Re: [css-d] CSS Zengarden Design #202

2008-03-18 Thread david
Mary Ellen Curtin wrote: > Georg wrote: > >>> How well does CSS Zengarden Design #202, "Retro Theater": >>> http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=/202/202.css&page=0 work in IE 6 >>> & lower? >> IE6 and lower on windows don't support 'position: fixed'. > ... > > IE6 needs workarounds, but that doe

Re: [css-d] CSS Zengarden Design #202

2008-03-18 Thread david
Mary Ellen Curtin wrote: > How well does CSS Zengarden Design #202, "Retro Theater": > http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=/202/202.css&page=0 > work in IE 6 & lower? On my IE6.0 machine the frame doesn't wrap around > the way it does in Firefox & IE7. I would say it breaks gracefully, > except

Re: [css-d] CSS Zengarden Design #202

2008-03-18 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Mary Ellen Curtin wrote: >>> How well does CSS Zengarden Design #202, "Retro Theater": >>> http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=/202/202.css&page=0 work in >>> IE 6 & lower? >> IE6 and lower on windows don't support 'position: fixed'. > ... >> IE6 needs workarounds, but that doesn't pose much of

Re: [css-d] IE8 conditional comment seen by IE multiple versions

2008-03-18 Thread Nancy E. Sosna Bohm
From: Alan > If you are allowed IE8 to overwrite IE7 and you have multiple versions of IE [1] by Yousif Al Saif on your PC > then the conditional comments meant to target IE8 are seen. Testing in IE6 and IE5.5 I see this. > [if lt IE 9][if IE 8] [if gt IE 7] [if gte IE 7] [if gt IE 6] [if gte I

Re: [css-d] CSS Zengarden Design #202

2008-03-18 Thread Mary Ellen Curtin
Georg wrote: >> How well does CSS Zengarden Design #202, "Retro Theater": >> http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=/202/202.css&page=0 work in IE 6 >> & lower? > > IE6 and lower on windows don't support 'position: fixed'. ... > IE6 needs workarounds, but that doesn't pose much of a problem, IMO.

Re: [css-d] CSS Zengarden Design #202

2008-03-18 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Mary Ellen Curtin wrote: > How well does CSS Zengarden Design #202, "Retro Theater": > http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=/202/202.css&page=0 work in IE 6 > & lower? IE6 and lower on windows don't support 'position: fixed'. IE/Mac supports 'position: fixed' pretty much all the way, but it look

Re: [css-d] CSS Zengarden Design #202

2008-03-18 Thread Melissa Meyer
Mary, It looks and works great on a mac in firefox and safari! -Melissa On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Mary Ellen Curtin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Lasko asked: > > > Is there a browser on the face of the earth it does work in? > > ha. Well, I'm looking at it with IE7 & Firefox2.0 on Vi

Re: [css-d] CSS Zengarden Design #202

2008-03-18 Thread Mary Ellen Curtin
David Lasko asked: > Is there a browser on the face of the earth it does work in? ha. Well, I'm looking at it with IE7 & Firefox2.0 on Vista, and it seems to work OK -- in the sense that there's a big movie-theater marquee wrapped around the text, which scrolls down nicely when you scroll down.

Re: [css-d] CSS Zengarden Design #202

2008-03-18 Thread David Laakso
Mary Ellen Curtin wrote: > How well does CSS Zengarden Design #202, "Retro Theater": > http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=/202/202.css&page=0 > work in IE 6 & lower? Hmm. Is there a browser on the face of the earth it does work in?

[css-d] CSS Zengarden Design #202

2008-03-18 Thread Mary Ellen Curtin
How well does CSS Zengarden Design #202, "Retro Theater": http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=/202/202.css&page=0 work in IE 6 & lower? On my IE6.0 machine the frame doesn't wrap around the way it does in Firefox & IE7. I would say it breaks gracefully, except page-down is painfully slow for me

Re: [css-d] make link non-clickable

2008-03-18 Thread Thierry Koblentz
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > discuss.org] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 3:27 PM > To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org > Subject: Re: [css-d] make link non-clickable > > > The cms "module" pulls a link from the xml

Re: [css-d] make link non-clickable

2008-03-18 Thread neal
yes it is a terrible thing - goes against the grain of all we stand for! the client should be caned - and me too for considering it we can probably end this thread now > This is really a CMS issue. > > Even if you *COULD* do this, then you'd have to *UNDO* it once client > want's > the link "clic

Re: [css-d] make link non-clickable

2008-03-18 Thread Rob Emenecker
This is really a CMS issue. Even if you *COULD* do this, then you'd have to *UNDO* it once client want's the link "clickable". From a professional perspective, I'd just tell the client they're suffering from a concussion! And, do you want someone else to look at your code and say, "Cutting edge,

Re: [css-d] make link non-clickable

2008-03-18 Thread neal
The cms "module" pulls a link from the xml - right now they dont want that link to be clickable (do not want linked page to be viewed)- but they want the link text to remain so they want the "link text to remain" - but actual link gone > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> The reason is "that's what t

