Re: [css-d] css3 buttons - hover and current state problems

On 6/18/11 8:37 AM, Stuart King wrote: Help, I need the current and hover states background to extend to the left and right edges. Currently the background stops several pixels from the edge. http://uncorkedventures.v1.vin65dev.com/html/shipping.html _

[css-d] css3 buttons - hover and current state problems

Help, I need the current and hover states background to extend to the left and right edges. Currently the background stops several pixels from the edge. http://uncorkedventures.v1.vin65dev.com/html/shipping.html __ css-discuss [cs

Re: [css-d] CSS3 animations - enter the matrix

At 1:25 AM +1000 4/17/11, Alan Gresley wrote: Moving on, the demo. http://css-3d.org/enter-the-matrix.htm Mondo kewl. Cheers, tedd -- --- http://sperling.com/ __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-

Re: [css-d] CSS3 animations - enter the matrix

On 4/16/11 8:58 AM, Gabriele Romanato wrote: This is awesome! :-) On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: http://css-3d.org/enter-the-matrix.htm I will in future put demos of this nature on this domain. http://css-3d.org/ I agree with Gabriele. It reminds me of time spent i

Re: [css-d] CSS3 animations - enter the matrix

This is awesome! :-) On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: > Hello all, > > > I have for years been smashing down barriers concerning CSS. This may have > been on this mailing list or on www-style (CSS WG). I came into this realm > of human endeavor just when CSS3 was starting to

[css-d] CSS3 animations - enter the matrix

Hello all, I have for years been smashing down barriers concerning CSS. This may have been on this mailing list or on www-style (CSS WG). I came into this realm of human endeavor just when CSS3 was starting to be implemented by Safari 2 or 3 (back in 2008). My early CSS was an attempt at cre

Re: [css-d] CSS3 animation, transform, rotation, gradient and color

On 1/27/11 1:02 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: On 24/01/2011 1:58 PM, David Laakso wrote: These are really exciting and innovative trips in the avant-garde. Best, ~d PS An on/off switch might be a nice touch with some of them... Is that to stop the annoying animation or to pause it? Preventive

Re: [css-d] CSS3 animation, transform, rotation, gradient and color

On 24/01/2011 1:58 PM, David Laakso wrote: These are really exciting and innovative trips in the avant-garde. Best, ~d PS An on/off switch might be a nice touch with some of them... Is that to stop the annoying animation or to pause it? I have now figured out how to have them only go once.

Re: [css-d] CSS3 animation, transform, rotation, gradient and color

On 1/23/11 2:56 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: Hello list, Enjoy. Please view in Safari. Other interesting CSS3 can be found here. These are really exciting and innovative trips in the avant-garde. B

[css-d] CSS3 animation, transform, rotation, gradient and color

Hello list, Enjoy. Please view in Safari. Other interesting CSS3 can be found here. -- Alan http://css-class.com/ Armies Cannot Stop An Idea Whose Time Has Come. - Victor Hugo

[css-d] [CSS3]: The background-rotate property

Hi all. Hope this hasn't been discussed yet: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2011/01/css3-background-rotate-property.html Regards, Gabriele Romanato http://www.css-zibaldone.com http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articles/ (English) http://onwebdev.blogspo

Re: [css-d] [css3] support for filters

Somehow www-st...@w3.org got dropped, CC to CSS WG list. Sorry for duplicates. On 6/01/2011 4:13 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote: Hello Rik. Can I please request that you comment inline (snipping irrelevant parts) instead of top posting. It will make this thread easier to follow. There is a good d

[css-d] CSS3 transform & transition with img and borders

Hello all, Best in Safari. Both Opera 11 and Safari 5 can not have both border-radius and border on an element. If this is wrapped by an the it works in Safari. The later test show spinning borders around a stationa

[css-d] CSS3: Use of the @namespace rule

Hi. It seems that css-d is a little reluctant with the adoption of the new CSS3 features. I saw many comments with a too backward tone. Anyway, I insist on my evangelic mission: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/12/css-use-of-namespace-rule.html ps. IE8 and 7 don't support it. But as far as

