On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 18:04, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Tuesday 18 March 2003 08:54 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
Greg,
If you want I can send these rpms to you for verification.
I just rebuilt qt with the 3.1.1-12 spec file from cvs and the problem is
gone. Laurent applied a patch for
. sounds like a fallback of
some kind is needed but not sure what.
James
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: NEW
creation_date:
description
that company to come in and show them how to set it up, read the
tape, and then now that they knew how to set it up and read the tape
they could read the instructions.
James
. An
confirmation email for Club will tell you to do so.
Just a curiosity, don't you have to launch drakclub so you can send an
e-mail to MDK Club so you can get a confirmation e-mail that tells you
how to send and e-mail to MDK Club to ..
James
Curiosity here Did this work with 9.0's 3.1 and what would
happen if you move the 9.0 version up to 9.1 Hm I need a box to
start playing with.
James
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 14:10, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
That's an excellent suggestion. Is it in a howto somewhere?
Sorry, no time for that yet, too busy trying to convince others that
Mandrake is an enterprise-class samba server (winbind
communication error'
If I run a qt only app I get the same error as above except the last two
lines (starting DCOP ERROR) are missing.
BTW the identical behavior can be found using a nested window as you
find int vnc.
James
on this item in /etc/urpmi/urpmi.cfg. This source is still
configured and can be re-activated any time you'd like but for the
moment urpmi -a and urpmi xx will not access this media. I
use it all the time for boxes so I don't have to carry disks with me
everywhere I go.
James
an or capability in
BuildRequries in the spec sheet, but this might be a usable work around.
James
Wes
, Do you mean like
# rpm -qip
http://redhat.secsup.org/redhat/linux/7.3/en/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS/4Suite-0.11.1-8.i386.rpm
(try it it works)
I chose this rh rpm because I knew it wouldn't be installed on your MDK
box. *grin* (btw the switch is q as in query ip just in case of font
problem)
James
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3402
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-18 01:30 ---
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 09:39, ricaide wrote:
This is a hardware related thing in my experience. better than reboot.
try ctrl-alt-f1 move the mouse (in extreme
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 19:41, Benjamin Pflugmann wrote:
On Mon 2003-03-17 at 11:43:00 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le lun 17/03/2003 à 12:07, Greg Meyer a écrit :
So, I ask, what is worse? This scenario, or doing the supposedly bad
thing and logging in as root?
Cannot resist to
. This one is coming
with both RH's and SuSE's enterprise server package. I've heard more
than one great review on it so it would be the one I'd look at first.
James
(P.S. am currently seeking employment in the UK ... and a job interview
offer or similar would help me complete my visa
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 17:39, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Monday 17 March 2003 06:13 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 05:51, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Monday 17 March 2003 08:41 am, Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Montag, 17. März 2003, 14:37:45 Uhr MET, schrieb LUGGE:
Will it be included
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 17:13, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
On Monday 17 March 2003 5:35 pm, Pascal wrote:
# urpmsave --dir ~/rpmsavedir myrpmname
(before updating glibc and crashing all the system :) )
creates a tgz of all files installed by the rpm in the specify
directory so that u can
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 16:38, Jason Greenwood wrote:
Yes, better use of rsync in software manager could REALLY save some
serious bandwidth. I don't understand why there is not more widespread
use of rsync??
I know that modem users would love it. h gets me thinking..
And why is there
... Todd
One thing I noticed is that it is a local user vulnerability only... not
a remote exploit. If someone has my console... They probably won't need
something like this to get in/exploit the box. just my 2c.
James
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 23:21, Benjamin Pflugmann wrote:
On Mon 2003-03-17 at 21:50:20 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
On the other hand, the typical MS Windows user/admin will simply hit
OK, because they are used to do this all the time (that is not meant
as a flame, but personal
themselves
laughing at the thought of this chuztpah. (-:
Cheers; Leon
Dang first they export the jobs and now they are exporting the cracking
opportunities. Life sucks...*grin*
James
with 4.01 strict. I checked against my company page which is 4.01
transitional and it works. But I haven't found another strict site to
compare.
