dbing...@mac.com
> 760806 7699
Valid HTML and CSS would help:
HTML
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ruthinstitu
te.org%2F
CSS
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?profile=css21&warning=0&uri
=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ruthinstitute.org%2F
ascade down to all the other
> font size settings?
What's wrong with simply trusting that the visitor has their preferred
font setting already set - and not setting a font size on body at all?
David Jones, Content Coordinator, Information and Technology Management,
Customer Relat
CD version) and look at
your site using Konqueror.
You don't have to pay big bucks and put up with slow performance to test
websites under Linux browsers like Konqueror.
David Jones, Content Coordinator, Information and Technology Management,
Customer Relations - KL PS, (808) 948
robably did the images in some weird, convoluted
> way, but it's the only way I could figure out how to do it.
>
> Thanks in advance,
Hmmm, W3C validator reports 10 errors in your "XHTML 1.0 Strict"
document:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.
in the Reality Browser's CSS implementation - causing
floated elements to overlap when they're not supposed to. The process of
porting it from The Matrix has been very rough on testers - we should
all applaud Gabriele's courage in testing it!
David Jones, Co
a virtual Windows PC on your existing one, and install
the older IE version on it. You can have a separate virtual machine for
each different browser version. Each browser set up this way responds to
IE conditional comments as its own version.
Want an older version of a browser? Try evolt.org:
http:/
gt; makes it very
lightweight. Lightweight enough that I used to run it on my old desktop
Windows98 PC ... Apache2Triad is very easy for novices (and when it
comes to configuring a web server, that's pretty much exactly where I
am!)
David Jones, Cont
t tested this, but I think that
would make the 10th line of text be right at the bottom of the box, not
partially cut off by falling outside the fixed height of the box.
Plus the box height would still be usable for visitors who've increased or
decreased their font size (another fea
much larger than it needs to be and is being scaled down
in CSS/HTML?
The throbbing stars are cute but very annoying ... Not nauseating, but
like a spoiled child jumping up all the time shouting "Look at me, look
at me!"
David Jones, Content Coordinator, Information and Technology Managemen
een before?
Joshn, hmm, not sure what you mean by disabling background-color on
hover? Other than to specify what color you want used.
David Jones, Content Coordinator, Information and Technology Management,
Customer Relations - KL PS, (808) 948-5830
"MMS " made the following annotations.
--
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of good one
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 12:52 PM
> To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
> Subject: [css-d] BETTER! much reduced code, should be a lot
> easier to see
>
> Hi sorry about the last post that ma
mplate for me?
>
> http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/chris.html
Hmmm, if you go to the parent domain and scroll down a bit, you'll see
his name listed under Contact ...
David Jones, Content Coordinator, Information and Technology Management,
Customer Relations - KL PS, (808) 948-5830
&q
ning=0&uri
=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.objectivedesigns.com%2Famittius%2Fwhite%2Findex.htm
IE6 doesn't support PNG's 256-levels of transparency. Other folk on the
list know what to do about that ...
David Jones, Content Coordinator, Information and Techn
rgin: 10px;
> background-image: url(images/arrow.png);
> background-repeat: no-repeat;
> }
>
> 2. something here
>
> any ideas?
Hmmm, perhaps try using padding instead of margin?
David Jones, Content Coordinator, Information and Technology Management,
Cust
expecting.
Of course, if you can accidentally change your default font setting,
your visitor can deliberately change his or her default font setting,
too, and upset all your design calculations. Perhaps it's better to
think in terms of a 1em grid than a "10px" grid ...
David Jones, Conten
out I removed all the styling from the
> form and its fieldsets. All ok. Then I added just
>
> fieldset { position: relative; }
>
> and there was the crazy offset. It doesn't even seem to be
> related to any other screen element.
My guess is that IE6 has a diffe
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Grevers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 1:32 PM
> To: David Jones
> Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
> Subject: Re: [css-d] How to align list numbers?
>
> On 5/23/08, David Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
g one and let them know that there's no point in
their scripts injecting ads into CSS files - they only mess up the CSS
file and aren't seen by anyone. (Be interesting to know if they're also
injecting ads into ex
27; could also be added to prevent
> this on scaling.
The thought occurred to me that without a width, IE's autoexpansion bug
might decide that the off-left item really needed to be wide enough to
hold its content and widen the element enough for part of it to appear
in the viewport?
tline-tables.
David Jones, Content Coordinator, Customer Relations - KL PS, (808)
948-5830
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of snak detek+0r
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 10:39 AM
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] How to align
Is there a way to align roman numeral list numbers left, instead of
right-aligned on the period?
Example:
I. List item 1
II. List item 2
Instead of:
I. List item 1
II. List item 2
Thanks in advance. And apologies for whatever corporate-mandated
disclaimer that might appear below.
David
21 matches
Mail list logo
