : 2.1 Vendor: > > MandrakeSoft Release : 29mdk

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Bug 1148] [ggv] ggv pdf rendering under gnome 2.2 looks terrible

2003-07-29 Thread andre
On Wednesday 16 July 2003 20:03, Abel Cheung wrote: > On 2003-07-16(Wed) 19:50:24 +0200, Olivier Blin wrote: > > > Anyway, pdf displaying ability is OFFICIALLY not supported, and can > > > be removed anytime. So don't put expection to it in the future. :-/ > > > > ok, thanks for your explanations :

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 4241] [XFree86-devel] New: should require groff

2003-07-24 Thread andre
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 20:59, Thierry Vignaud wrote: > no, each package having man pages should require man. > Why, you can also see them in konqueror > but these man pages may be splited out to XFree86-man-pages or > man-pages-x11 ?

RE: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] kernel-2.4.21.5mdk-1-1mdk

2003-07-24 Thread Duclos Andre
Hi, Test this patch for SATA 376 with caution please. Bye -Message d'origine- De : Svetoslav Slavtchev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mercredi 23 juillet 2003 09:42 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] kernel-2.4.21.5mdk-1-1mdk Quoting Svetoslav Slavtchev <[EMA

Re: [Cooker] test, ignore...

2003-07-20 Thread andre
Also surprised that the mailing list wasn't down

Re: [Cooker] Mdk cooker

2003-07-19 Thread andre
On Saturday 19 July 2003 18:22, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > Ainsi parlait Johan Scheepers : > > Hi, > > How does mdk cooker work > > Do I need iso downloads?? > > Install mdk9.1 and upgrade?? > > Install cooker directly by network, unless you already have a 9.1 running. If you do a network install fr

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpmdrake-2.1-25mdk

2003-07-17 Thread andre
On Thursday 17 July 2003 16:35, FACORAT Fabrice wrote: > Note : should rpmdrake prevent himself from being launch twice ? Why. You can't install at the same time but there are no other problems

Re: [Cooker] kernel 2.4.21-0.13 has no APM?

2003-07-16 Thread andre
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 22:00, Ben Reser wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:22:01PM -0400, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote: > > IBM reports that they find two orders of magnitude more bugs in an OS > > release within 30 days of a public release than in the /entire/ > > development QA period. That obse

[Cooker] rpmdrake-2.1-25mdk doesn't want to select packages.

2003-07-16 Thread andre
Subject says everything ps. the previous version still had the memory problem of wanting to in/uninstall packages which were deselected

Re: [Cooker] dosbox in main?

2003-07-06 Thread andre
On Sunday 06 July 2003 15:43, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote: > dosemu used to be in main, but have been dropped (due to compile > problems..?) dosbox is far easier to use and works right out of the box on > several platforms, no need for configuration and it runs alot of dos > programs, maybe this handy

Re: [Cooker] OT X multi-user (was Fast user switching in KDE)

2003-07-04 Thread andre
There are some security problems with it IIRC. And with the price of hardware so low it is cheaper to setup a second box as X terminal.

Re: [Cooker] Fast user switching in KDE

2003-07-03 Thread andre
Does that work on all videocards. Couldn't the i810 only handle 1 X screen or has that been fixed?

Re: [Cooker] E16.6 or E17

2003-07-03 Thread andre
On Thursday 03 July 2003 19:19, phriedrich wrote: > Hallo, > > does anybody out there has any experiences with enlightenment 16.6 or 17 on > mandrake 9.1? Or does someone know some special tips? > > Because I use Enlightenment always I don't want to replace my existing one > (16.5) with one that do

Re: [Cooker] wish for mdk 9.2: file shadow functionality

2003-07-01 Thread andre
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 10:33, Buchan Milne wrote: > > Those programs are not that big of a deal. You only have to deal with > > changed > > > files who have not set the dump attribute > > I think that is over-simplifying the issues. That is the main issue. If you have temp files that don't live b

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 2069] [kdegames] kwin4 crashes with SIGSEGV

2003-07-01 Thread andre
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 02:08, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 16:13, [qa] wrote: > > http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069 > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: > > > >What|Removed |Added > > --

Re: [Cooker] Some Ideas for rescue-mode

2003-07-01 Thread andre
Why don't change the installation routine to a knoppix version of Mandrake with a mandrake version of knx-hdinstall. You will have a rescue mode with plenty of room so you can use emacs instead of e3 to edit files while the number of cd's you have to burn to install Mandrake stays the same