James
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 10:11, Thomas Backlund wrote:
Viestissä Sunnuntai 16. Maaliskuuta 2003 19:49, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza
kirjoitti:
I tested the page (cooker from last monday but kdbase
updated to 83.mdk, and nvidia rebuilded rpms installed) and
I am having the same problems.
I
/dl-sf.html
Brook.
I grabbed the rpms yesterday from there and I'm in the process of
using 8.2 on my 9.1 install. So far so good but I'm new to this so I
really haven't gotten fully into usermode linux yet.
James
we are being managed
and not allowed to make what are mistakes that we as mear users are too
uniformed and incompetent to handle.
James
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--- Reminder
sand.
- Original Message -
From: James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Cooker List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 3:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Re: War
On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 18:36, Leon Brooks wrote:
On Friday 14 March 2003 03:56 am, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 18:55, Gollum wrote:
Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
I want my bootsplash
Bootsplash is one of the packages I *always* unselect during a Mandrake
install. Pointless, annoying eye-candy.
What does it look like... haven't got box 1 that it works on... not that
I care just
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 12:16, Buchan Milne wrote:
For those of you running samba on possibly untrusted networks, there are
RPMs available (both with and without ldap support) at
http://ranger.dnsalias.com/mandrake for 8.0, 8.1 (more coming, first set
missed wins and winbind support), 9.0 and
...
Install fests. I'm sure all of these people don't want a user james on
their boxanother is when a friend calls up and says... It won't work
can you help... I log in as root so I don't have to keep asking them
for the root password... once is enough this way.
As for the very real problem
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 14:17, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, David Walser wrote:
Does grub suffer the same disability?
Most other distros use grub by default. Why don't we?
Austin
We did for one release, hopefully we never do again. It was a disaster
and a
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 20:21, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 16 March 2003 10:59 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
I'll give you one scenario where I log in as root all the time...
Install fests. I'm sure all of these people don't want a user james on
their boxanother is when a friend calls
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 20:18, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 16 March 2003 11:01 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 14:17, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, David Walser wrote:
Does grub suffer the same disability?
Most other distros use grub by default. Why
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-17 04:30 ---
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 14:20, cybercfo wrote:
And of course you are the god who does... *sigh* I don't give a hoot
about it actually what I do give a hoot about is
On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 03:08, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are correct... however If I use the packages from 9.0 ... I get the
battery working. with the ones from cooker I get 0:00 on the taskbar.
All other files packages remain the same... I
in. Some of
our employees in my company have been complaining about this with their
laptops and e-mail readers from that other OS. It works at home or the
office but not in other places.
James
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug
naive, but it does seem funny to note that my cpu has no bugs
related to a coma
James
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 01:38, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Don't know if this is a bug or not... but in Hardrake2 if you have
an Intel PIII CPU one of the listings if for a Coma bug now.. is
this supposed to comma as in the punctuation mark, or coma
and Konqueror.
Don't know where it is but I just did
touch /usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html
just to get rid of the popup But yes this one is annoying
James
To whomever did the new evolution rpms THANKS!! the speed increase was
10x or better... Great Job.
James
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 15:03, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 19:56, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote:
Of course, Guy!,
Certenly the brother of Jorge Bus, gobernator of Florida, said when came to
Spain two weeks ago that he was very glad to visit the Spanish
it's French probably isn't intelligent enough to know that in
order to install it, it needs to remove it's sodee from the cup holder?
The only problem with politicians is that they don't sell hunting
licenses for them.
James
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 01:51, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can't use the ACPI package as this laptop doesn't support it. I have
to use APM and that does work..with the 9.0 version.
as ACPI it should does the switch automatically :
icewm/src
.
NO NO NO If to be a patriot I have to give this one or any other
related item up .. well tell the shrub to bend over...
