-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Chetan Crasta
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 11:24 PM
To: Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
Cc: css-d
Subject: Re: [css-d] HTML, CSS, JavaScript: Model-View-Contr
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
wrote:
>Whilst Gabriele's weblog citations
> were initially interesting, of late they have been coming so
> frequently
I agree. Many of Gabriele's blog posts are about simple things like
"Styling a Form" etc. These topics do not re
Kevin A. Cameron wrote:
To be honest this 'discussion' on the merits of this post was a far greater
waste of time than the post in question! :P
With respect, I disagree. Whilst Gabriele's weblog citations
were initially interesting, of late they have been coming so
frequently that I was clo
To be honest this 'discussion' on the merits of this post was a far greater
waste of time than the post in question! :P
Signal to noise ratio of this list tilts to the wrong side sometimes...
Kevin
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:23 PM, David Laakso
wrote:
> On 1/5/11 4:02 PM, Gabriele Romanato wrote
On 1/5/11 4:02 PM, Gabriele Romanato wrote:
I'll stop it. From now on, no more posts from my blog.
Well, no need to throw yourself through a closed window on the top floor
of a tall building...:-) .
Your "on-topic" posts to CSS-D are always informative and thought
provoking. I do hope you
No Barney, what I did is completely wrong.
It's off-topic and quite spamming.
I'll stop it. From now on, no more posts from my blog.
thanks for your answers and the answers of all css-d readers. Lesson
learned. :-)
http://www.css-zibaldone.com
http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English)
ht
>
> Maybe I was too confident in the fact that the readers of this list were
> already familiar with OOP. Sorry for the weird feeling. I feel like
> apologizing know, so excuse me. bye :-)
Sorry Gabriele, didn't mean to bite your head off ;)
I'm interested in everything you mentioned in that art
Well, thoughts about web development are not truths in the religious
sense of the word. I was just expressing my views in quite a polite
way, without being conceited or imposing me over other people's
opinion. Just a thought, a resemblance, a comparison, a linking that
popped into my head
At 6:01 PM + 1/5/11, Barney Carroll wrote:
Hiya Gabriele,
Your article confused me massively, and I found it incredibly difficult to
work out what you were trying to present. Based on your concluding line:
Even though this model differs greatly from the original OOP one, it's worth
mentio
On 01/05/2011 01:01 PM, Barney Carroll wrote:
Hiya Gabriele,
Your article confused me massively, and I found it incredibly difficult to
work out what you were trying to present. Based on your concluding line:
Even though this model differs greatly from the original OOP one, it's worth
ment
Hiya Gabriele,
Your article confused me massively, and I found it incredibly difficult to
work out what you were trying to present. Based on your concluding line:
Even though this model differs greatly from the original OOP one, it's worth
> mentioning that its further applications are incredibly
A way to rethink the traditional and static three-layered model:
http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2011/01/html-css-and-javascript-model-view.html
HTH :-)
http://www.css-zibaldone.com
http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English)
http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articles/ (English)
http://onwebdev.blo
12 matches
Mail list logo
