On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Hendrik van Arragon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've made a little class for serial communication, which i want to export
> from c++ to python. My problem is, that this class does not know what data
> it's receiving. The layer above the protocol knows how to handle the data
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:03 AM, John Reid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using a version of the indexing suite I believe I copied from
> Roman's codebase some time ago. I've recently refactored my project into
> multiple modules and now I'm have some runtime errors when iterating
> over sequences in pytho
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Suresh Joshi wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I had a question about how to handle void* and HWNDs from within Python
> using Boost::Python and Py++. Reading through the Py++ documentation, I'm
> loving how I can slice and dice my classes/wrappers and seemingly do
> whateve
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Ehsan Pi wrote:
> In Python, the output of the GetAddress is a void * to the memory address:
>
> >>> import MyWrapper
> >>> foo = MyWrapper.Foo(100)
> >>> address = foo.GetAddress()
> >>> print address
>
> >>>
>
> My question is can I fill
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Ehsan Pi wrote:
> Thanks Roman,
>
> I believe these are not specific to py++ but boost.python, correct?
Yes
> What I
> mean is whether it can be automated through the py++ wrapper, or do I have
> to manually alter the py++ generated cpp file?
Yes. py++ supports o
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Ehsan Pi wrote:
> Thanks Roman for your quick reply,
>
> That's what confuses me. HWND is essentially a pointer to an int to hold the
> window handle. How can to convert them to each other?
I am not sure that you are right, but in case you are, use
make_constructo
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Ehsan Pi wrote:
> In python I get the not-match error:
>
> >>> import MyWrapper
> >>> import win32gui
> >>> hwnd = win32gui.GetDesktopWindow()
> >>> foo = MyWrapper.Foo(hwnd)
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "", line 1, in
>
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Davidson, Josh wrote:
> I did run into a couple subtle problems with this approach. Depending on
> where I put the header file, Py++ doesn't generate pypp.hpp/pypp.cpp files
> that actually register the data structures. Everything shows up in the
> exposed_dec
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Davidson, Josh wrote:
> I'm adding return value call policies to methods of a class as follows:
> mb.class_("SerialStore").member_functions(lambda decl:
> decl.name.startswith("getSim")).call_policies = \
> call_policies.return_internal_reference
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Davidson, Josh wrote:
> Actually, it is using a source_reader_t by default. __parse_declarations
> invokes __parse_file_by_file, which uses a source_reader_t (line 236) to
> parse each file. It then bombs out after parsing all of the files when it
> calls _jo
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Davidson, Josh wrote:
> Hopefully, there’s enough information in the traceback, but if not I can try
> to sanitize an example. I’m on rev 1856.
More or less. Sorry for late response, I was pretty busy.
> File "c:\Python26\lib\site-packages\pygccxml\parser\proj
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Jim Bosch wrote:
> I am aware of Py++ and the extensions associated with it, and some of that
> could definitely go into Boost.Python proper (and I think I've heard Roman
> state that he wouldn't have a problem with someone else doing the work to
> make it so, and
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Kirill Lapshin wrote:
> Fair enough, it is not a big deal and easy to handle in client code. I
> don't necessarily agree with your point though. To me the whole wrapper
> business is implementation detail. Unless I'm missing something it doesn't
> really matter ho
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Kirill Lapshin wrote:
> Hi Roman/all,
>
> Today I've found what I believe a bug in balanced file writer.
>
> Suppose you have 24 class_creators and trying to split them into 10
> buckets. What it currently does is:
> - how many creators per bucket? 24/10 = 2. uhm,
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Kirill Lapshin wrote:
> On 18/05/2011 04:27, Roman Yakovenko wrote:
>>
>> Many years ago, I submitted a patch to this mailing list which adds
>> support for boost::shared_ptr< const T > to Boost.Python. It looks like
>> it was not
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Kirill Lapshin wrote:
> Hello Roman/All,
>
Hello.
> I used Py++ before, and was very happy with it, now I'm working on a new
> project and trying to introduce Py++ here as well. Naturally I decided to
> get a latest version (was using a bit outdated version bef
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Holger Joukl wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> has py++ moved somewhere else?
>
> This seems to be unreachable:
>
> http://language-binding.net/pyplusplus/pyplusplus.html
I just redirected "language-binding.net" to
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pygccxml/ . It will take some
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:14 AM, zeb wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to export the following code to python, but failed. Please
> help me!
> Here is the code:
> --
> c++ code:
> --
> class IWorker {
> public:
> virtual int getData() = 0;
> };
>
> class Worker : public IWork
erything you need on
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pygccxml/ page - documentation, bug
tracking, mailing list, source and etc.
