>
> > > Have you tried to completely uninstall all mozilla package and re-install
> > > them ?
> >
> > Are we using a MS or M$ product?
>
> Have I to remember you, that we are speaking of a prduct derived from
> Netscape, one of the bloatedst and slowest browser the net ever saw?
>
> The code
Neulich schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > Have you tried to completely uninstall all mozilla package and re-install
> > them ?
>
> Are we using a MS or M$ product?
Have I to remember you, that we are speaking of a prduct derived from
Netscape, one of the bloatedst and slowest browser the net ever
>
> Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "RA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> > On Wednesday 27 June 2001 16:41, you wrote:
>
> Have you tried to completely uninstall all mozilla package and re-install
> them ?
>
>
Are we using a MS or M$ product?
>
> --
> Frédéric Crozat
> MandrakeSoft
Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"RA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> On Wednesday 27 June 2001 16:41, you wrote:
>> Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>
>> "RA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>> > On Wednesday 27 June 2001 16:20, you wrote:
>> >> Dans l'article
>> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>
On Wednesday 27 June 2001 16:41, you wrote:
> Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
> "RA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > On Wednesday 27 June 2001 16:20, you wrote:
> >> Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >>
> >> "RA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> >> > Hey.
> >> >
> >> > On a Mdk 8.0 syst
Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"RA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> On Wednesday 27 June 2001 16:20, you wrote:
>> Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>
>> "RA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>> > Hey.
>> >
>> > On a Mdk 8.0 system mozilla-bin segfaults when started by a user, but
>> > work
On Wednesday 27 June 2001 16:20, you wrote:
> Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
> "RA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > Hey.
> >
> > On a Mdk 8.0 system mozilla-bin segfaults when started by a user, but
> > work for root.
> > Tried mozilla-0.9.1-2mdk recompiled from cooker-SRPMS and mdk-freq.
Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"RA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Hey.
>
> On a Mdk 8.0 system mozilla-bin segfaults when started by a user, but
> work for root.
> Tried mozilla-0.9.1-2mdk recompiled from cooker-SRPMS and mdk-freq.
as root, launch
/usr/lib/mozilla/rebuild-databases.sh
Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>
> > As LWN reports it today, we're currently re-preparing an IPO.
>
> I have registered and am greatly looking forward to seeing the
> prospectus.
Very nice! I would enjoy that our community be here to voice out when it's
Yes ... and espectially when it packages great spelchekers ! ;-) (soory,
couldn't resist ... ;-)
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Armisis Aieoln wrote:
> I am seriously intrested in being a Mandrake Investor.
> As long as it stays product orentated.
>
> Dave
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> As LWN reports it today, we're currently re-preparing an IPO.
I have registered and am greatly looking forward to seeing the
prospectus.
--
Ron. [au]
Kindly note my new email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and new web site: http://www.ains.net.au/~ronst/
I am seriously intrested in being a Mandrake Investor.
As long as it stays product orentated.
Dave
On Thursday 24 May 2001 14:40, you wrote:
> Michael Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> [...]
>
> > Is anyone at Mandrake seriously considering this? I don't know any
> > French law, but i
Michael Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Is anyone at Mandrake seriously considering this? I don't know any French
> law, but if the legal status is similar to that of a UK private limited
> company then Mandrake can offer shares for sale to whoever it wants to on
> an individual basi
Frederic Crozat wrote:
>Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Blue Lizard"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
>>Frederic Crozat wrote:
>>
>>>Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "michael"
>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>>>
mozilla segfaults immediately before opening.
>>>run /usr/lib/
Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Blue Lizard"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Frederic Crozat wrote:
>
>>Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "michael"
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>>
>>>mozilla segfaults immediately before opening.
>>>
>>>
>>run /usr/lib/mozilla/rebuild-databases.sh as ro
Frederic Crozat wrote:
>Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "michael"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
>>mozilla segfaults immediately before opening.
>>
>
>run /usr/lib/mozilla/rebuild-databases.sh as root
>
And of that doesn't work?