Re: [css-d] CSS3 transformations: rotate

On Oct 6, 2010, at 2:11 AM, Gabriele Romanato wrote: > http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/10/css3-transformations-rotate.html > > Opera seems not to support it. -o-transform: rotate() works just fine here (as one would expect for something that is in a spec in early stages of development). Ph

Re: [css-d] CSS3 multiple background images

Good advice thanks! On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:52 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: Gabriele Romanato wrote: Hi, I think this post will be useful for beginners: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/10/css3-multiple-background-images.html HTH ^^/ bye Gabriele Romanato Hello Gabriele, Why not just use border ra

[css-d] CSS3 transformations: rotate

Hi. http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/10/css3-transformations-rotate.html Opera seems not to support it. In IE9's feature list there's no sign of it. :-( HTH bye Gabriele Romanato http://www.css-zibaldone.com http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articl

Re: [css-d] CSS3 multiple background images

Gabriele Romanato wrote: Hi, I think this post will be useful for beginners: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/10/css3-multiple-background-images.html HTH ^^/ bye Gabriele Romanato Hello Gabriele, Why not just use border radius for rounded corners. Leaves the multiple backgrounds for the

Re: [css-d] CSS3 multiple background images

On 10/3/10 10:48 AM, Gabriele Romanato wrote: Hi, I think this post will be useful for beginners: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/10/css3-multiple-background-images.html HTH ^^/ bye Gabriele Romanato Ah, just what I need! Timely. I had forgotten about that. Thanks :-) . Best, ~grassh

[css-d] CSS3 multiple background images

Hi, I think this post will be useful for beginners: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/10/css3-multiple-background-images.html HTH ^^/ bye Gabriele Romanato http://www.css-zibaldone.com http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articles/ (English) http://onweb

Re: [css-d] CSS3 media queries

On 9/30/10 4:46 AM, Bernat Lleonart wrote: I'm using CSS3 media queries on a site, and I'd like them to work on IE8 and older browsers. I've read about css3-mediaqueries-js (http://code.google.com/p/css3-mediaqueries-js/), but I don't know how to use the script. I'm including this on my ma

[css-d] CSS3 media queries

Hello, I'm using CSS3 media queries on a site, and I'd like them to work on IE8 and older browsers. I've read about css3-mediaqueries-js (http://code.google.com/p/css3-mediaqueries-js/), but I don't know how to use the script. I'm including this on my main.css: @media (max-width: 500px) {

Re: [css-d] [+] css3 pie?

> Has anyone used this? > > css3pie.com No, but I just twitted this: CSS3 Playground by Mike Plate: http://css3.mikeplate.com/ /* cool stuff */ -- Regards, Thierry www.tjkdesign.com | www.ez-css.org | @thierrykoblentz __ css-d

[css-d] css3 pie?

Has anyone used this? css3pie.com Am looking for any positive and negative views on this. Thanks, Jeff __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-di

Re: [css-d] CSS3 animations considered harmful

> > >> -Original Message- >> From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d- >> boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of david >> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 3:12 PM >> To: css-d >> Subject: Re: [css-d] CSS3 animations considered

Re: [css-d] CSS3 animations considered harmful

On 08/11/2010 04:39 PM, Climis, Tim wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d- >> boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of david >> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 3:12 PM >> To: css-d >

Re: [css-d] CSS3 animations considered harmful

David Laakso : > >CSS is a programming language: albeit, a very simple one. It copes with >"look and feel." Expanding CSS to include more than that is scary. But >therein may, or may not, lie the future. /Push the envelope./ Oh please, folks! CSS itself is not a programming language. It is a st

Re: [css-d] CSS3 animations considered harmful

> -Original Message- > From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d- > boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of david > Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 3:12 PM > To: css-d > Subject: Re: [css-d] CSS3 animations considered harmful > > tedd wrote: &

Re: [css-d] CSS3 animations considered harmful

tedd wrote: > At 9:19 PM -0400 8/10/10, David Laakso wrote: >> Gabriele Romanato wrote: >>> Hi! >>> need some responses and criticisms about my opinions expressed right >>> here: >>> >>> >>> http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/08/css3-animations-considered-harmful.html >>> >>> HTH ^^/ >>> >>