> I also haven't seen Roman Yakovenko posting here recently.
>
There were 0 posts related to py++ :-). The project is aliv
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Jacob Davis wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Jim Bosch wrote:
>
>> I think you'll want to define a custom wrapper class for each of these
>> typedefs with a distinct type. From your example, it looks like many of
>> these might be similar enough th
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Davidson, Josh wrote:
> I'm having some trouble getting pyccxml to parse specialized classes.
> Consider the following simple header file:
>
>
> #ifndef TEMPLATECLASS_HPP_
> #define TEMPLATECLASS_HPP_
>
> template
> class TemplateClass {
>
...
> };
>
> #endif
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Davidson, Josh wrote:
> I'm wondering if this behavior is correct when using pygccxml. Consider
> the following two sets of simple class definitions:
>
> -- SET 1 --
> class inner {
> protected:
>unsigned a;
>unsigned b;
>
he one to know best?) I may try.
I don't think fixing py++ is the right approach.
> I'm also considering a workaround of
> checking bases for all the classes and add missing "self != self" for all
> those which derive from equality_comparable;
> Perhaps there is the
to
create a function transformation for them.
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
ion where I can expose iterators(some kind
> of support available for iterators).
No need to reinvent the wheel:
* http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_43_0/libs/python/doc/v2/iterator.html
- this functionality is not supported by py++
*
http://language-binding.net/pyplusplus/documentation/inde
ppose a constructor is declared as private can I change it's access as
> a public (or can I overwrite it somehow)?
#define private public
#include
this ugly trick will allow you to achieve what you want, but it may
not work on some compilers/classes. You will have to check
> and it is working fine.
>
> Thanks can someone, please let me know the reason why :: (scope operator) is
> required in the start of the argument.
I tried really hard to make this functionality more "user friendly", but failed.
Take a look on
http://pygccxml.svn.sourcef
ould be the reason behind it, and what could I do
> to include those class (for example class myName).
I don't know, may be father code excludes it, may be the class is
private, may be bug in py++, may be bug in your
"find_out_dependency-include" loop. I really can't say you.
You
t; INFO Parsing source file "./a.h" ...
> INFO gccxml cmd: /usr/local/bin/gccxml -I"." "./a.h"
> -fxml="/tmp/tmpB13bTu.xml"
> INFO GCCXML version - 0.9( 1.132 )
>
> WARNING: someClassB [class]
>> execution error W1040: The declarat
us;
> Result const result;
> // boost::optional const result;
> };
May be I miss something, but this class has "const member variable"
and doesn't have user define copy constructor ( it is commented out ).
In this case the class indeed noncopyable.
Am I wrong?
-
+ wrong, you can always override its decision:
>
>>mb = module_builder_t( ... )
>>mb.class_(...).noncopyable = False
>
> Thanks again it is helpful for us.
It seems, that py++ was wrong :-(. Can you specify gccxml version, OS
and your compiler? Do you mind to submit a small test case that
repro
e used py++ (latest version) for code generation
Please post a small and complete code directly to the mailing list.
Did you try to remove "noncopyable" from the generated code? If so
what happened?
If you think, that py++ wrong, you can always override its decision:
mb = module_build
ggest you to take a look on Py++ unittests, especially on
"statics_tester.py" and "statics_to_be_exported.[c|h]pp" files. They
deal with exactly your use case
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
neration-engine
), especially "code creators" sections. Then take a look on
'pyplusplus/file_writers/( single_file.py and multiple_files.py )
modules.
pyplusplus/code_creators/algorithm.py has some code, that helps to
work with "code creators tree&q
y >
.def( "push_back", &mylist_push_back )
...
>From Python, your user will not see any difference:
alist = AList()
alist.push_back|( )
HTH
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
Both indexing suites provides interface very similar to Python
containers. So the user will not have to learn new API, but if you
insists, you can rename/introduce new method from Python
AList.push_back = AList.append
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
_
his topic is covered in the following document:
http://language-binding.net/pyplusplus/documentation/containers.html
HTH
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
ss_( 'null_type' ).include()
>
> the warning disapeared but the module still couldn't be loaded.
I attach the generated code from my test, which is based on your
files, so you can study it. It works fine for me ( Ubuntu 10.04, gcc
4.4.3 and I think Boost SVN ).
HTH
--
Roman Yakov
and verified that the proposed solution actually
works. I will try to add "boost::tuple" support to py++ next week.
Let me know, if you need more help with this issue.
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
the last time.
> But now... there's some problem with pygccxml I think :|
This is indeed a huge progress, I will take a look on this error today.
