Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

On 2011/01/03 17:26 (GMT-0500) David Laakso composed: Rory Bernstein wrote: Is there nothing I can do to get this working in Camino? Or is @font-face just not an option for Camino currently? Your help was so appreciated on this issue. Camino is completely volunteer supported; and, co

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

On 1/3/11 5:07 PM, Rory Bernstein wrote: http://lettershop.ehclients.com/visual_diary_archive The Titillium is showing in all the above browsers now on reload, probably because you have uploaded missing files since I last wrote... ~d Thanks, David. Is there nothing I can do to get this workin

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

Rory Bernstein wrote: Ah. I see the light. OK, I just uploaded the OTF files. Can I now assume that this font will show for most users? Thank you so much for this help, Rory Trailer looks really horrible in Seamonkey 2.0.11 under Windows/XP;SP3 at 1152 x 864, and "3" in page numbers looks s

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

Ah. I see the light. OK, I just uploaded the OTF files. Can I now assume that this font will show for most users? Thank you so much for this help, Rory Now good in Seamonkey. Bill __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

On Jan 3, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Chetan Crasta wrote: > On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Rory Bernstein > wrote: > >> Can I get some feedback from the list about whether people are seeing the >> san-serif font in the nav (left column), Titillium or not? If it is not >> working on many browsers, th

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Rory Bernstein wrote: > Can I get some feedback from the list about whether people are seeing the > san-serif font in the nav (left column), Titillium or not? If it is not > working on many browsers, then I have some big problems! > > http://lettershop.ehclient

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

Can I get some feedback from the list about whether people are seeing the san-serif font in the nav (left column), Titillium or not? If it is not working on many browsers, then I have some big problems! http://lettershop.ehclients.com/visual_diary_archive Thanks, Rory Titillum

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

One reason would be because the release version is 2.0.11 ! Where did you find an archived 2.0.2 ? Philip Taylor Of course you're correct, Philip. Maybe Rory's font would render if it *were* v2.02 :) Thanks for the correction. Bill ___

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

smallvoiceshout...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, titillium in those two instances. Wouldn't expect it to be different but checked in Safari (win), Chrome, Opera, IE 7,8 and it's present in all. Bill -- Hi, I downloaded and installed Seamonkey 2.02 (Windows). Why not? :) One reason would be because

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

Yes, titillium in those two instances. Wouldn't expect it to be different but checked in Safari (win), Chrome, Opera, IE 7,8 and it's present in all. Bill -- Hi, I downloaded and installed Seamonkey 2.02 (Windows). Why not? :) Looks like Arial being displayed in those same two instances. I'

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Rory Bernstein wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Rory Bernstein > wrote: > > > > >> My web page that uses it: > > >> http://lettershop.ehclients.com/visual_diary_archive > > > > and I was expecting better results. Can I get some feedback from the list > a

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Rory Bernstein wrote: > > >> My web page that uses it: > >> http://lettershop.ehclients.com/visual_diary_archive > > and I was expecting better results. Can I get some feedback from the list > about whether people are seeing the san-serif font in the nav (left

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Rory Bernstein wrote: > > On 12/30/10 3:45 PM, Rory Bernstein wrote: > >> > >> I am using a google-hosted embedded web font called Neuton: > >> http://code.google.com/webfonts/family?family=Neuton&subset=latin > > >> My web page that uses it: > >> http://lettershop.

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

> On 12/30/10 3:45 PM, Rory Bernstein wrote: >> >> I am using a google-hosted embedded web font called Neuton: >> http://code.google.com/webfonts/family?family=Neuton&subset=latin >> My web page that uses it: >> http://lettershop.ehclients.com/visual_diary_archive David Laakso wrote: > Ditch Ne

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

On 1/2/11 10:51 AM, Chetan Crasta wrote: On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 8:59 PM, David Laakso wrote: Ditch Neuton. Go to Font Squirrel. Download Calluna and install it. Go back to Font Squirrel and use their fontface generator [expert setting]. As David suggested, the

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 8:59 PM, David Laakso wrote: > Ditch Neuton. > Go to Font Squirrel. > > Download Calluna and install it. > Go back to Font Squirrel and use their fontface generator [expert setting]. As David suggested, the Rory's only option is to choose a f

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

On 12/30/10 3:45 PM, Rory Bernstein wrote: Hi, I am using a google-hosted embedded web font called Neuton: http://code.google.com/webfonts/family?family=Neuton&subset=latin Here is a coded page that uses it. See left column (nav menu), the top-category text (the serif text, not the san serif),

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > You're comparing apples and oranges. Windows (and XP especially) and Linux, > or OS X. What you have to compare is font-rendering on the same platform for > embedded vs native (installed) fonts. Few web designers have issues with Wi

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

On Jan 2, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Chetan Crasta wrote: > Every font that I have embedded looked better in Linux. You're comparing apples and oranges. Windows (and XP especially) and Linux, or OS X. What you have to compare is font-rendering on the same platform for embedded vs native (installed) fo

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: >Do you have a citation for this, Chetan ? I'd be interested to read more concerning this artifact of Windows. > Apart from the link given earlier [1], I found two more articles that describe the issue: http://www.thebright

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > In general, the fonts I've used did/do look pretty good on all Windows OS Do have you have some sample pages that I can compare with the Newton offering, Philippe ? Philip Taylor __ css-discuss [

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

On Jan 2, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Chetan Crasta wrote: > Phillip are > due to Windows' horrible rendering of @font-face embedded fonts. > Windows XP, Vista and 7 do not correctly apply font smoothing to > embedded fonts. The issue affects all browsers on the windows > platform. I don't think this is

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

Chetan Crasta wrote: The issues described by Phillip are due to Windows' horrible rendering of @font-face embedded fonts. Windows XP, Vista and 7 do not correctly apply font smoothing to embedded fonts. The issue affects all browsers on the windows platform. Do you have a citation for this,

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

> http://lettershop.ehclients.com/visual_diary_archive > > My issue is that the font weight is heavier in the browser than it looked in > our photoshop comp. Is there any way, using CSS, to get the font weight to > look lighter (less bold)? Or do I just explain to the designer that the way > tex

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

I am grateful for all the activity about my question (@font-face). I am too sick today to really take it all in; but I wanted to quickly respond. I will get back to you early next week. Happy New Year everyone! Rory __ css-discus

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

On 12/30/10 3:45 PM, Rory Bernstein wrote: http://lettershop.ehclients.com/visual_diary_archive Rory Comment this out in the source file and shoot the designer :-) . http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Neuton http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Neuton>' rel='stylesheet' type='text

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

Rory Bernstein wrote: Thanks for the screenshots, Phillip. You're very welcome. What I find most disturbing is that the other font (the sans serif one) is not even showing up for you; it is rendering in some other font. (I'm talking about the grey, all caps items in the nav bar). How distu

Re: [css-d] google hosted font question

Not convinced you are doing your client any favours by using that : I have to zoom in by a factor of four before the glyphs stop breaking up :-( Seamonkey 2.0.11, Win/XP;SP3 @ 1152 x 864. Philip Taylor Rory Bernstein wrote: Hi, I am using a google-hosted embedded web font called Neuto

[css-d] google hosted font question

Hi, I am using a google-hosted embedded web font called Neuton: http://code.google.com/webfonts/family?family=Neuton&subset=latin Here is a coded page that uses it. See left column (nav menu), the top-category text (the serif text, not the san serif), that is bigger. The text that reads: recent