On Nov 4, 2005, at 3:05 PM, Angela Trigg wrote:
Been developing in Firefox like a good little CSS newbie, and am
making the
tweaks necessary to make it work in IE6/WIN (which feels like trying
to put a rubix cube together)
(grin) not a direct answer but have a look at
I wouln't worry too much about Netscape...cover the big ones (IE, firefox,
opera, safari).
What about AOL. Isn't it's internal browser based on Netscape. And then
there is it's new external browser based on IE. Does anyone know if it will
do a better job of supporting CSS than IE?
I can
I can't believe all of us web developer types let Microsoft's monopoly
win.
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 00:46:18 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [css-d] I want to scream
To: 'css-discuss' css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Linda H wrote:
I can understand Angela's frustration. I feel it too. I was very excited
about CSS when I first started using it, but poor browser support has
really dampened my spirits.
Some say a sense of humor helps.
They may be wrong.
Best,
~dL
--
David Laakso
http://www.dlaakso.com
David Laakso wrote:
Some say a sense of humor helps. They may be wrong.
No! They are dead right :-) :-) ;-)
CSS is pure fun, and buggy browsers only add some more fun[1] to it.
Georg
[1]http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/molly_1_15.html
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
Linda H wrote:
I wouln't worry too much about Netscape...cover the big ones (IE, firefox,
opera, safari).
What about AOL. Isn't it's internal browser based on Netscape. And then
there is it's new external browser based on IE. Does anyone know if it will
do a better job of supporting CSS
Hi Angela,
Thought it best I write off list.
I know exactly how you feel... My first table less website (all CSS) nearly
gave me a nervous breakdown, thank god the client was overseas and not
pushing... it took an age and cost us far more to build than quoted and I
ended up getting a CSS
Hi Angela,
Thought it best I write off list.
Was this supposed to be off list? I'm embarrassed, I might have just
eavesdropped.
--
--
C Montoya
rdpdesign.com ... liquid.rdpdesign.com ... montoya.rdpdesign.com
__
css-discuss
Been developing in Firefox like a good little CSS newbie, and am making the
tweaks necessary to make it work in IE6/WIN (which feels like trying to put
a rubix cube together). I felt like I was so close, until I just took a look
at it in Netscape 7! I feel like throwing the towel in and going back
On Nov 4, 2005, at 3:05 PM, Angela Trigg wrote:
Been developing in Firefox like a good little CSS newbie, and am
making the
tweaks necessary to make it work in IE6/WIN (which feels like trying
to put
a rubix cube together). I felt like I was so close, until I just took
a look
at it in
Angela Trigg wrote:
can someone give me a reason to stick it out
given all the hacks you have to do, etc?
eventually you'll discover the power of CSS - to take semantic (x)html
and lay it out one way or another in minutes, to make a minor change
across the whole site in seconds, to get
On Nov 4, 2005, at 3:34 PM, Michael Hulse wrote:
On Nov 4, 2005, at 3:05 PM, Angela Trigg wrote:
Been developing in Firefox like a good little CSS newbie, and am
making the
tweaks necessary to make it work in IE6/WIN (which feels like trying
to put
a rubix cube together). I felt like I was
* TRIGGERID
www.triggerID.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Crockford
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 6:55 PM
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] I want to scream
Angela Trigg wrote:
can someone give me a reason to stick
PM
To: css-discuss
Subject: Re: [css-d] I want to scream
On Nov 4, 2005, at 3:34 PM, Michael Hulse wrote:
On Nov 4, 2005, at 3:05 PM, Angela Trigg wrote:
Been developing in Firefox like a good little CSS newbie, and am
making the tweaks necessary to make it work in IE6/WIN (which feels
like
Angela Trigg wrote:
I feel like throwing the towel in and going back to tables---
seriously-- I can code sites so fast that way because I've been doing
it for so many years...
...I've invested hours and hours and hours into trying to get this to
work using just CSS.
I know, that's why I'm attempting to learn, but man, it's so tempting to go
back. Luckily it's slow here with work so I'm able to devote this time, but
normally I can't spend this much time on development for a client.
CSS design does take time, because you aren't learning a new form of
table
At 03:55 PM 11/4/2005, Tony wrote:
Angela Trigg wrote:
can someone give me a reason to stick it out
given all the hacks you have to do, etc?
eventually you'll discover the power of CSS - to take semantic (x)html
and lay it out one way or another in minutes, to make a minor change
across the
.
- Original Message -
From: Angela Trigg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'css-discuss' css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 12:08 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] I want to scream
I don't think the issue is P7, I think it has to do with my nested divs and
my lack of skill on using
@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] I want to scream
Angela Trigg wrote:
I feel like throwing the towel in and going back to tables---
seriously-- I can code sites so fast that way because I've been doing
it for so many years...
...I've invested hours and hours and hours into trying
From: Michael Hulse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Demo at bottom of page:)
http://www.udm4.com/demos/horizontal-relative-dropup.php
UDM4 is not free - unless one tries to bypass the licensing. That
said, the scripts that Angela is using are from our free extensions.
We have no way to control how a user
20 matches
Mail list logo
