On 07/09/2010 09:30 AM, Gabriele Romanato wrote:
Hi all!
Just some reflections:
http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/07/why-negative-css-text-indent-doesnt.html
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visufx.html#overflow-clipping
we need to make more tests on this issue.
Tests are always helpful. I
I'm currently working on a site: http://dvpwebdesign.com/test/index.html, where
i am having issues with the bottom menu layout on the index page. I've set up
individual divs for each menu so i can alter menu color and text. I've used
margins of 33px for 3 of the menu divs from the left so that
Apologies everyone, problem resolved!
On 11 Jul 2010, at 12:10, Dipesh Parmar wrote:
I'm currently working on a site: http://dvpwebdesign.com/test/index.html,
where i am having issues with the bottom menu layout on the index page. I've
set up individual divs for each menu so i can alter
Hi,
http://blakeys.com/design/index.php/en/blakeys-websites-introduction
I am just playing around with getting some things to work and the
imageflow and layout looks fine in mac os x; safari 5 and Firefox but
my friend has just sent me a crazy jpg showing the two columns
underneath being
Chris Blake wrote:
http://blakeys.com/design/index.php/en/blakeys-websites-introduction
I am just playing around with getting some things to work and the
imageflow and layout looks fine in mac os x; safari 5 and Firefox but
my friend has just sent me a crazy jpg showing the two columns
Chris Blake wrote:
Yes, I am sure it's not w3c compliant at the moment but I
will look into that if I can get things working. It might be a bit
backwards but 6 errors isn't too many,
Dear Chris -- With the greatest respect, one error is too
many, not for reasons of pedantry but simply
Chris Blake wrote:
http://blakeys.com/design/index.php/en/blakeys-websites-introduction
Any constructive tips would be most welcome.
CB
This /may/ help...?
http://www.smushit.com/ysmush.it/
Best,
~d
PS
Crashes IETester on Mac OS X 10.4 running Parallels.
--
Hello all,
I believe we can now see all the information regardless the viewport size.
I've added the position fixed property only for those that have a
width and height greater then a certain value.
I've used media queries and add a js to deal with IE versions.
Users that zoom in text, on the
Oh, that is /desperately/ slow, Márcio : 23 seconds
to complete loading. I am afraid I wouldn't be
willing to wait that long in the real world. I really
think you need to reduce the complexity and increase
the efficiency.
Philip Taylor
MEM wrote:
I would like to request your help,
2010/7/11 Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk:
Oh, that is /desperately/ slow, Márcio : 23 seconds
to complete loading. I am afraid I wouldn't be
willing to wait that long in the real world. I really
think you need to reduce the complexity and increase
the efficiency.
OK, again not an answer to your real problem, Márcio,
but as a visitor I would expect to be able to click
on the + sign, not on the text, in order to expand
the view.
Philip Taylor
MEM wrote:
Yes. :( I'm thinking about ajax, and image size reduction.
Maybe that will do it.
But apart
I'd like some feedback on this. I'm teaching a class on web design to students
who've had various levels of training. I'm seeing a number of students mark up
their XHTML with descriptively named DIVs that have no counterpart in the CSS.
Is this some kind of XML holdover or what? Am I missing
I agree with you. Information within the code that's meant for humans
to read should go into comments; div and ID names themselves should be
fairly descriptive anyway (#maincontent, #leftcol etc.). HTML
elements such as divs are meant to be read only by the browser and
making the browser search
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010, Tim Offenstein wrote:
I'd like some feedback on this. I'm teaching a class on web design
to students who've had various levels of training. I'm seeing a
number of students mark up their XHTML
Why XHTML?
with descriptively named DIVs that have no counterpart in the
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010, Val Dobson wrote:
I agree with you. Information within the code that's meant for humans
to read should go into comments; div and ID names themselves should be
fairly descriptive anyway (#maincontent, #leftcol etc.).
#leftcol is not a good name. What if the design
I'm using the footerStickAlt sticky footer method on this site-in-progress:
http://www.redkitecreative.com/projects/optienz/jobs/
It seems to be working fine in FF, Safari, Chrome, IE8/7 but is breaking
in Opera 10.6 and below. Can someone tell me how to fix it or where to
find more info on
2010/7/11 Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk:
OK, again not an answer to your real problem, Márcio,
but as a visitor I would expect to be able to click
on the + sign, not on the text, in order to expand
the view.
Philip Taylor
Yes. It was on my list before, I end
2010/7/11 Debbie Campbell d...@redkitecreative.com:
I'm using the footerStickAlt sticky footer method on this site-in-progress:
http://www.redkitecreative.com/projects/optienz/jobs/
It seems to be working fine in FF, Safari, Chrome, IE8/7 but is breaking
in Opera 10.6
I'm on Vista and in
Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
Why XHTML?
If a DIV isn't closed, it's not valid [X]HTML; it should get a
failing grade.
The classes and IDs can be used later when the CSS is modified.
I have to say, I'm more-or-less with Chris on this one. An unclosed
DIV is no better and no
MEM wrote:
Thanks for point out some issues here and there, they are more then
welcome. :) I have a life to learn about this. :D
OK, then another one :-)
When I click on the first +, it expands (reveals) that region;
when I click on the second +, it expands (reveals) that region;
but when I
2010/7/11 MEM tal...@gmail.com:
The Safari issue, stills there. :(
Márcio
Well If I was Safari I would do the same. Strange however that others
don't follow.
My #wrapper-esquerda element was defined with a overflow:hidden;
property. (at the time I wanted to contain something perhaps),
2010/7/11 Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk:
MEM wrote:
Thanks for point out some issues here and there, they are more then
welcome. :) I have a life to learn about this. :D
OK, then another one :-)
When I click on the first +, it expands (reveals) that region;
when I
MEM wrote:
Yes. :) The reason why we cannot have all expanded it's because, if we
have all expanded the portfolio 100% height cool effect is lost.
OK, but will your visitors think it cool ? Or would they prefer
to have control over what is concealed and what is revealed. As
one potential
2010/7/11 Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk:
OK, but will your visitors think it cool ? Or would they prefer
to have control over what is concealed and what is revealed.
They sure prefer to have control and I sure prefer to give them that
control, to show or hide, and to do,
MEM wrote:
I would like to request your help, for two big issues that I'm unable to
solve:
The URI: www.nuvemk.com/nascer/
Márcio
Keep it simple. Oh, easy for Leonardo. Far more difficult for the rest of us...
Best,
~d
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
25 matches
Mail list logo
