From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Han
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] Nothing about Linux, but it's too nice!!! [WAS:
> weird Windows 2000/XP bug]
>
> Juan Quintela ([EMAIL PROTECTED
A more elegant (and safer) way is through /etc/security/limits.conf
Alkis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Han
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Nothing about Linux, but it's too
Juan Quintela ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> "steven" == Steven Lawrance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I love Linux as much as anyone here, but to put things in perspective, how
>> about this:
>> void main(void) {
>> while (1)
>> fork();
>> }
> You can fix this with limits, i.e. not letting any
> "steven" == Steven Lawrance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
steven> I love Linux as much as anyone here, but to put things in perspective, how
steven> about this:
steven> void main(void) {
steven> while (1)
steven> fork();
steven> }
You can fix this with limits, i.e. not letting any user to
- Original Message -
From: "Philip Van Hoof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Steven Lawrance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Nothing about Linux, but it's too nice!!! [WAS: wei
On 2001.11.04 16:57 Steven Lawrance wrote:
> I'll have to look into ulimit through PAM :-). Thanks for the info :-)!!
For ulimit, you will have to check the information of bash. Since ulimit
is a bash-thing. (man bash+/+ulimit). ulimit is for the processes forked
by bash only I think, while PAM
I'll have to look into ulimit through PAM :-). Thanks for the info :-)!!
I wonder if Windows has anything like ulimit? They only recently "innovated"
filesystem quotas and symliks (did reparse points actually make it into
2000/XP?), so they may still be working on innovating other things like
On 2001.11.04 16:25 Steven Lawrance wrote:
> I love Linux as much as anyone here, but to put things in perspective, how
> about this:
>
> void main(void) {
> while (1)
> fork();
> }
>
You can use ulimit and pam to limit max amount of
processes, memory usage, max filedescriptors,
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001 07:25:09 -0800
Steven Lawrance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I love Linux as much as anyone here, but to put things in perspective,
> how
> about this:
>
> void main(void) {
> while (1)
> fork();
> }
Yet.. here it's quite obvious what u r doing, you're
to blame ;
I love Linux as much as anyone here, but to put things in perspective, how
about this:
void main(void) {
while (1)
fork();
}
On Thursday 01 November 2001 10:16 am, you wrote:
> I know it's not a Cooker-subject, but it's too comic and I want you to
> smile with me ;o)))
> Have a ni
Cygwin !!! I don't know much about Cygwin but the original posting says
"causes Windows200/XP to reboot"
The posting to the usenet news group had an incorrect #include. Correct this
and this little beauty has rebooted every Window$ 2000 PC and locked every NT
box we have tried it on ! It must
Friday, November 02, 2001, 5:32:14 PM, you wrote:
DD> Well.. I tried this on a 2000 machine with cygwin and gcc and changed
DD> the include line to #include , but it didn't do anything
DD> special...
DD> Exactly what compiler and what circumstances?
I compiled it on turbo-C 7 ( dos ) and it r
YG> On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Helge Kruse wrote:
>> Did you read the source code? This program won't never be compiled. How can
>> it do anything i.e. reboot any o/s, if it was never compiled yet?
YG> C'mon
YG> #include <--
YG> void main(){
YG> while(1)
YG> cout<<"\t\t\b\b\b\b\b\b";}
YG> It
I believe it came from a uunet news group. The original was subtely
different. It had something more like printf(" \t\t\t\b\b\b\b"). We tried it,
and it works. You get no warning ! The PC just re-boots ! We tried various
combinations but found the above worked on all PC's. It works in java too
vember 2001 19:16
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Cooker] Nothing about Linux, but it's too nice!!! [WAS: weird
> Windows 2000/XP bug]
>
>
> I know it's not a Cooker-subject, but it's too comic and I want
> you to smile
> with me ;o)))
> Have a nice
I know it's not a Cooker-subject, but it's too comic and I want you to smile
with me ;o)))
Have a nice weekend!
Claudio
Original Message
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 17:19:47 +0200
From: Teodor Cimpoesu
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: weird Windows 2000/XP bug
Some
16 matches
Mail list logo