(mandrake mozilla releases since the first .9 have always done
Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "michael"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> mozilla segfaults immediately before opening.
run /usr/lib/mozilla/rebuild-databases.sh as root
--
Frédéric Crozat
MandrakeSoft
On Saturday 19 May 2001 14:25, you wrote:
I found with the new Mozilla if I had any theme except the classic or modern
installed it would not work or if I had Netscape 6 installed with any other
theme besides modern or classic Mozilla would segfault. As soon as I changed
the Netscape theme bac
SI Reasoning wrote:
>here too
>
and here.
here too
--- Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> $ mozilla http://www.linux-mandrake.com/
> /usr/bin/mozilla: line 145: 8785 Segmentation fault
> $MOZ_PROGRAM -remote
> "openurl($opt)" 2>/dev/null >/dev/null
> Error sending command.
>
> $ rpm -q mozilla
> mozilla-0.9-3mdk
>
>
> =-=
> k
Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "SI
Reasoning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Mozilla in mandrake 7.2 runs Outlook web for our office flawlessly.
> However the one packaged in cooker runs Outlook web poorly. I get the
> initial page but the javascript does not seem to work very well. Is that
Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Brian J. Murrell"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> I noticed that Mozilla 0.8.1 has been updated in cooker. Is it any
> better than it used to be? Was anything significant done, like a new
> tarball or was it just packaging/cosmetic changes?
Check the change
Sorry. My e-mail gets stuffed with messages, so I don't normally keep
everything I get. I usually keep e-mail concerning packages I have/may
install and this one slipped through the cracks.
Frederic Crozat wrote:
> Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Digital Wokan"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écri
On Tuesday 03 April 2001 08:12, Sergio P.Korlowsky wrote:
| On Monday 02 April 2001 14:20, you wrote:
| > Cooker, 02 April installation:
| >
| > [claudio@clag2 claudio]$ rpm -q mozilla
| > mozilla-0.8.1-2mdk
| > [claudio@clag2 claudio]$ mozilla
| > Error sending command.
| > [claud
On Monday 02 April 2001 14:20, you wrote:
> Cooker, 02 April installation:
>
> [claudio@clag2 claudio]$ rpm -q mozilla
> mozilla-0.8.1-2mdk
> [claudio@clag2 claudio]$ mozilla
> Error sending command.
> [claudio@clag2 claudio]$
>
> Only for me?
>
> Claudio
Nop you're not alone... ;-)
[
Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Digital Wokan"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Runtime mismatch, so leaking memory... Toss a couple of core dumps on
> top of that during the install of mozilla*.rpm packages and you get the
> general idea.
Please, check previous posting before you post..
It
Not only for you. I hadn't even noticed. However, only a problem in
console mode as opposed to x. Try clicking the button instead of using
a terminal.
:)
On 02 Apr 2001 15:20:57 -0400, Claudio wrote:
> Cooker, 02 April installation:
>
> [claudio@clag2 claudio]$ rpm -q mozilla
> mozilla-0.8.1-
Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Stefan van der Eijk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Claudio wrote:
>>
>> Cooker, 02 April installation:
>>
>> [claudio@clag2 claudio]$ rpm -q mozilla mozilla-0.8.1-2mdk
>> [claudio@clag2 claudio]$ mozilla
>> Error sending command.
>> [claudio@clag2 claudio]
Claudio wrote:
>
> Cooker, 02 April installation:
>
> [claudio@clag2 claudio]$ rpm -q mozilla
> mozilla-0.8.1-2mdk
> [claudio@clag2 claudio]$ mozilla
> Error sending command.
> [claudio@clag2 claudio]$
>
> Only for me?
nope... worx like a charm here...
[stefan@stefan stefan]$ rpm -qa | grep m
At 16.49 02/04/01 +0200, you wrote:
> > Cooker, 02 April installation:
> >
> > [claudio@clag2 claudio]$ rpm -q mozilla mozilla-0.8.1-2mdk
> > [claudio@clag2 claudio]$ mozilla
> > Error sending command.
> > [claudio@clag2 claudio]$
I've resolved that error installing all the mozilla*.rpm files.
Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Claudio"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Cooker, 02 April installation:
>
> [claudio@clag2 claudio]$ rpm -q mozilla mozilla-0.8.1-2mdk
> [claudio@clag2 claudio]$ mozilla
> Error sending command.
