Re: [Cooker] kernel 2.4.0 and XFree86 4.0.1-28mdk

2001-01-16 Thread Matt Morrison
>Matt Morrison wrote: > > > > I have discovered an interesting problem with 2.4.0 and X, and I'm not >sure > > what's going on. I've been running XFree86-4.0.1-28mdk and related >packages > > for a while, with no major problems (aside from random segfaults from >time > > to time, but that's ano

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0-4mdk error

2001-01-15 Thread OS
And I've been waiting for the patch for my Future Domain PCMCIA SCSI card ever since 2.4 first hit Mandrake !!! (maybe it's in kernel-2.4.0-5mdk ) Owen On Sunday 14 January 2001 9:51 pm, you wrote: > On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 11:14:19AM +0100, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > i know this problem, but

Re: [Cooker] kernel 2.4.0 and XFree86 4.0.1-28mdk

2001-01-15 Thread Richard Smith
Matt Morrison wrote: > > I have discovered an interesting problem with 2.4.0 and X, and I'm not sure > what's going on. I've been running XFree86-4.0.1-28mdk and related packages > for a while, with no major problems (aside from random segfaults from time > to time, but that's another story entir

[Cooker] kernel 2.4.0 and XFree86 4.0.1-28mdk

2001-01-15 Thread Matt Morrison
I have discovered an interesting problem with 2.4.0 and X, and I'm not sure what's going on. I've been running XFree86-4.0.1-28mdk and related packages for a while, with no major problems (aside from random segfaults from time to time, but that's another story entirely). I've also had kernel 2.

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0-4mdk error

2001-01-14 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 11:14:19AM +0100, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > i know this problem, but getting hundred request to have 2.4.0 final > in cooker make me forget some minor bugs (that come from linus BTW:) Fair enough. What do I care if a tokenring driver has an unresolved symbol. Now do t

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0-4mdk error

2001-01-14 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > # rpm -ivh --force kernel-2.4.0-4mdk.i586.rpm > kernel > ## > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in > /lib/modules/2.4.0-4mdk/kernel/drivers/net/tokenring/smctr.o > > How is this kind of error not detec

[Cooker] kernel-2.4.0-4mdk error

2001-01-13 Thread Brian J. Murrell
# rpm -ivh --force kernel-2.4.0-4mdk.i586.rpm kernel ## depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.0-4mdk/kernel/drivers/net/tokenring/smctr.o How is this kind of error not detected before the RPM is uploaded to the mirrors? Not that I giv

[Cooker] kernel-2.4.0-2mdk and Pcmcia-3.1.23 freeze laptop when inserted 3CCFE575CT : infos from sourceforge .... may be Chmouel or someone else can look at these ???

2001-01-11 Thread Franco Silvestro
Sorry for my intrusion but It seems I'm not the only with this problem ...;o/ May be Chmouel can understand better than me these (I try also put it in Bugzilla): http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=33427 http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=64898&forum_id=33427

[Cooker] kernel 2.4.0 missing lm_sensors

2000-12-20 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Hello. Kernel 2.4.0 is STILL not including ALL of the chip support in the latest lm_sensors. Specifically the viapro chip support is missing. Have you read the INSTALL file for lm_sensors *completely*? Did you notice this block of text? ** Only a subset of the modules in lm_sensors are patched

[Cooker] kernel 2.4.0-0.13mdk

2000-12-12 Thread Stefan van der Eijk
CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_MCT_U232 was not answered by the make oldconfig (on both x86 and alpha)

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0-0.10mdk

2000-12-08 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Jean Meloche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just tried to boot kernel-2.4.0-0.10mdk. yup, initrd is broken in last pre? -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org --Chmouel

[Cooker] kernel-2.4.0-0.10mdk

2000-12-07 Thread Jean Meloche
Just tried to boot kernel-2.4.0-0.10mdk. It dies quickly with ... devfs: boot_options = 0x2 CFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem). Kernel BUG at buffer.c:827! invalid operand: CPU: 0 EIP: 0010:[] ... This is on a 2 x 500 MHz intel -- Jean Meloche [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-gold # 133947