Re: [css-d] CSS3 animations considered harmful

At 9:19 PM -0400 8/10/10, David Laakso wrote: >Gabriele Romanato wrote: >> Hi! >> need some responses and criticisms about my opinions expressed right >> here: >> >> http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/08/css3-animations-considered-harmful.html >> >> HTH ^^/ >> > > Gabriele Romanato > > >CSS i

Re: [css-d] CSS3 animations considered harmful

Gabriele Romanato wrote: > Hi! > need some responses and criticisms about my opinions expressed right > here: > > http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/08/css3-animations-considered-harmful.html > > HTH ^^/ > > Gabriele Romanato > > CSS is a programming language: albeit, a very simple one. It co

[css-d] CSS3 animations considered harmful

Hi! need some responses and criticisms about my opinions expressed right here: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/08/css3-animations-considered-harmful.html HTH ^^/ Gabriele Romanato http://www.css-zibaldone.com http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/article

Re: [css-d] css3 rounded shadow in opera/IE

On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 22:08:45 +0100, Martin wrote: > Thanks everyone, > > The entries without vendor specific tags work fine on Opera. > The PIE extension seems to be partially working on IE. I'm testing > it on IE8. The drop-shadow effect seems to work fine. The radius property > doesn't seem to

Re: [css-d] css3 rounded shadow in opera/IE

On 08/05/2010 10:55 AM, Martin Möller wrote: > For IE try: http://css3pie.com/ > > CSS3 PIE is a .htc plugin that makes Internet Explorer 6-8 capable of > rendering several of the most commonly used CSS3 properties ... > > > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Duncan Hill wrote: > >> On Thu, 05

Re: [css-d] css3 rounded shadow in opera/IE

For IE try: http://css3pie.com/ CSS3 PIE is a .htc plugin that makes Internet Explorer 6-8 capable of rendering several of the most commonly used CSS3 properties ... On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Duncan Hill wrote: > On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 09:25:26 +0100, Philippe Wittenbergh > wrote: > >> >>

Re: [css-d] css3 rounded shadow in opera/IE

On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 09:25:26 +0100, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > On Aug 5, 2010, at 5:14 PM, Duncan Hill wrote: > >>> For the record - WebKit (Safari 5 / Chrome 5) support border-radius >>> without the vendor prefix (-webkit-). Box-shadow still needs the >>> vendor prefix as it was not p

Re: [css-d] css3 rounded shadow in opera/IE

On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 08:49:38 +0100, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > On Aug 5, 2010, at 4:13 PM, Duncan Hill wrote: > >> the usual recommendation is to give the rules with vendor prefix first, >> followed by the 'natural' rule so that when Mozilla and Webkit fully >> adopt >> the property, the

Re: [css-d] css3 rounded shadow in opera/IE

On Aug 5, 2010, at 5:14 PM, Duncan Hill wrote: >> For the record - WebKit (Safari 5 / Chrome 5) support border-radius without >> the vendor prefix (-webkit-). Box-shadow still needs the vendor prefix as it >> was not part of the CSS3 background and borders module when it became a >> Candidate

Re: [css-d] css3 rounded shadow in opera/IE

On Aug 5, 2010, at 4:13 PM, Duncan Hill wrote: > the usual recommendation is to give the rules with vendor prefix first, > followed by the 'natural' rule so that when Mozilla and Webkit fully adopt > the property, their browsers will respond to the 'natural' rule and ignore > the prefixed v

Re: [css-d] css3 rounded shadow in opera/IE

On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 23:43:27 +0100, Martin wrote: > Hi there. > > Is there any way of imitating it in opera and IE. It works fine in FF > and Chrome. > > .shadowed { > border: 1px solid #c4c8cc; > -moz-box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px #999; > -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 15px; > -moz-bo

[css-d] css3 rounded shadow in opera/IE

Hi there. Is there any way of imitating it in opera and IE. It works fine in FF and Chrome. .shadowed { border: 1px solid #c4c8cc; -moz-box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px #999; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 15px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 15px; -webkit-box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px #888;

[css-d] CSS3: the border-radius shorthand property

Hi! just a quick info on something that I found a little tricky, especially with all those browser extensions and prefixes: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/07/css3-border-radius-shorthand-property.html HTH ^^/ Gabriele Romanato http://www.css-zibaldone.com http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/