James
suicidally stupid luser who would select
OpenSymbol, see in the preview box that it was ALL FRICKIN SYMBOLS, and
then hit OK?
I'm not biting.
Adam,
I'm with you If the user picks a red background with red text
OK... (I love to watch the squirming...)
James
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 18:17, Jason Greenwood wrote:
Thomas Backlund wrote:
Viestissä Torstai 13. Maaliskuuta 2003 03:51, Jason Greenwood kirjoitti:
Mandrake/Cooker Team,
IIRC, Mandrake 9.0 only had about 450 MB on the 3rd download ISO. There
has been much talk on Cooker about what to
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 15:34, HoytDuff wrote:
On Wednesday 12 March 2003 10:24, Levi Ramsey wrote:
french has a (deserved) history of meaning fancy in
the annals of American marketing.
Like French kissing? What do they French call that? Not English kissing, I
hope.
They might call it
4212 ?S 0:00 kwrapper ksmserver
4214 ?S 0:00 kdeinit: ksmserver
4217 ?S 0:00 kdeinit: kwrited
4228 ?S 0:00 kdeinit: kio_file file
/tmp/ksocket-james/klauncherfa44kb.slave-socket
/tmp/ksocket-james/kdesktopAZgwtc.slave
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 02:34, Pascal Cavy wrote:
Le Mardi 11 Mars 2003 05:51, James Sparenberg a écrit :
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 12:10, Pascal wrote:
Just a suggestion for people having long startup delay on kde.
Have a look on your session directory .kde/share/config/session
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-11 12:42 ---
Still present as the cooker version hasn't changed... advise moving back to the
version in 9.0 as this one worked.
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2483
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2887
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 04:52, Florin wrote:
have you installed the acpi package ? it works here ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (james) writes:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-11 12:42 ---
Still
. Looks like I need to do some cleaning.
For Cooker and CHRPM combined there've been 20,000 just since the middle
of January...
28413 for cooker alone and a total e-mail count of just over 80,000
e-mails in Evolution and still going strong.
James
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 17:44, Levi Ramsey wrote:
On Tue Mar 11 10:43 -0800, Todd Lyons wrote:
Interestingly, sharp only has meaning to anybody who's studied music
in some small form. Most of the people I've come across like to call it
hash (which irks me) or pound (my personal preference).
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 17:58, Jason Greenwood wrote:
Impressive, you must have a big HDD!! =)
eddie wrote:
James Sparenberg wrote:
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 08:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 16:26, Brook Humphrey wrote:
I just looked at my mailbox
U Don't know who's to blame for this one..*grin* but the new look of
MCC with the new Icons is a definite plus!...
James
Thomas ... initial reaction here.
My Setup.
Compaq Armada M700 laptop
Running RC2 updated to latest from Cooker.
so far (after 5 minutes) no problems. Suspend works ok (using APM not
ACPI) otherwise I haven't had much of a chance to check it out.. but so
far so good.
james
On Sun, 2003
and then set the delay to what you want.
James
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 23:14, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
Le lun 10/03/2003 à 03:42, James Sparenberg a écrit :
Don't waste your time, everybody knows FreeBSD is better than Linux :o
Damian I've avoided that one (but notice I'm not arguing)
Anyways, every one know that BSD
... Unless of course you prefer that you box leave you in the dark
about what it just did.
James
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 14:15, John Allen wrote:
As a wild guess I bet it is scanning for Netscape plugins for Konqueror,
John,
Let me go in edit kcontrol and see if I can turn of the scan
feature.. and try again.
james wrote:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2864
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 14:15, John Allen wrote:
As a wild guess I bet it is scanning for Netscape plugins for Konqueror,
I disabled netscape plugins in Konq and no change in behavior was
noted.
james wrote:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2864
--- Additional
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 03:56, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Monday 10 March 2003 12:20 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 19:00, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 09 March 2003 09:42 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
ago.