[Cooker] kernel-2.4.0-0.7mdk on alpha

2000-12-06 Thread Stefan van der Eijk
rebuilding kernel-2.4.0-0.7mdk on my alpha ends like this: /usr/bin/kgcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/users/stefan/RPM/BUILD/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mno-fp-regs -ffixed-8 -mcpu=ev5 -Wa,-mev6-DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c pci.c pci.c: In function `pc

Re: [Cooker] [Cooker[ kernel-2.4.0-0.4 - preformance

2000-11-26 Thread Pedro Rosa
I just checked out the ac4 patch for last kernel and noted several patches that are related to issues rised in a previous post. So I tested it and: SMB seems to work as in previous kernels. NCP performance rose a little bit but keeps being miserable. NFS seems to not behave so wild as before.

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0

2000-11-25 Thread pablito
The hack kernel doesn't recognize my usb mouse, unfortunately. - Original Message - From: "Pedro Rosa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 4:57 PM Subject: Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 : Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: : : &g

Re: [Cooker] [Cooker[ kernel-2.4.0-0.4 - preformance

2000-11-24 Thread Pedro Rosa
John Allen wrote: > Using IDE drives?? > > Check the IDE driver setting with hdparm > > hdparm -c3 -d1 -m16 /dev/hda > DMA is on and muticount is 16. I can't use for now c3 due to some problems with old HDD that sometimes stay on the IDE. But once again I note that settings didn't change sin

Re: [Cooker] [Cooker[ kernel-2.4.0-0.4 - preformance

2000-11-24 Thread John Allen
Using IDE drives?? Check the IDE driver setting with hdparm hdparm -c3 -d1 -m16 /dev/hda Pedro Rosa wrote: > I cheked the work of the new kernel and came into two features: > > On network file transfers. It seems 10-15% slower than previous > kernels. And this situation is observed both on S

Re: [Cooker] [Cooker[ kernel-2.4.0-0.4 - preformance

2000-11-23 Thread Pedro Rosa
> Some problems I faced the last few hours suggest that the "test-11" kernel and 0.4 may have some serious problems. Until now I couldn't get no oops or any info on the logs that could drop some light on this. So sorry I can only describe the phenomena. Under smbfs I tried to download some qu

Fwd: [expert] Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0-0.4mdk

2000-11-23 Thread Salane
Let me try this question here -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: [expert] Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0-0.4mdk Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 09:54:50 -0500 From: Salane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have a question concerining 2.4.0 either the test9 or the rpm source.

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0-0.4mdk

2000-11-23 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Pedro Rosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The src.rpm builds in full with only one feature - lack of i686 > architecture on config names. i do not do any optimisations on the kernel since we got too many problems. But i'll maybe gonna to plan to ship i686 kernel enabled with agressive optmisation

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0-0.4mdk

2000-11-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
from the quill of Pedro Rosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Video4Linux drivers are broken and this is due to i2c. Isn't it the > one > patched from lm_sensors? I am working on building the new i2c/lm_sensors in. I have it building but it did not build all the chip supp

[Cooker] [Cooker[ kernel-2.4.0-0.4 - preformance

2000-11-23 Thread Pedro Rosa
I cheked the work of the new kernel and came into two features: On network file transfers. It seems 10-15% slower than previous kernels. And this situation is observed both on SMB and NCP. On NFS it does not seem to be significatively slower but it strangely behaves by foing up and down in the

[Cooker] kernel-2.4.0-0.4mdk

2000-11-23 Thread Pedro Rosa
I just built it and came into the following: The src.rpm builds in full with only one feature - lack of i686 architecture on config names. It compiles on 2.96 without visible features. (btw I built ALL 5-6 previous kernels on 2.96) Video4Linux drivers are broken and this is due to i2c. Isn't it

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 - two different source?