[css-d] CSS3: The :not (negation) pseudo-class

Hi! just a quick explaination here: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/07/css3-not-negation-pseudo-class.html HTH ^.^/ http://www.css-zibaldone.com http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articles/ (English) http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/ (English) __

[css-d] CSS3: The border-opacity property (proposal)

Hi! I never take a vacation: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/07/css3-border-opacity-property.html I hope they will take this into account (seen a lot of posts on the subject, mainly about the use of RGBA values, not a property per se). :-) HTH. Hugs, Gabriele Romanato ^.^/ http://www.cs

Re: [css-d] "CSS3 Please" code and Explorer support

Dave, David: this is going to become obsolete with version 9 of IE, which will support most of the CSS3 Color module. bye, ps. check out on MSDN blog. On Mar 29, 2010, at 7:14 AM, David Hucklesby wrote: > On 3/28/10 8:59 PM, Dave M G wrote: >> CSS-d, >> >> I got some code from the "CSS3 Please

Re: [css-d] "CSS3 Please" code and Explorer support

On Mar 29, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Dave M G wrote: > http://css3please.com/ > > For the box-shadow effect, it indicates that it can be used in IE 6, 7, > and 8. However, when I look at it with my windows machine, which has > IE8, it doesn't work. The box shadow is rendered like 2 pixel wide > border

Re: [css-d] "CSS3 Please" code and Explorer support

>> Those Microsoft filters only work when the element they are applied to >> has "layout."[1] Try adding "zoom: 1;" to the ruleset for the filter... > I understood 'zoom' to be a Microsoft proprietary CSS property which does not > validate. I would set a height or width value instead which achieve

Re: [css-d] "CSS3 Please" code and Explorer support

On Monday 29 March 2010 17:14, David Hucklesby wrote: > On 3/28/10 8:59 PM, Dave M G wrote: > > CSS-d, > > > > I got some code from the "CSS3 Please" web site: > > > > http://css3please.com/ > > > > For the box-shadow effect, it indicates that it can be used in IE 6, 7, > > and 8. However, when I l

Re: [css-d] "CSS3 Please" code and Explorer support

On 3/28/10 8:59 PM, Dave M G wrote: > CSS-d, > > I got some code from the "CSS3 Please" web site: > > http://css3please.com/ > > For the box-shadow effect, it indicates that it can be used in IE 6, 7, > and 8. However, when I look at it with my windows machine, which has > IE8, it doesn't work. The

[css-d] "CSS3 Please" code and Explorer support

CSS-d, I got some code from the "CSS3 Please" web site: http://css3please.com/ For the box-shadow effect, it indicates that it can be used in IE 6, 7, and 8. However, when I look at it with my windows machine, which has IE8, it doesn't work. The box shadow is rendered like 2 pixel wide border on

Re: [css-d] CSS3 content attribute for page

On 11/11/2009 12:46 AM, Massimo Ugues wrote: > Hallo all. > I'm using CSS3 for pagination in print mode as described in the tutorial. > > @page { > @bottom-center { content: "Page " counter(page) " of " counter > (pages); } > } > > This works fine but I would like to extract the text conte

[css-d] CSS3 content attribute for page

Hallo all. I'm using CSS3 for pagination in print mode as described in the tutorial. @page { @bottom-center { content: "Page " counter(page) " of " counter (pages); } } This works fine but I would like to extract the text content from the css and put it in a div in the html page: somethin

Re: [css-d] CSS3-style pseudo elements no longer work in pseudo browser

Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > On Oct 12, 2009, at 5:12 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: > >> >> >> Firefox does follow the specs since the first-letter is floated, thus is >> it display;block. In IE8 though it showing as display:inline. The >> first

Re: [css-d] CSS3-style pseudo elements no longer work in pseudo browser

On Oct 12, 2009, at 9:10 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: >> The difference you see with Gecko (but not with e.g. WebKit) is >> caused by the line-height. In the case of a floated :first-letter, >> Gecko follows this part of the spec [1]: > > > Not correct. There is no change in the line-height in Gec

Re: [css-d] CSS3-style pseudo elements no longer work in pseudo browser

On Oct 12, 2009, at 5:12 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: > > > Firefox does follow the specs since the first-letter is floated, > thus is > it display;block. In IE8 though it showing as display:inline. The > first-letter overlaps the following bloc

