Am 28.07.2012 13:58 schrieb Georg:
On 28.07.2012 13:29, Markus Ernst wrote:
http://www.rapid.ch/de/rapid-einachsgeraete/prospekte.html
The headings here match the width of 3 image elements plus borders and
the 2 margins between them. With space characters added to the
margins, the width cannot
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Markus Ernst wrote:
> Hi
>
> Something that I asked myself for years already: If you have some floating
> boxes, you may want them to fill the available width and then continue at a
> next row. Now, if these boxes do not have a fixed height, this will result
> in
On 29.07.2012 11:41, Georg wrote:
On 29.07.2012 07:29, David Hucklesby wrote:
Now you made me double-check. :)
Always a good thing ... that I don't do as often as I should these
days ;-)
To make my solution work we have to determine the exact width of the
auto-added white-space. As browser
Le 29 juil. 2012 à 15:01, Philippe Wittenbergh a écrit :
> Gecko and WebKit treat 'font-size: 0' in a special way - they both respect it
> no matter what, just because too many webpages use this to hide text under
> images or something similar, I forgot what the exact argument was when Gecko
>
On 29.07.2012 07:29, David Hucklesby wrote:
Now you made me double-check. :)
Always a good thing ... that I don't do as often as I should these days ;-)
In Webkit, I can only find a minimum font size setting. (Safari;
Chrome)??
Five-step font-size selection under "Settings" --> "Show advanc
Le 29 juil. 2012 à 14:29, David Hucklesby a écrit :
> In Webkit, I can only find a minimum font size setting. (Safari; Chrome)??
>
> In Firefox, there's an additional "Allow pages to choose their own fonts"
> checkbox. Normally this is set, so I tried toggling it. No problem.
Gecko and WebKit t
On 7/28/12 9:45 AM, Georg wrote:
On 28.07.2012 17:48, David Hucklesby wrote:
There's another alternative that lets you retain the white-space in the
HTML, which is to use a font-size of zero on some container, and
restore the font-size on the paragraphs with a value other than EMs or
percents.
On 28.07.2012 17:48, David Hucklesby wrote:
There's another alternative that lets you retain the white-space in the
HTML, which is to use a font-size of zero on some container, and
restore the
font-size on the paragraphs with a value other than EMs or percents.
Have you checked how white-spac
David Hucklesby wrote:
You are on the right track when you talk about a container.
There's another alternative that lets you retain the white-space in the
HTML, which is to use a font-size of zero on some container, and restore
the
font-size on the paragraphs with a value other than EMs or pe
On 7/28/12 5:10 AM, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:>
Le 28 juil. 2012 à 20:29, Markus Ernst a écrit :
The headings here match the width of 3 image elements plus borders
and the 2 margins between them. With space characters added to the
margins, the width cannot be caluclate
On 28.07.2012 13:58, Georg wrote:
Sort of - in a round-about way. The "auto added" space is approx .5em
either side of an inline-block, so by subtracting 1em from margin at
front-side (often means negative front-margin) and offsetting the
blocks (position: relative) to line up 1em further in -
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:>
Le 28 juil. 2012 à 20:29, Markus Ernst a écrit :
The headings here match the width of 3 image elements plus borders
and the 2 margins between them. With space characters added to the
margins, the width cannot be caluclated reliably anymore.
Write your source c
Le 28 juil. 2012 à 20:29, Markus Ernst a écrit :
> The headings here match the width of 3 image elements plus borders and the 2
> margins between them. With space characters added to the margins, the width
> cannot be caluclated reliably anymore.
Write your source code without any white-space
On 28.07.2012 13:29, Markus Ernst wrote:
http://www.rapid.ch/de/rapid-einachsgeraete/prospekte.html
The headings here match the width of 3 image elements plus borders and
the 2 margins between them. With space characters added to the
margins, the width cannot be caluclated reliably anymore.
Am 27.07.2012 01:43 schrieb Georg:
On 27.07.2012 00:46, Georg wrote:
On 27.07.2012 00:18, Boray ERIS wrote:
Is this a joke?
Nope. It's CSS!
...an if you don't bother to test this old float-alternative at your
end, here are a few examples.
http://www.gunlaug.com/contents/test/test-floating-
On 27.07.2012 14:09, Peter H. wrote:
I wonder how far back inline-block is supported. When you say 'obsolete
browsers', are you referring to IE6 and IE7?
IE6/7 need some fixes for buggy support, but no real problems. Gecko was
late in adding support, but can't imagine that being a problem now
thanks Georg, that's very handy. Peter
> -
> El 27/07/2012, a las 17:27, Georg escribió:
>
> an alternative to equal height floats, and inline-block are very often the
> best
>
__
css-d
On 27.07.2012 14:09, Peter H. wrote:
On the other hand, if 'float-' is a mistype (and doesn't exist as a
declaration) then there is no float declaration and the whole thing depends on
display: inline-block;
Is that right?
The hyphen is my "quick and dirty" way of disabling a declaration
wit
yah it's almost like you don't need the float: left
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Peter H. wrote:
> Georg, I'm intrigued by your example and have wanted that behaviour
> several times in the past and couldn't figure a way to achieve it without
> fixed height divs.
>
> But from your test page
Georg, I'm intrigued by your example and have wanted that behaviour several
times in the past and couldn't figure a way to achieve it without fixed height
divs.
But from your test page there's a bit of css that I don't understand:
.floating {
float-:left;
width:140px;
ma
On 27.07.2012 01:52, Tedd Sperling wrote:
You are irritatingly brilliant. :-)
Naa, I refreshed my mind on old methods on...
http://www.brunildo.org/test/index.html
...a few weeks ago. It's all there, just different.
regards
Georg
___
On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:43 PM, Georg wrote:
> ...an if you don't bother to test this old float-alternative at your end,
> here are a few examples.
>
> http://www.gunlaug.com/contents/test/test-floating-boxes.html
> http://www.gunlaug.com/contents/test/test-floating-boxes-c.html
> http://www.gunlau
On 27.07.2012 00:46, Georg wrote:
On 27.07.2012 00:18, Boray ERIS wrote:
Is this a joke?
Nope. It's CSS!
...an if you don't bother to test this old float-alternative at your
end, here are a few examples.
http://www.gunlaug.com/contents/test/test-floating-boxes.html
http://www.gunlaug.com/
On 27.07.2012 00:18, Boray ERIS wrote:
Is this a joke?
Nope. It's CSS!
Georg
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.c
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Georg wrote:
> On 26.07.2012 11:58, Markus Ernst wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Something that I asked myself for years already: If you have some
>> floating boxes, you may want them to fill the available width and then
>> continue at a next row. Now, if these boxes do not
On 26.07.2012 11:58, Markus Ernst wrote:
Hi
Something that I asked myself for years already: If you have some
floating boxes, you may want them to fill the available width and then
continue at a next row. Now, if these boxes do not have a fixed
height, this will result in rows that do not sta
Hi
Something that I asked myself for years already: If you have some
floating boxes, you may want them to fill the available width and then
continue at a next row. Now, if these boxes do not have a fixed height,
this will result in rows that do not start at the left edge, as this
example illu
27 matches
Mail list logo