2000-11-20 Thread Christian Gennerat
Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit : > Christian Gennerat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > What is the difference between > > https://kenobi.mandrakesoft.com/~chmou/kernel24/kernel-2.4.0-0.3mdk.src.rpm > > the src of rpm. The src used to make the binary rpm, I think > > > > and: > > https://kenobi.mandr

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 - two different source?

2000-11-20 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Christian Gennerat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What is the difference between > https://kenobi.mandrakesoft.com/~chmou/kernel24/kernel-2.4.0-0.3mdk.src.rpm the src of rpm. > and: > https://kenobi.mandrakesoft.com/~chmou/kernel24/kernel-source-2.4.0-0.3mdk.i586.rpm --=-=-= The kernel-source p

[Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 - two different source?

2000-11-20 Thread Christian Gennerat
What is the difference between https://kenobi.mandrakesoft.com/~chmou/kernel24/kernel-2.4.0-0.3mdk.src.rpm and: https://kenobi.mandrakesoft.com/~chmou/kernel24/kernel-source-2.4.0-0.3mdk.i586.rpm -- The falsely dramatic drives out the truly dull.

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hackkernel

2000-11-17 Thread Brian J. Murrell
from the quill of Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ugly, sorry. I could tell you that i know a lot of people > (corporate=>big_money) who want the bigmem as well the reiserfs. Yes, ultimately, we all wan't bot

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hackkernel

2000-11-17 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Until the issues are worked out yes. Right now it's a tradeoff. You > can have bigmem or reiserfs, but not both. I think with most of us on > this list, resierfs is more important than bigmem. How many people here > actually run systems that ne

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hackkernel

2000-11-16 Thread Thierry Vignaud
"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So it's been updated since 0.35mdk? no. > What was in 0.35mdk was not the latest. It was missing drivers that > I had to get from the lm_sensors package. Actually what was in 0.35 > was not even building lm_sensors but I reported the fix to that

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0

2000-11-16 Thread Pedro Rosa
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > Pedro Rosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> ACPI is broken. It does not compile >> Alsa has problems on the src.rpm. It fails some linkings to isapnp >> headers. On the other side, while compiling from kernel-source, Alsa >> has problems initializing the card. >> tvaudi

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hackkernel

2000-11-16 Thread Brian J. Murrell
from the quill of Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > is already in ... So it's been updated since 0.35mdk? What was in 0.35mdk was not the latest. It was missing drivers that I had to get from the lm_sensors pac

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hackkernel

2000-11-16 Thread Brian J. Murrell
from the quill of Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > so you want remove bigmem for reiserfs ? Until the issues are worked out yes. Right now it's a tradeoff. You can have bigmem or reiserfs, but not both. I t

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hackkernel

2000-11-16 Thread Thierry Vignaud
"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Does it replaces the hackkernel rpms yet available on cooker? > > > > yes soon, it's not already included in cooker. > > My wishlist for the next hackkernel-2.4.0: > > 1) Latest lm_sensors is already in ... > 2) No bigmem support until Ch

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hackkernel

2000-11-16 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1) Latest lm_sensors > 2) No bigmem support until Chris Mason can work out the bigmem problems > with reiserfs so you want remove bigmem for reiserfs ? -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org --Chmoue

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hackkernel

2000-11-16 Thread Brian J. Murrell
from the quill of Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Christian Gennerat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Does it replaces the hackkernel rpms yet available on cooker? > > yes soon, it's not already included in cooker. My wishlist for the next hackkernel-2.4.0

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0

2000-11-16 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Pedro Rosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ACPI is broken. It does not compile > Alsa has problems on the src.rpm. It fails some linkings to isapnp > headers. On the other side, while compiling from kernel-source, Alsa > has problems initializing the card. > tvaudio.o module fails dependencies i c

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0

2000-11-16 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Christian Gennerat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have upgraded modutils to 2-3-19, and the oops in yenta have disappeared. > Are they still interested? no. -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org --Chmouel