Re: [css-d] CSS3-style pseudo elements no longer work in pseudo browser

Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > On the subject of IE 8 and :first-letter: I was fighting with a little > bug the other day. [...] > Philippe > --- > Philippe Wittenbergh > http://l-c-n.com/ Regarding, Firefox does follow the specs since the

Re: [css-d] CSS3-style pseudo elements no longer work in pseudo browser

Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > On the subject of IE 8 and :first-letter: I was fighting with a little > bug the other day. IE 8 (at least on Vista and Win 7 rc) incorrectly > computes the em-based values for margin/padding/border on :first- > letter. It bases its calculations on the font-size o

Re: [css-d] CSS3-style pseudo elements no longer work in pseudo browser

On the subject of IE 8 and :first-letter: I was fighting with a little bug the other day. IE 8 (at least on Vista and Win 7 rc) incorrectly computes the em-based values for margin/padding/border on :first- letter. It bases its calculations on the font-size of the parent element, not on the f

Re: [css-d] CSS3-style pseudo elements no longer work in pseudo browser

On Oct 12, 2009, at 1:58 PM, David Hucklesby wrote: > I was using CSS3 style pseudo-elements like this some time ago - > > p::first-letter { ... } > > This seemed to work in most browsers, including IE6. Only the > single-colon versions work in IE7 and IE8 though. Small nitpick: the fact that

[css-d] CSS3-style pseudo elements no longer work in pseudo browser

Just FYI really - I was using CSS3 style pseudo-elements like this some time ago - p::first-letter { ... } This seemed to work in most browsers, including IE6. Only the single-colon versions work in IE7 and IE8 though. Cordially, David -- ___

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

On 27/03/2009, at 4:26 AM, Climis, Tim wrote: > But there are a few things I wish for that would make even more > semantic sense. A. lists contained in paragraphs, or B. a list > header element (like thead or th) Perhaps a definition list could be styled to achieve what you want? http:/

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

> How about *adding* a negative top margin to the UL? viz: An interesting idea that I had not thought of. It would work though. ---Tim __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

Climis, Tim wrote: >> What about doing it backwards then put a class on the and target the >> following > > What I'm going for is to take the bottom margin off of a paragraph preceding > a list. I don't need the list to be styled any differently, so there's no > reason to target it at all. >

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

> What I'm going for is to take the bottom margin off of a paragraph > preceding a list. I don't need the list to be styled any > differently, so there's no reason to target it at all. > > Here's a list: > * Something > * Something else > > Instead of: > > Here's a list: > > *something > *some

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

> Scott has a valid point here. Maybe this is the way you should be doing it. > Also is it possible to make up ones own elements? That's sorta what XML is > right? If you could do that then you can style it just like a p or h1 tag. He does. And I may do that. I'm not using h6 for anything on thi

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

You should use h* elements instead of p elements for any kind of header. You might then not need to specify any classes and it's more semantically correct Sent from my iPhone On Mar 26, 2009, at 9:21 AM, "Climis, Tim" wrote: >> What about doing it backwards then put a class on the and >

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

> You should use h* elements instead of p elements for any kind of > header. You might then not need to specify any classes and it's more > semantically correct >> What I'm going for is to take the bottom margin off of a paragraph >> preceding a list. I don't need the list to be styled any >> di

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

> What about doing it backwards then put a class on the and target the > following What I'm going for is to take the bottom margin off of a paragraph preceding a list. I don't need the list to be styled any differently, so there's no reason to target it at all. Here's a list: * Something * S

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

Climis, Tim wrote: > I'm just curious, is there a css3 selector for previous siblings? > And if there is, how widely supported is it? > > It'd be useful for styling paragraphs that come before (introducing) > lists for instance. None exists, but you could use jQuery to do it: p.p_before_ul {

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

>>> ul ~ p {...} matches p elements that comes AFTER ul elements. >> The ~ matches all the p elements after a ul element. The + matches a p >> element immediately after a ul element. What about doing it backwards then put a class on the and target the following