Re: [css-d] make link non-clickable

2008-03-18 Thread Frank Piuck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The reason is "that's what the client wants" > I follow standards fairly well in my own little way - but the client and > the cms are my nemeses > > << >> prevent links from _looking_ like links, thereby making it less probable >> that users click on them,>>> >> >

Re: [css-d] make link non-clickable

2008-03-18 Thread Jukka K. Korpela
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The reason is "that's what the client wants" But you haven't told _what_ he wants. Just saying "I want links that are not links" is not a description. > <<> prevent links from _looking_ like links, thereby making it less >> probable that users click on them,>>> > > Th

Re: [css-d] make link non-clickable

2008-03-18 Thread Karey Cummins
this exists in content link if there any way to make that link non-clickable only with css --- I've done this when doing tutorials where I show a link to a non-existent site like www.yournamehere.com. I either replace the content within the href with a # or else will appl

Re: [css-d] make link non-clickable

2008-03-18 Thread neal
Thanks all and Ingo - love the sarcasm - well deserved by me violating semantics so brazenly The reason is "that's what the client wants" I follow standards fairly well in my own little way - but the client and the cms are my nemeses << prevent links from _looking_ like links, thereby making it l

Re: [css-d] make link non-clickable

2008-03-18 Thread Jukka K. Korpela
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > this exists in content > > link That's strange (and _quite_ different from a link with href="http://www.somewhere.com";), but anyway,... > if there any way to make that link non-clickable only with css No, clickability in the general sense is an inherent property of

Re: [css-d] make link non-clickable

2008-03-18 Thread Ingo Chao
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > this exists in content > > link > > > if there any way to make that link non-clickable only with css You could replace the entire page by a large PNG. Ingo -- http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html http://www.dolphinsback.com

[css-d] make link non-clickable

2008-03-18 Thread neal
this exists in content link if there any way to make that link non-clickable only with css one solution that I do not want to use is putting an absolutely positioned clear image over it. thansk Neal __ css-discuss [EMAIL PRO

Re: [css-d] Help with containers?

2008-03-18 Thread jennifer ham
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:42 PM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello; > > First post here... > > I am having trouble with setting up a container properly...it works > for the most part. I need for the background colors contained by it > to extend as wide as the browser window is — I know s

Re: [css-d] :: space above image ::

2008-03-18 Thread David Laakso
Valerie Wininger wrote: > David, > > It's the following: > > a { > margin:0; > padding:0 0 0 *10px*; > text-decoration:none; > } Thanks, Valerie (and Cynthia, off-list). Ah, yes... the obvious is sometimes elusive. -- http://chelseacreekstudio.com/

[css-d] Help with containers?

2008-03-18 Thread John
Hello; First post here... I am having trouble with setting up a container properly...it works for the most part. I need for the background colors contained by it to extend as wide as the browser window is — I know some folks have those nice 30-inchers! — and that seems to be working with th

Re: [css-d] :: space above image ::

2008-03-18 Thread Valerie Wininger
David, It's the following: a { margin:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt *10px*; text-decoration:none; } I removed that 10px of padding and it fixed the problem. Valerie On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:21 PM, David Laakso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stuck. The top of the image in the right column should but

[css-d] :: space above image ::

2008-03-18 Thread David Laakso
Stuck. The top of the image in the right column should butt the dashed page border. It does so in Safari, and win/IE 5.01 through 7.0. What is the culprit (s) causing the space above the image in Camino, Mac/Opera, and Mac/FF? -- http://ch

Re: [css-d] IE8 breaks layout

2008-03-18 Thread Alan Gresley
Dennis Bixler wrote: > > Tony Crockford wrote: > > http://www.hyperhappen.com/ > > > is it worth trying to fix it up? Or should I wait for a newer IE8 > > release... > > As David said you should wait before correcting what may not be broke > when the final release of IE8 is out. Tony gave all

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

2008-03-18 Thread David Laakso
Jack Timmons wrote: > Greetings all. > > Need a site check: > > http://www.myrvspace.com/rv-dealers/rv-dealers.php > > Anyway, I'm getting a single complaint about there being some weird line at > the bottom. Now, I know in Firefox on widescreen monitors (it seems) the > background somehow stops an

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

2008-03-18 Thread Valerie Wininger
It looks right in IE7 and Firefox 2. In IE6 where the light blue starts to go back to dk blue there is a distinct line where the darker blue starts. If that makes sense. You might check out Browsershots too-- http://browsershots.org/ Valerie On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Jack Timmons <[EMAIL

Re: [css-d] IE8 breaks layout

2008-03-18 Thread Dennis Bixler
> Tony Crockford wrote: > http://www.hyperhappen.com/ > is it worth trying to fix it up? Or should I wait for a newer IE8 > release... As David said you should wait before correcting what may not be broke when the final release of IE8 is out. If it truly is buggy in this beta you should first c

[css-d] Site Check Please

2008-03-18 Thread Jack Timmons
Greetings all. Need a site check: http://www.myrvspace.com/rv-dealers/rv-dealers.php Don't mind the CSS or layout. I know it needs a lot of work, and unfortunately it will never get done unless we're not given any more projects to add onto the site. Frankly, it's been patched together by numerou