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0

2000-11-16 Thread Pedro Rosa
First tests on 2.4.0-0.1 ACPI is broken. It does not compile Alsa has problems on the src.rpm. It fails some linkings to isapnp headers. On the other side, while compiling from kernel-source, Alsa has problems initializing the card. tvaudio.o module fails dependencies Compiled on gcc 2.96 + gl

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0

2000-11-16 Thread Christian Gennerat
Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit : > Christian Gennerat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > It is a tarball, and the diff file pre4 downloaded from kernel.org > > The stand-alone pcmcia-cs package include drivers only for ISA config. > > For PCI config, you must use the kernel-inside package > > said David

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0

2000-11-15 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Pedro Rosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now I downloaded your last package and will give a try. Right now I'm > fighting your options. First I would like to ask what are the chances > to see reiserfs alive in a near future. Myself I've seeing reiser > broken for at least a month. it depends, yo

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0

2000-11-15 Thread Pedro Rosa
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > Hi, > > To be ready to the upcoming kernel-2.4.0 i'll begin the switch soon, > there is a lot of issue who need to be resolved, i have beginned some > package if you want to test them you can download from : > > https://kenobi.mandrakesoft.com/~chmou/kernel24/ > > it

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0

2000-11-15 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Christian Gennerat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It is a tarball, and the diff file pre4 downloaded from kernel.org > The stand-alone pcmcia-cs package include drivers only for ISA config. > For PCI config, you must use the kernel-inside package > said David Hinds. > If you are interested in, I c

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0

2000-11-15 Thread Christian Gennerat
Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit : > Christian Gennerat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I have compiled and started it on two Toshiba Libretto 100. > > The first one has mdk 7.1 installed, and when pcmcia starts, > > I have 2 oops in yenta driver > > and if I start sound drivers, I have and endingless

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hackkernel

2000-11-15 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Christian Gennerat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does it replaces the hackkernel rpms yet available on cooker? yes soon, it's not already included in cooker. -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org --Chmouel

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0

2000-11-15 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Christian Gennerat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have compiled and started it on two Toshiba Libretto 100. > The first one has mdk 7.1 installed, and when pcmcia starts, > I have 2 oops in yenta driver > and if I start sound drivers, I have and endingless oops. > The second has an earlier mdk 7

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0

2000-11-15 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Robert L Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What is the diffs from kernel.org? If you didn't get too wild i may grab > yours and try it https://kenobi.mandrakesoft.com/~chmou/index.cgi/~checkout~/kernel/kernel-2.4.spec?rev=1.9&content-type=text/plain -- MandrakeSoft Inc h

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0

2000-11-15 Thread Christian Gennerat
Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit : > To be ready to the upcoming kernel-2.4.0 i'll begin the switch soon, > there is a lot of issue who need to be resolved, i have beginned some > package if you want to test them you can download from : > > https://kenobi.mandrakesoft.com/~chmou/kernel24/ > > it based on

[Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hackkernel

2000-11-15 Thread Christian Gennerat
Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit : > To be ready to the upcoming kernel-2.4.0 i'll begin the switch soon, > there is a lot of issue who need to be resolved, i have beginned some > package if you want to test them you can download from : > > https://kenobi.mandrakesoft.com/~chmou/kernel24/ > > it based on

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0

2000-11-14 Thread Robert L Martin
it based on test11-pre4 (yes i know pre5 is out), let me know if you have problems. --- be still my beating heart! you mean somebody actually is willing to give the correct kernel version? What is the diffs from kernel.org? If yo

[Cooker] kernel-2.4.0

2000-11-14 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Hi, To be ready to the upcoming kernel-2.4.0 i'll begin the switch soon, there is a lot of issue who need to be resolved, i have beginned some package if you want to test them you can download from : https://kenobi.mandrakesoft.com/~chmou/kernel24/ it based on test11-pre4 (yes i know pre5 is ou