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

> Ops! My fault on previous email: > > Sintax is: > ul ~ p {...} matches p elements that comes AFTER ul elements. Yeah, my testing had just discovered that. :( Digging into the spec to see what was up, it looks like there's not a selector for what I want. Maybe because it would need a second

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

Climis, Tim wrote: > These are the things you need to bring: > > Bananas > Pie > > > Unless I'm misreading the spec, that would match the and make my list > text italicized, which isn't what I want. I want to match the . > > Something like E1 + E2, where E1 is the subject of the selecto

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

On Mar 26, 2009, at 10:21 PM, Climis, Tim wrote: > I'm just curious, is there a css3 selector for previous siblings? > And if there is, how widely supported is it? > > It'd be useful for styling paragraphs that come before (introducing) > lists for instance. Nope, nothing like that exists.

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

On Mar 26, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Mauricio ((Maujor)) Samy Silva wrote: >> I'm just curious, is there a css3 selector for previous siblings? >> And if >> there is, how widely supported is it? > -- > ---

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

On Thu, March 26, 2009 2:03 pm, Climis, Tim wrote: > Unless I'm misreading the spec, that would match the and make my list > text italicized, which isn't what I want. I want to match the . > DOH! Yes, I fail - sorry :-( Well, it is lunchtime... -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

> you could achieve the same thing (for the example you give) using > CSS2.1 adjacent-sibling selectors [1]: > p + ul { > font-style: italic; > } >From the spec: > Adjacent sibling selectors have the following syntax: E1 + E2, where E2 is > the subject of the selector. The selector matche

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

Ops! My fault on previous email: > Sintax is: ul ~ p {...} matches p elements that comes AFTER ul elements. Maurício __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

> I'm just curious, is there a css3 selector for previous siblings? And if > there is, how widely supported is it? --- Yes! There is. Sintax is: ul ~ p {...} matches p elements that comes

Re: [css-d] css3 selectors

On Thu, March 26, 2009 1:21 pm, Climis, Tim wrote: > I'm just curious, is there a css3 selector for previous siblings? And if > there is, how widely supported is it? > > It'd be useful for styling paragraphs that come before (introducing) lists > for instance. > No, but you could achieve the same

[css-d] css3 selectors

I'm just curious, is there a css3 selector for previous siblings? And if there is, how widely supported is it? It'd be useful for styling paragraphs that come before (introducing) lists for instance. ---Tim Climis Computer Coordinator International Services ___

Re: [css-d] CSS3

On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Atkinson, Sarah wrote: > Does anyone know when Browsers will start supporting CSS3? Perhaps the question should be when will CSS3 be officially recommended? Or when browsers start conforming to more of the standards (i.e. border-radius instead of -moz-border-radius

Re: [css-d] CSS3

On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Jack Timmons wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Atkinson, Sarah < > sarah.atkin...@cookmedical.com> wrote: > >> Does anyone know when Browsers will start supporting CSS3? >> >> > Also: http://www.css3.info -- -Jack Timmons http://www.trotlc.com Twitte

Re: [css-d] CSS3

On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Atkinson, Sarah < sarah.atkin...@cookmedical.com> wrote: > Does anyone know when Browsers will start supporting CSS3? > > Define "Start supporting CSS3"? Most of the "major" browsers do. Not sure about IE8, but FF, Safari, and Opera support some CSS3 standards. The

[css-d] CSS3

Does anyone know when Browsers will start supporting CSS3? __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css

Re: [css-d] CSS3 question redux: How do you select based on whether an element contains a particular child element?

On 29/01/2009, at 8:28 AM, Dylan Wilbanks wrote: > The rule he wants to set is: > IF an A element does NOT have a child element IMG, THEN apply this > style. You should be able to do it with javascript DOM manipulation, but that's probably outside this list spec. KathyW.

Re: [css-d] CSS3 selectors to filter out content style

On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:54:09 -0800, Dylan Wilbanks wrote: > Someone I know came to me with a problem: he wants his print stylesheet to > not apply a > style when a link contains an image. > [sample code stripped] > > The generated content appears around the example link AND the linked image > whe

[css-d] CSS3 question redux: How do you select based on whether an element contains a particular child element?

