[CTRL] [ctrl] Conspiracy archive (fwd)

2004-04-03 Thread William Bacon
-Caveat Lector- "I pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the REPUBLIC for which it stands, one Nation under God,indivisible,with liberty and justice for all." visit my web site at http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon My ICQ# is 79071904 for a precise list of the powers

[CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy of PREJUDICE?

2002-02-21 Thread Party of Citizens
-Caveat Lector- Time to boycott AOL? -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 16:03:07 -0800 (PST) From: Party of Citizens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Conspiracy-Theory] Messianic Jews - Jewish Te

Re: [CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy

1999-04-28 Thread Brian Redman
-Caveat Lector- On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Frank Newsom wrote: > -Caveat Lector- > > This list is a really fine group of conspiracy folk. Can't even find the > one right under their own noses. There was once a time when you could only > post 4 times a day. There were many more "factual" posts and

[CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy

1999-04-27 Thread Frank Newsom
-Caveat Lector- This list is a really fine group of conspiracy folk. Can't even find the one right under their own noses. There was once a time when you could only post 4 times a day. There were many more "factual" posts and less discussion. Many of the older members are no longer here or po

Re: [CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy

1999-04-27 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld
-Caveat Lector- [EMAIL PROTECTED] trolled: >I'm a newcomer to this list, so I shouldn't really be saying >anything... That's right...'netiquette' is to 'lurk' for awhile and get a feel for a list, and if you deem it not for you, unsubscribe without comment. Listmembers, it seems we're getting

Re: [CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy

1999-04-27 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld
-Caveat Lector- From: Frank Newsom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >This list is a really fine group of conspiracy folk. Can't even find >the one right under their own noses. There was once a time when you >could only post 4 times a day. Hmmm...I've been on this list almost from the beginning, when posti

Re: [CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy

1999-04-27 Thread Ric Carter
-Caveat Lector- - Original Message - From: Teo One Thousand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I find myself deleting most of it. I scan and delete virtually everything, but there are a few gems every here and there, and the wide range of conspiracies/theories means that almost anyone can find at

Re: [CTRL] [Re: [CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy]

1999-04-27 Thread Robert Tatman
-Caveat Lector- Teo One Thousand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a valid way to look at this issue. I like to hear everything, then > decide what has merit and what doesn't. We are about the free exchange of > ideas. Consider mind control for instance. There is little FACT that one > c

Re: [CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy

1999-04-27 Thread Kris Millegan
-Caveat Lector- Well, howdy ya'll, ya know, I have thought long and hard about this. I have a life also and yes it takes time to keep up with info. Myself I am a member of myriad different lists, plus I have to put up with, sometimes, over a hundred error messages about full mailboxes, invalid

Re: [CTRL] [Re: [CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy]

1999-04-27 Thread Scott Brown
-Caveat Lector- AOL User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Caveat Lector- > > I am new to the list. I feel that the list is not credible mostly because of > the volume. You know you just can't please folks no matter what you do. On the one hand, many skeptics don't believe because they say, "wh

Re: [CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy

1999-04-27 Thread Colleen Jones
-Caveat Lector- Who runs this list anyway? I get so much mail now I am on too many lists; so, I am getting off others to stay with CTRL CTRL by reputation is attracting a lot of attention; I have had so many e mails from people off list, stating how they have found CTRL to their liking...

Re: [CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy

1999-04-27 Thread AOL User
-Caveat Lector- I fully agree. There must be some limit. Or else the group should divide into subconspiracy groups. DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are

Re: [CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy

1999-04-26 Thread 1lls0081
-Caveat Lector- AOL User wrote: > -Caveat Lector- > > I am new to the list. I feel that the list is not credible mostly because of > the volume. We have a limit of 100 posts a day andAOL check up people take up some of those posts! My Main Site http://freeweb.digiweb.com/science_fiction/Th

Re: [CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy

1999-04-26 Thread Teo One Thousand
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 4/26/99 3:47:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << I'm a newcomer to this list, so I shouldn't really be saying anything...but...I guess I will give my opinion. I appreciate the great info. but it does get a bit overwhelming with too man

Re: [CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy

1999-04-26 Thread Teo One Thousand
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 4/26/99 4:11:08 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << It may take some getting use to, but you'll find yourself adapting to the volume. This is a great LISTSERV for the quality, diversity, intensity and capacity of knowledge, intelligenc

Re: [CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy

1999-04-26 Thread AOL User
-Caveat Lector- I am new to the list. I feel that the list is not credible mostly because of the volume. DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matt

Re: [CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy

1999-04-26 Thread Jeff Hearon
== - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 26, 1999 3:46 PM Subject: Re: [CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy > -Caveat Lector- > > I'm a newcomer to this list, so I shouldn't really be saying > anything...but...I gu

Re: [CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy

1999-04-26 Thread MsCntryLdy
-Caveat Lector- I'm a newcomer to this list, so I shouldn't really be saying anything...but...I guess I will give my opinion. I appreciate the great info. but it does get a bit overwhelming with too many posts. I would like to get maybe 1/2 of the mail I do on this listserver. I find myself d

[CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy

1999-04-26 Thread Frank Newsom
-Caveat Lector- This list is a really fine group of conspiracy folk. Can't even find the one right under their own noses. There was once a time when you could only post 4 times a day. There were many more "factual" posts and less discussion. Many of the older members are no longer here or po

Re: [CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy

1999-02-11 Thread Che
-Caveat Lector- At 04:44 PM 2/10/99 -0500, Frank Newsom wrote: > -Caveat Lector- > >This list is a really fine group of conspiracy folk. Can't even find the >one right under their own noses. There was once a time when you could only >post 4 times a day. There were many more "factual" posts an

Re: [CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy

1999-02-10 Thread revcoal
-Caveat Lector- On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Frank Newsom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >This list is a really fine group of conspiracy folk. Can't even find the >one right under their own noses. Some of us notice it...but don't want to waste our limited daily allotment of postings commenting on it...we

Re: [CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy

1999-02-10 Thread Brown, Jeremy
-Caveat Lector- You know, you're right! Everybody on this list is blind to the truth! They have to all wake up and smell what they are shoveling! Let's start a new exchange of information. Right here, right now! I propose the following changes to the list: 1) Instead of "Caveat Lector", the lis

[CTRL] CTRL Conspiracy

1999-02-10 Thread Frank Newsom
-Caveat Lector- This list is a really fine group of conspiracy folk. Can't even find the one right under their own noses. There was once a time when you could only post 4 times a day. There were many more "factual" posts and less discussion. Many of the older members are no longer here or po

Re: [CTRL] [[CTRL] Conspiracy Theory: The Movie]

1999-02-05 Thread Robert Tatman
-Caveat Lector- Johannes Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The numbers 5 and 23 crop up frequently. Hmmm...I would've expected 17 as well fnord. (Or perhaps the frequent occurrence of 16 is meant to imply 17 *by its absence*... "Indeed do many things come to pass!") Hail Eris! Bob =