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing l
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 2:24 AM, Maciej Sitarz wrote:
> On 28.03.2010 11:53, Roman Yakovenko wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Maciej Sitarz >
>> So that would be a big problem, because that's a C++ API for a library
>> which
>>>
>>&
gt; /usr/local/boost_1_42_0/boost/python/object/value_holder.hpp:137: error: no
> matching function for call to
> ‘ms_mascotresults_wrapper::ms_mascotresults_wrapper(matrix_science::ms_mascotresfile&,
> const unsigned int&, const double&, const int&, const char* const&, const
> char* const&)’
>
>
> ms_mascotresults.cpp:12: note: candidates are:
> ms_mascotresults_wrapper::ms_mascotresults_wrapper(const
> ms_mascotresults_wrapper&)
>
>
> ms_mascotresults.cpp:12: note:
> ms_mascotresults_wrapper::ms_mascotresults_wrapper()
>
>
>
>
>
> If I comment the virtual function getPeptide in the .hpp, it builds
> perfectly with this constructor :
>
> class_("ms_mascotresults", init &, const unsigned int, double, int, const char *,const char *>())
>
> This is the first time I use Boost.Python so I don't really know what
> happens inside, I don't understand this errors of candidates given the fact
> that there is only one constructor in the .hpp ...
>
>
> Thanks in advance for your help.
>
> Fallino
>
>
>
> ___
> Cplusplus-sig mailing list
> Cplusplus-sig@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
>
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Roman Yakovenko
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Tomasz Mikolajczyk
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm a new user of boost::python art. I started to play a bit with the
>> code and the py++ generator and encountered diffic
ut I don't know what to do to avoid it.
I will take a look on this issue today.
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
ave to "configure" py++ to produce such code. You
can take a look on PyOgre project, as it does this.
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
working example. You can download it and study.
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
"operator*" and
"operator->".
The following example (
http://language-binding.net/pyplusplus/troubleshooting_guide/smart_ptrs/smart_ptrs.html
) should help you. Also, in the past there were a lot of discussions
on this subject, so using Google will definitely help
support for these operators. and pyplusplus is failing to
> generate wrapper code for these operator. Are there any work around or some
> functionality available in py++ to handle these.
If you will create small and complete example of what your are trying
to do, then may be I would be ab
of free time these days, nevertheless I will be
glad to test your changes, when they will be ready.
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/ma
;t have one at this point - make_getter/setter is creating it. What
> am I doing wrong here?
I am not sure. What py++ version do you use?
Can you post small and complete example, of what you are trying to do?
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
nage to investigate how did
> they do it.
I sent the question to PyOgre main developer. When the answer will be
available, I will publish it here.
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
___
Cplusplus-
2.4/site-packages/pygccxml/parser/source_reader.py",
> line 231, in read_gccxml_file
> pygccxml.parser.source_reader.gccxml_runtime_error_t: Error occured while
> running GCC-XML: /home/macieks/boost/boost_1_42_0/boost/mpl/bool_fwd.hpp:21:
> sorry, unimplemented: call_expr cannot be mang
uses
"BOOST_PYTHON_MEMBER_FUNCTION_OVERLOADS" macro ( see Boost.Python
reference for explanation ).
I guess what you want to use/change is the function alias:
mb = module_builder_t ( )
connection = mb.class_( 'Connection' )
for callback in connection.mem_
uot; );
bp::class_< foo1_t::foo2_t, bp::bases< foo3_t > >( "foo2_t",
"documentation" );
}
}
There is another problem with that code: class foo3_t is exposed under
class foo1_t. You can fix this using a simple Python code:
foo3_t = .foo1_t.foo3_t
The only
)
sorted = pypp_sort_classes( classes, include_vars )
< put class X before class Y >
return sorted
pyplusplus/creators_factory/sort_algorithms.sort_classes = my_sort_classes
If you have even less time, you always can modified file by hands,
create the patch and apply it e
e. In any case, without virtual table you
can't expect the "desired functionality" to work.
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
shouldn't it?
1. I would talk with developers to understand the reasons for such interface
2. create wrapper function, which takes regular python list and
creates a vector from it and expose this function, instead of the
original one
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
but with the following class definition
class Base {
public:
virtual ~Base(){}
};
class Derived : public Base { };
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@pyt
{}
int value;
protected:
item_t& operator=( const item_t& other );
};
int main( int argc, const char** argv ){
std::vector< item_t > values( 10, item_t( 12 ));
for( size_t i = 0; i < values.size(); ++i ){
values[ i ].value = i;
}
}
--
R
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Maciej Sitarz wrote:
> On 20.03.2010 20:47, Roman Yakovenko wrote:
> Em... but the example main() compiles and works... unless I want to
> 'push_back' object to the vector.
