Hi All,
When I installed cygwin I did not see mysql. Is
mysql available as package in cygwin.
selected all the packages in cygwin and mysql did not
get installed.
My real problem is not able to use DBI and DBD
drivers for mysql in cygwin. I installed mysql for
windows and installed DBI in cygw
1) fixed issue where the cygxerces-c2_1_0.dll wasn't being included (my tar
include file didn't get updated).
2) added patch from Gareth for nasty bug in DOMDocumentTypeImpl.cpp
3) changed back from -2 to -1 in version, following conventions at
http://www.cygwin.com/setup.html
source:
http://aback
Sorry about that guys... I don't like making excuses, so I'll just blame
it
on the hallucinogenic drugs :) I'll have a -1 version back there soon and
I'll remove the -2 version. It'll contain the fix for the problem with the
wrong dll (my tar.incl file still had the libxerces instead of cygxerc
On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 04:18, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I don't recall people bumping the -x numbers previously. I don't see
> why that's necessary. Theoretically, we are a small enough and
> intelligent enough group that we won't be confused when the contents of
> a file are updated without up
Sorry about that guys... I don't like making excuses, so I'll just blame it
on the hallucinogenic drugs :) I'll have a -1 version back there soon and
I'll remove the -2 version. It'll contain the fix for the problem with the
wrong dll (my tar.incl file still had the libxerces instead of cygxerce
Christopher Faylor wrote:
So, I am always against these hand waving "works for me" patches that
people like to provide as in 2 below.
I feel the same against this kind of "hacks", that's why I asked to put
in in "test"...in the meantime we can solve the real problem.
--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
[
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 03:11:44PM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>
>
>On 6 Nov 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 01:01, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>> > On 6 Nov 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
>> >
>> > > Consider this: if the test copy we review was -3, and you approve that
>> > > version,
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 11:03:22AM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>What should we do with this package ? It has been almost two weeks since
>Lapo posted it and there isn't a single comment. Is it ok to be
>uploaded ?
Well, I think my opinion is pretty consistent.
Rather than say signal delivery in c
Wrong list, redirected. Please remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the
distribution when responding.
gilles BOURGEOIS wrote:
hello, from france,
(newbie using cygwin), i am wondering about how I could use the DLL API
*directly* without prompting with the starting x terminal (bash commands)
The fact i
hello, from france,
(newbie using cygwin), i am wondering about how I
could use the DLL API directly without prompting with the
starting x terminal (bash commands)
The fact is I want to use this DLL in order
to create a UNIX-C compilation process(makefile + gcc), but I do not
want the end-
On 6 Nov 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 01:01, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> > On 6 Nov 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> > > Consider this: if the test copy we review was -3, and you approve that
> > > version, you should not rename it to -1, else when -2 comes out, all the
> > > t
On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 01:01, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> On 6 Nov 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > Consider this: if the test copy we review was -3, and you approve that
> > version, you should not rename it to -1, else when -2 comes out, all the
> > testers will fail to upgrade. So -3 in review, stays
On 6 Nov 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
> Consider this: if the test copy we review was -3, and you approve that
> version, you should not rename it to -1, else when -2 comes out, all the
> testers will fail to upgrade. So -3 in review, stays as -3 when
> uploading. Likewise, updating -1 to -2 to -3
On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 00:37, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>
> On 6 Nov 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > > > Anyone wishing to review these packages can point setup.exe to
>http://abackus.imagineis.com.
> > >
> > > You've changed the version number to 2.1.0-2, but this is not correct.
> >
> > Actually, i
On 6 Nov 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
> > > Anyone wishing to review these packages can point setup.exe to
>http://abackus.imagineis.com.
> >
> > You've changed the version number to 2.1.0-2, but this is not correct.
>
> Actually, it's long practice here, that each update gets a new -x
> number,
--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Pavel,
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 10:55:36AM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
> > >> Jason Tishler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 21:16, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Abraham Backus wrote:
>
> > http://abackus.imagineis.com/xerces-c/xerces-c-2.1.0-2.tar.bz2
> > http://abackus.imagineis.com/xerces-c-devel/xerces-c-devel-2.1.0-2.tar.bz2
> > http://abackus.imagineis.com/xerces-c-doc/xerces-c-do
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Gareth Pearce wrote:
> > > >Anyone wishing to review these packages can point setup.exe to
> > > >http://abackus.imagineis.com.
> > >
> > > I'll definitely review these when i get home ... hopefully they will
> solve
> > > my xerces-c related problems.
> >
> > Ping. Have you ha
1. doxygen
version: 1.2.18-1
status : reviewed; a confirmation is required from someone on this list,
other than me, that this package is OK
notes : this package is currently vetoed
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-10/msg00056.html
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygw
> On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Gareth Pearce wrote:
>
> > >Anyone wishing to review these packages can point setup.exe to
> > >http://abackus.imagineis.com.
> >
> > I'll definitely review these when i get home ... hopefully they will
solve
> > my xerces-c related problems.
>
> Ping. Have you had a chance
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Abraham Backus wrote:
> http://abackus.imagineis.com/xerces-c/xerces-c-2.1.0-2.tar.bz2
> http://abackus.imagineis.com/xerces-c-devel/xerces-c-devel-2.1.0-2.tar.bz2
> http://abackus.imagineis.com/xerces-c-doc/xerces-c-doc-2.1.0-2.tar.bz2
>
> Anyone wishing to review these packag
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Gareth Pearce wrote:
> >Anyone wishing to review these packages can point setup.exe to
> >http://abackus.imagineis.com.
>
> I'll definitely review these when i get home ... hopefully they will solve
> my xerces-c related problems.
Ping. Have you had a chance to review this pac
What should we do with this package ? It has been almost two weeks since
Lapo posted it and there isn't a single comment. Is it ok to be uploaded ?
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Lapo Luchini wrote:
> Ready at the same usual address:
> http://www.lapo.it/tmp/rsync-2.5.5-2.tar.bz2
> http://www.lapo.it/tmp/r
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
> >> Jason Tishler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> What about the attached?
> >>> Note that I only tested setup.exe under Cygwin gcc 2.95.3-5 but I
> >>> also tried something similar under Linux gcc 3.x.
>
> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 08:05:08PM -, Max
24 matches
Mail list logo