I think it has something to do with Galaxy. See bug 3081
I take
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 03:39, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Monday 10 March 2003 02:12 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 19:06, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 09 March 2003 09:57 pm, Quel Qun wrote:
PS: I am not sure an unconventional fluxbox bg is worth a bug entry.
I believe
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 04:30, Steffen Barszus wrote:
On Monday 10 March 2003 07:04, James Sparenberg wrote:
If it's going to have a wiki which I'm all for I recommend TWiki.. We
use it internally at my company... Why ... Stability reliability and the
ability to do skins / private webs
is done would be nice ...
Not a percentage per se but something like a downloading column that
says 23/30 meaning this is rpm #23 out of 30 you are going to get. Oh
and I'm speaking of the command line here not the gui.
James
package a ton of this for companies.
2. RPM is the LSB standard not deb not tgz and definitely not mprm
3. RPM is more than an extension.. A lot more. The more I learn about
it the more I'm amazed at what it does. ( or rather what I can leverage)
James
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 19:06, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 07:00, François Pons wrote:
Le lun 10/03/2003 à 14:22, Buchan Milne a écrit :
While we are here, any chance to have gui tools for
1)Selecting how often to run automatic updates
This could be great indeed
James
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 02:35, David Walser wrote:
Levi Ramsey wrote:
Just because it's how Windows does
it or it's what people are used to is a stupid argument to do
anything.
Batting one for two, David. Dead on for the first case, but I certainly
hope you do not design UIs for the
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 01:14, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 04:02, Levi Ramsey wrote:
On Sun Mar 09 22:07 -0500, Austin wrote:
Well, at the very least, it's a great reason to switch to gnome. :-)
Let's go for broke with this thread and bring emacs vs. vi, postfix vs.
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 05:39, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
Le dim 09/03/2003 à 23:07, Austin a écrit :
I'll bite the troll here ;-)
Gnome is a good environment for experienced Linux people, but it lacks a
lot of polish
for not
abandoning us either.
James
is empty already.)
James
on a computer (Like making 3D animation rock) but
couldn't for the life of them setup networking on the computer they use
day in day out, if their life depended on it. There are people who are
not competent to their software, but they rock with their software.
James
In finishing there are some
a look at a number of backgrounds and one problem (as
has been noticed in an article on freshmeat) the question of right to
use is not clear on about 99% of them. The other 1% it's clear and it's
definitely not ok to use them.
James
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3081
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-11 06:10 ---
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 20:40, bb_plus wrote:
in the MDK modified version it reads your .desktop file in the user who
started the session. In th stock tight vnc it's in
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 19:18, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Saturday 08 March 2003 10:14 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
Greg curiosity here... is your default WM KDE?
Yes.
I've noticed the same problem here with KDE is why... but when I switch
to iceWM it worked... I've had the same trouble
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 23:57, Warly wrote:
Jean-Michel Dault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was discussing with a few business people on friday, and we talked
about screensavers and backgrounds.
They *want* screensavers, as a matter of fact, the first thing they do
when they receive a
during boot. If in Lilo I
set the line to vga=normal the video runs very solid. For whatever
reason if I set it to anything else I get the same problem with video
sync.
James
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who
something. Do an
rpm -Uvh on the libqt3 and libqt3-commmon rpms from either of these and
try again... Alot of the strangeness I'm seeing came about the time they
updated libqt3 and libqt3-common and I'd love to get some independent
verification if I could. If not... se la gare.
James
it.
James
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 16:46, Steffen Barszus wrote:
On Monday 10 March 2003 01:00, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 09 March 2003 06:50 pm, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Le Lundi 10 Mars 2003 00:29, Greg Meyer a écrit :
On Sunday 09 March 2003 06:03 pm, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Maybe
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 15:56, Austin wrote:
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Levi Ramsey wrote:
We really need to shout urpmi's praises from the rooftops. Hardly a
week goes by without me running into someone on Slashdot or Kuro5hin (or
other sites) who complains about manually doing RPM
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 19:06, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 09 March 2003 09:57 pm, Quel Qun wrote:
PS: I am not sure an unconventional fluxbox bg is worth a bug entry.