This is exactly my point
>> I think, you will have to chan
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Maciej Sitarz wrote:
> On 20.03.2010 19:12, Roman Yakovenko wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Maciej Sitarz wrote:
> The compile errors are still the same:
> generated.cpp:40: instantiated from here
> test.h:6: er
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Maciej Sitarz wrote:
> On 17.03.2010 08:52, Roman Yakovenko wrote:
>>
>> Nothing, really.
>>
>> Please take a look on the following document:
>>
>> http://language-binding.net/pyplusplus/documentation/tutorials/module_b
u can not use such
classes with Boost.Python indexing suite. I suggest you to switch to
the indexing suite that comes with Py++:
http://language-binding.net/pyplusplus/documentation/containers.html .
I am pretty sure it will work out of the box. You will not have to
specify "noncopyable=True"
nguage-binding.net/pyplusplus/documentation/tutorials/module_builder/module_builder.html#declarations-customization
and let me know whether is makes sense to you.
If not come back and we will resolve the issue
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
is working at all?
I am using and testing py++ and pygccxml on Ubuntu 9.10 32/64
architectures with gcc-4.4.1 as the default compiler.
pygccxml svn contains compiled gccxml for those architectures (
http://pygccxml.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pygccxml/gccxml_bin/v09/ )
and us
.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pygccxml/pyplusplus_dev/examples/gmplib_dev/
HTH
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 1:30 PM, peoro wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Roman Yakovenko
>> Can you create small and complete example? ( C++ code, Py++ script and
>> Py++ generated code )?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
> Sure:
>
> # main.cpp
> #inc
You will get pure-Python solution.
There are even few code generators out there, that will happily
generate initial ctypes code for you.
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
___
Cplusplus-sig ma
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 6:22 PM, peoro wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Roman Yakovenko
> wrote:
>> Did you try len( x )?
>>
>
> Yes, I tried and it isn't working.
> ...
> I've been trying with SVN revisions 1814 and 1824.
Can you create sm
hat, in my opinion, should be provided.
It is provided.
> Is this a feature or a bug? And in the former case, how would I be
> supposed to get a set's size? explicitly exposing a `size' function
> for it?
Did you try len( x )?
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python
xml-development
> I've been trying to play with pyplusplus.module_builder, but cannot
> find a way to allow native conversions, and google isn't being of help
> either.
> Is it possible to achieve native conversions, and, if it is, why is it
> not done by defaul
l recurring = false ){
createTimer( interval, boost::function( callback_wrapper_t(
function ) ), recurring )
}
3. Register the createTimerWrapper
I think this could work. May be there is a better way. If you have a
lot of functions like this and the idea works, I can help you to
generat
FIX=''
, SHLIBSUFFIX='.so'
)
Since your code generator written in Python, you can continue where
Py++ stops and generate your favorite "make" file. You can go even
father. Py++ tests generate the code, compile, load new module and
test the functionality. All this is done in a single, stand alone
process.
HTH
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
xplain how to solve this issue with
> Py++ and boost::python.
Take a look on
http://language-binding.net/pyplusplus/documentation/multi_module_development.html
. The document describes the situation you have.
If you need a good example take a look on Python-Ogre project. It uses
"multi modu
http://frontiersin.org/psychology/psychology/paper/10.3389/neuro.11/011.2009/html/
The articles talks about some science fiction ( for me:-) ), but also
has few paragraphs related to Boost.Python and Py++.
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net
i ){ ... }
and expose it.
Another solution would be to use ctypes module to call those functions.
In both cases Py++ can help you:
http://language-binding.net/pyplusplus/documentation/functions/transformation/transformation.html
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language bin
n Document__EqualWrap.
If I understand you right, you need:
1. define new global function, which takes Document& as the first argument
bool Document_EqualWrap( const Document& x, const Document& y ){...}
2. Expose it:
...
.def( "__eq__", &Document_EqualWrap )
Is not
"bar"
, (int ( ::overloads_macro::Foo::* )( ::overloads_macro::X
const &,::overloads_macro::Y const * ) )( &::overloads_macro::Foo::bar
)
, ( bp::arg("arg0"), bp::arg("arg1")=bp::object() ) );
as you can see ( and try ) the generated
piled...
>
> How can I do?
It is not clear what you are asking for.
If the "Document" class has special function for comparison, than may
be you can define few global operators ( == and != ).