> [claudio@clag2 claudio]$
> Only for me?
We have a lot of prob
Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Steve Fox"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> While upgrading to the latest mozilla packages I see this message:
>
> Runtime mismatch, so leaking context!
>
> It gets repeated a couple timesanyone have an idea what that means?
> Sounds nasty.
It's a know b
Le Mardi 27 Mars 2001 07:38, vous avez écrit :
> Does someone else have experienced the problem that mozilla thinks the
> fonts are smaller then the displayed? This results in that the text goes
> over other text and over boxedges.
>
i've a little trable with Mozilla 8 and TTF fonts; no space betw
>
>
> --- Frederic Crozat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > "r j"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> >
> > > Man, me too! Mozilla is sooo much better now but it would be so
> > sweet to
> > > have a browser that was _just_ a browser-pager sometimes. Many do
--- Frederic Crozat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "r j"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> > Man, me too! Mozilla is sooo much better now but it would be so
> sweet to
> > have a browser that was _just_ a browser-pager sometimes. Many docs
> are
> > HTML and
Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "r j"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Man, me too! Mozilla is sooo much better now but it would be so sweet to
> have a browser that was _just_ a browser-pager sometimes. Many docs are
> HTML and loading moz is a real pain -10 seconds to get started on Dual
> 4
--- Leon Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Wray wrote:
>
> > And mozilla is very close to bloatware already...
> > and its not even finished yet!
>
> Unlike most bloated projects, most of that bloat actually does
> something
> useful. What I would like to see in Mozilla is a kernel
Steve Wray wrote:
> And mozilla is very close to bloatware already...
> and its not even finished yet!
Unlike most bloated projects, most of that bloat actually does something
useful. What I would like to see in Mozilla is a kernel-modules-style
granularity, so that (for example)
XUL|Java
--- Jason Straight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Says, "Error sending command."
>
> I tried starting with a fresh .mozilla dir in my ~ also.
This same thing happened to me today. The cause was a previous mozilla process
that did not exited. Do the following:
killall -9 mozilla;rm -rf ~/.mozilla
On 2001.03.01 21:41:59 +0400 Jason Straight wrote:
> Says, "Error sending command."
>
> I tried starting with a fresh .mozilla dir in my ~ also.
Try as root, it should work. The rpm has perms problems for files in
/usr/lib/mozilla directory.
--
As soon as a still-to-be-finished computer task be
Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jason
Straight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Says, "Error sending command."
>
> I tried starting with a fresh .mozilla dir in my ~ also.
I've seen that too..
Try to completely uninstall mozilla packages, remove /usr/lib/mozilla
and re-try..
--
Frédéri
Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Hal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit
:
> andre wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > With this morning's rsync:
>> >
>> > [hal@baroque hal]$ mozilla
>> > Error sending command.
>> >
>> >
>> The shellscript /usr/bin/mozilla is a little bit broken. If you use
>> /usr/lib/mozilla/moz
andre wrote:
>
> >
> > With this morning's rsync:
> >
> > [hal@baroque hal]$ mozilla
> > Error sending command.
> >
> >
> The shellscript /usr/bin/mozilla is a little bit broken. If you use
>/usr/lib/mozilla/mozilla the first time it will work.
Hmm, tried this... Maybe I just don't know what I
>
> With this morning's rsync:
>
> [hal@baroque hal]$ mozilla
> Error sending command.
>
>
The shellscript /usr/bin/mozilla is a little bit broken. If you use
/usr/lib/mozilla/mozilla the first time it will work.
Thanks a lot .. I read the README.OR.DIE too
Tom Brinkman wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 26 December 2000 05:27 am, Santosh Dawara wrote:
> > I am not sure if this question has been
> > asked before, but when is Mozilla M18
> > going to be available for Mandrake 7.2 ?
> > I can only download M17
On Tuesday 26 December 2000 05:27 am, Santosh Dawara wrote:
> I am not sure if this question has been
> asked before, but when is Mozilla M18
> going to be available for Mandrake 7.2 ?
