Re: [Cooker] [not urgent] - controls centers reflexion

2002-11-11 Thread Brian Smith
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 12:30:35 +0100 Florent BERANGER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Many major softwares (as Gimp) are in Gtk. Your case (no gtk apps) is too specific. Please don't apply your case to all users. I'm sure the subset of users who rarely if ever run a Gtk app is not very small.

Re: [Cooker] [not urgent] - controls centers reflexion

2002-11-11 Thread Florent BERANGER
Le Lundi 11 Novembre 2002 05:06, Brian Smith a écrit : > On Sunday 10 November 2002 03:20 am, Florent BERANGER wrote: > > > I agree that the Mandrake config tools ought to be integrated into the > > > KDE or Gnome control centers. What would be super-nice > > > icing-on-the-cake kind of

Re: [Cooker] [not urgent] - controls centers reflexion

2002-11-11 Thread Alastair Scott
Brian wrote: > In those cases, obviously Mandrake will want to fill in the gap. Most of the > folks not using KDE or Gnome probably don't need config tools, but if they > do, perhaps Webmin would be a good choice, since it's environment-neutral. It's starting to get confusing because KDE 3.1 (bet

Re: [Cooker] [not urgent] - controls centers reflexion

2002-11-10 Thread Brian Smith
On Sunday 10 November 2002 03:20 am, Florent BERANGER wrote: > > > > I agree that the Mandrake config tools ought to be integrated into the > > KDE or Gnome control centers. What would be super-nice icing-on-the-cake > > kind of stuff would be if they'd do a Qt front-end to the tools so they > > b

Re: [Cooker] [not urgent] - controls centers reflexion

2002-11-10 Thread Florent BERANGER
Selon Brian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Saturday 09 November 2002 05:13 pm, J.A. Magallón wrote: > > On 2002.11.09 Gary Greene wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > [...] > > > > > as it does now. If you want only one control center

Re: [Cooker] [not urgent] - controls centers reflexion

2002-11-09 Thread Brian Smith
On Saturday 09 November 2002 05:13 pm, J.A. Magallón wrote: > On 2002.11.09 Gary Greene wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > [...] > > > as it does now. If you want only one control center, just embed your > > tools into the KDE Control Center (+the seperate one for GNOM

Re: [Cooker] [not urgent] - controls centers reflexion

2002-11-09 Thread J.A. Magallón
On 2002.11.09 Gary Greene wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > [...] > as it does now. If you want only one control center, just embed your tools > into the KDE Control Center (+the seperate one for GNOME users.) > That's what I most would like. MDK can develop its own to

Re: [Cooker] [not urgent] - controls centers reflexion

2002-11-09 Thread Alex Chudnovsky
On Saturday 09 November 2002 21:40, Florent BERANGER wrote: > KDE control center have more and more fonctionnalities each days (X > configuration with kxconfig, lilo configuration, camera configuration, > keyboard layout, power control, hardware infos, network config,...). > > A day, we'll have 2 c

Re: [Cooker] [not urgent] - controls centers reflexion

2002-11-09 Thread Gary Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 09 November 2002 02:40 pm, Florent BERANGER wrote: > KDE control center have more and more fonctionnalities each days (X > configuration with kxconfig, lilo configuration, camera configuration, > keyboard layout, power control, hardware inf

[Cooker] [not urgent] - controls centers reflexion

2002-11-09 Thread Florent BERANGER
KDE control center have more and more fonctionnalities each days (X configuration with kxconfig, lilo configuration, camera configuration, keyboard layout, power control, hardware infos, network config,...). A day, we'll have 2 control "centers" in KDE environment, not 100%