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
_
False )
#will add code to the bottom of the module
mb.add_module_code( "#bottom", tail=True )
Even if it doesn't solve you the current issue, it can help you with PyLint.
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
Y_NONOPT -2
./fuse_opt.h:144:#define FUSE_OPT_KEY_KEEP -3
./fuse_opt.h:152:#define FUSE_OPT_KEY_DISCARD -4
./fuse_opt.h:261:#endif /* _FUSE_OPT_H_ */
Search completed with 63 matches.
I could be wrong, but a proposed solution successfully handles (
_builder_t( ... )
for file_path in pygccxml.declarations.declaration_files( mb.global_ns ):
if file_path is not under "fuse" source code directory:
continue
else:
use simple regex to search for "#define FUSE_*" expression,
extract its value and add it to
ws to generate POINTER( c_char )
instead of c_char_p.
The relevant commit are:
* http://pygccxml.svn.sourceforge.net/pygccxml/?rev=1786&view=rev
* http://pygccxml.svn.sourceforge.net/pygccxml/?rev=1790&view=rev
The functionality should be used like:
mb = ctypes_module_builder_t( ... )
mb.t
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Roman Yakovenko
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 2:46 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for looking into this. I'm afraid the fix for the CFUNCTYPE vs
>> POINTER(CFUNCTYPE) issue is not completely working though.
>
types.POINTER( ctypes.CFUNCTYPE( None, ctypes.c_void_p,
> ctypes.POINTER( fuse_conn_info ) ) )),
> ("destroy", ctypes.POINTER( ctypes.CFUNCTYPE( None, ctypes.c_void_p
> ) )),
> [...]
:-(. I will take a look on this today.
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.lan
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Roman Yakovenko
wrote:
> Thanks. I will try to fix the problems you reported this evening and
> will let you know.
Nikolaus, I fixed both issues you reported:
* http://pygccxml.svn.sourceforge.net/pygccxml/?rev=1784&view=rev
* http://pygccxml.svn.sourc
'padding', ctypes.c_uint, 29),
> ('fh', ctypes.c_uint64),
> ('lock_owner', ctypes.c_uint64)]
>
> Best,
>
> -Nikolaus
>
> --
> »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
>
> PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD
g=7
> do_callback called with flag=7
> Segmentation fault
>
>
> Please let me know if you can reproduce the problem. It took me quite
> some time to figure this out.
>
>
> Best,
>
> -Nikolaus
>
> --
> »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana
s.python.org/issue7569 ). I think it is a good think.
I have only one problem: in Py++( pygccxml) types are "singletones".
What is the best interface for the user to customize such thing?
Should Py++ generate POINTER(c_char) in all cases by default?
I would like to know your opinio
ile and I will let you you when I
implement the feature.
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
most cases it will do exactly what is needed. I
prefer to explicitly select the desired declarations.
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
variables, which are pointers to functions and
pygccxml failed in this case.
I committed the fix. You will need to update pygccxml and Py++ projects.
I also attached the generated file.
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
# This file has been generat
ter" could help you (
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_41_0/libs/python/doc/v2/faq.html#custom_string
), but I never tried it on such use case.
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
___
Cplusplus-si
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:35 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Roman Yakovenko writes:
>>> Certainly all the exported symbols should already be available from
>>> parsing the header file... Is it possible to omit the symbols file
>>> and generate code based only on the h
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Roman Yakovenko writes:
>> May be you should take a look on
>> "module_builder/ctypes_decl_dependencies.py" module. It contains
>> "find_out_dependencies" functionality. As input it takes a set o
epends on?
mb = ctypes_module_builder_t( ... )
mb.global_ns.exclude()
fuse_lowlevel_ops = mb.class_( ' 'fuse_lowlevel_ops' )
for d in find_out_dependencies( [fuse_lowlevel_ops] ):
d.include()
I can't test the code right now, but it should look very similar to this.
HTH
--
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Roman Yakovenko
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a way to add additional code to the output generated by the
>> ctypes code generator? Specifically, I would like to add some special
interpreters it also can help you to see what python*.so will
be actually used.
> 3) import the module in python interpreter.
>
> Do I need to do something else (define some other variables or make some
> other changes) in order to make my module work?
In case you have few mo
; only on the headers?
I don't think so( it didn't worked in my use case ) but you can try.
Start to comment out code in ctypes_builder.py and post the result :-)
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
_config=gccxml_cfg )
> mb.build_code_creator(shared_library_file)
> mb.add_registration_code( '#...@pydevcodeanalysisignore', False )
>
> yields
>
> AttributeError: 'ctypes_module_builder_t' object has no attribute
> 'add_registration_code'
>
Rig
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