> I can only download M17 as of now. M18
> requires a number of other upgrades
> itself.
> Is there
Santosh Dawara a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> I am not sure if this question has been
> asked before, but when is Mozilla M18
> going to be available for Mandrake 7.2 ?
> I can only download M17 as of now. M18
> requires a number of other upgrades
> itself.
>
> Is there someway I can inst
On 11 Dec 2000, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Antony Suter) writes:
>
> > Im looking forward to mozilla 0.6 arriving in Cooker soon! :)
>
> Because Mozilla 0.6 is based on Netscape 6 branch (unlike M18 which is
> based on developement aka trunk branch) and has been released only f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Antony Suter) writes:
> Im looking forward to mozilla 0.6 arriving in Cooker soon! :)
You can look but you won't find it :))
I don't intent to "upgrade" to Mozilla 0.6..
Why ?
Because Mozilla 0.6 is based on Netscape 6 branch (unlike M18 which is
based on developement aka t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guillaume Rousse) writes:
> Frederic Crozat wrote:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guillaume Rousse) writes:
> >
> > > I just tried to install mozilla-5.0.0-0.M18.4mdk.i586.rpm on a fresh 7.2
> > > I upgraded libstdc++, glibc and rpm, but every installation attempt
> > > fails wit
Frederic Crozat wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guillaume Rousse) writes:
>
> > I just tried to install mozilla-5.0.0-0.M18.4mdk.i586.rpm on a fresh 7.2
> > I upgraded libstdc++, glibc and rpm, but every installation attempt
> > fails with a core dump message after the last #. Installation scripts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guillaume Rousse) writes:
> I just tried to install mozilla-5.0.0-0.M18.4mdk.i586.rpm on a fresh 7.2
> I upgraded libstdc++, glibc and rpm, but every installation attempt
> fails with a core dump message after the last #. Installation scripts
> only consist of updating menu, so
On Sun, 15 Oct 2000 12:00:05 EST "Con Kolivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >I think "fsck" was a typo for "suck"
> >
> >:)
> >
> >Matt
> >
> >
>
> Thank you. Should I be clearer in use of obscenities next time?
>
> Con
>
> >On Sun, 15 Oct 2000 01:19:02 EST "Con Kolivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sun Oct 15, 2000 at 12:00:05PM -0500, Con Kolivas wrote:
> >I think "fsck" was a typo for "suck"
> >
> >:)
>
> Thank you. Should I be clearer in use of obscenities next time?
No typeo... just a polite way of saying... ahem... well, replace the
"s" in fsck with "u" and you'll understand. You
>
>I think "fsck" was a typo for "suck"
>
>:)
>
>Matt
>
>
Thank you. Should I be clearer in use of obscenities next time?
Con
>On Sun, 15 Oct 2000 01:19:02 EST "Con Kolivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It would appear that using konqueror as a web browser with three
> > different
> > helvet
I think "fsck" was a typo for "suck"
:)
Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Franden
Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2000 8:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Mozilla fonts fsck with Konqueror
On Sun, 15 Oct 2000 01:19:02 EST "Con Kolivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It would appear that using konqueror as a web browser with three
> different
> helvetica's included is not as helpful to the browsing experience as
> it is
> to netscape. Konqueror seems to produce bad fonts (too fa
>
> [root@agathe guillaume]# rpm -U mozilla-*
> package mozilla-browser-5.0.0.M17-1mdk (which is newer than
> mozilla-browser-5.0_M17-3mdk) is already installed
> package mozilla-mail-5.0.0.M17-1mdk (which is newer than
> mozilla-mail-5.0_M17-3mdk) is already installed
> New name is mozilla-browse
>
> There are still some issues:
> - Menu icon does not apear in "Networking/WWW". Maybe a mandrake menu
> expert can have a look at it (should be EZ to fix).
lenny should be able to fix this ...
> - The files /usr/lib/mozilla/components/xpti.dat and xptitemp.dat
> are created with %pos
I've uploaded
hackmozilla-5.0-0.NB2608.2mdk.i686.rpm
hackmozilla-5.0-0.NB2608.2mdk.src.rpm
hackmozilla-devel-5.0-0.NB2608.2mdk.i686.rpm
to /incoming.
