To: Martin Doerr
Cc: crm-sig
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 295 homework
Dear Martin
I do not want to bore the SIG members any more, but your argument serves my
cause, and not yours.
Let me remind that the discussion is about an example of (E78 Curated Holding
which is a subclass of)) E24 Physical
activity of curating the (data) set.
>>
>> In the fourth example on could put the word Digital in parenthesis or delete
>> it:
>> The (Digital) Collections of the Munich DigitiZation Center (MDZ)
>> accessible via
>> https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/
&g
itiZation Center (MDZ) accessible
via https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/ at least in January 2018
Best
Christian-Emil
From: Crm-sig on behalf of Franco Niccolucci
Sent: 11 January 2018 11:03
To: Achille Felicetti
Cc: crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 295 homework
Thanks Achi
Dear Franco,
I'd like to clarify: The CRM does not intend to constitute a dictionary
of what terms mean in an absolute way. Of course the content of the
Digital Library at any point in time is immaterial. No objections to
your comments. But it is equally obvious, that any accessible form of it
enter (MDZ) accessible
via https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/ at least in January 2018
Best
Christian-Emil
From: Crm-sig on behalf of Franco Niccolucci
Sent: 11 January 2018 11:03
To: Achille Felicetti
Cc: crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 295 homework
Thanks Achille.
Tha
Dear Achille
my position is to deprecate the use of the term “digital collection” to
precisely designate whatever, as it is ambiguous (agree with Thanis).
If used colloquially, it is an acceptable term to designate the assembly of
various digital objects.
In no case it can refer to or exempli
Dear Franco,
I fully support you threefold view of the digital world, but I have also the
impression, in the case of a digital collection, that the particular situation
under which such an entity exists, needs some specific conceptualisation. In
particular, my question is: in which of the three
Thanks Achille.
That sentence about 0s and 1s is there probably because people, and especially
humanists like dictionary editors, don’t understand the nature of numbers.
The number “two” is the number two, not two cows, two oranges or two humans.
Its definition does not need any physical repr
Dear Franco,
> Il giorno 10 gen 2018, alle ore 21:52, Franco Niccolucci
> ha scritto:
>
> Quoting Martin below
>
> [By Digital Collections] ... we do not mean the servers as a whole, but only
> the material signal encoding on the media.
>
> This statement is an oxymoron. Whatever material th
All these examples show that the issue exist!
My opinion in short: there is of course a distinction between “hard” and “soft”
copies. Hard (i.e. material) copies involve modifying matter; soft (i.e.
immaterial) ones don’t. Hard copies are affected by degradation, soft ones
don’t. Soft copies ma
Not really, Daria. It is not digital, it possibly represents/is the support of
a digital encoding, same as a selfie of me on my iphone is not my face.
Franco
Prof. Franco Niccolucci
Director, VAST-LAB
PIN - U. of Florence
Scientific Coordinator
ARIADNE - PARTHENOS
Piazza Ciardi 25
59100 Prato,
QR-code is very phisical (on surface) and absolutely digital, because presents
0 & 1.
With kind regards,
Daria Hookk
Quoting Martin below
[By Digital Collections] ... we do not mean the servers as a whole, but only
the material signal encoding on the media.
This statement is an oxymoron. Whatever material thing cannot be digital, not
even “signals”: according to my Oxford Dictionary, digital means "expressed
Dear Thanasi,
On 1/10/2018 1:30 PM, Athanasios Velios wrote:
Shouldn't this:
§ The Digital Collections of the Munich DigitiZation Center (MDZ)
accessible via https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/ at least in January
2018.
be instead:
§ The group of servers (hardware) holding the Digital Co
Shouldn't this:
§ The Digital Collections of the Munich DigitiZation Center (MDZ)
accessible via https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/ at least in January 2018.
be instead:
§ The group of servers (hardware) holding the Digital Collections of
the Munich DigitiZation Center (MDZ) accessible vi
On 1/8/2018 4:25 PM, Øyvind Eide wrote:
Dear Martin, and all,
it looks good to me. Given the deprecation of E84 it could be nice to
add a sentence to the scope note of E24, something like:
”Instances of this class can act as carriers of instances of E73
Information Object.”
OK, see below!
crm-sig-boun...@ics.forth.gr] On Behalf Of Øyvind Eide
Sent: 08 January 2018 14:35
To: crm-sig
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 295 homework
Dear Martin, and all,
it looks good to me. Given the deprecation of E84 it could be nice to add a
sentence to the scope note of E24, something like:
”Instances o
Dear Martin, and all,
it looks good to me. Given the deprecation of E84 it could be nice to add a
sentence to the scope note of E24, something like:
”Instances of this class can act as carriers of instances of E73 Information
Object.”
Regards,
Øyvind
> Am 04.01.2018 um 18:39 schrieb Martin D
Dear All,
Here my proposals:
"ISSUE 295
Following Martin’s proposal to remove class E84 since it does not
satisfy the requirements proposed on issue 340, the sig proposed the
examples of material carrier of a digital object to be moved to E24 of
an E25 digital feature and possibly to E78
19 matches
Mail list logo