I believe that this one is. It has to come out. I know it is in contrib, but
it is very Unprofessuonal and ugly to boot.
?) into it... ;o)
heck fire can I get my favorite one in here too? startx vs booting
directly into X .*grin*
James
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 20:26, Damian Gatabria wrote:
On Monday 10 de March 2003 01:02, Levi Ramsey wrote:
On Sun Mar 09 22:07 -0500, Austin wrote:
Well, at the very least, it's a great reason to switch to gnome. :-)
Let's go for broke with this thread and bring emacs vs. vi, postfix vs.
... it was actually at normal
speed. Remove the CD ... and it takes forever. I'd noted before that
whenever I logout login that kde tries to access the cdrom for unknown
reasons (floppy too for that matter..) Could there be a connection?
James
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2483
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 00:06 ---
I've found what the problem is... but I havent' found a perminent solution. MDK
insists on loading the module floppy.. Even though this laptop doesn't have a
floppy
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 19:02, Greg Meyer wrote:
Has anybody tested the current tightvnc-server. I have been playing with it
tonight after updating to the current cooker, and when connecting with the
tightvnc-client on a Windows box, I only see a screen with the default
Mandrake wallpaper
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2864
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 03:40 ---
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 13:40, luigiwalser wrote:
I edited /etc/sysconfig/desktop to say gdm instead of kdm... did
telinit 3 then telinit 5 ... gdm took about 5 secs to
/2003 à 06:50, James Sparenberg a écrit :
I don't know who these would go to and I've no way to file the bug via
bugzilla... I think it would go to Jean-Michel but I'm not sure.
If you try to install php-cgi or php-cli from the current cooker, you
get this error message.
Installation
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2887
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 11:40 ---
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 00:35, waschk wrote:
It was done as root. These are all rpms that urpmi cannot install as
well...
James
--- You are receiving this mail
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2864
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 11:50 ---
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 11:30, falcaraz wrote:
Since I used my one vote a while back I'll agree that startup to mdkkdm
or kdm takes a lot longer now than it used to.
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2887
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 12:10 ---
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 02:45, waschk wrote:
The MD5 is good if you look at the info of my original post it's the gpg
sigs that are bad... BTW I can reproduce the
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2887
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 13:10 ---
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 03:43, waschk wrote:
This is the keyring as generated by rc2 during the install... I've not
modified it at all.
pub 1024D/9B4A4024
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 05:33, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Sparenberg wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 07:17, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lissimore wrote:
Yes more bugs are being reported. But also
) it will make a
submit a more lengthy process (by a minute or two) but I think you'll
get more of what you need.
Second... I guess I need to submit a patch to the howto Greg is
assembling on this very point ... (and make better use of this myself
*grin*)
James
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 08:39, Frederic Crozat wrote:
On Fri, 07 Mar 2003 10:30:55 -0600, Bret Baptist wrote:
On Friday 07 March 2003 10:15 am, Frederic Crozat wrote:
I think the BIG problem with UNCONFIRMED bug is their test case scenario :
If you check all the bugs I replied to this
) it will make a
submit a more lengthy process (by a minute or two) but I think you'll
get more of what you need.
Second... I guess I need to submit a patch to the howto Greg is
assembling on this very point ... (and make better use of this myself
*grin*)
James
device is /dev/scd0 then type eject scd0 if
it ejects then you have the symlink problem. Two fixes either create a
little script that does the eject scd0 or create the symlink.
James
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2511
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 19:20 ---
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 06:58, fgriffin wrote:
I can confirm (but I've used my one vote elsewhere) this behavior on
cards using the pc_net driver as well ... modifying
101 - 200 of 618 matches
Mail list logo