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1631] [kdeedu] New: kiten defs need katakana font, radical lookup display problem

2003-07-01 Thread andre
On Thursday 13 February 2003 23:04, KanjiFlash wrote: > https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631 > >Product: kdeedu > Component: kdeedu >Summary: kiten defs need katakana font, radical lookup display > problem >Version: 3.1-2m

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 3995] [Xtart] FluxBox is not listed by Xtart

2003-06-30 Thread andre
evilwm, fluxbox, ratpoison and Waimea all use 16 and should be fixed ion and ion-metadome both use 14, but that could be allright 15 is Afterstep and pwm 00 is /usr/X11R6/bin/rvt kdebase:/etc/X11/wmsession.d/01KDE gnome-session:/etc/X11/wmsession.d/02GNOME WindowMaker:/etc/X11/wmsession.d/03WindowM

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 3995] [Xtart] FluxBox is not listed by Xtart

2003-06-30 Thread andre
Xtart or Fluxbox should be patched. Where does Mandrake gets its /etc/X11/wmsession.d/XX from. If it is Debian what is their policy. If there is no policy then i would suggest: pick a number between 17 & 98 for your windowmanager and check if it is not taken. ps for i forget shouldn't /usr/bin

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 3995] [Xtart] FluxBox is not listed by Xtart

2003-06-30 Thread andre
On Monday 30 June 2003 22:59, Michael Scherer wrote: > On Monday 30 June 2003 21:48, andre wrote: > > Neither is twm, but this is not a Xtart problem but FluxBox that > > misses a /etc/X11/wmsession.d/XXFluxbox > > /etc/X11/wmsession.d $ ls > 01KDE03WindowMaker

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 3995] [Xtart] FluxBox is not listed by Xtart

2003-06-30 Thread andre
Neither is twm, but this is not a Xtart problem but FluxBox that misses a /etc/X11/wmsession.d/XXFluxbox

Re: [Cooker] wish for mdk 9.2: file shadow functionality

2003-06-30 Thread andre
On Monday 30 June 2003 19:16, Buchan Milne wrote: > Like? make [clean]? rpm? amanda (amrestore or amrecover)? rsync? > > You could make a true mess (instantly fill a filesystem) of a system by > implementing this at glibc level across the board ... Those programs are not that big of a deal. You onl

Re: [Cooker] wish for mdk 9.2: file shadow functionality

2003-06-30 Thread andre
On Monday 30 June 2003 17:49, FACORAT Fabrice wrote: > Please don't put trash in low level. let low level be "simple" and you > will have less security problems. > > Trash should be manage by the D.E ( Gnome, KDE, WM, ... ) and their > should have a common trash for all theses D.E. it means that >

Re: [Cooker] wish for mdk 9.2: file shadow functionality

2003-06-30 Thread andre
On Saturday 28 June 2003 23:09, Pierre Jarillon wrote: > Le Vendredi 27 Juin 2003 19:58, andre a écrit : > > This is not a gnome or kde issue. This should be done on a very low level > > so ALL programs will use the trash. > > This could be an issue. But I am not sure that a

Re: [Cooker] problem with rpmdrake

2003-06-27 Thread andre
On Friday 27 June 2003 22:43, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Friday 27 June 2003 22:21, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > > andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > I could install rpms with rpmdrake today but after s

Re: [Cooker] wish for mdk 9.2: file shadow functionality

2003-06-27 Thread andre
On Friday 27 June 2003 23:52, Greg Meyer wrote: > No, I think the difference is that I completely control when something gets > deleted for good, and within two days, if I don't need the deleted files > because of a mistake, they are gone. The system I see you all raving about > could potentially

Re: [Cooker] problem with rpmdrake

2003-06-27 Thread andre
Has nothing to do with installing devfsd. A cron job was accessing the rpm database and when i wanted to select or just read the summary of a rpm it would crash

Re: [Cooker] problem with rpmdrake

2003-06-27 Thread andre
On Friday 27 June 2003 22:21, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I could install rpms with rpmdrake today but after some time using it i > > got this error > > > > Cannot make temp dir /tmp/rpmdrake.AKjRIp > > Could not

Re: [Cooker] wish for mdk 9.2: file shadow functionality

2003-06-27 Thread andre
On Friday 27 June 2003 21:04, Michael Scherer wrote: > > > this is more a request for kde or gnome, you should file a bug > > > report in their bugzilla, this sound like a good idea. > > > > This is not a gnome or kde issue. This should be done on a very low > > level so ALL programs will use the t

