23 nov 2014 kl. 03:14 skrev Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com:
Percentage values scale the width of the viewport unlike pixel values.
Tom / I assume when you say use max-width you mean;
img {
max-width: 123px
}
If so why do that, if you know the image size just give the
Tim Arnold wrote:
This is a fair example of this idea that I recently worked on:
http://www.workingamericahealthcare.org/ (Built in Drupal, Front End
work mine, design by others who know better).
Hmmm. I followed the link, and it appeared in my browser window which
occupied the right half
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Tim Arnold wrote:
This is a fair example of this idea that I recently worked on:
http://www.workingamericahealthcare.org/ (Built in Drupal, Front End
work mine, design by others who know better).
Hmmm. I followed
David Laakso wrote:
No issue seen this end Windows SeaMonkey/2.30.
Unless your browser / geometry / font settings / font scaling / screen
resolution / a million other possibilities are identical to mine, David,
you may not see the same artifacts. My point was not that all viewers
will
On Nov 23, 2014 6:52 AM, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
David Laakso wrote:
No issue seen this end Windows SeaMonkey/2.30.
Unless your browser / geometry / font settings / font scaling / screen
resolution / a million other possibilities are identical to mine, David,
you may
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
David Laakso wrote:
No issue seen this end Windows SeaMonkey/2.30.
Unless your browser / geometry / font settings / font scaling / screen
resolution / a million other possibilities are identical to mine, David,
On Sunday, November 23, 2014, Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't have any site analytics, although that probably does help narrow
things down, although you never know who will visit your site on a device
that is not in your analytic.
This is the confusing part Tim :)
nov 23 2014 13:40 David Laakso laakso.davi...@gmail.com:
Just getting Drupal to work at default is enough to tax even Leonardo…
I think that might be why Perch http://grabaperch.com/ was invented.
__
css-discuss
MiB wrote:
I think that might be why Perch http://grabaperch.com/ was invented.
Assuming that Perch was used to generate its own landing page, it would
not be for me :
Line 435, Column 7: Stray end tag div.
/divfooter role=contentinfo
Philip Taylor
I suppose I must begin testing on different devices immediately so break
points can be inserted. Otherwise I'm afraid I'll be far along in
development only to realize I'd have to go backwards causing all kinds
of frustrations.
What are the popular devices ?
Christophers
Tim Arnold
While testing on devices is important, you get a long way using the dev
tools in Chrome or Firefox.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:50 AM Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
I suppose I must begin testing on different devices immediately so break
points can be inserted. Otherwise
On Nov 23, 2014 11:01 AM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
While testing on devices is important, you get a long way using the dev
tools in Chrome or Firefox.
The new dev tools in Chrome also provides some pretty amazing device
emulation. It's certainly not perfect but miles closer to
Tom Tim - I forgot about the mobile tools in Chrome, they are pretty
good, I wonder if you can add devices, my phone is not listed.
Christopher
Tim Arnold mailto:tim.arn...@gmail.com
Sunday, November 23, 2014 11:18 AM
On Nov 23, 2014 11:01 AM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com
Target / Context = Result So if your max page width is 960 and your
container is 650 then: 650/960=.677 (x100) so 67.7%
How do I find my page max width, if the page width can be adjust at any
time, right now I don't know what my page width is so to give containers
and so forth the correct
On Nov 23, 2014, at 8:21 AM, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
MiB wrote:
I think that might be why Perch http://grabaperch.com/ was invented.
Assuming that Perch was used to generate its own landing page, it would not
be for me :
Line 435, Column 7: Stray end tag div.
On Nov 23, 2014, at 10:29 AM, Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com
wrote:
Tom Tim - I forgot about the mobile tools in Chrome, they are pretty good,
I wonder if you can add devices, my phone is not listed.
Christopher
Hi Christopher
With firefox, you can set different screen
I don't recommend using all of these 'just because'. Good info though.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 8:27 PM Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com
wrote:
On Nov 23, 2014, at 10:29 AM, Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
Tom Tim - I forgot about the mobile tools in Chrome, they
nov 23 2014 17:58 Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com:
Target / Context = Result So if your max page width is 960 and your container
is 650 then: 650/960=.677 (x100) so 67.7%
How do I find my page max width, if the page width can be adjust at any time,
right now I don't know
Crest Christopher composed on 2014-11-22 19:46 (UTC-0500):
How do you accommodate most, if not all screen sizes.
Let the browser produce its innate functionality at instead of constraining it:
1-Pretend px, pt, cm, mm, in and other non-relative units do not exist in CSS.
2-With one
I understand, you take the pages max width, whatever that may be then do
the math, in your example, you used 960px.
Christopher
Tom Livingston mailto:tom...@gmail.com
Sunday, November 23, 2014 12:14 PM
Normally what I do is have my page width be 100% of the viewport until
I reach my desktop
If I have a 4096 width resolution, I know what are thinking and have
said already :-) I divide by a 320px width container that works out to
12.8% my container/div has transformed what previously was working well,
into an extremely narrow container/div that looks horrible ?
Christopher
24 nov 2014 kl. 02:26 skrev Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com:
With firefox, you can set different screen sizes in their responsive layout
mode. VERY helpful.
We have mentioned the new Firefox Developer Edition, right?
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/developer/
IMHO the Firefox
On Nov 23, 2014, at 8:21 AM, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
MiB wrote:
I think that might be why Perch http://grabaperch.com/ was invented.
Assuming that Perch was used to generate its own landing page, it would not
be for me :
Line 435, Column 7: Stray end tag div.
nov 24 2014 07:00 MiB digital.disc...@gmail.com:
Are you a man or a mice?
I most certainly meant to ask ”Are you a man or a mouse”?
My apologies for that grammatical error. You see how easy we mere mortals can
make an error like that?
A code god like you, Philip, surely would have a field
nov 24 2014 07:25 Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com:
This version of the Developer Tools seems ten times more better then the
version I have in 33.1 (33.1.1) just released, literally at the time of me
writing this message/email.
I also like Chrome tools and the Developer Tools
25 matches
Mail list logo