I asked this earlier, but the more I look at what he's asking me the more I see I got the issue wrong. Here's the sample HTML again: http://flickr.com";>http://flickr.com/foo/picture-ID"; /> Here is an http://example.com";>example link. The rule he wants to set is: IF an A element does NOT have

Re: [css-d] CSS3 selectors to filter out content style

Dylan Wilbanks wrote: > I thought that using the :not selector was the solution: > a:not([href*="flickr"]):before { >content: " ["; >color: #000; >text-decoration: none; > } > a:not([href*="flickr"]):after { >content: " " attr(href) "] "; >color: #000; >text-decoration:

[css-d] CSS3 selectors to filter out content style

Someone I know came to me with a problem: he wants his print stylesheet to not apply a style when a link contains an image. Here's some sample HTML to explain the problem: http://flickr.com";>http://flickr.com/foo/picture-ID"; /> Here is an http://example.com";>example link. His CSS puts in gen

Re: [css-d] css3

David Hucklesby wrote: > On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:22:05 -0500, David Laakso wrote: > >> Is PC Safari and Chrome rendering (unable to view this end for a lot of >> boring reasons): >> >> 1/ border-radius >> 2/ box-shadow >> 3/ text-shadow >> >> Known issues: there are many-- thanks for not remindi

Re: [css-d] css3

peter hyde-smith wrote: > > In Chrome 1.0.154.43 on Win Vista SP2, see screen shot here... > > http://www.fatpawdesign.com/laaksoscreenshot.png > > > www.fatpawdesign.com > > Oh, my... "Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star" -- A thin red line and a salmon-color ampersand forthcoming. http://chel

Re: [css-d] css3

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:22:05 -0500, David Laakso wrote: > Is PC Safari and Chrome rendering (unable to view this end for a lot of > boring reasons): > > 1/ border-radius > 2/ box-shadow > 3/ text-shadow > > Known issues: there are many-- thanks for not reminding me... >

Re: [css-d] css3

Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > David Laakso wrote: >> Is PC Safari and Chrome rendering (unable to view this end for a lot >> of boring reasons): >> >> 1/ border-radius 2/ box-shadow > > 1/2 combination: > Safari - OK, > Chrome - FAULTY (looks terrible) > >> 3/ text-shadow > > 2: > Safari - YES, >

Re: [css-d] css3

David Laakso wrote: > Farewell. Time to break-out the coil of rope and take it to the woods... > ~d Hey ... that's *my* line! G -- http://www.gunlaug.no __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss

Re: [css-d] css3

David Laakso wrote: > Is PC Safari and Chrome rendering (unable to view this end for a lot > of boring reasons): > > 1/ border-radius 2/ box-shadow 1/2 combination: Safari - OK, Chrome - FAULTY (looks terrible) > 3/ text-shadow 2: Safari - YES, Chrome - NO. > Known issues: there ar

Re: [css-d] css3

David Laakso wrote: > Is PC Safari and Chrome rendering (unable to view this end for a lot of > boring reasons): > > 1/ border-radius > 2/ box-shadow > 3/ text-shadow > > Known issues: there are many-- thanks for not reminding me... > >

Re: [css-d] css3

Bill Brown wrote: > David Laakso wrote: >> >> > > Tested in XP/VirtualBox on Ubuntu Ibex: > Safari and Chrome both appear to recognize your border-radius, > box-shadow and text-shadow settings as they stand now. > > Hope it helps. Would have respon

Re: [css-d] css3

David Laakso wrote: > Is PC Safari and Chrome rendering (unable to view this end for a lot of > boring reasons): > > 1/ border-radius > 2/ box-shadow > 3/ text-shadow > Tested in XP/VirtualBox on Ubuntu Ibex: Safari and Chrome both appear to reco

[css-d] css3

Is PC Safari and Chrome rendering (unable to view this end for a lot of boring reasons): 1/ border-radius 2/ box-shadow 3/ text-shadow Known issues: there are many-- thanks for not reminding me... -- A thin red line and a salmon-color ampers

[css-d] CSS3 selector depending on descendants

I'm positive I read up on this a while back but am struggling to find it now and am beginning to suspect I imagined it... Is there a (Mozilla-implemented) CSS3 selector that affects its target only if the target has specific descendants? (So I could specify a hierarchy of 'ul li li' and select

<    1   2   3   >