Re: [css-d] IE8 breaks layout

2008-03-18 Thread Alan Gresley
Ingo Chao wrote: > Tony Crockford wrote: > > http://www.hyperhappen.com/ > > > > is the site, can anyone see what the issue might be? > > > > I wrote the css a long time ago and IE7 was quite happy with it, but > > IE8 is cutting elements and backgrounds off. it seems to be not > > wrapping flo

Re: [css-d] IE8 breaks layout

2008-03-18 Thread Ingo Chao
Tony Crockford wrote: > http://www.hyperhappen.com/ > > is the site, can anyone see what the issue might be? > > I wrote the css a long time ago and IE7 was quite happy with it, but > IE8 is cutting elements and backgrounds off. it seems to be not > wrapping floated elements properly, but I can'

Re: [css-d] IE8 breaks layout

2008-03-18 Thread David Laakso
Tony Crockford wrote: > http://www.hyperhappen.com/ > > is the site, can anyone see what the issue might be? > > I wrote the css a long time ago and IE7 was quite happy with it, but > IE8 is cutting elements and backgrounds off. it seems to be not > wrapping floated elements properly, but I can't

Re: [css-d] Can't find source of block-level error

2008-03-18 Thread Kim Brooks Wei
Ah hah. And there it is, pretty as a picture! Thanks, Valerie Kimi At 11:28 AM -0400 3/18/08, Valerie Wininger wrote: >Get rid of the margin-right on the .narrowcolumn and the sidebar div >should slide up next to it. -- Kimi Wei 201.475.1854 http://th

[css-d] IE8 breaks layout

2008-03-18 Thread Tony Crockford
http://www.hyperhappen.com/ is the site, can anyone see what the issue might be? I wrote the css a long time ago and IE7 was quite happy with it, but IE8 is cutting elements and backgrounds off. it seems to be not wrapping floated elements properly, but I can't be sure. is it worth trying to fi

Re: [css-d] Can't find source of block-level error

2008-03-18 Thread Valerie Wininger
Get rid of the margin-right on the .narrowcolumn and the sidebar div should slide up next to it. Valerie On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Kim Brooks Wei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://blog.kim.thewei.com/ > > At 7:49 AM -0500 3/18/08, Peter Hyde-Smith [ed: THANKS PETER!] wrote: > > >you wi

[css-d] IE8 conditional comment seen by IE multiple versions

2008-03-18 Thread Alan Gresley
Hi Everyone If you are allowed IE8 to overwrite IE7 and you have multiple versions of IE [1] by Yousif Al Saif on your PC then the conditional comments meant to target IE8 are seen. Testing in IE6 and IE5.5 I see this. [if lt IE 9][if IE 8] [if gt IE 7] [if gte IE 7] [if gt IE 6] [if gte IE 6

Re: [css-d] Can't find source of block-level error

2008-03-18 Thread Kim Brooks Wei
http://blog.kim.thewei.com/ At 7:49 AM -0500 3/18/08, Peter Hyde-Smith [ed: THANKS PETER!] wrote: >you will also have to declare an explicit width on >the .narrowcolumn > >You are not validating I've solved some problems and page now validates, but I still need to get the sidebar to the top of

Re: [css-d] Image alignment within div

2008-03-18 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Pete Harrison wrote: > The images are within the Branding Div. As if I didn't know :-) That has *absolutely nothing* to do with "containment of floats" and "control of line-up", I'm afraid. Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no __

Re: [css-d] Image alignment within div

2008-03-18 Thread Pete Harrison
The images are within the Branding Div. Regards Pete -Original Message- From: Gunlaug Sørtun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 March 2008 13:52 To: Pete Harrison Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Subject: Re: [css-d] Image alignment within div Pete Harrison wrote: > > I have a div wit

Re: [css-d] Image alignment within div

2008-03-18 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Pete Harrison wrote: > > I have a div with 3 images all floated left. In FF they show fine, > but in IE6 the first image is shifted up for some reason. I cannot > see why this is happening so any help would be appreciated. It happens because those images are not contained in the div, and not c

Re: [css-d] Can't find source of block-level error

2008-03-18 Thread Peter Hyde-Smith
Subject: [css-d] Can't find source of block-level error > http://blog.kim.thewei.com/ > > I could use some help with this. I've managed to totally confuse > myself. My sidebar won't snap into place to the right of my > narrowcolumn, and my page won't validate. I can't figure out what's > going o

[css-d] Can't find source of block-level error

2008-03-18 Thread Kim Brooks Wei
http://blog.kim.thewei.com/ I could use some help with this. I've managed to totally confuse myself. My sidebar won't snap into place to the right of my narrowcolumn, and my page won't validate. I can't figure out what's going on. Thanks . . . -- Kimi Wei 20

[css-d] Image alignment within div

2008-03-18 Thread Pete Harrison
I have a div with 3 images all floated left. In FF they show fine, but in IE6 the first image is shifted up for some reason. I cannot see why this is happening so any help would be appreciated. The page is at www.biofuels-maritime.com/n-index.asp and the css is at www.biofueld-maritime.com/bio.cs