(The 2000/06/09 nightly build would not run on my sys...)
Could these maybe replace the M13 release in contrib?
There are still s
is going to die
> My cable connection has a 16Kb/sec upload limitation. Hardly enough
> to even bother the machine. Not many people will be able to get them
> from my machine with that speed.
>
that's what i was saying, if you are giong to offer the service this is
going to be a probelm ...can
> > > maybe someone has the bandwidth to provide this service ...
> > > the rpms (if any) on the mozilla site will suck ...
> > > it's easy, set up a dummy acct for d/l mozilla and run from
> > > cron that does building.
> > True.
> > I could do it for the alpha (that computer is always on here
> > maybe someone has the bandwidth to provide this service ...
> the rpms (if
> > any) on the mozilla site will suck ...
>
> > it's easy, set up a dummy acct for d/l mozilla and run from
> cron that does
> > building.
> True.
>
> I could do it for the alpha (that computer is always on here), but
> > Could it be possible for mandrake to provide rpm's of the mozilla
> > nightly builds? Just automate the building process on it (shouldn't
> > be too difficult, I'll even have a go at it) and provide it as
> > the hackmozilla contrib RPM.
> maybe someone has the bandwidth to provide this serv
> Could it be possible for mandrake to provide rpm's of the mozilla
> nightly builds? Just automate the building process on it (shouldn't
> be too difficult, I'll even have a go at it) and provide it as
> the hackmozilla contrib RPM.
maybe someone has the bandwidth to provide this service ...
Here are:
hackmozilla.spec
mozilla.sh (startup script)
mozilla.xpm (32x32 icon)
What's missing:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest/mozilla-source.tar.gz
(B4 building: gzip -d mozilla-source.tar.gz ; bzip2 -9
mozilla-source.tar )
have fun!!
Stefan
%defin
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, you wrote:
> Pablo Saratxaga wrote:
>
> > Kaixo!
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 02:22:34PM +0100, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> >
> > > > mozilla-5.0-0.13.1mdk for M13 release 1, and mozilla-5.0-0.13.2mdk,...
> > > make that mozilla-5.0-0.m13.1mdk for M13 release 1, and
Pablo Saratxaga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> IMHO mozilla-5.0-0.M13.1mdk would be better. "0.13" won't tell much to people;
> but having "M13" (which is the official numbering) is inmediately
> understandable by anyone. The leading 0. is only to avoid that the final
> version (that is 5.0 w
Kaixo!
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 08:25:36AM -0600, Lord And Master;) wrote:
> Well as of current the CVS version of last night is a hell of a lot more stable
> the M13 is, M13 was about as stable as running windows;) but as of feb 25th the
> CVS release is stable enough to use day to day, so until
yo!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 10:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] mozilla
>
>
> Pablo Saratxaga wrote:
>
> > Kaixo!
> >
> > On Fri, Feb
yo!
> -Original Message-
> From: Pablo Saratxaga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 10:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] mozilla
>
>
> Kaixo!
>
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 02:22:34PM +0100, Stefan van der E
> Kaixo!
>
> > > mozilla-5.0-0.13.1mdk for M13 release 1, and mozilla-5.0-0.13.2mdk,...
> > make that mozilla-5.0-0.m13.1mdk for M13 release 1, and
> Why not 0.M13 ? M13 is more meaningful than m13 (at least for me)
I just forgot to hold down the shift key ;-)
> > How about CVS versions?
>
Pablo Saratxaga wrote:
> Kaixo!
>
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 02:22:34PM +0100, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
>
> > > mozilla-5.0-0.13.1mdk for M13 release 1, and mozilla-5.0-0.13.2mdk,...
> > make that mozilla-5.0-0.m13.1mdk for M13 release 1, and
>
> Why not 0.M13 ? M13 is more meaningful than
Kaixo!
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 02:22:34PM +0100, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> > mozilla-5.0-0.13.1mdk for M13 release 1, and mozilla-5.0-0.13.2mdk,...