Re: [Cooker] problem with rpmdrake

2003-06-27 Thread andre
On Thursday 26 June 2003 22:36, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > it'll be tomorrow. I've had trouble fixing a nasty > translation/utf8 bug i've only tracked down minutes before going > out to my japanese language yearly exam. sorry for the delay. I could install rpms with rpmdrake today but after some

Re: [Cooker] wish for mdk 9.2: file shadow functionality

2003-06-27 Thread andre
On Friday 27 June 2003 01:45, Greg Meyer wrote: > On Thursday 26 June 2003 02:42 pm, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: > > Anyway I am not interesed in mimicking what MS does, but in something > > that is useful and convenient to the average MDK user. > > I personally don't find this useful. When I delete

Re: [Cooker] wish for mdk 9.2: file shadow functionality

2003-06-27 Thread andre
On Friday 27 June 2003 15:04, Michael Scherer wrote: > > I suggest another way : the clever trash ! (not yet patented ;-) > > > > The trash already does exist. My idea is to improve it. > > - Add a configuration file for the trash with : > > a max size > > select a strategy. > > - If the ma

Re: [Cooker] wish for mdk 9.2: file shadow functionality

2003-06-26 Thread andre
On Thursday 26 June 2003 17:56, Buchan Milne wrote: > This can be done with rsync in backup mode with hard links. I haven't > tried it yet though. > This should be done in the filesystem. A rm shouldn't remove the file but move it to the backup dir > Remember, binary files (ie word docs) don't ma

Re: [Cooker] problem with php-pdf

2003-06-25 Thread andre
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 17:25, Oden Eriksson wrote: > onsdagen den 25 juni 2003 16.45 skrev loic leplomb: > > i don't find php-pdf package on linux mandrake therefor, i took another > > package and i added pdf.so in /usr/lib/php/extension and i added it in > > php.ini. > > > > i have this message

[Cooker] problem with rpmdrake

2003-06-25 Thread andre
If i try to start rpmdrake i get this Can't call method "signal_connect" on an undefined value at /usr/lib/libDrakX/ugtk2.pm line 1282. and no rpmdrake

Re: Userdrake Was (Re: [Cooker] Announcement: New userdrake to replace vi-gr-. Check it out!)

2003-06-24 Thread andre
On Tuesday 24 June 2003 14:39, Daouda LO wrote: > andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tuesday 24 June 2003 10:42, Daouda LO wrote: > > > andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > On Monday 23 June 2003 19:00, Daouda LO wrote: > > > > &g

Re: Userdrake Was (Re: [Cooker] Announcement: New userdrake to replace vi-gr-. Check it out!)

2003-06-24 Thread andre
On Tuesday 24 June 2003 10:42, Daouda LO wrote: > andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Monday 23 June 2003 19:00, Daouda LO wrote: > > > - Ability to put Uid and Gid manually when adding user/group > > > > I can do Uid but how do you do Gid? > > To

Re: [Cooker] userdrake error

2003-06-23 Thread andre
On Monday 23 June 2003 23:55, francesco.melo wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] vete]# userdrake > Can't call method "set_active" on an undefined value at /usr/sbin/userdrake > line 81. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] vete]# It will work if you unset some of the (italian i asume) local stuff. Don't no how to really

Re: [Cooker] Announcement: New userdrake to replace viagra. Check it out!

2003-06-23 Thread andre
On Monday 23 June 2003 19:00, Daouda LO wrote: > - Ability to put Uid and Gid manually when adding user/group I can do Uid but how do you do Gid?

Re: [Cooker] An interesting comment

2003-06-19 Thread andre
On Thursday 19 June 2003 22:14, Han Boetes wrote: > Nah. There are also a lot of people from other countries working on > mandrake, or any other *nix distro/whatever. *nix is created on the > internet. Nationality is no longer the reason people choose one distro > or the other. > > > > # Han Spoken

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software

2003-06-19 Thread andre
On Thursday 19 June 2003 18:08, Buchan Milne wrote: > andre wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 June 2003 11:42, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > >>Buchan's suggestion was not for selecting rpm's, it was for > >>allowing non-root users to browse, so that afterwards they

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software

2003-06-19 Thread andre
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 11:42, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > Buchan's suggestion was not for selecting rpm's, it was for > allowing non-root users to browse, so that afterwards they can > request software installation to the machine's administrator. For which rpmdrake is totally inappropriate. Fo

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >