Re: [css-d] 100% height over existing page

2008/7/31 Al Sparber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > From: "Seona Bellamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Is there a CSS way of doing this? > > No - and the Lightbox scripted method is flawed to boot :-) > > Our Lighshow widget would do exactly what you need to do and be accessible > if script is disabled. It's not

Re: [css-d] 100% height over existing page

From: "Seona Bellamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi guys, > > I need to create an absolutely positioned div that will float on top > of the existing page layout, and be 100% of the height of the rendered > page, not the viewport. Something similar to what Lightbox does - > greying out the page and disp

Re: [css-d] IE7 bug - scroll bar extends w/ floated italics

From: "fat graffix" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> hi all... seems because of a floated italicized paragraph in IE7, the scroll bar at bottom of page extends beyond the window width — only happens in IE7, not IE6. i remember seeing something about this bug on this list... anybody know what's up ??? - http:

[css-d] 100% height over existing page

Hi guys, I need to create an absolutely positioned div that will float on top of the existing page layout, and be 100% of the height of the rendered page, not the viewport. Something similar to what Lightbox does - greying out the page and displaying a box over it. The trouble is, because it's to

[css-d] IE7 bug - scroll bar extends w/ floated italics

hi all... seems because of a floated italicized paragraph in IE7, the scroll bar at bottom of page extends beyond the window width — only happens in IE7, not IE6. i remember seeing something about this bug on this list... anybody know what's up ??? - http://www.fatgraffix.com/2008-test-02/ th

[css-d] Image too small in IE7, Padding moves footer

Thanks everyone for your help so far. I do need help on a couple more things: http://www.prairiedreamstudio.com/testindex.html http://www.prairiedreamstudio.com/css/layout.css http://www.prairiedreamstudio.com/css/allie.css 1) In IE7, the photo has a border around it, but the border hangs dow

[css-d] [ADMIN] Some reminders (or, better late than never)

So it would appear that I've not been paying close-enough attention to the mailing list these last few weeks. My apologies on that front. While I'm not going to get into a detailed analysis of recent turbulence, some general reminders are in order. * There are more than 8,500 people s

Re: [css-d] Help with Navigation Bar

I'm having a few different problems with my navigation bar that I would > really appreciate any insight on. > > > > 1. How do I center the entire navigation div? (I've tried different > things, but nothing has worked.) One way would be to set the nav division to it's accurate width

[css-d] Help with Navigation Bar

I'm having a few different problems with my navigation bar that I would really appreciate any insight on. 1. How do I center the entire navigation div? (I've tried different things, but nothing has worked.) 2. The width of each link looks good in IE 7 and Firefox, but in IE 6 each

Re: [css-d] CSS Coding Ideas?

he > post. > > Thanks in advance for any help or guidence. > > Matt Stoneback > Owner, Eddy Sound, LLC. 20080730 1629 GMT-6 What you might look into is when in hover, showing a second image. Like, when the mouse moves over the "before you attend" it switches the graphic ou

Re: [css-d] CSS Coding Ideas?

Matthew Stoneback wrote: > Good afternoon - > > http://dev.eddysound.com/dev/rrc/design_help/RRC%20Landing%20Page.jpg > > http://dev.eddysound.com/dev/rrc/design_help/RRC%20Landing%20Page%20-%20Glow.jpg > I started to code the site and got this far: > http://dev.eddysound.com/dev/rrc/ It look

[css-d] CSS Coding Ideas?

Good afternoon - I hate to ask this but I have a dilemma I am hoping some more experienced CSS coders can help me with. I was asked to help a local church in coding their website. They have a designer who is producing all of the layout, unfortunately the designer is not making my job very easy.

Re: [css-d] Suckerfish -now I have a domain!

apologies supposedly according to guru David I made an error and it was rude to have posted about the same problem someone else was posting about. I really do have this problem though and I was workingon it the same time as they were! Can anyone help me out on this one? Thank you My sucker f

Re: [css-d] Suckerfish -- jumping

Thank you, it seems to have stabilized it. The updated style sheet will go live near the end of August. On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Jonny Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 30 Jul 2008, at 17:25, Nancy Johnson wrote: > >> Thanks, >> >> Actually, I did find a page that is currently live

[css-d] RE Suckerfish -- jumping

I'm having a similar problem with my new site (www.slrecords.net/test.html), on some computers when using IE7/6 the second tier menus don't line up correctly when you change the font size - anyone else come across this? It's only on some computers, can't work out why. Cheers Ed __

Re: [css-d] WP captions ruin leading

On 30 Jul 2008, at 18:06, David Laakso wrote: > Bambi Vincent wrote: >> >> each >> paragraph in which an image is attached gets its line-spacing >> tightened. >> >> http://bobarno.com/thiefhunters/2008/07/russian-rip-off-part-5/ >> You'll see it in the first paragraph. >> > > "Live" adjustment in

Re: [css-d] WP captions ruin leading

> > I'm trying to add the new wp 2.6 caption function to old posts. Just > like when I tried out the image-caption plugin under 2.5, each > paragraph in which an image is attached gets its line-spacing > tightened. Why? How can I avoid this? > > Although it's terribly ugly, I left an example at: >

Re: [css-d] Suckerfish -- jumping

On 30 Jul 2008, at 17:25, Nancy Johnson wrote: > Thanks, > > Actually, I did find a page that is currently live that jumps > vertically in IE6 and IE7 , please go to > http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/ewr/interpretations.cfm. Try adding .12em margin-top to .contentcopy h1 margin: .12em .13em 0 .13em

Re: [css-d] WP captions ruin leading

Bambi Vincent wrote: > > each > paragraph in which an image is attached gets its line-spacing > tightened. > > http://bobarno.com/thiefhunters/2008/07/russian-rip-off-part-5/ > You'll see it in the first paragraph. > > > > Thiefhunter > _ "Live" adjustment in Mac FF/3.0.1. Try it. Check it

Re: [css-d] Suckerfish -- jumping

Thanks, Actually, I did find a page that is currently live that jumps vertically in IE6 and IE7 , please go to http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/ewr/interpretations.cfm. Nancy On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Bill Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jonny Stephens wrote: >> On 30 Jul 2008, at 14:10,

[css-d] WP captions ruin leading

Dear CSS experts, I'm trying to add the new wp 2.6 caption function to old posts. Just like when I tried out the image-caption plugin under 2.5, each paragraph in which an image is attached gets its line-spacing tightened. Why? How can I avoid this? Although it's terribly ugly, I left an ex

[css-d] Problems with positioning

I'm fairly new to all this and could use a bit of help. http://webct.mscc.edu/motlowtest/ http://webct.mscc.edu/motlowtest/css/style.css First, the area containing the Search box doesn't display properly in IE. It appears to be ok in Firefox. Any ideas on fixing it or doing it better? Also, righ

[css-d] Suckerfish -now I have a domain!

My sucker fish menu on the About my site naviagtion link is messed up. Obviously I already have some li/ul css and I added a new class called sucker for the li. Where did I go wrong? (The styles are the last ones before the closing style tags) TIA http://tinyurl.com/6zfhld

Re: [css-d] li widths

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:15:51 +0100 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CC: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org > Subject: Re: [css-d] li widths > > On 29 Jul 2008, at 16:17, Bill Brown wrote: > > > good one wrote: > >> Bill that is execptionally kind of you I attach the file, I tr

Re: [css-d] ADMIN: Fixed up Style sheets !!!

All right, that's enough. More than enough. Thread over. If anyone still wishes to assist Christopher with this problem, do so offlist. I will follow up on this in a separate message, as well as offlist with selected individuals. -- Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Ch

Re: [css-d] Contextual Selector Question

Hello, in your case the result should be the same. Only if you had used both selectors, then the rule for #nav li ul li would have a higher specificity than #nav li li, so if there are definitions for the same properties in both rules, then the ones from the first would overwrite the ones from

[css-d] Contextual Selector Question

My navigation menu has the following tree: div - ul - li - ul - li Is #nav li li the same as #nav li ul li? Do you need to include the ul when styling the last li? Thanks for the help--I appreciate it! Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail __

Re: [css-d] Suckerfish -- jumping

Jonny Stephens wrote: > On 30 Jul 2008, at 14:10, Nancy Johnson wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have had a suckerfish drop down on my site for awhile, we are adding >> some new interactive pages that are not live, that jump vertically in >> IE6 and IE7 ever so slightly. What is live now jumps a bit >> ho

Re: [css-d] Suckerfish -- jumping

On 30 Jul 2008, at 14:10, Nancy Johnson wrote: > Hi, > > I have had a suckerfish drop down on my site for awhile, we are adding > some new interactive pages that are not live, that jump vertically in > IE6 and IE7 ever so slightly. What is live now jumps a bit > horizontally but not vertically.

[css-d] Suckerfish -- jumping

Hi, I have had a suckerfish drop down on my site for awhile, we are adding some new interactive pages that are not live, that jump vertically in IE6 and IE7 ever so slightly. What is live now jumps a bit horizontally but not vertically. Is there any fix for this? The only difference between be

Re: [css-d] li widths

On 29 Jul 2008, at 16:17, Bill Brown wrote: > good one wrote: >> Bill that is execptionally kind of you I attach the file, I tried >> geocities but it is useless as it puts in all of its ads so it >> completely messes up the css and html(a bit like hotmail). Thank you >> VERY much, Kind Regards, E