> make that mozilla-5.0-0.m13.1mdk for M13 release 1, and
Why not 0.M13 ? M13 is more meaningful than m13 (at least for me)
> How about CV
Kaixo!
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 11:23:08AM +0100, Warly wrote:
>
> With the scheme about development version addressed with decimal number,
> the right name would be
>
> mozilla-5.0-0.13.1mdk for M13 release 1, and mozilla-5.0-0.13.2mdk,...
IMHO mozilla-5.0-0.M13.1mdk would be better. "0.13" wo
> With the scheme about development version addressed with decimal number,
> the right name would be
>
> mozilla-5.0-0.13.1mdk for M13 release 1, and mozilla-5.0-0.13.2mdk,...
make that mozilla-5.0-0.m13.1mdk for M13 release 1, and
How about CVS versions? Any suggestions on how to name them
With the scheme about development version addressed with decimal number,
the right name would be
mozilla-5.0-0.13.1mdk for M13 release 1, and mozilla-5.0-0.13.2mdk,...
Now just have to check this renaming does not break too much things.
--
Warly
Kaixo!
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 04:05:00PM -0700, Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
> And probably the best thing todo is continue the
> 'Obsoletes: mozilla-Mxy' untill it is released and then
> 'Obsolete: mozilla-M9'
NO !
Having the milestone in the name means you nead as many Obsolete lines
as mile
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Pablo Saratxaga wrote:
> Kaixo!
>
> Maybe here is a case for decimal releases: Version: 5.0 Release: 0.M13.1mdk ?
DUH, a leading 0. yep i'm not awake yet..
--
MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Axalon
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Adrian Reber wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Lenny Cartier wrote:
> >
> > > Adrian Reber wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The current version of mozilla in contrib is:
> > > >
> > > > Name: mozilla-M12
> > > > Version :
Kaixo!
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 05:51:11PM +0100, Lenny Cartier wrote:
> > I think it would be better to name mozilla this way:
> >
> > Name: mozilla-browser
> > Version : 5.0
> > Release : M13-1mdk
> >
> > Because the M13 is the release number and not part of the package name!
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Lenny Cartier wrote:
>
> > Adrian Reber wrote:
> > >
> > > The current version of mozilla in contrib is:
> > >
> > > Name: mozilla-M12
> > > Version : 5.0
> > > Release : 1mdk
> > >
> > > I think it would be
> Adrian,
>
> 2 weekends ago I rewrote the .spec file for Mozilla M13.
> My re-write addresses the issues you encountered. I sent
> my changes over to mandrake, but I beleive that Lenny
> had some problems building it. I've attached my .spec
> file to this mail, and invite you to give it a try.
>
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Lenny Cartier wrote:
> Adrian Reber wrote:
> >
> > The current version of mozilla in contrib is:
> >
> > Name: mozilla-M12
> > Version : 5.0
> > Release : 1mdk
> >
> > I think it would be better to name mozilla this way:
> >
> > Name: mozilla-brows
Adrian,
2 weekends ago I rewrote the .spec file for Mozilla M13.
My re-write addresses the issues you encountered. I sent
my changes over to mandrake, but I beleive that Lenny
had some problems building it. I've attached my .spec
file to this mail, and invite you to give it a try.
If you do, coul
Adrian Reber wrote:
>
> The current version of mozilla in contrib is:
>
> Name: mozilla-M12
> Version : 5.0
> Release : 1mdk
>
> I think it would be better to name mozilla this way:
>
> Name: mozilla-browser
> Version : 5.0
> Release : M13-1mdk
>
> Because the
> Here's my .spec file for Mozilla M13. Please update the M12 -> M13.
Fixed some a dependancy...
Stefan
%define name mozilla
%define version 5.0
%define release 2mdk
%define mozrel M13
Name: %{name}
Summary: Mozilla
Version: %{version}_%{mozrel}
Release: %{release}
Serial:0
Copy
Very nice...
--
Jeff Garzik | "Vegetarian" is the Indian word
Building 1024 | for 'lousy hunter.'
MandrakeSoft, Inc. |
401 - 489 of 489 matches
Mail list logo
