David Ehle wrote:
areas are entirely different skill sets. Complimentary but seperate.
True.
BTW. This is getting off topic.
True.
Regarding RFC compliance - Its a good thing. But it is more important to
get your mail. PHB's don't accept or understand the idea that its MS's
fault. If they can s
I have to agree with Chris on this. This was several year ago, but you
could get a CS degree from a major state school in Indiana without knowing
how to install a ethernet card. Hopefully this has changed but at one
time a the computer science department produced people who could program
fluentl
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 09:32:30PM +0530, Bill Long wrote:
> I am probably wrong, but it seems to me that the origin of Courier was that
> of a single individual who built himself a program that he needed. Then was
> kind enough to open it up to the rest of the world. I'm wondering if there
> is a
From: "Peter C. Norton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am a system administrator, not a programmer.
The difference between the two is mainly one of job description, and
shouldn't be one of understanding how programs work or how to modify
them.
I strongly disagree, an SA must be able to program, but that d
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 06:35:00PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> File a bug report with Microsoft. As you've noted, normally illegal 8-bit
> content gets rejected. Now, it is acceptable, but an IMAP client is
> explicitly notified that the 8bit content uses an unknown character set.
Sam, I h
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 11:47:36AM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Sounds good in principle, but keep in mind that not everyone who uses open
> source software is capable of making changes to a complex piece of C code.
> I am a system administrator, not a programmer.
The difference between the two
From: Bill Long [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The great thing about open source software is that it lets you make
> changes that you need to. In my case there are a few of things I'm
> looking for which courier doesn't do. However, rather than ask Sam,
> or anybody else to take up their valuable
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 03/12/03
at 10:03 AM, "MikeM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>On 3/12/03 at 2:23 PM Gregor Lawatscheck wrote:
>|Wouldn't it be great to have
>|compatibility as a further advantage on the list of features? I think so.
> =
>One of the reasons I use Courier i
the group (for wasting bandwidth).
If I'm not wrong, then I hope my point is made in a non-insulting manner.
:)
bill
- Original Message -
From: "Gregor Lawatscheck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 7:53 PM
Subj
On 3/12/03 at 2:23 PM Gregor Lawatscheck wrote:
|Wouldn't it be great to have
|compatibility as a further advantage on the list of features? I think so.
=
One of the reasons I use Courier is precisely because it tracks the
standards well. There is enough shoddy, mediocre, RFC-igno
At 09:02 12/03/2003, you wrote:
Giovanni,
May I make a recommendation?
The great thing about open source software is that it lets you make changes
that you need to. In my case there are a few of things I'm looking for
which courier doesn't do. However, rather than ask Sam, or anybody else to
ta
PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: [courier-users] Re: RFC compliance: goodbye to courier MTA
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:35:00 -0500
> Sam Varshavchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Giovanni Panozzo writes:
> >
> > > and that solv
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:35:00 -0500
Sam Varshavchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Giovanni Panozzo writes:
>
> > and that solved most, but not all, of my problems:
> >
> > a) Every HTML message sent ftom Outlook Express 5.5 Italian has
> > an invalid 8bit section at the beginning.
>
> File a
13 matches
Mail list logo
